Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5041-5060 of 5838 results.
Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya SaÂmity Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....……………………….Respondent Judgment September 23, 1986. Cases Referred to- Divisional Forest Officer Vs. Bishwanath Tea Co. Ltd. AIR 1981 (SC) 1368; Radha Krishna Agarwal Vs. State of Bihar AIR 1977 (SC) 1496; Bihar Eastern Gangetic Fishermen Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs Sip......vil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider ChowÂdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya SaÂmity Ltd.....................Appellant Vs. Bangladesh & others…………………………………………………………….......7 SC. 2149 ; Kekhraj S. Lalvani Vs. Dy. Custodian AIR 1966 (SC) 334; Har Shanker AIR 1973 (SC) 1121; M/s. Momin Motor Vs. Regional Transport Authority PLD 1962 108; Chairman Chittagong Pourashava Vs. Md. Amjad Khan 1980 B.S C.R. 54; M/S. Radha Krishna Agarwal Vi. State of Bihar and others AIR 1977 P......nd shall not act arbitrarily or in discriminatory manner. In these circumstances, writ jurisdicÂtion is quite available to the lessee. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 85. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Feroza Majid and another Vs. Jiban Biman CorpoÂration, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... the appellants. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. In view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 78. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider ChowÂdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J ATM Afzal J Feroza Majid and another……………….... Appellant Vs. Jiban Biman CorpoÂration......................Respondent Result: The appeal is dismis......Supreme Court with him, instructed by Sajjadul Huq, Advocate on Record—For the Appellants. Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate, A. B. M. Khairul Huq Advocate, Supreme Court, with him instructed by Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate on Record—For the ResponÂdent. Civil Appeal No. 6 of 1985. (From ...... the appellants. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. In view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 78. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 104
Sree Monoranjan Banik & anr Vs. Sree Nitya Ranjan Karmakar & ors., 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....gs. The learned Single Judge also relied on Md. Jabed Ali and others v. Rakhal Chandra Mondal and others, 33 DLR (AD) 309 wherein this court held that ''when a valid order under section 117 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act is on record, and the order has been given effect to, the Civil C...... MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Sree Monoranjan Banik and another……………………………….Petitioners Vs. Sree Nitya Ranjan Karmakar & others………………&......ar & others………………………………Respondent Judgment September 22, 1986. Cases Referred To- Md. Jabed Ali and others v. Rakhal Chandra Mondal and others, 33 DLR (AD) 309; Khairullah Bhuiyan v......the Transfer of Property Act. The impugned order does not call for any interference. The petitioner is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1987 BLD (AD) 122. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Sree Gopal Chandra Mondal and another Vs. Lasman Dasi & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....e suit property. The High Court Division correctly affirmed the decision of the appellate court. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ...... Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A. T. M. Afzal J Sree Gopal Chandra Mondal and another.........................Appellants Vs. Lasman Dasi & others……………………......e suit property. The High Court Division correctly affirmed the decision of the appellate court. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......e suit property. The High Court Division correctly affirmed the decision of the appellate court. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Comm Taxes, Dhaka (East Zone) Vs. M/S. Macneil & Kilburn Ltd., Adamjee Ct, Dhaka, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....mination of the agency business of the assessee. In that case the assessee was appointed as sole selling agent and sole distributors for the cigarettes manufactured by the company in Hyderabad State. That was the agreement in 1913. In 1939 the assessee was given discount for goods sold outsi...... Vs M/S. Macneil & Kilburn Ltd., Adamjee Court, Dhaka....................Respondent Judgment August 3, 1986. Cases Referred To- AIR 1932 (PC) 138: C.I.T Vs. K Rahman & Co. Ltd 1980 B.T.D. 242: C.I.T. vs. Vizir Sultan & Son 36.I.T.R. Goderaj Co ......s. C.I.T. AIR 1965 S.C. 65; C.I.T. Vs. Chari & Chari Ltd. AIR 1966 S.C. 34; Karam Chand Thapra 80 I.T.R. 167. Lawyers Involved: Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellant. Exparte —For Responden...... In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Tribunal is restored. There will be no order as to costs Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Dira Dockyard & Engineers Ltd. & ors Vs.Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & ors, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....in Article 33 of the Order. For the reasons stated above, we are of the view that the appeal must fail. It is accordingly dismissed but there will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Present: Dira Dockyard and Engineers Ltd. and others.... Appellants Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & others…………Respondent ......s. Industrial Development Bank. (1966) 18 DLR (SC) 354; PLD 1966 SC 1938. