Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Akbar Hossain (Md) Vs. MD, Agrani Bank and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
.... (Civil) Present: Mahmudul Amin Chowdhury CJ Mainur Reza Chowdhury J Md. Gholam Rabbani J Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. ...... In view of the above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 21. ......inur Reza Chowdhury J Md. Gholam Rabbani J Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Fazlul Karim J Akbar Hossain (Md)…………………………. Petiti...... Md. Fazlul Karim J Akbar Hossain (Md)…………………………. Petitioner Vs. MD, Agrani Bank and others ……………&..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Government of Bangladesh and other Vs. Nidhi Ram Moni and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
.... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mahmudul Amin Choudhury CJ Mainur Reza Chowdhury J Md. Gholam Rabbani J Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Fazlul Kari......e High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 14. ......lip;……(5) ii) A co-sharer of a vested property has a preferential claim to lease than the stranger……(6) Lawyers Involved: B Hossain, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed Mvi Md Wahidullah—Advocate-on-Record—For t......sp; Government of Bangladesh and other…… Petitioners Vs. Nidhi Ram Moni and others………………....Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
S. M. Iqbal Hossain Vs. Managing Director, I F I C Bank Ltd., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....that the High Court Division took a correct view in the matter and as such the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......that the High Court Division took a correct view in the matter and as such the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ...... Ed. ......e Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: M. M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J S. M. Iqbal Hossain................. Petitioner Vs. Managing Director, International Finance Investment and Commerce (IFIC) Bank Ltd. Head..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Md. Marfat Ali Miah Vs. Sree Jagadish Chandra Sheel and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ispose of the suit expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ....... The Other Class Suit No. 82 of 1991 is restored to its file and number. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ....... The Other Class Suit No. 82 of 1991 is restored to its file and number. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......e Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Marfat Ali Miah being dead his legal heir: Firoj Ahammad Bhulu.....Appellant Vs. Sree Jagadish Chandra Sheel and others....................................... Respond..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Md. Yousuf Ali Vs. Kazi Syed Shamsul Hoque and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Ed. ......n cannot be sustained and so the appeal should be allowed. 22. The appeal is, therefore, allowed. In the facts and circumstances we direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. ......m vs. Bangladesh 16 BLD (AD) 110;Kazi Imamuddin Bhuiya Vs. Bangladesh 10 BLC (AD) 2005 page 134. Lawyers Involved: A. J. Mohammad All, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant Ma...... Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Yousuf Ali ..........................................Appellant. Vs. Kazi Syed Shamsul Hoque and others...........Respondents. Judgment 30 Ja..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 178
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Shahjahan Gazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ent of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Md. Ashaduzzaman Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ismissed. Ed. ......pal amount he borrowed from the Bank. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ip;……......Respondents. Judgment March 23, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate (Moksudul Islam, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. Rafique-Ul-Huq, Senior Advocate, (Faheemul......ellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Ashaduzzaman................ Petitioner. Vs. Bangladesh, representedby the Secretary, Ministry of local Government, Engineering and R..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Md. Habibur Rahman Vs. M/S. Uttara Bank Ltd., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ......r and others….…… Respondents Judgment July 31, 2005. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred to- Union of India and another vs. Ladulal Jain AIR 1963 SC, 1681. M/s. Anwar and Brothers vs. Bangladesh Shipping Corporation (1995) 15 BLD (HCD) 447. Lawyers Involved......our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ......(AD) 59. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Md. Shafique Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Ed. ......-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......ses Referred To- Kazi Md. Aminul Islam vs. Secretary, Ministry of Law 16 BLD (AD) 110; Moulvi Md. Khurshid Alam vs. Bangladesh 50 DLR (AD) 82. Lawyers Involved: Mr. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-- For the Petitioner Not represented-For the Respondent C......area in question and his appointing authority is authorized under the law to curtail the area or jurisdiction in view of the decision of this Division reported in the case of Kazi Md. Aminul Islam Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Law 16 BLD (AD)110 and in the case of Moulvi Md. Khourshid Alam Vs. Bang..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Al-haj Mohammad Seraj-ud-Dowla and others Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of works, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... been made out, we find no merit in the petition for leave to appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......ommitted any error or illegality and no case for interference by this Division has been made out, we find no merit in the petition for leave to appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. .............Respondent. Judgment June 22, 2002. Cases Referred To- 18 DLR (H.C) 709, 26 DLR (H.C) 10, 47 DLR (H.C) 163. Lawyers Involved: Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record— For the Petitioner. Not represented- For the Respondents....... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain J Al-haj Mohammad Seraj-ud-Dowla and others.................................Petitioners. Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of works...................................................Respo..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Messres MS Jafar Vs. Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca & others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....point of view we do not find any substance in this point. This appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......point of view we do not find any substance in this point. This appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......late Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Messers MS Jafar...................................................... Appellant Vs. Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca & others ……………..Respondents Judgment ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Com. of In. Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca Vs. M/S. Badridas Full-chand, Saidpur, Rangpur, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Md Asghar Muhammad Yunus & Co. (1968) 18 Taxation, 89; Commissioner of Income tax vs. D.A. Chetti and Co., 1948 I.T.R., 404; Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Md. Asgar Mohammad Yunus & Co. P.L.D, 1968 Karachi 805; Mohabir Glass Manufacturing Co. vs. C.I......eal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is hereby set aside and the answer of the question under section 66 (1) must be in the negative. