Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5121-5140 of 5287 results.
Syed Modaris Ali Vs. Syed Md. Illias Ali and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....ris Ali ............Appellant Vs. Syed Md. Illias Ali and others.......... ......Respondents Judgment May 6th, 1971. ......he observations made in the judgment. The cost of this appeal will abide by the result. In view of the above order, the cross-objection has lost its importance and is, therefore, rejected. Ed. ......ion has lost its importance and is, therefore, rejected. Ed. ...........Appellant Vs. Syed Md. Illias Ali and others.......... ......Respondents Judgment May 6th, 1971. Lawyers Involv..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Rabiul Hossain Vs. Chairman, District Council Khulna and DC Khulna and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....s petition was passed without lawful authority and has no legal effect. The petitioner is entitled to his cost of this petition which we assess at Rs. 51.00 (Rupees fifty one-only). Ed. ......s petition was passed without lawful authority and has no legal effect. The petitioner is entitled to his cost of this petition which we assess at Rs. 51.00 (Rupees fifty one-only). Ed. ......DC Khulna and others................Respondents Judgment January 13th, 1971. Lawyers Involved: Ismailuddin Sarkar — For the Petitioner. Abdul Matin Khan Chowdhury — For the Respondents. Petition No. 138 of 1968. Judgment: ......p; Fazle Munim J Rabiul Hossain... ............Petitioner Vs. Chairman, District Council Khulna and DC Khulna and others................Respondents Judgment January 13th, 1971. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 92
Abul Hossain and Abul Md. Vs. Amatu Md., 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....oncerned. Ed. ...... learned Sessions Judge directing that the petitioner be committed to the Court of Sessions for trial is set aside. Let the records be sent down expeditiously to the court concerned. Ed. ......nt down expeditiously to the court concerned. Ed. ......e court concerned. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Bijon Bala Chowdhurani & others Vs. Maniruddin Biswas & others, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....the learned Advocate for the petitioners is upheld it will amount to partial pre-emption. The result, therefore, is that the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. ......the learned Advocate for the petitioners is upheld it will amount to partial pre-emption. The result, therefore, is that the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... therefore, is that the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. ......mp; others..............Petitioners Vs. Maniruddin Biswas & others.........Opposite Parties Judgment June 11th, 1970. Cases Referred: Afazuddin Mridah and others vs. Mubarakulla and others 5 DLR 445; Sachindra Nath Chakravarty vs. Trailakya Nath Chak..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Kasiruddin Sarkar @ Kasiruddin Fakir Vs. The State, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....R (FC) 56. st Sairan vs. State (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 35; Sultan Ahmad vs. Crown (1954) 6 DLR (FC) 28: Fazal Elahi vs. Crown (1953) 5 DLR (FC) 207. Lawyers Involved: M. Golam Rabbani and Md. Nurul Islam, Advocates—For the Appellant. T Talukdar, Advocate—For the State......ppellant is set aside and he is acquitted from the charge under section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code. He may be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ...... and front of neck measuring 6"x 2" extending upto the spine. The said doctor opined that the injury was homicidal and ante mortem in nature. On receipt of this report PW 9 Sub-Inspector, Khandkar Fazlur Rahman, Officer in-Charge of Gaibandha Police Station lodged a First Information R......) DLR (FC) 56. st Sairan vs. State (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 35; Sultan Ahmad vs. Crown (1954) 6 DLR (FC) 28: Fazal Elahi vs. Crown (1953) 5 DLR (FC) 207. Lawyers Involved: M. Golam Rabbani and Md. Nurul Islam, Advocates—For the Appellant. T Talukdar, Advocate—For the S..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Jogomaya Kundu Vs. Sudhir Kumar Kundu and another, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... Vs. Sudhir Kumar Kundu and another……...Opposite Parties Judgment November 16th, 1970. Cases Referred: Md. Sharif vs. Diwan Singh AIR 1940 Lah 95; Ghazan vs. Mt. Bag Bhari, AIR 1932 Lah. 210; Ujir Shei......of restoration of possession. There is, therefore, no ground for this Court to interfere with the order passed by the appellate Court. In the result, the Rule is discharged. Ed. ......of restoration of possession. There is, therefore, no ground for this Court to interfere with the order passed by the appellate Court. In the result, the Rule is discharged. Ed. ......titioner Vs. Sudhir Kumar Kundu and another……...Opposite Parties Judgment November 16th, 1970. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Pronab Kumar Majumder Vs. Hatem Mondal and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... 11 DLR 470; Jamman Mia vs Assistant Custodian of Enemy Property (1969) 21 DLR 562; Shahzada Muhd. Omar Beg vs Sultan Mohammad Khan and others (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 41. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdur Rahim, Advocate—For the Petitioner. AM Mahmudur Rahman, Advocate— For......I make no order as to costs. However, I direct the learned Munsif to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible. Let the records of this case be sent down expeditiously. Ed. ......erred: SN Gupta & Co vs Sadananda Ghosh & others (1959) 11 DLR 470; Jamman Mia vs Assistant Custodian of Enemy Property (1969) 21 DLR 562; Shahzada Muhd. Omar Beg vs Sultan Mohammad Khan and others (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 41. