Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 5061-5080 of 6409 results.

Md. Asaduzzaman Vs. Kazi Abdus Sabur and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)

....der of the Land Appeal Board. There is therefore no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 609. ...... - This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 17.8.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 4453 of 2000 making the rule absolute. 2. The respondent-writ petitioner filed the aforesaid Writ Petition challenging the ju..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31

Kazi Naimul Huq and others Vs. Md. Abdus Sattar Bhuiyan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

.... Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1472 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 24th April, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 6082 of 2001 with Civil Rule No. 409(R) of 2004). Judgment         &nb...... consequently High Court Division was not in error in dis­charging the Rule. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 605. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24

Md. Abdul Malek and another Vs. Md. Sanowar Hossain and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)

.... Hassan Ameen J.- The pre-emptee-petitioners seek leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 21-01-2007 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3107 of 2003 discharging the Rule affirming the judgment and order dated 29-05-2003 passed in Miscellaneous Appeal No.56 of 200...... that the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner have got no merit and accordingly, the same is dis­missed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 603. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26

Jabbar Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Md. Abul Kashem & another, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)

....defendant preferred civil revisional application before the High Court Division and the High Court Division by the impugned order allowed the revisional application summarily with­out issuing a Rule. 3. Leave was granted to consider the sub­mission that the High Court Division shou......ate commissioner as was ordered by the appellate court on earlier occasion. In the circumstances we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 598. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 71

Md. Aftab Uddin Vs. Kosimuddin and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

.... Ruhul Amin J.- This petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment of April 17, 2005 by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.772 of 1994 discharging the Rule obtained against the judgment and decree dated November 11, 1993 of the 1st Court of Additiona......appeal. In that state of the matter we do not find any merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 595. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24

N A Choudhury Vs. Controller of Insurance & Ors, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)

....n life insurance business. The appellant's company was not accord­ed permission for registration to carry on the business of general insurance. 3. The appellant then filed the writ petition and a Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned action of fai......sider it in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations the appeal stands dismissed. The parties do bear their respective costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 588. ..

Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 81

Kataruddin and others Vs. Md. Nurul Huque and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....his petition for leave to appeal is directed against, the judgment and order dated 2.5.2005 passed by the Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2332 of 2002 discharging the Rule which arose out of the judgment and decree dated 5.5.2002 passed in Other Class Appeal No.120 ......firmity in the decision of the High Court Division and accordingly no interference is called for. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 585. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23

Enayet Hossain Vs. Nur Islam Howlader, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....n J. - This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 20.06.2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.2384 of 1991 making the Rule absolute. 2. Short facts are that father of the peti­tioners filed Title Suit No. 5......- This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 20.06.2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.2384 of 1991 making the Rule absolute. 2. Short facts are that father of the peti­tioners filed Title Suit No. 58 of ..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 91

Noor Mohammad Biswas Vs. Surendra Nath Mondal, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....e­sented -Respondent Nos. 2-10. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 574 of 2005. (From the Judgment and Order dated November 29, 2004 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Rule No. 80(S) of 1998). Judgment         &......vision call­ing for interference by this Division. Accordingly the petition is dismissed with cost of Tk. 10, 000/-. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008)578. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25

Abdur Rahman Vs. Jan Bibi and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....as well as for a decree of perma­nent injunction in respect of the land described in schedule 1(ka). The plaintiff upon instituting the aforementioned suit filed an application under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking injunction against the defendant Nos. 1 and 2.......d char­acter of the land in suit and as such no interference is called for. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 576. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20

Secretary, Rahmat-E-Alam Islam Mission & Etim Khana Vs. Md. Shafiqul Huq, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....to appeal are directed against the common judgment and order dated 23.02.2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision Nos. 3992 & 2974 of 1999 discharging both the Rules. 2. Short facts are that the plaintiff institut­ed Title Suit No. 66 of 1991 in th......ion. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. Both the civil petitions accordingly are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 569. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48

Md. Hashmat Ullah Tapadar Vs. Md. Basel Khan, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)

.... - This Appeal, by Leave, at the instance of the appellant is directed against the judgment and order dated 09.08.2001 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3051 of 1999 making the Rule absolute. 2. The facts, in short, are that the plaintiff-appellant instituted Title Sui......is Appeal, by Leave, at the instance of the appellant is directed against the judgment and order dated 09.08.2001 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3051 of 1999 making the Rule absolute. 2. The facts, in short, are that the plaintiff-appellant instituted Title Suit No...

