Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 5041-5060 of 6090 results.

Mainul Islam Vs. State and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....l) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Mainul Islam.........Petitioner (In both the Cases) Vs The State & another….....Respondent (In Criminal Petition No. 189 of 2003) The State......e find that the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner do not inspire us to lay our hands. The petitions thus appear to be bereft of substance and hence are dismissed. Ed. ......e find that the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner do not inspire us to lay our hands. The petitions thus appear to be bereft of substance and hence are dismissed. Ed. ......l Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 190 of 2003 are that after holding investiga­tion by the police while submitting report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure accused respondent Ali Asgar Bepari was excluded from the said police report and as such a narazi petition was filed ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41

Dulal @ Md. Dulal Talukder and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....nt: Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Dulal @ Md. Dulal Talukder and another.............Petitioner Vs The State...........................Respondents Judgment May 24, 2005 Lawyers In......with as prayed for. Bail granted earlier be further extended till disposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......with as prayed for. Bail granted earlier be further extended till disposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ..........Petitioner Vs The State...........................Respondents Judgment May 24, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Nizamul Huq, Advocate instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners Md. Abdur Rouf, Deputy Attorney General, instruc..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 27

Shahabuddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

.... (Criminal) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Shahabuddin ..........Petitioner Vs. The State...............Respondent Judgment November 20, 2005 Lawyers Involved: ......ate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Shahabuddin ..........Petitioner Vs. The State...............Respondent Judgment November 20, 2005 Law...... commit any illegality in rejecting the application filed under Section 561A of the code of Criminal procedure. There is no substance in this petition and hence it is dis­missed. Ed. ...... commit any illegality in rejecting the application filed under Section 561A of the code of Criminal procedure. There is no substance in this petition and hence it is dis­missed. Ed. ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 45

Samar Uddin and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

.... K. M. Hasan C J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Hamidul Haque J Md.Tafazzul Islam J Samar Uddin and another...........................Petitioner Vs The State……………………………&hellip...... Modaris Ullah of village Goyghar, PS. and District Moulavibazar be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet for a period of 6 (Six) months from date. Ed. ...... Modaris Ullah of village Goyghar, PS. and District Moulavibazar be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet for a period of 6 (Six) months from date. Ed. ...... 6. Considering the above submissions, the leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Let the accused-petitioner.1 Samar Uddin 2. Asrat alias Asarat Ali, both sons of Modaris Ullah of village Goyghar, PS. and District Moulavibazar be enlarged on b..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 84

Farukur Rahman @ Farook and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....2001) Sajjad Shaheen @ Prince...................Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 15/2001) Miraj Hossain...............Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No.16/2001) Vs. The State………………………Respondent (In all case......al Appeal No.14/2001) Sajjad Shaheen @ Prince...................Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 15/2001) Miraj Hossain...............Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No.16/2001) Vs. The State………………………Respond......ce to the appellants before us. In the aforesaid premises, we are of the view that the appel­lants are entitled of get benefit of doubt. As a result, all the appeals are allowed. Ed. ......ce to the appellants before us. In the aforesaid premises, we are of the view that the appel­lants are entitled of get benefit of doubt. As a result, all the appeals are allowed. Ed. ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 25

Md. Golam Murtuza @ Isphil Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

.... (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Golam Murtuza @ Isphil..........Appellant vs The State……………………………&hellip......ions Jude is erroneous and can not be sustained in law. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the accused-appellant is set at liberty if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ......ions Jude is erroneous and can not be sustained in law. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the accused-appellant is set at liberty if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ......llip;…………….Respondent Judgment October 20, 2003 Lawyers Involved: Khondoker Mahbub Hossain Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants M.A. Rouf, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 53

Delip Kumar Shaha Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....(Criminal) Present: J. R. Mudassir Husain C J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Delip Kumar Shaha.................Petitioners Vs The State……………………………&hellip...... and according­ly dismissed the appeal. Since the High Court Division in its judgment considered all the points as raised, the criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ...... and according­ly dismissed the appeal. Since the High Court Division in its judgment considered all the points as raised, the criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......ip;………………………………..Respondent Judgment February 25, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not Respondent-Respondent. Criminal Pet..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29

