Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5081-5100 of 8188 results.
Haji Arshad Ali Kari Vs. Asmat Ali Hawlader and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....t represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 642 of 2007. Judgment Mohammad Fazlul Karim J.- This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 13.03.2007 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.1170 of 1998 making th......¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦...............Petitioner Vs. Asmat Ali Hawlader and others……………………......Respondent Judgment July 30, 2008. Case Referred To- Government of Bangladesh Vs. Jalaluddin Ahmed, 37 DLR (AD) 27. Lawyers Involved: Syed Mahbubar..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Giyash Uddin Vs. Martuza Bibi and ors., 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....right of easement over the suit land. 9. The trial court dismissed the suit and the appellate court reversed the finding of the trial court and the High Court Division by the impugned judgment and order discharged the Rule affirming the judgment and order of the appellate Court. 10. We have he......below on proper assessment of evidence causing no failure of justice. We find no substance petitions which are accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (AD) (2010) 316...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Hazera Begum Vs. Artha Rin Adalat & another, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... Tariq, Advocate—For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 1124 of 2001. Judgment Md. Hamidul Haque J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 20-7-20 (Annexure ‘E’) passed in Money Execution Case No. 2 of 1991 by the learned S...... Artha Rin Adalat. The Rule is liable to be discharged. In the result, the Rule is discharged. Stay granted earlier is vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 78. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 89
....udgment
Syed Fazle Ahmed J.-Rule Nisi was issued under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the decision and order dated 28.1.1981 passed by the Respondent No. I in IRO Case No. 52 of 1980 should not be declar......ufficient materials and as such the decision does not call for any interference by this court.
In the result, the Rule stands discharged.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 46 DLR (1994) 143. ..
Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Khandaker Abul Bashar Vs. State, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
.... Petitioner. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent No.2. Not represented-Respondent No.1. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 58 of 2009. (From the Judgment and order dated 20.08.2008 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.5880 of 2......de of Criminal Procedure was rightly discharged by the High Court Division. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. This Case is also Reported in: 15 MLR (AD) (2010) 404, 63 DLR (AD) (2011) 79. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Bangladesh Water Development Board Vs. Golam Robbani Khan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No.1 Not Represented-For Respondent Nos. 2-6. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1354 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 16.7.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 94 of 2006.) Judgmen......ormed by the writ petitioner and approved by the highest authority of the respondents. The leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 15 MLR (AD) (2010) 402. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 82
Abu Bakar Siddique Vs. Md. Khorshed Alam & ors., 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....posite Party Nos. 2(a) & 2(b). Civil Revision No. 4616 of 1999. Judgment Md. Abdul Wahhab Miah J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party No. 1 to show cause as to why the order dated 26-10-99 passed by the Senior Assistant Judge, 4th Court, Dhaka in Title Suit No. 62 of ......this Rule is discharged without any order as to costs on the ground of maintainability with the findings and observations made herein above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 75. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Jamir Ali (Md) and Md. others Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Land and others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....f the land is unutilized petitioners have no right to get back the same. (See case of Abul Bashar Vs. Bangladesh reported in 50 DLR (AD) 11. In the result both the Rules are discharged without any order as to costs. Order of injunctions stand vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DL......sition as well as acquisition was served upon the said Abdur Razzak. Respondent No. 3 utilised only 14 bighas of land, 6 bighas and 13 decimals of land remained unutilised in spite of decision of the Government taken on 2-6-88 to utilise the same within three years and petitioner’s prayer for rele..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Atar Ali Miah (Md) Vs. State and Others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
.... Civil Revision No. 1606 of 1999. Judgment AK Badrul Huq J. - The subject matter of challenge in this Civil Revision Petition under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is a judgment and order dated May 5, 1999 recorded by Senior Assistant Judge, Habiganj Sadar, Habiganj in Title Suit N......an the said Taka 31,39,901.00, the highest offer made in third phase by plaintiff-petitioner. Defendant-opposite party No.8 deposited lease amount, required Income Tax and VAT. Lease deed between the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, defendant opposite party No.1 and defendant-opp..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
....ner.
Not represented—the Respondents.
Writ Petition No. 1638 of 1996.
Judgment
MM Ruhul Amin J.- This Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why impugned order dated 3-5-1992 (Annexure-D) passed in Debt Settlement Board Case No. 442 (Pathar) 89-90 Pathar......er the impression that the matter would be fixed for hearing on a future date and he remained in contact with the Bench Clerk of the Board and subsequently by executive order dated 21-6-1992 from the Government all further proceedings of Debt Settlement Board have been stayed and the petitioner was ..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Farzana Moazzem Vs. Securities and Exchange Commission and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....etitioner came to know that because of Title Suit No. 1 of 2000 filed by respondent Nos. 8 and 9 against respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 and 7 in the Court of the 5th Subordinate Judge, Dhaka and an order of injunction obtained by them thereunder DSE could not pay the outstanding amount to the peti......ning of Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. It was held by Mrs. Sujata Monohar, J while relying on a case reported in AIR 1989 (SC) 1607 that Bombay Stock Exchange being recognised by the Central Government and established with the objects of public interest is a statutory body amenable to the w..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 210
....hat hartal being a political issue cannot be resolved by way of any declaration or direction by any Court either for or against hartal. Hartal being a highly sensitive political issue any restrictive order passed by this Court by way of making the Rule absolute will not be possible to enforce for pr......
