Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5021-5040 of 5838 results.
Md. Mostafa Hossain Vs. Sikder Md. Faruque and another, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....roceeded to hear the appeal on merit as question of great public interest is involved therein. Petition for addition of party was also rejected as it was found to be unnecessary particularly when the State was contesting the appeal. 9. Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Learned Counsel for the appellant, has as...... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Md. Mostafa Hossain ............................Appellant Vs. Sikder Md. Faruque and another........... Respondents Judgment June 29, 1987. Result......ported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 10, BLD 1988 (AD) 170. ....... In the result, the appeal is dismissed. In view of the circumstances of the case, no order as to costs is made. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 10, BLD 1988 (AD) 170. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 132
The State Vs. Tayeb Ali and others, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....ed in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 6; 1987 BLD (AD) 265. ......me Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J The State....................................Appellant Vs. Tayeb Ali and others…………………...Respondents Judgment March 31, 1987. R......der section 304 Part-I, but the sentence of 10 years' imprisonment is maintained. Subject to this, the appeal is allowed. Ed.This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 6; 1987 BLD (AD) 265. ......der section 304 Part-I, but the sentence of 10 years' imprisonment is maintained. Subject to this, the appeal is allowed. Ed.This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 6; 1987 BLD (AD) 265. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Md. Golam Hossain Vs. Mst. Asia Khatun Chowdhury, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....ial Court was correct in dismissing the suit. 21. In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed.This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 1......me Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Md. Golam Hossain .........................Appellant Vs. Mst. Asia Khatun Chowdhury..........Respondent Judgment March 29, 1987. The Premises......his Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 1......ial Court was correct in dismissing the suit. 21. In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed.This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 1..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Moulana Mokhtar Ahmed Vs. Mohammadul Huq Usmani & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....nfortunate it may seem though that the decision in the case turned on two marginal votes only. 18. The appeal is accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......habuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T. M. Afzal J Moulana Mokhtar Ahmed……………………………Appellant Vs. Mohammadul Huq Usmani & others………………Respond......hellip;……Respondents Judgment March 19, 1987. Lawyers Involved: T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, (Abu Taher Chowdhury, Advocate, with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Ad......nfortunate it may seem though that the decision in the case turned on two marginal votes only. 18. The appeal is accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Md. Naimuddin Sardar Vs. Md. Abdul Kalam Biswas, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....evidence, particularly the rent-receipts produced by the parties and also on wrong view of law taken by the learned Single Judge, in respect of the proceeding under section 19(1) of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act. 6. As to jurisdiction of the High Court Division un...... Md. Naimuddin Sardar……………………………………………………Appellant Vs. Md. Abdul Kalam Biswas @ Md. Abul Kalam Basiruddin @ Abul Kalam Azad & another&helli......Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H. Rahman J A. T. M. Afzal J Md. Naimuddin Sardar…………………………...... In the result, therefore, the appeal is allowed with cost. The impugned judgment and decree of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the first appellate court restored. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Mst. Maleka Khatun & another Vs. Abid Ali & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....ling of the pre-emption case. It was claimed that appellant No. 1 filed Miscellaneous Case No. 701 of 1975-76 before the C.O. Revenue for the separation of her plot No. 404 under section 117 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act. On 22nd July 1976 order for separation was passed. Further, resp......J Mst. Maleka Khatun & anr……………………………………………….Appellants Vs. Abid Ali & others.……………………&he......;…Respondents Judgment September 2, 1985. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Mahbubey Alam, Advocate with him, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Hoque, Advocate-on-Record—for the Appellants. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Adv......d above, the appeal is allowed, judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the lower appellate Court restored. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Abani Mohan Saha Vs. Asst. Custodian (S. D. O) Vested Property, Chandpur & ors, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....H Rahman J. Order of the Court By a majority decision the appeal is dismisÂsed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 223. ......sion (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider ChowÂdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Abani Mohan Saha………………………………Appellant Vs. Assistant Custodian (S. D. O) Vested Property, Chandpur and others ………… Respondents ......H Rahman J. Order of the Court By a majority decision the appeal is dismisÂsed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 223. ......H Rahman J. Order of the Court By a majority decision the appeal is dismisÂsed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 223. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 115