Habibur Rahman alias Habu and oth­ers Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....ed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Habibur Rahman alias Habu and oth­ers......................Petitioner Vs The State..............................Respondents Judgment August 31, 2005. Lawy......But the courts below did not consider this vital aspect of the prosecution case. Petitioners are directed to prepare the paper book out of court in accordance with rules. Ed. ......But the courts below did not consider this vital aspect of the prosecution case. Petitioners are directed to prepare the paper book out of court in accordance with rules. Ed. ......o suffer rigorous imprisonment for 3 (three) months more. The sentences to run concurrently. 2. The facts revealed in the leave peti­tion, in short, are that the on 06.02.1984 one Shukur Ali, brother of Sabdar Ali P.W.1 along with his cousin Moslem (P.W.11) were cleaning weed from the..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 31

State Vs. Moniruzzaman Kazi alias Thanda Kazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

.... ......commit any error in acquitting the accused. In view of the discussion made above we do not find any substance in this appeal. The crim­inal appeal is therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......commit any error in acquitting the accused. In view of the discussion made above we do not find any substance in this appeal. The crim­inal appeal is therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......Involved: Golam Kibria, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on -Record-For the Appellants Shahadat Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents Criminal Appeal No. 23 of 2000 (From the ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29

BUET Vs. Dr. Nizamuddin & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

.... a disput­ed question of fact it cannot be considered in a writ petition. For the reasons and discussions made above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... a disput­ed question of fact it cannot be considered in a writ petition. For the reasons and discussions made above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... a disput­ed question of fact it cannot be considered in a writ petition. For the reasons and discussions made above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... a disput­ed question of fact it cannot be considered in a writ petition. For the reasons and discussions made above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..

Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 87

Satish Chandra Mondal Vs. Ayjuddin Gazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....r­cumstances was well justified to interfere with the same in revisional jurisdiction. For the reasons and discussions above the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...................Appellant vs Ayjuddin Gazi being dead his heirs Amjad Gazi and others.......Respondents Judgment May 3, 2006 Cases Referred to- Ramdhari Rai Vs. Gorakh Rai, AIR 1931 (Patna) 236; Shahid Nasim and 2 other Vs. Syeda Imtiaz Khatoon, PLD 1997 (......r­cumstances was well justified to interfere with the same in revisional jurisdiction. For the reasons and discussions above the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......Deva ILR (1866) 2 Bombay 547. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by S. R. Khoshnabish, Advocate-on -Record-For the Appellant. Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents (1a-1j). Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-11. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35

Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Sree Subas Chandra Sarker , 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....suit. 6. Leave was granted to consider the contentions that the property in question being non-retainable land of the Zamindar having stood acquired as per provision of Section 20(2) of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 and that as the property belonged to the Government and is ......s. vs Sree Subas Chandra Sarker being dead his heirs: Indira Rani Sarker.....Respondent Judgment April 6, 2006. Cases Referred to- Perusal Rani Sen Gupta Vs. Bangladesh (1983) 3 BLD(AD) 277; Bangladesh, rep­resented by the Secretary, Ministry of Hou......llate Court. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order of costs. Ed. ......tary, Ministry of Housing and Public Works and another Vs. Shirely Anny Ansari, 52 DLR(AD) 180; Chitta Ranjan Chakraborty being dead, his heirs Ashish Chakraborty and oth­ers Vs. Md. Abdur Rob Alias Mvi. Md. Abdur Rob, 49 DLR AD) 96. Lawyers Involved: M.A. Azim Khair, Deputy A..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43

Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Wazed Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

.... water in 1335 B. S and that at the time of preparation of S.A. record the said land was diluvial land and accordingly S. A. record was prepared and that as per provi­sion of section 86 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 the land in question was listed in khas khatian No. 1, that...... J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, rep­resented by the Deputy Commissioner, Pirojpur and oth­ers....................Appellants Vs. Md. Wazed Ali and others……………………......er allu­vion. In the light of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......zul Islam J Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, rep­resented by the Deputy Commissioner, Pirojpur and oth­ers....................Appellants Vs. Md. Wazed Ali and others…………………………&hell..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27

