Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Selim A Khan Vs. Md. Harun Malik and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t of the High Court Division and we do not find that there is any error of law calling for interference by us. In view of the discussion made above the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Md. Harun Malik and another.....................Respondent Judgment January 2, 2005. Lawyers Involved: M. A. Samad, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-Respondent Criminal Pet......t of the High Court Division and we do not find that there is any error of law calling for interference by us. In view of the discussion made above the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......t of the High Court Division and we do not find that there is any error of law calling for interference by us. In view of the discussion made above the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Abdur Rouf Sarder Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....o. In such circumstances we do not find any reason to lay our hands. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 800. ......o. In such circumstances we do not find any reason to lay our hands. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 800. ......o. In such circumstances we do not find any reason to lay our hands. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 800. ......Rouf Sarder...............Petitioner Vs The State...........................Respondent Judgment March 16, 2006. Case Referred to- Siddique Munshi Vs. The State, 44 DLR (AD) 169. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, in..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 52
S. M. Emdadul Hossain (Bulbul) Vs. Jinnur Hosain and another, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... order dated 26.07.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 8491 of 2001 is stayed for a period of 6 (six) months from dated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......s also Reported in: ...... order dated 26.07.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 8491 of 2001 is stayed for a period of 6 (six) months from dated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......iminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J S. M. Emdadul Hossain (Bulbul).................................Petitioner Vs. Jinnur Hosain and another.........................Respondent Order: August 8, 2004. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Md. Nurul Amin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....has been mentioned above, we do not find that the High Court Division committed any error in the decision. This petition, therefore, being bereft of substance stands dismissed. Ed. ......has been mentioned above, we do not find that the High Court Division committed any error in the decision. This petition, therefore, being bereft of substance stands dismissed. Ed. ......has been mentioned above, we do not find that the High Court Division committed any error in the decision. This petition, therefore, being bereft of substance stands dismissed. Ed. ......has been mentioned above, we do not find that the High Court Division committed any error in the decision. This petition, therefore, being bereft of substance stands dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Mahbubur Rahman Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... made on behalf of the petitioner we do not find any ground to lay our hands. There being no substance in the petition, the said leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... made on behalf of the petitioner we do not find any ground to lay our hands. There being no substance in the petition, the said leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... made on behalf of the petitioner we do not find any ground to lay our hands. There being no substance in the petition, the said leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......e Division (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Mahbubur Rahman..........................Petitioner Vs. The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka Collectorate Building, Dhaka..........Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Mizanur Rahman alias Mithu and anothÂer Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....granted to consider the same. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......granted to consider the same. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......granted to consider the same. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......granted to consider the same. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Md. Golam Mostafa alias Gholam Mostafa and others Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....sideration. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Let the order of stay granted earlier be extended for further 6(six) months from date. Ed. ......stafa and others..............Petitioner Vs The State...............................Respondent Judgement February 29, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Kazi Shahadat Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner ......sideration. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Let the order of stay granted earlier be extended for further 6(six) months from date. Ed. ......sideration. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Let the order of stay granted earlier be extended for further 6(six) months from date. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Chair, Board of Int. and Secondary Education, Jessore and others Vs. Nazir Ahmed, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....lity. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......ses Referred to- Government of India and another vs. C. A. Balakrishnan and others, AIR 1975 (SC) 1498; Ram Sewak Prasad Vs. State of U. P and others, AIR 1991 (SC) 1818; ANM Belayet Hossain and others Vs. Bangladesh Oil, Gas and Mineral Corporation, 51 DLR, 104; 4 BLC (AD) 65; Sec......lity. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Chairman, Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Jessore and others …..Appellants. Vs. Md. Nazir Ahmed and another...................Respondents Judgment Ma..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Bangladesh Bank & others Vs. Messers Fabrica Nacional De Monedy Timbre & others, 1998, 27 CLC (AD)
....ive body of lawyers may consider the matter and move the Government if found necessary. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ents Judgment April 1, 1997. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent Nos. 1-2 K. S. Nabi, Attorney General &n......ive body of lawyers may consider the matter and move the Government if found necessary. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ive body of lawyers may consider the matter and move the Government if found necessary. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Abul Hashem Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....of case under the Provisions of Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan (Bishes Bidhan) Ain, 1995 in the light of the observation/direction made above. The leave petition is thus disposed of. Ed. ......of case under the Provisions of Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan (Bishes Bidhan) Ain, 1995 in the light of the observation/direction made above. The leave petition is thus disposed of. Ed. ......of case under the Provisions of Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan (Bishes Bidhan) Ain, 1995 in the light of the observation/direction made above. The leave petition is thus disposed of. Ed. ...... (Criminal) Present: Syed J. R Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Abul Hashem..........................Petitioner Vs. The State represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Cox's Bazar...........Respondent ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Mona alias Zillur Rahman Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....satisfactory. So the delay is not condoned. Therefore, both on merits and on delay. This petition for leave to appeal loses merits for consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......its for consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......satisfactory. So the delay is not condoned. Therefore, both on merits and on delay. This petition for leave to appeal loses merits for consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......satisfactory. So the delay is not condoned. Therefore, both on merits and on delay. This petition for leave to appeal loses merits for consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Md. Nurul Amin Vs. Md. Ismail and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....) months. The petitioner is permitted to add additional grounds. However, the proceedings before the lower Court below shall continue in accordance with law. Ed. ......ddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on- Record-For the Petitioner. Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate, (Dr. A. K. M. Ali, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Altab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-for the Respondent No. 1 Not Represented-Respondent No. 2 ......) months. The petitioner is permitted to add additional grounds. However, the proceedings before the lower Court below shall continue in accordance with law. Ed. ...... Present Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M.A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Nurul Amin .............................Petitioner Vs. Md. Ismail and other........................Respondents Judgement January 1..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Mohammad Salim Ahmed @ Md. Salim Miah Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nd order of conviction. We in facts and circumstances do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The petition having no substance is dismissed. Ed. ......s imprisonment for 14 (fourteen) years and to pay fine of TK. 5,000/- in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 2 (two) years more. 2. The facts, in short, are that one Md. Farooq Hossain an employee of Zaman and Company on 11.09.1996 at about 3.45 P.M. was returning with his co......nd order of conviction. We in facts and circumstances do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The petition having no substance is dismissed. Ed. ......nd order of conviction. We in facts and circumstances do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The petition having no substance is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Md. Jahangir Alam (Selim) Vs. Md. Hebjul Bari and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....without any order as to cost. The impugned judgment and order dated 13-04-2003 passed in Writ Petition No. 536 of 2003 are hereby set aside and the rule so issued is hereby recalled. Ed. ......without any order as to cost. The impugned judgment and order dated 13-04-2003 passed in Writ Petition No. 536 of 2003 are hereby set aside and the rule so issued is hereby recalled. Ed. ......without any order as to cost. The impugned judgment and order dated 13-04-2003 passed in Writ Petition No. 536 of 2003 are hereby set aside and the rule so issued is hereby recalled. Ed. ......without any order as to cost. The impugned judgment and order dated 13-04-2003 passed in Writ Petition No. 536 of 2003 are hereby set aside and the rule so issued is hereby recalled. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Chief Engin, Dredger Direct, BD Water Dev. Board. Vs. Chairman, 2nd Lbour Court, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ed to be taken away without issuing a show cause. 17. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed without any orders to costs. Ed. ......irman, 2nd Labour Court and others........ Respondents (In both Appeals) Judgment May 13, 2002. Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Abdul Hakim Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain. Advocate-on- Record-For the Appellants (In Criminal Appeal No. 99 of 1998) B.Hossai......ed to be taken away without issuing a show cause. 17. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed without any orders to costs. Ed. ......ed to be taken away without issuing a show cause. 17. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed without any orders to costs. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Md. Abdul Jalil Vs. Mosammat Shefali Begum and othÂers, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment dated 6.1.1997 passed in Civil Revision No. 3254 of 1992 is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 715. ...... Vs. Mosammat Shefali Begum and others.....Respondents Judgment May 17, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdul Majid, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Shamsul Huda, Advocate, instructed by Sufia ......ingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment dated 6.1.1997 passed in Civil Revision No. 3254 of 1992 is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 715. ......ourt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J M.A. Aziz J Md. Abdul Jalil....................Appellant Vs. Mosammat Shefali Begum and others.....Respondents Judgment May ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Kanai Lal Roy Vs. Swaraswati Roy, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ence". There is no order as to cost. Ed. ...... 2004 Lawyers Involved: M.K. Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant Abdul Quayum, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents Civil Appeal No. 234 of 2003 (From th......e with law by giving opportunity to the concerned party to produce the will itself in question and prove it by adducing evidence". There is no order as to cost. Ed. ...... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzal Islam J Kanai Lal Roy.... ..............Appellant Vs. Swaraswati Roy alias Srimati Swaraswati Roy and others............Respondents Jud..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Sree Sukhendu Nath Saha and others Vs. Hamangini Saha, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....fs in the land in suit. In view of the discussions made herein-above we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......fs in the land in suit. In view of the discussions made herein-above we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......fs in the land in suit. In view of the discussions made herein-above we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sree Sukhendu Nath Saha and others…………………………….Appellants Vs. 1. Hamangini Saha being dead her heirs 1 (a) Swapan Kumar Roy and others……..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Mainul Islam Vs. State and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e find that the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner do not inspire us to lay our hands. The petitions thus appear to be bereft of substance and hence are dismissed. Ed. ......e find that the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner do not inspire us to lay our hands. The petitions thus appear to be bereft of substance and hence are dismissed. Ed. ......e find that the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner do not inspire us to lay our hands. The petitions thus appear to be bereft of substance and hence are dismissed. Ed. ......e find that the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner do not inspire us to lay our hands. The petitions thus appear to be bereft of substance and hence are dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Dulal @ Md. Dulal Talukder and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....with as prayed for. Bail granted earlier be further extended till disposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......with as prayed for. Bail granted earlier be further extended till disposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......with as prayed for. Bail granted earlier be further extended till disposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......with as prayed for. Bail granted earlier be further extended till disposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 27