High Court Division
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
Present:
M Reza Chowdhury J
Syed JR Mudassir Hussain J
MA Aziz J
Khondaker Modarresh Elahi……………. Petitioner
Vs
Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh……… Respondents
Judgment
October 25, ..
Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 216
City Sugar Industries Ltd. and others Vs. Human Rights and Peace for Bangladesh, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
.... No.761 of 2010) Not represented-The Respondents (In Civil Petition Nos.767-769, 772-773 and 781 of 2010). Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos.761,767-769,772-773 and 781 of 2010. (From order dated 21.03.2010 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.3503 of 2009 in connect...... The writ respondent No.1 is Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Planning, Sher-E-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka. Writ respondent No. 2 is the Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forest Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Bangladesh Secretariat, P.S.-Shahbag, Dhaka. Writ..Category: Environmental Law | Date: | Hits: 344
Mohammad Reazaul Karim and others Vs. A. B. M. Khalequzzaman and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....rd- For Respondent Nos. 18 (In Civil Appeal No.321 of 2008). Not represented- Respondent No.19-21 (In Civil Appeal No.321 of 2008). Civil Appeal Nos. 319-321 of 2008. (From the judgment and order dated 11.09.2008 passed by the High Court Division in Company Matter No. 1 of 2008 heard analo......r no interference by this Court. In the result, all the appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 15 MLR (AD) (2010) 369, 62 DLR (AD) (2010) 411...Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 191
Mobasher Hossain (Md) and others Vs. Saidur Rahman (Pvt) Ltd. and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
.... Advocate‑ For the Petitioner. Khan Saifur Rahman, Senior Advocate‑ For Respondent No. 1. Admiralty Suit No. 12 of 2001. Judgment A B M Khairul Haque J.- This is an application for an order of mandatory injunction, praying for recovery of possession of the vessel MV. Hemayetuddin M N......he launch ghat at Gazaria where it was in the morning of 8th April, 2002 within seven days from date. There shall be no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 51. ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 188
Moulana Fariduddin Ahmed and another Vs. Md. Kolimullah and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
...., Advocate‑ For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Opposite parties. Civil Revision No. 2571 of 1998 with Civil Revision N0. 2572 of 1998. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- This order will dispose of both the Rules. Earlier Rule arises out of Title Suit No. 50 of 1990, which wa......of the observation as made hereinabove. The order of stay granted earlier is hereby re‑called and vacated. Send down the records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 49...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Momena Begum Vs. Dhaka City Corporation and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
.... also filed an application for temporary injunction under Order XXXIX rules 1 and 2 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure with a prayer for ad-interim injunction but the trial Court by order dated 18‑5‑1999 rejected the prayer for ad interim injunction against which the present pe......m the case of Dr. MO Gani Vs. Dr. ANM Mahmood, 18 DLR (SC) 463. Accordingly, the Rule is discharged, however, without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 43...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Hilly Housing Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Akhtaruzzaman Chowdhury and ors., 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
..... Not represented- the opposite parties. Civil Order No. 3324 of 2001. Judgment SK Sinha J.- This application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against the order dated 12-2-2001 passed by the 1st Court of Subordinate Judge, Chittagong in Other Class Suit......ll-reasoned and well-supported by the materials on record. We find no substance in the application. The application is rejected summarily. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 46. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Bhola Vs. State, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....ttorneyÂ-General‑ For the State. Criminal Appeal No. 673 of 1997. Judgment Md. Shamsul Huda J.- This appeal is directed at the instance of accused appellant Bhola against the judgment and order dated 29‑10‑1991 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Sherpur in Sessions Case No. 40 of ......s order dated 29‑10‑91 is upheld with the above modification and the appeal is dismissed. Send down the lower court's record immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 36...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Hotel Agrabad Ltd. Vs. Chairman, Labour Court and others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....nd are being disposed of by this Judgment. 2. In these Rules the petitioner Company "Hotel Agrabad Ltd." (hereinafter called the petiÂtioner Company) has called in question the judgÂment and order dated 31-12-91 passed in IRO Case Nos. 78 and 79 of 1984 by the First Labour Court, Chittagong......ur Court in IRO Case Nos. 78 and 79 of 1984 are upheld. The petitioner will pay a cost of Taka 5000 in each of the Rules. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (2007) 297. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 121
39773976397539743973397239713970396939683967396639653964396339623961396039593958