Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5061-5080 of 6098 results.
Md. Sirajuddin Mondal and other Vs. Mosammat Miration Nessa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n established by the plaintiff that Jairuddin did not surrender his tenancy, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 2, 000/- Ed. ......land so taken settlement by groring crops and that also paid rent, that Jitu Mondal died leaving 2 sons, 2 daughters, and by amicable partition amongst the said persons Jitu Mondal's son Gudar Ali relinquished his right in respect of the land of plot No. 837, that Jitu Mondal's one son and ......n established by the plaintiff that Jairuddin did not surrender his tenancy, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 2, 000/- Ed. ......0/- Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Chairman, Bangladesh Telephone and Telegraph Board Vs. Mohammad Toufique & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioner is directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. The order of status quo passed on 07.08.2005 vacated. Ed. ...... instructed by A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Shafique Ahmed, Senior Advocate with him), instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No.1. Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-4. Civ......paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioner is directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. The order of status quo passed on 07.08.2005 vacated. Ed. ......urt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J. R Mudassir Husain CJ M. M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J The Chairman, Bangladesh Telephone and Telegraph Board, Telejogajog Bhaban, 37/E, Eskaton Garden Road, P. S: Ramna, Dhaka-1000..........Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 97
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Israt Jahan Kazal, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ur above discussions, we are of the view that the judgment of the High Court Division requires interference by us. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......llip;……….Respondent Judgement March 24, 2004. Case Referred to- Mirza Shahab Ispahani, 40 DLR (AD) 116. Lawyers Involved A. J. Mohammad Ali. Additional Attorney General, instructed by Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-On-Record- For the Appellan......ur above discussions, we are of the view that the judgment of the High Court Division requires interference by us. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Republic Works and Urban Development…………………….........Appell..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Commissioner of Customs and anr Vs. Bangladesh Traders, Dhaka, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n made without any lawful authority and of no legal effect and further directing the writ respondents to return the bank guarantees furnished by the writ petitioners are hereby set aside. Ed. ......stoms, 50 DLR 225; 42 DLR (AD) 167; 48 DLR (AD) 199; Mustafizur Rahman's Case, 51 DLR (AD) 40; Mizanur Rahman's case 52 DLR (AD) 49. Lawyers Involved: A.J. Mohammad (In all the cases) Ali, Additional Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate -on-Record- For the Appellants......n made without any lawful authority and of no legal effect and further directing the writ respondents to return the bank guarantees furnished by the writ petitioners are hereby set aside. Ed. ......Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Sree Promad Chandra Barman & others Vs. Most. Khodeza Khatun Bewa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....y, the High Court Division committed error of law in making the Rule absolute, which requires interference by this court. The appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......y, the High Court Division committed error of law in making the Rule absolute, which requires interference by this court. The appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......y, the High Court Division committed error of law in making the Rule absolute, which requires interference by this court. The appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......llowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Ali Asgar Khan Vs. Md. Anwarul Islam, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... suit from the trial court and transferring the same to its own file for trial and disposal and this requires interference by us. The appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......ithout any order as to cost. Ed. ...... suit from the trial court and transferring the same to its own file for trial and disposal and this requires interference by us. The appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ...... Judgment: M. M. Ruhul Amin J .- This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 21.08.1996 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in First Miscellan..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Md. Abdul Mannan Akanda Vs. Md. Lutfar Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t been filed fulfilling the requirement of Rule 4 of order XXVI (Part-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. The civil review petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ip;….....Petitioner Vs. Md. Lutfar Rahman and others……….........Respondents Judgement April1 0, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate--on-Record......t been filed fulfilling the requirement of Rule 4 of order XXVI (Part-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. The civil review petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Kamrul Hasan, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....into consideration the basic fact that appointment of the respondent was cancelled in public interest. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with cost of Tk.30.000/- (twenty thousand). Ed. ......esh and others…………….Appellants vs Kamrul Hasan.........Respondent Judgement July19, 2004. Lawyers Involved: A J Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney General, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record.- For the ......into consideration the basic fact that appointment of the respondent was cancelled in public interest. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with cost of Tk.30.000/- (twenty thousand). Ed. ......nd). Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 123
Government of Bangladesh Vs. A. S. M. Firoj Uddin Bhuiyan, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... 16. In view of the above we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the appellants. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Judgement February 10, 2004. Case Referred to- Central London Property Trust Ltd Vs. High Trees House Ltd, 1974 QB 130. Lawyers Involved: A. J. Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney General instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate -on-Record- For the Appellants...... 16. In view of the above we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the appellants. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of Bangladesh & Ors……...Appellants vs A. S. M. Firoj Uddin Bhuiyan being dead his heirs Mrs Rosey Firoz and others……... ........Respondents Judgement February 10, 2004. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Moksed Ali Mondal Vs. Abdus Samad Mondal and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gment and decree passed by the Court of appeal decreeing the plaintiff's suit and this requires interference by us. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......y order as to costs. Ed. ......gment and decree passed by the Court of appeal decreeing the plaintiff's suit and this requires interference by us. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Moksed Ali Mondal being dead his heirs Md. Abdul Mannan and others...Appellants. Vs. Abdus Samad Mondal and others………&he..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Rasheda Begum Vs. M.M. Nurussafa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000 and shall also not be a subject matter for adjudication in the Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000. 15. In the result the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ......e Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000 and shall also not be a subject matter for adjudication in the Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000. 15. In the result the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ......e Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000 and shall also not be a subject matter for adjudication in the Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000. 15. In the result the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ...... Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzal Islam J Rasheda Begum………………….....Appellant Vs M.M. Nurussafa and others .........Respondents Judgement May 2, 2004. Cases Referred to- ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 122
