Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4981-5000 of 5818 results.
Matiur Rahman Vs. Habibur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... holder in the suit land. 7. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. 8. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... holder in the suit land. 7. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. 8. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Matiur Rahman....................... Petitioner Vs. Habibur Rahman and others .......Respondents Lawyers Involved: Abdul Quayum, Senior Advocate, instru......Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Matiur Rahman....................... Petitioner Vs. Habibur Rahman and others .......Respondents Lawyers Involved: Abdul Quayu..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Md. Abdur Razzaque Vs. Chief Election Commissioner, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ter, there is no substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for petitioner. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 416. ......ter, there is no substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for petitioner. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 416. ......J Md. Abdur Razzaque............................................... Petitioner Vs. The Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commission Secretariat, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka and others…………………..... Respondents Judgment...... (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Abdur Razzaque............................................... Petitioner Vs. The Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commission Secretariat, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 116
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Sultan Ahmed, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nal, Dhaka in A.T. Case No. 129 of 1991. The A.T. Case was filed under section 4 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1980 challenging the orders dated 25.02.1988 and 05.04.1988 passed by the Ministry of Establishment and Directorate of National Security Intelligence respectively and for de......s, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 378. .............................................................Respondent Judgment August 17, 2006. Case Referred to- AFB Jahan Mia (Md) Vs. Chairman, National Board of Revenue and others, 49 DLR (AD) 122. Lawyers Involved: M. A. Azim Khair, Deputy Attorney Gene......ul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of Bangladesh represented by the Principal Secretary to Prime Minister's Office, Tejgaon, Dhaka & another...............Petitioner Vs. Md. Sultan Ahmed ........................................................Respondent ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Jashimuddin & other Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sion upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......sion upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......nbsp; Not represented- Respondent Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 198 of 2o04. (From the judgment and order dated 21.03.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 1891 of 1998.) ...... (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Jashimuddin & other.....................................Petitioners Vs. The State.........................................................Respondent Judg..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Md. Alimuzzaman Khan Vs. Mohammad Golam Kibria, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....aterials on record arrived at a correct decision. We find no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......aterials on record arrived at a correct decision. We find no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......, Section 73 As the plaintiff’s service was not regulated by any legal instrument or by any statutory provision no declaration or enforcement of contract as to the terms and conditions of service should be given and no such relief has been sought for by the plaintiff. ......laim damages for the breach of contract committed by the employer. In this connection, the High Court Division relied on the decisions in the case of Bangladesh Small Industries Corporation, Dhaka Vs. Mahbub Hossain Chowdhury reported in 29 DLR (SC) 41 and the case of M/S. Amin Jute Mills Ltd. V..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Sree Hare Krishna Das Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....no petition for review was also called from the petitioner or from the office of the Chief Martial Law Administrator and/or President's Secretariat and it is only the Joint Secretary (Admn) of the Ministry of Law and Justice directed the petitioner to file review petition addressing him; the pet......ring the review petition filed by the petitioner, rejected the same. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 146. .............................. Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, President Secretariat, Govt. of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Bangabhaban, Dhaka and others ............Respondents. Judgment May 8, 2004. Case Referred to- ......ivil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sree Hare Krishna Das...................................................... Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, President Secretariat, Govt. of t..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Md. Abdul Ali Bhuiyan Vs. Jahura Khatun and Others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....s any instance of misreading and non-reading. So the concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the courts below can not be disturbed. The leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......s any instance of misreading and non-reading. So the concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the courts below can not be disturbed. The leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ...... Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abdul Ali Bhuiyan.........................................Petitioner Vs. Jahura Khatun and Others...................................Respondents Judgment June 12, 2004. ......(Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abdul Ali Bhuiyan.........................................Petitioner Vs. Jahura Khatun and Others...................................Respondents Judgme..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Md. Firozul Islam and others Vs. Md. Helalul Islam and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, having no leg to stand the leave petition is without any substance. 7. The leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......he submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, having no leg to stand the leave petition is without any substance. 7. The leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......ppellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Firozul Islam and others.................... Petitioners Vs. Md. Helalul Islam and others .............. Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Firozul Islam and others.................... Petitioners Vs. Md. Helalul Islam and others ...............Respondents Judgment May 8, 2..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Osimuddin, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011)119. ...... the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011)119. ......me Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Forest, Secretariat Building, Dhaka and others ..........Appellants. Vs. Md. Osimuddin................................Respondent. ......ivil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Forest, Secretariat Building, Dhaka and others ..........Appellants. Vs. Md. Osimuddin................................Respondent. Judgment June 20, 2005. Cas..