Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Sirajuddin alias Siraj Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....Vs. Ajudhia (2 Allahabad (644), In re-Natesa Mudaliar, A.I.R. 1945 Madras, 330. Sital Vs. Emperor AIR 1942 Oudh. 214. Reg. Vs. Tukay Bin Tamana, I.L.R. 1 Bombay 214. Lawyers Involved: Md. Behatar Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. M.A. Rouf, Senior Advocat......e find no reason for reversal of the decisions of courts below and hence dismiss the appeal. The appellant must now surrender to his bail and serve out the remainder of the sentence. Ed. ......e find no reason for reversal of the decisions of courts below and hence dismiss the appeal. The appellant must now surrender to his bail and serve out the remainder of the sentence. Ed. ...... the Appellant. M.A. Rouf, Senior Advocate, instructed by A.W. Mallick, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 23 of 1974. (From judgment and order dated the 9th February, 1970 passed by the High Court, in Criminal Revision No. 149 of 19..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Swami Joytirghananda Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Khulna and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....er discharging the Rule are set aside and the Petition No. 245 of 1966 is restored to file for hearing according to law. There shall, however, be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ......er discharging the Rule are set aside and the Petition No. 245 of 1966 is restored to file for hearing according to law. There shall, however, be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ...... Lawyers Involved: B.N. Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by A. Rab-II, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Faqeer Shahabuddin Ahmed, Attorney-General, instructed by A.M. Khan Chowdhury, Advocate -on-Record.—For the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. S.S. Hoda, ......as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Dacca Improvement Trust Vs. Waliullah and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... a formal decree, as a matter of fact, was prepared after the filing of the said appeal. The result, therefore, is that the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... a formal decree, as a matter of fact, was prepared after the filing of the said appeal. The result, therefore, is that the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......h Bhargava Vs. Jawaharlal Bhargava and others A.I.R. 1961(S.C.) 832; Secretary of State for India Vs. Mask & Co. L. B. 67 I. A. 222 = A.I.R. 1940 P.C 105; Abdul Rouf and others Vs. Abdul Hamid Khan in 16 D.L.R. (S.C.) 515; Phool Chand Vs. Gopal Lal, reported in A.I.R. 1967, 1470; Law...... Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. D. C. Bhattacharya, J. Fazle Munim, J. Dacca Improvement Trust…………….Appellant. Vs. Waliullah and others……………....Respondents Judgment January ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca Vs. M/S. Ata Hossain Khan Ltd., 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....d Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (1952-21 ITR 79 at page 81). Lawyers Involved: A.W. Chowdhury, Senior Advocate, instructed by A. M. Khan Chowdhury, Advocate-on-Record -For the Appellant. Md. Hasan, Advocate, instructed by S.M. Huq Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civil Appea......that this appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court are set aside and that of the Appellate Tribunal restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 141.......B Mahmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Commissioner of Income-Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca......Appellant. Vs. M/s. Ata Hossain Khan Ltd....... Respondent. Judgment November 19, 1975. Result: The appeal is allowed....... Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 141...Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 164
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Abul Hossain & ors. Vs. The State and anr., 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....e learned counsel on the facts and circumstances of the case, there arises no question for review of the decision of this Division. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e learned counsel on the facts and circumstances of the case, there arises no question for review of the decision of this Division. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......………...Petitioners. Vs. The State and anr………...Respondents. Judgment April 6, 1976. Lawyers Involved: Shaukat Alt Khan, Advocate, with A. Basel Majumdar, Advocate, instructed by Abu Bakkar, Advocate-on-record&mdas...... Present: Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. D. C. Bhattacharya, J. Fazle Munim, J. Abul Hossain & ors………...Petitioners. Vs. The State and anr………...Respondents. Judgment April 6, 1976. Lawyer..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Haji Md. Shariatullah Vs. Ashrafun Nessa Bibi and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....Division (Civil) Present: AM Sayem CJ Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Haji Md. Shariatullah......Appellant Vs. Ashrafun Nessa Bibi and others. ...Respondents......g regard to the considerations made above we find no substance in this appeal. It is accordingly dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 91. ......sp; Lawyers Involved: Golam Rabbani, Advocate, instructed by Md. Behter Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For Appellant. T. W. Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by A. M. Khan Chowdhury, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondents. No. 1. Ranadhir Sen, Deputy Atto......Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: AM Sayem CJ Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Haji Md. Shariatullah......Appellant Vs. Ashrafun Ne..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Khondkar Mohiuddin Vs. Syed Moin Ahmed, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