Md. Sirajuddin Mondal and other Vs. Mosammat Miration Nessa and oth­ers, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....n established by the plaintiff that Jairuddin did not surren­der his tenancy, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 2, 000/- Ed. ......n established by the plaintiff that Jairuddin did not surren­der his tenancy, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 2, 000/- Ed. ......n established by the plaintiff that Jairuddin did not surren­der his tenancy, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 2, 000/- Ed. ......land so taken settlement by groring crops and that also paid rent, that Jitu Mondal died leaving 2 sons, 2 daughters, and by amicable parti­tion amongst the said persons Jitu Mondal's son Gudar Ali relinquished his right in respect of the land of plot No. 837, that Jitu Mondal's one son and ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35

Chairman, Bangladesh Telephone and Telegraph Board Vs. Mohammad Toufique & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioner is directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. The order of status quo passed on 07.08.2005 vacated. Ed. ......paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioner is directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. The order of status quo passed on 07.08.2005 vacated. Ed. ......paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioner is directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. The order of status quo passed on 07.08.2005 vacated. Ed. ...... instructed by A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Shafique Ahmed, Senior Advocate with him), instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No.1. Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-4. Civ..

Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 97

Government of Bangladesh Vs. Israt Jahan Kazal, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....ur above discussions, we are of the view that the judgment of the High Court Division requires interference by us. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ur above discussions, we are of the view that the judgment of the High Court Division requires interference by us. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ur above discussions, we are of the view that the judgment of the High Court Division requires interference by us. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......llip;……….Respondent Judgement March 24, 2004. Case Referred to- Mirza Shahab Ispahani, 40 DLR (AD) 116. Lawyers Involved A. J. Mohammad Ali. Additional Attorney General, instructed by Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-On-Record- For the Appellan..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34

Commissioner of Customs and anr Vs. Bangladesh Traders, Dhaka, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....n made without any lawful authority and of no legal effect and further directing the writ respondents to return the bank guarantees furnished by the writ petitioners are hereby set aside. Ed. ......raders, Dhaka…………………...Respondents (In all the cases) Judgement October 20, 2003. Cases Referred to- Mr. Ayub and others Vs. Collector of Customs and others, Writ Petition No. 1495 of 1996; Rahmania Vanaspati Product Ltd......n made without any lawful authority and of no legal effect and further directing the writ respondents to return the bank guarantees furnished by the writ petitioners are hereby set aside. Ed. ......stoms, 50 DLR 225; 42 DLR (AD) 167; 48 DLR (AD) 199; Mustafizur Rahman's Case, 51 DLR (AD) 40; Mizanur Rahman's case 52 DLR (AD) 49. Lawyers Involved: A.J. Mohammad (In all the cases) Ali, Additional Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate -on-Record- For the Appellants..

Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 95

Sree Promad Chandra Barman & others Vs. Most. Khodeza Khatun Bewa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

.... land in favour of the plaintiffs by way pattan. The suit land recorded in the names of the plaintiffs was again corrected in favour of defendants after filing objection under section 19(1) of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act. So the suit is liable to be dismissed. The trial court decreed t......y, the High Court Division committed error of law in making the Rule absolute, which requires interference by this court. The appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......y, the High Court Division committed error of law in making the Rule absolute, which requires interference by this court. The appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......y, the High Court Division committed error of law in making the Rule absolute, which requires interference by this court. The appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37

Ali Asgar Khan Vs. Md. Anwarul Islam, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

.... suit from the trial court and transferring the same to its own file for trial and disposal and this requires interference by us. The appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Ali Asgar Khan, Registrar, Supreme Court of Bangladesh & others....Appellants. Vs. Md. Anwarul Islam being dead his heirs; Most. Afroza Begum& others...............Resp...... suit from the trial court and transferring the same to its own file for trial and disposal and this requires interference by us. The appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......ithout any order as to cost. Ed. ..

Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 76

Md. Abdul Mannan Akanda Vs. Md. Lutfar Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....t been filed fulfilling the requirement of Rule 4 of order XXVI (Part-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. The civil review petition is dismissed. Ed. ......yed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ M. A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Abdul Mannan Akanda…………………….....Petitioner Vs. Md. Lutfar Rahman and others……….........Respondents Judgement......t been filed fulfilling the requirement of Rule 4 of order XXVI (Part-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. The civil review petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ip;….....Petitioner Vs. Md. Lutfar Rahman and others……….........Respondents Judgement April1 0, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner  Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate--on-Record..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34