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate on Record—For the Appellants. A KM. Nazrul lslam, Advocate......in Article 33 of the Order. For the reasons stated above, we are of the view that the appeal must fail. It is accordingly dismissed but there will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Siraj Miah & another Vs. State & another, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Siraj Miah & another………………………………Appellants Vs. State & another…………………………&......d J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Siraj Miah & another………………………………Appellants Vs. State & another……………………&helli......nd allow the appeal. The appellants are acquitted of the charge leveled against them. Let them be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. ......nd allow the appeal. The appellants are acquitted of the charge leveled against them. Let them be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Sufia Khanam Chowdhury Vs. Faizun Nesa ChowÂdhury, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....irection for amendment of the plaint is set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. With this modification the appeals are dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... M. H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Sufia Khanam Chowdhury………………………….Appellant (in both the cases) Vs. Faizun Nesa Chowdhury...........................Respondent (in both the cases) ......such amendment to be necessary in the interest of justice. The learned Single Judge is found to have rightly relied upon the decisions of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Keramat Ali V Md. Yunus 15 DLR SC 120 and the Indian Supreme Court in the case of A. K. Gupta and Sons Ltd V. Dam......irection for amendment of the plaint is set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. With this modification the appeals are dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Chunnu Mia Vs. Monindra Lal Roy & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....rgument was advanced before the High Court Division with regard to the merit of the settlement. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......nim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J Chunnu Mia………………………Appellant Vs. Monindra Lal Roy & others……Respondents Judgment June 29, ......C. 123; Sridhar Suar AIR 1976 (SC) 1860; Srimath D. P. Desikar AIR 1936 (P.C.) 183; Atyam Veerraju AIR 1966 (SC) 629. Lawyers Involved: Sheikh Afzalur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Ranadhir Sen, Advocate, instructed......rgument was advanced before the High Court Division with regard to the merit of the settlement. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Hazera Begum and others Vs. Roushan Ara BeÂgum and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....araja B. Singh (1953) 5 DLR 251; Jalil Sikder (1975) 27 DLR (AD) 143; Mohar Ali (1977) 27 DLR 451; Izat B. Sarkar 21 DLR S.C, 444; Subah Lai AIR 1932 (All) 393; Balaram 24 CWN 1057; Secy, of State Vs. Devendralal 38 C.W.N. PC 285; Adiluddin 5 PLR (Dae) 302; Lala Hera Chand 1942 A.I.R P.C. ......sp; Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Hazera Begum and others………………………Appellants Vs. Roushan Ara Begum and others……………Respondents ......vendralal 38 C.W.N. PC 285; Adiluddin 5 PLR (Dae) 302; Lala Hera Chand 1942 A.I.R P.C. 64; Radhamoni 27 I.A. P,C 136; Bharat Pillai 46 IA. 285; Pillai AIR 1942 Mad. 622; Bhavrao 23 Bom. 137; Siddik Md. Sha AIR 1930 P.C 57; Secy, of State vs. D.L. Khan 61 I A, 78 (P.C) =38 C.W.N. 285; Maharaja Sr......r with the judgment of Badrul Haider Chowdhury J. Order of the Court By a majority decision, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Narendra Nath Basu Roy and another Vs. Municipal CommitÂtee, Mymensingh, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....s: "For acquisition of rent-receiving interest. Notification No. 4835-L.R. dated the 2nd April 1956:- "In exercise of the power conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 (East Bengal Act No. XXVIII of 1951), as amended by the East...... Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH RahÂman J ATM Afzal J Narendra Nath Basu Roy and another……………………………Appellants Vs. Municipal CommitÂtee, Mymensingh................................Respondents Judgment A......da Rly. 39 CWN 552P.C.; D.M.D. National Bank vs. Ataul Huq, DLR (SC) 74. Lawyers Involved: S R Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Md. Fazlul Karim, Advocate instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respon......s landlord and tenant. And there ends the matter. In the result, therefore, this appeal is disÂmissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:39 DLR (AD) 16. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Nur Muhammad & others Vs. Moulvi Moinuddin Ahmed & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....€¦.(29) Cases Referred to- Ali Jan Vs. Bangladesh 37 DLR (AD) 161; Khondker Ehteshamuddin @ Iqbal 33 DLR (AD) 154; Federation of Pakistan Vs. Saeed Ahmed PLD 1974 (S.C) 151 (168); Secretary of States vs. Mask & Co. 44 CWN 70—AIR 1940 PC 105; Mian Mohammed Latif vs. Province of West Paki......ion (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH RahÂman J ATM Afzal J Nur Muhammad & others.....................Appellants Vs. Moulvi Moinuddin Ahmed & others.........Respondents Judgment February 18, 1986. ...... Fazle Munim CJ.— This appeal arises from Civil Revision No. 128 of 1978 decided by a Bench of the High Court Division, Chittagong (Mr. Justice Fazle Husain Mohammad Habibur Rahman and Mr. Justice Md. Abdul Jalil) on 21st January 1985. 2. Appellants who are plaintiffs filed O.S. No. 19 of 197......r Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the appeal is disÂmissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) 1. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Muslimuddin & others Vs. The State, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....inal) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH RahÂman J ATM Afzal J Muslimuddin & others………………………Appellants Vs. The State………………………………….Respondent Judgment Feb 20, 1986. Result: ......on (Criminal) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH RahÂman J ATM Afzal J Muslimuddin & others………………………Appellants Vs. The State………………………………….Respondent Judgment Feb 20, 1986. ...... of 1982. Judgment Fazle Munim CJ.-This appeal arises from Criminal Appeal No. 3 of 1982 decided by a Bench of the High Court Division, Dhaka (Mr. Justice Amirul Islam Chowdhury and Mr Justice Md. Altaf Hossain) on 30th May, 1983. 2 Facts as stated in the ejahar which was recorded by Offic......nts is set aside and all of them are acquitted and it is directed that they be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other case. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 311. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 56