..... 375; Abdul Majid Vs. Khalil 12 D.L.R. (S.C.) 132. Lawyers Involved: S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate, with S.C. Das, Advocate, instructed by A. W. Mian, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Md. Nurul Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 100-D of 1968. (From t......dgment and decree of the High Court are set aside and the judgment and decree of the Court of Additional District Judge are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 85. ......dgment and decree of the High Court are set aside and the judgment and decree of the Court of Additional District Judge are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 85. ...... Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 85. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Mozaffar Ahmed Vs. Md. Osman and anr, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....on (Civil) Present: Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Mozaffar Ahmed………...Appellant. Vs. Md. Osman and anr.........Respondents. Judgment &n...... is .barred by limitation. The appeal shall be disposed of on the evidence already on record. The appeal is disposed of in aforesaid terms without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Md. Osman and anr.........Respondents. Judgment December 4, 1975. Cases Referred to: Ayub Ali Vs. Amir Khan 43 C.W.N, 118; Yunus Mia Chowdhury Vs. Firoz Ahmed Choudhury (1952) 4 DLR 604—1951 PLR (......Civil) Present: Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Mozaffar Ahmed………...Appellant. Vs. Md. Osman and anr.........Respondents. Judgment &..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 239
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Syed Mofazzal Hossain Vs. The Election CoÂmmissioner and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....the setting aside of the election of the Vice-Chairman and the members is declared to have been without jurisdiction and as such void. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ......the setting aside of the election of the Vice-Chairman and the members is declared to have been without jurisdiction and as such void. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ...... Involved: Shah Azizur Rahman with Latifur Rahman, Advocates, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Faqeer Shahabuddin Ahmad, Attorney-General, instructed by A. M. Khan Chowdhury, Advocate-on-Record- U/O XLV Rule 1 (SC) Appellate Division Rules 1973. Civil App......Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Bangladesh Vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... Pakistan in Civil Re-vision Case No. 101 of 1968). Judgment: Kemaluddin Hossain, J.—Facts leading to the grant of Special leave to appeal are as follows: Respondent 1, Md. Abdur Razzak obtained a money decree against Respondent 2, Md. Belayet Ali Khan, a Government C......l subsist subject to the prior lien or charge of the Government and in accordance with the observation made herein. The appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ......aluddin Hossain, J.—Facts leading to the grant of Special leave to appeal are as follows: Respondent 1, Md. Abdur Razzak obtained a money decree against Respondent 2, Md. Belayet Ali Khan, a Government Contractor in O. C. suit No. 59 of 1962. During the pendency of the suit, Respon...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: A. M. Sayem, C. J. Syed A. B. Mahmud Hussain, J. Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain, J. Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya. J. Bangladesh……Appellant. Vs. Mohd. Abd..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Abdul Quader Chowdhury and others Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for exÂpeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ......section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for exÂpeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ......€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦...Respondent Judgment February 10, 1976. Result: The appeals are dismissed. Cases Referred to- Raja Huq Newaz V. Mohd. Afzal, 19 DLR (SC) 369; Muhammad Vs. Muzammel Khan, PLD 1967 (SC) 317, Gianchand Vs. State, 1968 Pakistan Criminal Law Journal (SC) 764, R.P. Kapu......e case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 225
Abdur Razzaque & anr Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ...... Lawyers Involved: Aleem-Al-Razee, Advocate, instructed by S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Rccord.—For the Appellants. Faqeer Shahabuddin Ahmed, Attorney-General, instructed by A.M. Khan Chowdhury, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No.......din Ahmed, Attorney-General, instructed by A.M. Khan Chowdhury, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 1976 (From the Judgment and order dated 24-2-75 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 330 of 197 3...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
