Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4961-4980 of 6409 results.
Government of Bangladesh Vs. M/S Eastern Industries (BD) Ltd. , 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....rrect decision. There is therefore no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 784. ......- This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 5.3.2006 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.1114 of 1998 making the rule absolute. 2. The short fact leading to the filing of the writ petition is that the writ peti..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
M/s. F. Jahan Enterprise Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chittagong and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....nted and in the submissions made by the appellant. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 779. ......nted and in the submissions made by the appellant. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 779. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 80
Kaiser A. Chowdhury and others Vs. M/s. Zakir Hossain Re-Rolling Mills and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....nd to be contempt of Court they tender unconditional apology to the High Court Division. 7. The learned Judges of the High Court Division upon hearing the parties disposed of the Rule with a direction upon the respondents to refund Tk.24,23,000/- to the petitioners within 2 (tw...... view of the matter, the learned Judges of the High Court Division misconstrued the terms of the decree in question in initiating the proceeding for contempt against the petitioners upon absolutely wrong and baseless information from the writ-petitioners. He lastly submits that the lea..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Md. Shahanur Rahaman and others Vs. Alhaj Abbas Ali Mondal, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....tly dismissed the civil revision warranting no interference by this court. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 772. ......tly dismissed the civil revision warranting no interference by this court. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 772. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Tayab Ali Vs. Md. Ataur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ul Amin J.- This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment dated July 5, 2005 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil' Revision No.457 of 2004 making absolute the Rule obtained against the judgment dated August 31, 2003 of the 3rd Court of Additional District Ju...... Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment dated July 5, 2005 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil' Revision No.457 of 2004 making absolute the Rule obtained against the judgment dated August 31, 2003 of the 3rd Court of Additiona..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Omar Farooque and another Vs. S.M. Shahabuddin and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....;Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This petition for leave to appeal is against the judgment dated November 28, 2004 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3189 of 1998 discharging the Rule obtained against the judgment and decree dated June 8, 1998 of the 6th Court of Additional Dis......o interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division sought to be appealed. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 765. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Alhaj Md. Ruhul Amin Sarkar & another Vs. Hargram Trust Board, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....Ruhul Amin CJ.- This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment dated May 10, 2005 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 5276 of2002 discharging the Rule upon awarding cost Tk. 10,000/-. 2. The civil revision was filed against the judgment and d......tions suit at Tk. 10,000/-. In the background of the aforesaid discussion on awarding cost at Tk. 10,000/-, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 762. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Mahmuda Haq Vs. Abdul Mannan Miah and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... CJ.- This petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated March 9, 2006 of a single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2631 of 1996 making the Rule absolute upon setting aside the judgment and decree dated April 18, 1996 of the Court of Addit...... This petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated March 9, 2006 of a single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2631 of 1996 making the Rule absolute upon setting aside the judgment and decree dated April 18, 1996 of the Court of Additional..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Bangladesh Bank Vs. A. Latif & Company Limited and another, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... signing and passing the award till realization of the awarded amount and thereupon the plaintiff filed Title Suit No. 01 of 2000 before the learned Joint District Judge to make the Award Rule of the Court. The defendant contested the proceeding by filing written statement. The Court af......n is coming which cannot be entertained at this stage. We find no merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 753. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Nur Nahar Begum Chowdhury and others Vs. Hazi Mostafizur Rahman and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; Md. Tafazzul Islam J. - This appeal, by way of leave, arises out of judgment and decree dated 10.3.1999 passed in Civil Revision No. 3538 of 1993 discharging the Rule affirming the judgment and decree dated 21.11.1993 passed by the learned Additional District J......terials on record discharged the Rule and accordingly no interference is called for. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 749. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Humayun Majid Vhora Vs. Q.S.M. Jahanzeb & others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....Amin J. - This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 27.07.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 5691 of 2005 making the Rule absolute. 2. Prosecution case, in brief, is that the complainant was holder of a locke......J. - This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 27.07.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 5691 of 2005 making the Rule absolute. 2. Prosecution case, in brief, is that the complainant was holder of a locker bei..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 49
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Moslema Khatun and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....05 of 2001. The petition for leave to appeal was filed against the judgment dated March 1, 2001 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1045 of 1994 making absolute the Rule. The writ petition was filed challenging the legality of the judgment and order dated December......Appeal No. 1105 of 2001. The petition for leave to appeal was filed against the judgment dated March 1, 2001 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1045 of 1994 making absolute the Rule. The writ petition was filed challenging the legality of the judgment and order d..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Md. Nazim Uddin Vs. Managing Director and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
..... Tafazzul Islam J.- This petition for leave to appeal arises out of judgment and decree dated 25.5.2005 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 196 of 2000 discharging the Rule which was obtained against the judgment and decree dated 11.11.1999 passed by the learned Add......gh the High Court Division passed the above judgment in a slipshod manner but the learned counsel could not point out thing from the materials on record on the basis of which the Rule could be made absolute. 5. Regarding the submission of the learned counsel that the trial court did not give an..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Fazlur Rahman Sikder Vs. Abdul Hashem Howlader & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....afazzul Islam J.- This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment dated 30.3.2005 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3893 of 1999 discharging the Rule obtained against the judgment and decree dated 12.8.1999 passed by the learned Subordinate Jud......nfirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 687. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Shahin Reza and others Vs. Abdul Hamid & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
..... - This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 26.07.2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.4786 of 1999 discharging the Rule. 2. Short facts are that the petitioner as plaintiff instituted Title Suit No. 22 of 1998 in......s on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 682. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 139
Sheikh Abdul Mazed Vs. Md. Shomrej Ali Mandal and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Ruhul Amin J. - This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment dated May 7, 2005 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1748 of 2004 discharging the Rule obtained against the order dated March 3, 2004 passed by the learned District Judge, Satkhira ......d by the courts below and consequent thereupon there was no failure of justice. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 680. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Hafez Md. Bilal Patwary @ Md. Billal Hossain Patwary Vs. Bangladesh, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....his petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 05.05.2004 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 3787 of 2003 discharging the Rule. 2. Short facts are that the writ petitioner was appointed as Nikah Registrar on tem&sh......nt reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 678. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Hazi Abdul Mannan and others Vs. Amena Begum and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sp; Md Ruhul Amin J.- This petition for leave to appeal is against the judgment dated March 8, 2004 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.60 of 1995 making absolute the Rule upon reversing the judgment and decree dated September 5, 1984 of the 3rd Court of Subordinate......nbsp; Md Ruhul Amin J.- This petition for leave to appeal is against the judgment dated March 8, 2004 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.60 of 1995 making absolute the Rule upon reversing the judgment and decree dated September 5, 1984 of the 3rd Court ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 21
Sayed Ahmed Majumder Vs. Samsul Hoque and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....fazzul Islam J.- This petition for leave to appeal arises out of the judgment dated 28.3.2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3645 of 2002 discharging the Rule obtained against the judgment and decree dated 28.5.2002 passed by the learned Additional Dist...... or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 673. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20
Rahmat Goni Vs. Mrs. Meherun Nessa & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....- This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 30.07.2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 16 of 2002 discharging the Rule. 2. Short facts are that the plaintiff filed Title Suit No.33 of 1998 in the Court of S......rrect decision. There is no cogent ground to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 670. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
28312830282928282826282528242823282228212818281528142813281128102809280828072806