Sudhir Chandra Sil & another Vs. Harimohan Das & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....The impugned judgment and decree are set aside and those of the lower Appellate Court affirmed. There will, however, be no order as to cost. The application for substitution is rejected. Ed. ......handra Sil & anr…………………………………………………….Appellants Vs. Harimohan Das & ors……………………&h......The impugned judgment and decree are set aside and those of the lower Appellate Court affirmed. There will, however, be no order as to cost. The application for substitution is rejected. Ed. ......The impugned judgment and decree are set aside and those of the lower Appellate Court affirmed. There will, however, be no order as to cost. The application for substitution is rejected. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Kalitara Biswas Vs. Mrinal Kanti Biswas and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....t below are set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. The original suit will now proceed expeditiously from the stage where it was left. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......Ahmed J M. H Rahman J A. T. M Afzal J Kalitara Biswas………………………………….Appellant. Vs. Mrinal Kanti Biswas and others…………Respondents Judgment......as and others…………Respondents Judgment June 10, 1987. Lawyers Involved: Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellant. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondent No. 1. Abdul Malek, Senior......t below are set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. The original suit will now proceed expeditiously from the stage where it was left. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Sonali Bank, Local Office, Dhaka Vs. Gazi Abdur Rashid & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....…………………………Respondents Judgment April 5, 1987. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred to- Municipal Council, Palai vs. T. J. Joseph, AIR 1963 SC 1561; State of Punjab vs. Sukdev Sarup Gupta, AIR 1970 SC 1641; EmÂperor v. Rayangouda Lingangouda Patil ......late Division (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider ChowÂdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Sonali Bank, Local Office, Dhaka ………………….Appellant Vs. Gazi Abdur Rashid & others.……………………………………Respondents Jud......Appellant. Miah Abdul Gafur, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent No. 1. S.S. Halder, Senior Advocate, instructed by Ranesh Chandra Maitra, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent No. 2. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent No. 3. Ex-parte-For the Respondent Nos. 4â......on 35A does not come into conflict with the limitation provided in the schedule as to the maximum ad valorem fees which may be determined under the schedule. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Kobad Ali and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....ot to have summarily rejected the application. We condone the delay, allow the appeal and remand the matter to the High Court Division for hearing in accordance with law. No costs Ed. ......o;s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Pabna…………………………………Appellant Vs. Md. Kobad Ali and others…. ………………&helli......c of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Pabna…………………………………Appellant Vs. Md. Kobad Ali and others…. ……………………&h......ot to have summarily rejected the application. We condone the delay, allow the appeal and remand the matter to the High Court Division for hearing in accordance with law. No costs Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Amin Scales Limited and another Vs. Md. Yakub, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....her proceeding to meet the ends of justice. We do not find any ground to interfere with either of these two orders. The appeals are dismissed without however any order as to costs. Ed. ......ed J M. H. Rahman J A.T. M. Afzal J. Amin Scales Limited and another……………………..Appellants (In both the appeals) Vs. Md. Yakub………………………&hellip......M. H. Rahman J A.T. M. Afzal J. Amin Scales Limited and another……………………..Appellants (In both the appeals) Vs. Md. Yakub……………………………&he......her proceeding to meet the ends of justice. We do not find any ground to interfere with either of these two orders. The appeals are dismissed without however any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Nausher Ali Sarder & others Vs. The State, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H Rahman J A .T. M. Afzal J Nausher Ali Sarder & others………………….Appellants Vs. The State……………………………&hellip......y;dhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H Rahman J A .T. M. Afzal J Nausher Ali Sarder & others………………….Appellants Vs. The State………………………&hellip...... are sentenced to transportation for life instead of death. 12. In the result, the appeal is dismissed but the sentence of death is commuted to transportation for life. Ed. ...... are sentenced to transportation for life instead of death. 12. In the result, the appeal is dismissed but the sentence of death is commuted to transportation for life. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
.....” See sections 16 and
17 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894. Here the legislature had made it clear
that the vesting of property is not for any limited period or limited duration.