The Com. of Income-tax Chittagong zone, Ctg. Vs. M/s Everett Orient Line Corpn, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ocate, Supreme Court, instructed by A.M. Khan Chowdhury Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Asrarul Hosain, Senior Advocate will Mohammad Hassan, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent in C.A. No. 15-D/71 S.R. Pal, Sen......ght in so far it allowed the three assessees' initial depreciation under s. 10(2)(vi) of the Act. We find no reason to interfere. All the three appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......e Tax, Madras Vs. Mir Mohammad Ali 1964 (53) ITR, 165; Abdul Wahab Vs. The Crown, 7 DLR (FC) 87. Lawyers Involved: A. W. Chowdhury, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by A.M. Khan Chowdhury Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Asrarul Hosain, Senior Advocate ......peals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 134
Government of BangÂladesh & ors Vs. M/s. Samir & Co, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....d, Additional Attorney-General, with Mahmudul Islam, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by A.W. Mallik, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellants. Ahmadur Rahman Khan, Advocate, insÂtructed by Md. Nurul, Huq, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 10 of 1972. (From......ct, and therefore no quesÂtion of irregular exercise of jurisdiction does arise in this case. The result therefore is that this appeal is dismissed but there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ......s Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Additional Attorney-General, with Mahmudul Islam, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by A.W. Mallik, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellants. Ahmadur Rahman Khan, Advocate, insÂtructed by Md. Nurul, Huq, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Respondent. Civil ......ment of BangÂladesh & ors........Appellant Vs. M/s. Samir & Co…………..Respondent Judgment November 20, 1975. Cases referred to- Council Vs. Bilas Singh, 52 C.W.N. 54; Sanday Patrick Vs. Mayammal, 7 I.C. 588; R. Vs. Bolton, reported in (1835-42) All England Reporter 71..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 258
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Dacca Zone Vs. M/s. Gulistan CineÂma Co., 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....urally. from them, it is neither arbitrary nor capricious. There is hardly any to disturb this finding of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ......urally. from them, it is neither arbitrary nor capricious. There is hardly any to disturb this finding of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ......Harjina & Co. (Pak) Ltd., Karachi Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) P.L.D. 1963 Karachi, 996. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Chowdhury, Sr. Advocate, instructed by Mr. A. M. Khan Chowdhury, Advocate-on -Record—For the Appellant. Syed Muzaffar Hossain, Advocat...... Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 126
Matilal Sikder & ors Vs. Benodini Dasi, being dead her heirs Bepin B Das & ors, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ordinate Judge are restored. As there is no appearance on behalf of the respondent there; shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 5. ......ordinate Judge are restored. As there is no appearance on behalf of the respondent there; shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 5. ......s Referred to: Syed Abdul Karim and others Vs. Harendra Chandra Dhupi and others, 14 D.L.R. 847; Jamiyat Ali Vs. Mrs. Chemon Ara Begum and others, 20 D.L.R. (Dacca) 480; Mohammad Hossain Khan and others Vs. Babu Kishva Nandan Shanai L.R. 64 I.A. page 250 = A.I.R. 1937 P.C. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: A. M. Sayem CJ S. A. B. Mahmud Hussain J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debash Chandra Bhattacharya J Matilal Sikder & ors……... Appellants Vs. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Ayub Ali Howladar Vs. Election Tribunal Bagerhat, Khulna and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... in this Division. We do not find any error in the conclusion of the Tribunal, nor in the decision of the High Court Division. The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... in this Division. We do not find any error in the conclusion of the Tribunal, nor in the decision of the High Court Division. The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... in this Division. We do not find any error in the conclusion of the Tribunal, nor in the decision of the High Court Division. The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs. Ed. ......ain J. Ayub Ali Howladar……………………..Appellant. Vs Election Tribunal Bagerhat, Khulna and others…...Respondents Judgment Nov. 20, 1975. &nbs..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 101
Amir Sultan Ali Hyder Vs. Md. K. Alam alias S. Alam & others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....ellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed ABM Husain CJ Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Amir Sultan Ali Hyder................................ Appellant. Vs. Md. K. Alam alias S. Alam & others............. Respondents Judgment July 1, 1977. R...... not be binding on the Courts below. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed. We, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1977) 29 DLR (SC) 295................ Respondents Judgment July 1, 1977. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred to- Must. Dirji Vs. Smt. Goalin, AIR 1941 Patna 61 (E.B.); Afsaruddin Vs. Wazed Ali Khan and anothers, (1952) 4 DLR.442; Azizul Huq Vs. M/S. Hanif Ltd. and others, (1955) 7 DLR; 287; A......however, make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1977) 29 DLR (SC) 295...Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 182