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdur Rahim, Advocate&md......: Nurul Islam J Pronab Kumar Majumder ...................Petitioner Vs. Hatem Mondal and others ............Opposite Parties Judgment November 5th, 1970. Cases Ref..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Aminul Islam Vs. State, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....R 549 PLD 1964 Dac 330; Fakku Mia alias Motahar All vs. The State 10 DLR 26; Srinivas Mall vs King Emperor 51 C.W.N 900. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Aziz with Latifur Rahman—For the Appellant. Md. Modabber Hosain —For the State. Criminal Appeal No. 204 of 1958. Judgment: Abdulla......s not at all been proved and he is entitled to be acquitted. The appeal is allowed. The conviction and sentence passed against the appellant are set aside and he is acquitted of the charge. Ed. ......e case, on the other hand, was that the appellant continued to remain in charge of the accounts entrusted to him upto 23.8.64 which is borne out from Ext. A which shows that the receiving Officer Mr. Khan put his signature on 23.8.64. The trial Court appears to have misread this piece of evidence an...... Abdullah Jabir J.- This appeal arises out of the judgment of A. Q. Chowdhury, Senior Special Judge, Jessore convicting the appellant Aminul Islam under sub-section (2) of section 5 of Act 11 of 1947 and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- in ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 83
Abdul Hamid Howlader and others Vs. Province of East Pakistan, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....n has no merit which is therefore, discharged with costs which we assess at Rs. 500/ (Rupees five hundred) only. The costs so ordered will be taken equally by the respondents. Ed. ......n has no merit which is therefore, discharged with costs which we assess at Rs. 500/ (Rupees five hundred) only. The costs so ordered will be taken equally by the respondents. Ed. ......ammad Ziaullah 17 DLR (1965) (SC) 325 PLD 1965 (SC); Lawyers Involved: DC Bhattacharjee and SS Haider. Advocates — For the Petitioners. Ruhul Islam, Attorney-General, AM Khan Chowdhury and Mr. Khan Advocates — For the Respondents 3-12. Tofail Ahmed &mdash......pondents. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Suriya Begum and others Vs. Alimulla Mallik, and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....o proceed with the Money Suit expeditiously immediately after the decision of the Title Appeal in due time in accordance with law. The connected application is also thus disposed of. Ed. ......o proceed with the Money Suit expeditiously immediately after the decision of the Title Appeal in due time in accordance with law. The connected application is also thus disposed of. Ed. ...... Vs. Alimulla Mallik, and others……..Opposite Parties Judgment July 8th, 1970. Cases eferred to: FA Khan vs. Government of Pakistan (The Republics of Pakistan) through the Finance Secretary, Govt. of......ed application is also thus disposed of. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 86
SK Shamsul Huda Vs. EPWAPDA, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....f the filing of the suit till the date of realisation. Fazle Munim J —I agree. Ed. ......f the filing of the suit till the date of realisation. Fazle Munim J —I agree. Ed. ......f the filing of the suit till the date of realisation. Fazle Munim J —I agree. Ed. ......red to- Jai Berham vs. Kedar Nath Marwari, 49 IA 357; Province of West Bengal vs. Surja Kanta Jana, 58 CWN 424; Punjab Province vs. Dr. Lakshmi Das AIR 1944 Lahore, 149; Re Arban, Munshilal and Sons vs. Modi. Bros. 51 CWN 563 and of Nanhelal Ananddal Jain and another vs. Singhai Gulobchan..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 98
Mofazzal Molla and another Vs. Parul Bala Debi and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....lla and another..........Petitioner Vs. Parul Bala Debi and others. ...........Opposite Party Judgment June 25, 1970. Cases Referred to: Akina Bibi vs. Md. Ali.Shaha, AIR 1941 Cal. 336; Sheosagar Singh vs. Sitaram AIR 1952 Pat. 48; Md. Idris Khan vs. ......on remand to the trial Court for disposal of the case in accordance with law and in the light of the observations made in this judgement. I leave the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. ......ions made in this judgement. I leave the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. ......I leave the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Golam Kader Vs. State, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....on and sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge is hereby set aside. We direct that the appellant be set at liberty forthwith if not wanted in connection with any other matter. Ed. ......on and sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge is hereby set aside. We direct that the appellant be set at liberty forthwith if not wanted in connection with any other matter. Ed. ......ith if not wanted in connection with any other matter. Ed. ......970. Cases Referred to: Lai vs. The Crown (1954) 6 DLR (FC) 38; PLD 1954 (FC) 95; State vs. Umed Ali (1963) 15 DLR 712. Lawyers involved: No one- both for the Appellant and Respondent. Appeal No. 174 of 1968. Judgment: TH ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Syed Idris alias Idris Mir and others Vs. State, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....dingly made absolute. The impugned order of conviction and sentence passed against the accused-petitioners is set aside. The accused-petitioners are discharged from their bail bonds. Ed. ......dingly made absolute. The impugned order of conviction and sentence passed against the accused-petitioners is set aside. The accused-petitioners are discharged from their bail bonds. Ed. ......dingly made absolute. The impugned order of conviction and sentence passed against the accused-petitioners is set aside. The accused-petitioners are discharged from their bail bonds. Ed. ......preme Court High Court Division Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction Present: Habibur Rahman J. Syed Idris alias Idris Mir and others................ Petitioners Vs. State…......................Opposi..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 82