In the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act all land vested in the Government
after the abolition of ren......todian, Vested and
Non-Resident Property, Chittagong and others .............................Respondents
Judgment
September 24, 1986
Cases
Referred to-
Rahima Aktar Vs. Asim Kumar Bose
1985 BLD (AD) 155; Watson v. Winch, 1 K. B. (1916) 688; Surtees v. Ellison
(18......t.
A. Y.
Salehuzzaman, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record —For the Respondent No. 1.
A. W.
Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq,
Advocate-on -Record—For the Amicus Curiae.
Ex parte—For
the R......
order of the Executing Court is set aside and it is directed that the Execution
Case No. 4 of 1967 be proceeded with and disposed of in the light of this judgment.
No order as to cost.
Ed.
..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70
The State Vs. Fazal and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....me Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J The State……………………………....App...... Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J The State……………………………....Appellant Vs. Fazal and others………………....Respondents J......rt Division as would call for interference by this court. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Order of the Court By the majority decision the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......rt Division as would call for interference by this court. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Order of the Court By the majority decision the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Bangladesh Biman Corporation Vs. Syed Aftab Ali and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....h that of the Chief Justice. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the impugned decree is set aside and the suit is dismissed. The appeal is allowed. No order as to cost’s. Ed. ......sion (Civil) Present: F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider ChowÂdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. RahÂman J A. T. M. Afzal J Bangladesh Biman Corporation..........Appellant Vs. Syed Aftab Ali and others……………….......Respondent Judgment May 14 1986. ......h that of the Chief Justice. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the impugned decree is set aside and the suit is dismissed. The appeal is allowed. No order as to cost’s. Ed. ......h that of the Chief Justice. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the impugned decree is set aside and the suit is dismissed. The appeal is allowed. No order as to cost’s. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 97
State Vs. Lalu Miah and another, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....1987) 117; 1987 BLD (AD) 212. ...... Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J State..........................Appellant. Vs. Lalu Miah and another………………..Respondents. Judgment September 8, 1986. R......e King AIR 1949 P.C. 257 (259); H.S. Rathod vs. State of Gujrat AIR 1979 S.C. 1232. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record.- For the Appellant. Habib Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondents. Criminal Appeal No. 16 of 1985. (......sed Kabir and Lalu who are on bail are directed to surrender to their bail bonds at once and serve their sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 117; 1987 BLD (AD) 212. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Md. Ayub Vs. Bangladesh, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... appeal is, therefore, allowed in part and the impugned order of the High Court Division adding respondent No. 7 as a party is set aside. There will, however, be no order as to cost. Ed. ...... Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Md. Ayub…………………………..……….Appellant Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works & others……....... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Md. Ayub…………………………..…&h...... appeal is, therefore, allowed in part and the impugned order of the High Court Division adding respondent No. 7 as a party is set aside. There will, however, be no order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Shafquat Haider & others Vs. M. Al-Amin and another, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....as however refused though two Films (motion pictures) got the same name, 'Virginia'. The ground for refusal was that there were two producers in two countries, one in India and the other in United States of America; the Indian film was in Urdu with Indian cast in black end white, depicting an im...... Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Shafquat Haider & others………………….....Appellants. Vs. M. Al-Amin and another....................... Respondents Judgment August...... Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondents. Civil Appeal No. 38 o......s order, however, does not restrain respondent No.1 from discharging his duties as Chairman of the company. The winding-up matter should be disposed of expeditiously. No order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 239
M/S. Zaman and Co. Vs. Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries Corporation and ors., 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....cation for review is dismissed for, hit non-appearance he should rush to the Court, law says within fifteen days, for its restoration. The appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......ry J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal. J M/S. Zaman and Co. represented by its Proprietor N. Zaman…………....Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries Corporation and ors………...Respo......Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries Corporation and ors………...Respondents Judgment August 24, 1986. Cases Referred to- Md. Chand Miah Sowdagar Vs SMH Rahman 1985 BLD 337; Kalu Vs. Sowaria 27 1C 703. Lawyers Inv......cation for review is dismissed for, hit non-appearance he should rush to the Court, law says within fifteen days, for its restoration. The appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 84
16641663166216611659165816571656165516541653165216511650164916481647164616451644