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Azizullah @ Azizur Rahman Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules 1988 and therefore is not maintainable. Consequently, the Review Petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ......e Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules 1988 and therefore is not maintainable. Consequently, the Review Petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ......ohammad Fazlul Karim J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahmed J Azizullah @ Azizur Rahman.......................Petitioned Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others…….........Respondents Judgment February 23, 2003. ......ainur Reza Chowdhury CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahmed J Azizullah @ Azizur Rahman.......................Petitioned Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others…….........Respondents Judgment ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Badsha Miah (Md) Vs. Sonali Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....the same has not been filed before the Administrative Tribunal nor even to this Division. But the appellant actually filed incompetent representation under the garb of review before the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Banking Division and the same was rejected on 3-8-1997 and in such view of the......cisions arrived at by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal and, as such, we find no substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......bsp; Md Fazlul Karim J Amirul K Chowdhury J Badsha Miah (Md)...............Appellant vs Sonali Bank and others.......Respondents Judgment &......cisions arrived at by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal and, as such, we find no substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 103
M Sahabuddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... State……………………………..Respondent Judgment May 11, 2005. Case Referred To- Abdul Kader Chowdhury and others vs State 28 DLR (AD) 38. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocat......nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Bangladesh Vs. AKM Enayetullah, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J A Kabir Chowdhury J Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment............... Appellant vs AKM Enayetullah.......................t aside and we set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed with observation made hereinabove. No order is made as to cost. Ed. ......ocate, (Mr. Ajmalul Hossain, QC Senior Advocate with him) instructed by Mr. Mvi Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 5 of 2004. (From the judgment and order dated 25th June, 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 4134 of 200......t aside and we set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed with observation made hereinabove. No order is made as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Mustafizur Rahman Vs. Md. Amjad Hossain, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....the suit. 20. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......the suit. 20. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ur Rahman....................Appellant vs Md. Amjad Hossain................Respondent Judgment October 24, 2005. Cases Referred to- Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury and others vs Gani Ahmed and others 33 DLR (AD) 1 = 1979 BSCR 375; Rokeya Khatun vs Alijan @ Alija......the suit. 20. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Tahedul Islam (Md) and others Vs. Md. Mojibar Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... in interfering with the judgment of the appellate Court and thereupon restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ...... in interfering with the judgment of the appellate Court and thereupon restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......is no order as to cost. Ed. ...... in interfering with the judgment of the appellate Court and thereupon restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Abdul Mazid Khan (Md) Advocate Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nbecoming conduct. 34. In view of the discussion made above, we do not find substance in this petition. The petition is dismissed. Copy of this judgment be forwarded to the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs to bring to his notice our observation regarding......g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ...... Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J Abdul Mazid Khan (Md) Advocate........Petitioner vs State and another... .........Respondents Judgment ......g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Farida Akhter and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....on from general seat, but by the members of Parliament in accordance with the provision of law which has since been made and passed by the Parliament namely, Act No. 30 of 2004. It is declared by the Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs that after the draft of the said proposed law rel......ng the cause of democracy through a process which could not be termed as undemocratic. In the result, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 237. ......rt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md Ruhul Amin J Md Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Md Tafazzul Islam J Amirul K Chowdhury J Farida Akhter and others.........................Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, ......Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md Ruhul Amin J Md Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Md Tafazzul Islam J Amirul K Chowdhury J Farida Akhter and others.........................Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Cabinet Division & others .........Respondents..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 221
Abdul Kashem Vs. Amirun Nahar and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... view of the discussion made above, the petition is found to be without merit. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 86. ...... view of the discussion made above, the petition is found to be without merit. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 86. ...... Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J Abdul Kashem............................Petitioner Vs. Amirun Nahar and others.................Respondents Judgment March 5, 2006. Lawyers Invo......ivision (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J Abdul Kashem............................Petitioner Vs. Amirun Nahar and others.................Respondents Judgment March 5,..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
State Vs. Muhibur Rahman Manik and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e set aside. In view of the discussion made above, the appeal is allowed. The impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:11 MLR (AD) 2006, 203. ......e set aside. In view of the discussion made above, the appeal is allowed. The impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:11 MLR (AD) 2006, 203. ...... Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J State………………………………………………………...Appellant Vs. Muhibur Rahman Manik and another………… Respondents Judgment March 28, 2006. Result: The appeal is allow...... (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J State………………………………………………………...Appellant Vs. Muhibur Rahman Manik and another………… Respondents Judgment March 28, 2006. Re..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 184
Ali Akbar (Md) Vs. Shajirannessa Bewa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nsidered unsustainable. 14. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ......nsidered unsustainable. 14. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ...... Present: Md Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Ali Akbar (Md)...............................Appellant vs Shajirannessa Bewa and others........Respondents Judgment &......nsidered unsustainable. 14. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
19301929192519221919191819171916191519141913191219111910190919081907190419031902