Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5121-5140 of 5648 results.
Subash Chandra Halder & another Vs. Abdul Bari & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....party is necessary within the meaning of Order 1 rule 10(2) CPC or for the ends of justice............(8) Lawyers Involved: TH Khan, Senior Advocate, (SK Sinha, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record -For the Appellants. Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate in......hus cannot be sustained. The order is, accordingly, set aside. The appeal is allowed without any order as to Cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1992) 12 BLD (AD) 174; 44 DLR (AD) 253. ......thout any order as to Cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1992) 12 BLD (AD) 174; 44 DLR (AD) 253. ......ion (Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Subash Chandra Halder & another.................Plaintiff-Appellants Vs. Abdul Bari & others ..................Defendant-Respondents Judgment April 12, 1992..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Manik Chand Bibi @ Rezian Nahar & anr Vs. Abdul Mutakabbir Chy @ Sufi Mia Chy, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....Appellant Vs. Abdul Mutakabbir Chowdhury alias Sufi Mia Chowdhury……………….Respondents Judgment December 3rd, 1991 Lawyers Involved: TH Khan, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record - For the Appellants. M Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record - For...... person entitled to execute the decree and that stage did not reach fill then. Hence, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......he impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ivil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Manik Chand Bibi alias Rezian Nahar and another.........................Appellant Vs. Abdul Mutakabbir Chowdhury alias Sufi Mia Chowdhury……………….Respondents Judgment..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 175
Mozahar Ali Howlader Vs. Lal Miah Talukder and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....itioner. Vs. Lal Miah Talukder and another…………………Respondent. Judgment July 9th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Moksudor Rahman, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on- Record -For the Petitioner. Not Represented -Respondents. Cri......rt Division is modified accordingly and it is directed that the accused‑petitioner be tried by the Sessions Judge and Ex‑officio Senior Special Judge, Jhalakati. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... by the Sessions Judge and Ex‑officio Senior Special Judge, Jhalakati. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e Division (Criminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Mozahar Ali Howlader………………….Accused-Petitioner. Vs. Lal Miah Talukder and another…………………Respondent. Judgment July 9th, 1992. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 100
Habibur Rahman Vs. Sree Jogiswar Roy Chowdhury Chand and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....nd and others…………………… Respondents Judgment April 23, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahabubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Mahbubey Alam, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate‑on-Record‑For the appellants. SR Pal, Senior Advocate, (Dr. Rafi......is outside of the net. For the above reasons we find no ment in the appeal. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) (1992) 247. ...... is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) (1992) 247. ......Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latufur Rahman J Habibur Rahman being dead his heirs Saleha Begum and other ...................Appellants Vs. Sree Jogiswar Roy Chowdhury Chand and others…………………… Respondents Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
AKM Mosharaf Hossain Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ed‑Appellant Vs. The State.................Respondent Judgment March 8th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Rokunuddin Mahmud, Advocate (Mr. Tamizul Haque, Advocate with him), instructed by Md. Aftab Hussain, Advocate-On-Record-For the Appellant. M Shamsul Alam, Deputy Attorney‑Genera......are of the view that the appellant is entitled to bail. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. The appellant will remain on same bail granted by this Court earlier till commencement of the trial. Ed. ......the appeal is allowed. The appellant will remain on same bail granted by this Court earlier till commencement of the trial. Ed. ......d. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 92
Guiness Peat (Trading) Limited Vs. Md. Fazlur Rahman, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J and Latifur Rahman J Guiness Peat (Trading) Limited ………………..Appellant Vs. Md. Fazlur Rahman. ................ Respondents Judgment January 29th, 1992. C......thin the jurisdiction of the court where the plaint was filed. We find no good ground to interfere with the concurrent order of the courts below. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... to interfere with the concurrent order of the courts below. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J and Latifur Rahman J Guiness Peat (Trading) Limited ………………..Appellant Vs. Md. Fazlur Rahman. ................ Respondents Judgment January 29th, 199..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 124
....tice will be sufficiently met if the unconditional apology of the appellant is accepted and the sentence remitted. It is ordered accordingly.