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22

Dr. Zahirul Haque Bhuiyan & others Vs. Dr. Shamsuddin Jahangir & another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)

....eave to appeal is directed against the judg­ment and order dated 12.03.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 6654 of 2002 discharging the Rule. 2. Short facts are that one Dr. Shamsuddin Jahangir as president of BCSIR Co-opera­......s miscon­ceived. The High Court Division accordingly rightly discharged the Rule. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 537. ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42

Jalal alias Md. Jalal Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)

....ground to interference. In this view of the matter the appeal is liable to be dismissed and it is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 534. ...... He further submits that the High Court Division committed error in dismissing the appeal without considering the fact that the police report i.e. final report sub­mitted in the case indicates absolute inno­cence of the accused appellant and more-so, in the First Information Report there..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41

Murari Mohan Sarder and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....defendant in the suit. During pen­dency of the suit one Md. Nur Islam and seven others filed an application dated 02.08.1993 in the Court of the learned Assistant Judge, Satkhira under Order 1 Rule, 10 and Order 22 Rule 10 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure to implead them ...... In this view of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 522. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24

Abdul Khaleque Pramanik Vs. Rajab Ali Pramanik and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)

....that the plaintiffs suppressed the summons of the suit i.e. Other Suit No.19 of 1986, obtained an ex parte decree whereupon the defendant  filed Miscellaneous Case No.20 of 1987 under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure which was allowed and that during pendency of the said Misc......e preferred this petition for leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 28.11.2004 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2341 of 1996 making the rule absolute. 2. The facts, in short, are that the plaintiff respondent Nos.1 to 4 instituted Ot..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22

Padma Bibi Vs. Headmaster & Secretary, Moheshkhali High School & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

.... preferred Other Appeal No. 148 of 1986 and the learned Additional District Judge, Cox's Bazar, after hearing, allowed the appeal. The defendant No.1 then moved the High Court Division and obtained Rule in Civil Revision No. 2100 of 1996 and after hearing the High Court Division made the Rule abs......after hearing, allowed the appeal. The defendant No.1 then moved the High Court Division and obtained Rule in Civil Revision No. 2100 of 1996 and after hearing the High Court Division made the Rule absolute. 3. The learned counsel for the plaintiff/petitioners submits that the High Court D..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29

N.G. Shaha Steel Ind. (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Custom Excise VAT Aplt. Tribunal, Dhk & ors, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)

....hul Amin J. - This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 23.05.1999 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.281 of 1998 discharging the Rule Nisi. 2. Short facts are that the appellant-com­pany is a manufacturer of GP sheets...... facts and circumstances stated above, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 507. ..

Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 83

Md. Alauddin and others Vs. Abdul Hakim and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)

....n filed against the judgment dated June 24, 2003 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1623 of 2001. The High Court Division by the aforesaid judgment made absolute the Rule obtained against the judgment and decree dated January 30, 2001 of the 2nd Court of Subordina......ppeal has been filed against the judgment dated June 24, 2003 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1623 of 2001. The High Court Division by the aforesaid judgment made absolute the Rule obtained against the judgment and decree dated January 30, 2001 of the 2nd Court ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 19

Sonali Bank Vs. Md. Mostafa Kamal & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....directed against the common judgment and order dated 7th & 8th December, 2004 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 2173 & 1776 of 2004 making both the Rules absolute. 2. In Writ Petition No.1776 of 2004 the petitioners' case is that they were ......ed against the common judgment and order dated 7th & 8th December, 2004 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 2173 & 1776 of 2004 making both the Rules absolute. 2. In Writ Petition No.1776 of 2004 the petitioners' case is that they were the sp..

Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 103