Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5101-5107 of 5107 results.
Ismat Zerin Khan Vs. The World Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
...., Dhaka in Title Suit No. 323 of 2002 renumbered as Title Suit No. 92 of 2003 upon its transfer to the Second Court of Assistant Judge, Dhaka. 2. The plaintiff filed the suit for certain declarations that the order of dismissal of the plaintiff is illegal, void and not binding upon the ...... order of the High Court Division and the trial Court is hereby directed to hear the suit on all issues including the issue regarding maintainability in accordance with law. Ed. ...... Ismat Zerin Khan....................Appellant. Vs. The World Bank and others..................Respondent. Judgment August 9, 2005. The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, Article 104 The Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (V of 1908), Order XIV, rul..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 211
Abul Kalam Azad Vs. Govt of BD, represented by the DC, Dinajpur & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....fter consideration of all the facts and materials exercised its discretion we do not find any reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......fter consideration of all the facts and materials exercised its discretion we do not find any reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......Division (Civil) Present: K. M. Hasan, C.J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim, J. Md. Hamidul Haque, J.Md. Tafazzul Islam, J. Abul Kalam Azad.....................Petitioner. Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dinajpur and others........Respondents. J..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 133
Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, UCBL & anr Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ered by the Court. 15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......ered by the Court. 15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......ad Fazlul Karim, J.- This appeal at the instance of the contemner-appellants arose out of judgment and order dated 1st and 2nd November, 2003 passed by the High Court Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh in Contempt Petition No.3 of 2003 arising out of Company Matter No.2 of 2000 convicting t..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Syed Ehsanul Hussain & ors Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ule. Since the High Court Division did not commit any error of law in the decision we are not inclined to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ule. Since the High Court Division did not commit any error of law in the decision we are not inclined to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......upreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin, J. K. M. Hasan, J. Md. Fazlul Haque, J . Syed Ehsanul Hussain and another........................Petitioners. Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation represented by its Zonal Manager, Khulna.....Responden..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Md. Nurul Hoque Miah Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ative Tribunal, Dhaka rejecting the appellant's Execution Case No.3 of 2000. 2. The facts, leading to this appeal, are that the appellant filed the aforesaid Miscellaneous Appeal No.4 of 2000 for declaration that as per judgment dated 24.6.1996 of the Administrative Appellate Tribunal in AAT App......s. 19. In that view of the observation and direction as above, this appeal is, accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 53. ......sion (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Nurul Hoque Miah……………………....Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment and others…………………â€..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 162
Director of Housing and Settlement Vs. Abdul Majid Howlader & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... 118 of 1997 affirming the judgment and decree dated April 16, 1997 of the 2nd Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Dhaka in Title Suit No. 191 of 1996 decreeing the same. The suit has been filed seeking declaration of title and for further reliefs that the plaintiff-Respondent Nos. 1-19 are entitled to......n Title Suit No. 191 of 1996 of the 2nd Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Dhaka is set aside. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 BLD (AD) 56, 9 MLR (AD) 73. ......rs……….....Respondents Judgment December 9, 2003 Result: The Appeal is allowed. Cases Referred to- Al-Haj Abul Basher, being dead his heirs Hosne Ara Begum and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 50 DLR (AD) 11, Nur Mohammad and others Vs. Moulvi Mainuddin Ahmed and others..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 189
M. A. Rashid and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gment and on the reasoning given above we are of the view that the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......gment and on the reasoning given above we are of the view that the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......n (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J M. A. Rashid and others……….....Petitioners Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and other..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 74
330326324323307303297