The appeal is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
Ed.......tice will be sufficiently met if the unconditional apology of the appellant is accepted and the sentence remitted. It is ordered accordingly.
The appeal is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
Ed.......ellant is accepted and the sentence remitted. It is ordered accordingly.
The appeal is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
Ed.......late Division
(Criminal)
Present:
MH Rahman J
ATM Afzal J
Latifur Rahman J
Shamsur Rahman, Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Dhaka Central Jail, Dhaka ...... ......Appellant.
Vs.
Tahera Nargis Syed and another............... Respondents
Judgment
July 28, 1991
Res..
Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 88
Abdus Samad @ AKM Abdus Samad and others Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....bsp; Lawyers Involved: Sirajul Huq, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioners. Not Represented -For the Respondent...... with the finding of fact. The petition is dismissed. The order of conviction and sentence is maintained with the modification that it is under section 148 of the Penal Code. Ed. ......he modification that it is under section 148 of the Penal Code. Ed. ...... Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdus Samad @ AKM Abdus Samad and others................. Petitioners. Vs. The State................. Respondent Judgment ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Shamser Ali (Md) and others Vs. Mosammat Kafizan Bibi, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....an Bibi………..…………….Respondent Judgment August 18th, 1991. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑ For the Appellant. M Nawab Ali, A......tion of the document. Consequently the judgment is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without cost and the judgment of the lower appellate Court is restored. Ed. ......, the appeal is allowed without cost and the judgment of the lower appellate Court is restored. Ed. ......hman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Shamser Ali (Md) and others ……………………Appellants. Vs. Mosammat Kafizan Bibi………..…………….R..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 98
Narayan Chandra Rajak Das Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Narayan Chandra Rajak Das......... Appellant Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others………...Respondents Judgment November......appellate Court's judgment was not a proper judgment of reversal. For all the above reasons, we do not find any merit in this appeal. Hence the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... any merit in this appeal. Hence the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Narayan Chandra Rajak Das......... Appellant Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others………...Respondents Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Abul Khair Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Vs. The State .................Respondent Judgment April 29th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Ahmed Ali Advocate (appeared with leave of the Court) instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on -Record- For the Petitioner. B Hossain Advocate-on-Record-For th......elay will merit such commutation. We find no compelling extenuating circumstance in this case and therefore find no ground whatsoever to interfere. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......on is dismissed. Ed. ......ellate Division (Criminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abul Khair...............Petitioner. Vs. The State .................Respondent Judgment April 29th, 1992. La..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Abdul Hamid Mollah Vs. Ali Mollah and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....Court with him) instructed by M Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Maksumul Hakim, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court (Abdul Hamid, Advocate Supreme, Court with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent No. 1. B. Hossain, Deputy Att......order of acquittal and the alleged misreading of evidence has not affected the decision on merit. There has been no failure of justice. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ......ailure of justice. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ......esent: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdul Hamid Mollah................... Complainant-Appellant Vs. Ali Mollah and another…………………... Accuse..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Chairman, Kushtia Cooperative Industrial Union Ltd Vs. Mujibur Rahman & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ondent Nos. 1-3. SS Haider, Senior Advocate, instructed by Ranesh Chandra Maitra, Advocate‑on‑Record‑ For Respondent No. 4. Moazzem Hossain, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record - For the Respondent Nos. 5-6. Contempt Petition No. ...... the superior Court. Normally, therefore, an advocate's information will be honoured by the Court, unless a strong case for refusal is made out by the Court in its order of refusal. Ed. ......y the Court, unless a strong case for refusal is made out by the Court in its order of refusal. Ed. ......Division (Civil) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Chairman, Kushtia Co‑operative Industrial Union Ltd .............Petitioner Vs. Mujibur Rahman & others...............Respondents Judgment June 10th, 199..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 98