AKM Shamsuzzaman Khan Vs. Chairman EPRTC, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....e of the amount of Rs. 8400.00 should be so deposited within the period stipulated as above. The appellant worker is entitled to his costs throughout and we order accordingly. Ed. ......e of the amount of Rs. 8400.00 should be so deposited within the period stipulated as above. The appellant worker is entitled to his costs throughout and we order accordingly. Ed. ......d to his costs throughout and we order accordingly. Ed. ...... M A Aziz - For the Appellant. Abdus Subhan — For the Respondents Appeal from original order No. 25 of 1968. (Appeal against the order of Mr. MH Rahman, District Judge and Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation, Dacca, dated the 19th day of June, 1967 in Workmen Miscel..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Daulatpur Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer and ors., 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... Nagina Silk Mills Ltd 15 DLR (SC) 181; PLD 1963 (SC) 322; the Secretary of State for India in Council vs. Hindustan Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd. 35 CWN 794. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Huq and Mohammad Hassan — For the petitioner. AM Khan Chowdhury, Assistant ......ugned notice and all proceedings thereunder as without lawful authority and of no legal effect. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case we make no order as to costs. Ed. ...... of State for India in Council vs. Hindustan Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd. 35 CWN 794. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Huq and Mohammad Hassan — For the petitioner. AM Khan Chowdhury, Assistant Advocate General—For the Respondent. Petition Nos. 527 and......etitioner Vs. Income Tax Officer and ors...............Respondent Judgment July 3rd, 1970. Cases Referred To: ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Basanta Kumar Basak Vs. Santosh Kumar Basak and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....all the material documentary and oral evidence on record in accordance with law and in the light of the observations made above. The costs of this appeal will abide the result. Ed. ......all the material documentary and oral evidence on record in accordance with law and in the light of the observations made above. The costs of this appeal will abide the result. Ed. ......iyan vs Prafulla Chandra Majumdar 13 DLR 865. Reference may also be made in this connection to the decision in the case of Maheschandra Das Choudhury vs Mukunda Chandra Das 14 DLR 347. wherein MR Khan, J as his Lordship then was, held that it will not be correct to presume that a particular pro......il Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Nurul Islam J Basanta Kumar Basak.............Plaintiff—Appellant Vs. Santosh Kumar Basak and others........Respondents Judgment July 23rd, 1970. Cas..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Serajul Hoque Muktar and others Vs. ARM Mustanesar Billah & others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... appeal is dismissed with costs; and the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below are affirmed. The leave as prayed for under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent is refused. Ed. ...... appeal is dismissed with costs; and the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below are affirmed. The leave as prayed for under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent is refused. Ed. ......AIR 1950 All. 693; Ham Din and another vs Buta, minor through Musammat Mahedan and another 120 1C 171; Ram Lai vs. Thakurdin and others 66 1C 678; Mrs Maya Devi vs Diwan Chand AIR 1935 Lahore 115; Khan Bahadur Khaleque Newaz Khan Chowdhury and others vs Maulvi Chowdhury Habibuddin Ahmed Siddique......15 of the Letters Patent is refused. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 69
State Vs. Shiraj Ali, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....the further evidence to be adduced, as directed. The condemned prisoner shall continue in the custody till disposal of the Session Case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 DLR (1972) 69. ......the further evidence to be adduced, as directed. The condemned prisoner shall continue in the custody till disposal of the Session Case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 DLR (1972) 69. ......the further evidence to be adduced, as directed. The condemned prisoner shall continue in the custody till disposal of the Session Case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 DLR (1972) 69. ......ahore 474, PLD 1960 Lahore 111. Lawyers Involved: A Talukdar with Daliluddin Ahmed—For Condemned Prisoner. AW Mallik with Muhammad Batir—For the State. Death Reference No. 15 of 1970 and Appeal No. 563 of 1970. Judgment Abdul Hakim J.- This judgment will dispose of the Death ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Rakhal Chandra Das and ors Vs. Benecha Khatun and others, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....ing the principal defendants therefrom are restored. But the decree of the trial Court for recovery of Rs 110/- as compensation is set aside. There will be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ......ing the principal defendants therefrom are restored. But the decree of the trial Court for recovery of Rs 110/- as compensation is set aside. There will be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ......ing the principal defendants therefrom are restored. But the decree of the trial Court for recovery of Rs 110/- as compensation is set aside. There will be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ....../- as compensation is set aside. There will be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
739738737736735734733732731730729728727725724723722720718717