Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Sena Kalyan Sangstha Vs. Haji Sufi Fazal Ahmed, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Ahmed and others ..................Respondents Judgment July 23, 2007. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Order XLVII, rule I The Bangladesh Supreme Court (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988, Rule 24 Grounds of review: ...... Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Sena Kalyan Sangstha and another..............Petitioners Vs. Sufi Fazal Ahmed and others ..................Respondents Judgment July ......arned Counsel of the petitioners. The review petitions are, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 197. ......arned Counsel of the petitioners. The review petitions are, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 197. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Chairman, BADC, Dhaka Vs. S.M. Ali Imam and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....MLR (AD) 2006, 83. ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Chairman, Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation, Dhaka..........Appellant. Vs. S.M. Ali Imam and others.... Respondents Judgment March 12, 200......ind merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 83. ......ind merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 83. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Ismat Zerin Khan Vs. The World Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Ismat Zerin Khan....................Appellant. Vs. The World Bank and others..................Respondent. Judgment August 9, 2005. The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, Article 104 The Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (V of 1908), Order XIV, rul...... (Civil) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Ismat Zerin Khan....................Appellant. Vs. The World Bank and others..................Respondent. Judgment Augus......LR (AD) 242; Rupali Bank Ltd Vs. Haji Md. Arab Ali and others 7 MLR (AD) 4; Sree Mukul Chandra Shaha and others Vs. Bahu Subash Chandra Sarker 4 MLR (AD) 426; 53 DLR (AD) 12 and 51 DLR (AD) 221; Mst. Shamim Akhtar Vs. Syed Alam Hussain and others 1975 SCMR 60; Bibhabati Vs. Ramendra Narayan (AI...... order of the High Court Division and the trial Court is hereby directed to hear the suit on all issues including the issue regarding maintainability in accordance with law. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 211
Abul Kalam Azad Vs. Govt of BD, represented by the DC, Dinajpur & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Division (Civil) Present: K. M. Hasan, C.J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim, J. Md. Hamidul Haque, J.Md. Tafazzul Islam, J. Abul Kalam Azad.....................Petitioner. Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dinajpur and others........Respondents. J......e Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: K. M. Hasan, C.J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim, J. Md. Hamidul Haque, J.Md. Tafazzul Islam, J. Abul Kalam Azad.....................Petitioner. Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dinajpur and others........Re......fter consideration of all the facts and materials exercised its discretion we do not find any reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......fter consideration of all the facts and materials exercised its discretion we do not find any reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 133
Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, UCBL & anr Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ad Fazlul Karim, J.- This appeal at the instance of the contemner-appellants arose out of judgment and order dated 1st and 2nd November, 2003 passed by the High Court Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh in Contempt Petition No.3 of 2003 arising out of Company Matter No.2 of 2000 convicting t......riminal) Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain C.J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim J. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J. Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, United Commercial Bank Ltd and another ....Appellants. Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury.... Respondents Judgment June 27, 2005 Lawyers Inv......ered by the Court. 15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......ered by the Court. 15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Syed Ehsanul Hussain & ors Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....upreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin, J. K. M. Hasan, J. Md. Fazlul Haque, J . Syed Ehsanul Hussain and another........................Petitioners. Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation represented by its Zonal Manager, Khulna.....Responden......d. ......ule. Since the High Court Division did not commit any error of law in the decision we are not inclined to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ule. Since the High Court Division did not commit any error of law in the decision we are not inclined to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Md. Nurul Hoque Miah Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....sion (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Nurul Hoque Miah……………………....Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment and others…………………â€......urt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Nurul Hoque Miah……………………....Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment and othersâ€......s. 19. In that view of the observation and direction as above, this appeal is, accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 53. ......s. 19. In that view of the observation and direction as above, this appeal is, accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 53. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 162
Director of Housing and Settlement Vs. Abdul Majid Howlader & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rs……….....Respondents Judgment December 9, 2003 Result: The Appeal is allowed. Cases Referred to- Al-Haj Abul Basher, being dead his heirs Hosne Ara Begum and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 50 DLR (AD) 11, Nur Mohammad and others Vs. Moulvi Mainuddin Ahmed and others...... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed JR Mudassir Husain J Director of Housing and Settlement, Segunbagicha, Ramna, Dhaka ……..... Appellant Vs. Abdul Majid Howlader and others……….....Respondents Judgment December 9, 2003 ......n Title Suit No. 191 of 1996 of the 2nd Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Dhaka is set aside. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 BLD (AD) 56, 9 MLR (AD) 73. ......n Title Suit No. 191 of 1996 of the 2nd Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Dhaka is set aside. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 BLD (AD) 56, 9 MLR (AD) 73. ..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 189
M. A. Rashid and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J M. A. Rashid and others……….....Petitioners Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and other......ported in: ......gment and on the reasoning given above we are of the view that the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......gment and on the reasoning given above we are of the view that the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 74