State Vs. Divisional Special Judge, Khulna Division and anr, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... aside and it is held that the Senior Special Judges got power to transfer the cases which they had earlier transferred to the Divisional Special Judge. The appeal is allowed. Ed. ...... aside and it is held that the Senior Special Judges got power to transfer the cases which they had earlier transferred to the Divisional Special Judge. The appeal is allowed. Ed. ......d to the Divisional Special Judge. The appeal is allowed. Ed. ...... CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J The State, represented by the Solicitor, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh ......... ......Appellant Vs. Divisional Special Judge, Khulna Division and anr...........Respondents Judgement..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 118
BD Chemical Industries Corporation & another Vs. M/s Sattar Match Works & ors, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....s Corporation and others…………. Respondents (In CA 36/1991) Judgment March 4th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: M Zahir, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant (In CA 100/1990) Khandker Mahbubudd......a period of six months from the date of filing of the application. Civil Appeal No. 36 of 1991 is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost in either of the appeals. Ed. ....... There will be no order as to cost in either of the appeals. Ed. ...... Rahman J Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation and another………………………………. Appellants Vs. M/s Sattar Match Works and others ..........Respondents (In CA 100/1990) ..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 227
Shamsuddin Ahmed, Advocate Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....For the Appellant. Aminul Haque, Attorney‑ General, (AW Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney General and Sharifuddin Chaklader, Assistant Attorney‑General, with him), instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑For the Respondents. Civil Appeal No. ...... Advocate of the Appellate Division of the Bangladesh High Court from 3.8.72 and of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court from 16.12.72. The Appeal is allowed. No cost. Ed. ......upreme Court from 16.12.72. The Appeal is allowed. No cost. Ed. ......; Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law and ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 92
Muhammad Muslim Ali Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... found that further inquiry was held in accordance with the Rules. There is thus no substance in this petition which is dismissed after condoning the delay in filing the same. Ed. ...... found that further inquiry was held in accordance with the Rules. There is thus no substance in this petition which is dismissed after condoning the delay in filing the same. Ed. ......n which is dismissed after condoning the delay in filing the same. Ed. ......; Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment and others&helli..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 123
Ishaque Khan (Md) and another Vs. Trading Corporation of Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rab‑I, Advocate‑on‑Record, Supreme Court‑‑For the Appellants. Quazi A T Monwaruddin, Advocate Supreme Court, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate‑on ‑Record‑‑For the Respondent. Civil Ap......rospective effect, but it will be effective from the date it was passed, namely 4.5.1987. Subject to this observation, the appeal is dismissed without, however, any order as to cost. Ed. ......on, the appeal is dismissed without, however, any order as to cost. Ed. ......) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Latifur Rahman J Ishaque Khan (Md) and another…………..Appellants Vs. Trading Corporation of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Principal Office, Kawra..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Fazlur Rahman Molla Vs. Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ult, we accept the appellant's contention and hold that his conviction is without any evidence. The appeal is allowed and the impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......ult, we accept the appellant's contention and hold that his conviction is without any evidence. The appeal is allowed and the impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ...... and the impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ...... CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Latifur Rahman J Fazlur Rahman Molla ...................Appellant Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice Division and anoth..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Shaikh Shahidul Islam Vs. State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....will continue to remain on the same bail already granted by this Court until commencement of the trial, if any. The trial Court will pass necessary orders as deemed fit at that time. Ed. ......will continue to remain on the same bail already granted by this Court until commencement of the trial, if any. The trial Court will pass necessary orders as deemed fit at that time. Ed. ...... of the trial, if any. The trial Court will pass necessary orders as deemed fit at that time. Ed. ...... Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Shaikh Shahidul Islam……………....……Accused‑Appellant (in both the Appeals) Vs. State .......................Respondent Judgment February 24th, 1992. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 150
10351034103310321031103010291028102710261025102410231022102110201019101810171016