Waliullah Munshi Vs. Lodu Mia Patwary & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....1979 of the Court of SuborÂdinate Judge, Lakshmipur will now proceed in accordance with law. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed.This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 308 ......Appellate Division (Civil) Present: F.K.M.A.Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H. Rahman J Waliullah Munshi…………………………... Appellant Vs. Lodu Mia Patwary & others………………..Respondent Judgment January 19, 1986........ J. Mohammad Ali, Advocate with him instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record. — For the appellant. T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, M. A. Wahhab Mia, Advocate with him instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on- Record— For respondent No. 1. EX-parte- Respondent Nos. 2-5. ......1979 of the Court of SuborÂdinate Judge, Lakshmipur will now proceed in accordance with law. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed.This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 308 ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Mrs. Amena Hoque Vs. Rajab Ali & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....(V of 1898), sections 265H, 265F, 265C & 339C The Sessions Judge cannot pass an order of acquittal without complying with the provisions under section 265F Cr.P.C. In a criminal trial the State being the prosecutor, it was the duty of the State to secure attendance of the witnesses and f......ivision (Criminal) Present: F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J Mrs. Amena Hoque……………………………………Appellant Vs. Rajab Ali & others……………………………….……Respondents Judgment Apri......under section 339C Cr.P.C. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Habibur Rahman Khan, Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondent Nos. 1-15. A.W. Mollik, Advocate-on-R......Sessions Judge are hereby set aside. The proceeding of S.T. Case No. 232 of 1983 will commence from the stage where it was on 22.12.83. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 303 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Ghyasuddin Ahmed Vs. Q.N. Faruque & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
.... of the learned Company Judge are modified acÂcordingly. The appeal is allowed is part. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 296 ...... F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. RahÂman J A.T.M. Afzal J Ghyasuddin Ahmed ……………………………………………...Appellant Vs. Q.N. Faruque & others........................................Respondents Judgment March......ptain John Johnston vs. G B. Potts & Co. Ltd. PLD 1967 Kar 496 ; Satish Chandra Banik vs. Dacca Jute Miils Ltd., PLD 1968 Dac 610 at p. 641. Lawyers Involved: Raifique-Ul-Huq, Senior Advocate, (Md. Fazlul Haque, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Ssjjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appe...... of the learned Company Judge are modified acÂcordingly. The appeal is allowed is part. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 296 ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Maqsood Alam Vs. Bangladesh, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
.... result, the appeal is allowed. The impugned orders of the High Court Division and the trial Court are set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 290 ......resent: F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rah man J A. T. M. Afzal J Maqsood Alam………………………………………….Appellant Vs. The People's RepubÂlic of Bangladesh, represented by the Military Estate OffiÂcer, Dhaka Ca...... result, the appeal is allowed. The impugned orders of the High Court Division and the trial Court are set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 290 ...... result, the appeal is allowed. The impugned orders of the High Court Division and the trial Court are set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 290 ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Srish Chandra Das Vs. Sri Sri Chatteswari Debi Bigraha, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....e judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the trial Court restored. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 283. ......on (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Srish Chandra Das................................................................... Appellant Vs. Sri Sri Chatteswari Debi Bigraha, repreÂsented by Shebaits: Chandra Shekhar Chakraborty &......e judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the trial Court restored. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 283. ......e judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the trial Court restored. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 283. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 88
A. B. M. Tofayel Ahmed Vs. Sheikh Aminuddin & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
.... Shahabuddin Ahmed J.-The ace petitioners are seeking special leave to appeal from an order of the High Court Division dated 28 May, 1985 setting aside a Magistrate's order by which he allowed the State to withdraw from prosecution against them under section 494 Cr. Procedure Code two Criminal Ca......riminal) Present: F K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M H. Rah man J A. B. M. Tofayel Ahmed...........................Petitioner (In both the cases) Vs. Sheikh Aminuddin & others………….. ResponÂdent (In both the cases) Judgment May 8......sed. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioners (In both the case). M. A. Wahhab Miah, Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondents (In both the cases). Criminal Petitio......rnment's order as to Withdrawal did not show any reason for withdrawal. We find nothing to interfere. Both the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 282 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Md. Shajahan Vs. Md. Sadeq & another , 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....sing the Tribunal's order and dismissing the election-petition. The appeal is, accordÂingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 275. ......rt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Md. Shajahan……………………………………..Appellant Vs. Md. Sadeq & another …………………………….....Respondents Judgment Mar...... This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 275. ......sing the Tribunal's order and dismissing the election-petition. The appeal is, accordÂingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 275. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 140
16431642164116401639163816371636163516341633163216311630162916281627162616251624