A.N.M. Gaziul Azim Vs. M.A. Kader and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ny error and as such no interference is called for. 7. In this view of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition and accordingly the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Judgement January 1, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Khandhker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mustafa Niaz Muhammad, Senior Advocate with him) instructed by Mohammad Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner A.S.M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record-......ny error and as such no interference is called for. 7. In this view of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition and accordingly the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......mirul Kabir Chowdhury J A.N.M. Gaziul Azim………………………………….....Petitioner Vs M.A. Kader and others..........................Respondents. Judgement January 1, 2005. La..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Md. Abu Hanif Mia and others Vs. Kad Banu and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... judgment and decree dated 26.01.1994 passed by the High Court Division in 2nd Appeal No. 1204 of 1965 is hereby set aside and those of the court of appeal below are restored. Ed. ......n fixed in Ext. 7. The court of appeal below on perusal of Exts.7 (a) and 7(b) held that the Ext. 7(b) is not a pattani likhan, but it appears to be a receipt for deposit of money through one Rajab Ali Sikder, for an area of land measuring 2.09 acres of land. The appellate court below further he...... judgment and decree dated 26.01.1994 passed by the High Court Division in 2nd Appeal No. 1204 of 1965 is hereby set aside and those of the court of appeal below are restored. Ed. ......ourt of appeal below are restored. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Pubali Bank Limited Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ourt as not abandoned property. 21. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......e Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, and others ..............Respondents Judgement: July 31, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Saiah Uddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant. Fida M. Kamal, Additional Attorney Genera......ourt as not abandoned property. 21. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......llip;…………………..Appellant Versus Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, and others ..............Respondents Judgement: July 31, 2005. Lawyers Involve..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Sonali Bank Vs. Md. Sirajul Hoque Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....has quite legally filed the suit impleading the defendant Nos. 3 and 4 as the defendants along with others. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......has quite legally filed the suit impleading the defendant Nos. 3 and 4 as the defendants along with others. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......has quite legally filed the suit impleading the defendant Nos. 3 and 4 as the defendants along with others. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzal Islam J Sonali Bank..................................Appellant Vs Md. Sirajul Hoque Chowdhury and others…………….........Respondents Judgement June ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Hasrat Mohani and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gh Court Division are set aside. The judgment and decree passed by (he Additional District Judge, Rangpur is restored. Consequently the suit stands dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... remaining 13.22 decimals of land was given pattan to one Rahim Uddin at a Jama of Taka 9.78 annas. The plaintiffs predecessor Abdur Rahman being in possession settled 4.00 acres of land to one Abid Ali and 3.22 acres to one Emad Uddin Ahmed and put them in possession thereof; that thereafter the ......gh Court Division are set aside. The judgment and decree passed by (he Additional District Judge, Rangpur is restored. Consequently the suit stands dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Government of Bangladesh………....Appellant Vs. Hasrat Mohani and others............Respondents Judgement June 21, 2005. Case Referred to- Abdul Kader..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 156
A. Motaleb Howlader Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... while passing the impugned judgment and order. We do not therefore find any reason to sustain the attack. 7. The petition, under the aforesaid circumstance, stands dismissed. Ed. ...... while passing the impugned judgment and order. We do not therefore find any reason to sustain the attack. 7. The petition, under the aforesaid circumstance, stands dismissed. Ed. ...... while passing the impugned judgment and order. We do not therefore find any reason to sustain the attack. 7. The petition, under the aforesaid circumstance, stands dismissed. Ed. ......p; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.-The petitioner A. Motaleb Howlader seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 27.01.2004 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Miscel..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Md. Saidur Rahman Shahid Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he accused petitioner could not show any illegality or irregularity in the judgment and order of the High Court Division and as such the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......ther…………… …...Respondents. Judgement January 14, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Ozair Farooq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-On-Record- For the Petitioner Not represented- Respondents Criminal Peti......he accused petitioner could not show any illegality or irregularity in the judgment and order of the High Court Division and as such the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......r Rahman Shahid………………………………...Petitioner Vs The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and another…………… …...Respondents. Judgement ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 102
University of Rajshahi Vs. Md. Abdul Mannan Bhuiyan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....have no respect for the ethics and values of the profession. In the background of the aforesaid discussions the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 15,000/-. Ed. ...... others.......Respondents Judgement June 13, 2005. Cases Referred to- 3 BLC (AD) 45. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdul Jabbar, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. Ajmalul Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by......have no respect for the ethics and values of the profession. In the background of the aforesaid discussions the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 15,000/-. Ed. ...... Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J University of Rajshahi, represented by the Vice Chancellor............Petitioner Vs Md. Abdul Mannan Bhuiyan and others.......Respondents Judgement June 13, 2005. Cases Referred to- ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Robert Pinaru Vs. Moulana Habibur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he appellate Court affirming the judgment and decree of the trial Court is restored. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: I ADC (2004) 421. ......to C.S. recorded tenant Monohar Ghosh and on the death of Monahar Ghosh his interest devolved upon his daughter Charubala who settled 41 decimals of land (including the land in suit) to one Taiyab Ali on 10th Baisakh, 1357 B. S. and in his name S. A. record was prepared and he possessed the land......he appellate Court affirming the judgment and decree of the trial Court is restored. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: I ADC (2004) 421. ......rt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J K. M. Hassan J Robert Pinaru....................Appellant Vs. Moulana Habibur Rahman and others…….....Respondents Judgment April 7, 2003. Cases Referr..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
20442043204220412039203820372036203520342033203120302028202720252024202320222021