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ad Yunus & Co. P.L.D, 1968 Karachi 805; Mohabir Glass Manufacturing Co. vs. C.I.T.A.I.R, i960 Patna, 516. Lawyers Involved: Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Not represented-The Respondent. ......Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Commissioner of Income Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca ……………………..Appellant. Vs. M/S. Badridas Full-chand, Saidpur, Rangpur... ……………&h..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Amar Chandra Saha Vs. Ajit Kumar Das, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... mere fact of payment of rent by the Tenant. We, therefore, find no reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. ...... mere fact of payment of rent by the Tenant. We, therefore, find no reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. ......igh Court. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. ......eme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Fazle Munim J Amar Chandra Saha........Appellant. Vs. Ajit Kumar Das.........Respondents Judgment June 10, 1976. Lawyers..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Udaypur Halima Darul Ulum Madrasha and others Vs. Bangladesh, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....lip;………Respondents Judgment July 29.1980. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (N. H. Khondaker, Advocate with him), instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellant. Md. Moksudur Rahman, Deputy A......ust succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court Division is set aside. Let the Government proceed in accordance with law. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ...... aside. Let the Government proceed in accordance with law. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ...... J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Udaypur Halima Darul Ulum Madrasha and others ……………………………….Appellant. Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land Administration and ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Sri Sri Madan Gopal Jew Bigraha and ors., 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....es Referred to- Jalil Ahmed vs. The Province of East Pakistan (1967) 19 DLR 106; Tanvir Ahmed Siddiky Vs. The Province of East Pakistan (1968)20 DLR (SC) 144. Lawyers Involve: Md. Moksudur Rahman, Dy. Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on- Record —Fo...... of the first appellate Court is empowered to question validity of Hate Court and restore that of the trial Court recording abatement of the suit, There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......t of the trial Court recording abatement of the suit, There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet and others ..........Appellants. Vs. Sri Sri Madan Gopal Jew Bigraha and ors. ...........Respondents. Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
S.M. Quddus & ors Vs. Chairman, Labour Court, Ctg. & anr, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....hellip;……………………………………Respondents Judgment March 7,980. Lawyers Involved: Md. Mozammel Huq, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record —For the P...... provides, in our opinion, sufficient justification for granting termination benefits instead of reinstatement. In that view of the matter, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. ...... Md. Mozammel Huq, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record —For the Petitioner (in all the petitions). A. K. M. Shafiqur Rahman, Advocate instructed by Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent No. 2 (in all the petitions). Not repre...... provides, in our opinion, sufficient justification for granting termination benefits instead of reinstatement. In that view of the matter, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury & others Vs. Gani Ahmed and others, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....is is a question of fact and hardly arises in this appeal by special leave. For the foregoing reason, we dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 1. ......is is a question of fact and hardly arises in this appeal by special leave. For the foregoing reason, we dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 1. ...... For the foregoing reason, we dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 1. ...... 1. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abdus Subhan &. others, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....Islam J KM Subhan J Govt. of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Public Works and Urban Development, Secretariat Buildings, Dacca & another………………..Petitioners Vs. Md. Abdus Subhan & others……………...Respondents. Judgment December 14, 1979. Res......n of P.O. 16 of 1972 is illegal and as such the provision of M.L.R. VII 1977 has no application. The petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 255....... owner before, forcible eviction of the possessors of such right from the premises is illegal under PO XVI of 1972. Lawyers Involved: Maksudur Rahman, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record, —For the Petitioners. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record. — F...... Ruhul Islam J KM Subhan J Govt. of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Public Works and Urban Development, Secretariat Buildings, Dacca & another………………..Petitioners Vs. Md. Abdus Subhan & others……………...Respondents. Judgment December 14, 1979...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Abdul Jabbar Khan @ Jabbar Khan & ors Vs. State and another, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
...., 22 Cal. 131 ; Sheonandan Mahton vs. Emperor, 19 Cr.LJ. 263 ; Subal Chandra Nama Das vs. Abdullah Sheikh, 30 CWN 546 ; Jogesh Chandra Sarkar vs Abdul Gani, 18 Cr.LJ. 626. Lawyers Involved: Md. Meser All, Senior Advocate instructed by S.M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. M......oned in the original complaint petition and sent up for trial by the police and he will be guided by the principles enunciated above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 247 ......and he will be guided by the principles enunciated above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 247 ......Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain, C J. Ruhul Islam, J., Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Abdul Jabbar Khan @ Jabbar Khan & ors ……..Appellants. Vs. State and another.......................................... Respondents Judgment Janua..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Bangladesh Vs. Hail Abdul Gani Biswas and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....ion of the High Court Division set aside and remitted back to the High Court Division for disposal. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 233 ......ion of the High Court Division set aside and remitted back to the High Court Division for disposal. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 233 ...... 1972 they are concluded by the transactions past and closed………..(11) Lawyers Involved: K. A. Bakr Attorney-General, with Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate on Record— For the Appellant in all the appeals. Shamsul Huq Chowdhury, Advoc......ent: Kemaluddin Hussain CJ F. K. M. A Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Bangladesh………………………… Appellant in all the appeals Vs. Hail Abdul Gani Biswas and others..................Respondents Judgment March 9, 1980. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 85