Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5141-5160 of 6409 results.
Digandra Chandra Pandith Vs. Abdur Razzaque and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... This petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment dated March 27, 2005 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 5059 of 1998 making absolute the Rule obtained against the judgment and order dated September 10, 1998 of the 3rd Court of Subordina......uhul Amin J.- This petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment dated March 27, 2005 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 5059 of 1998 making absolute the Rule obtained against the judgment and order dated September 10, 1998 of the 3rd Court..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20
Robiul Islam & ors Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Land, Bangladesh Secretariat & ors, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ct decision. There is, therefore, no warrant in law to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 304. ......ct decision. There is, therefore, no warrant in law to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 304. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Mosharraf Hossain and others Vs. Md. Shahid Ali, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....er dated January 17, 2004 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division rejecting the application seeking review of the judgment dated May 5, 2003 in Civil Revision No. 8766 of 1991 making the Rule absolute upon setting aside the judgment and order dated March 11, 1989 of the Court of S......ted January 17, 2004 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division rejecting the application seeking review of the judgment dated May 5, 2003 in Civil Revision No. 8766 of 1991 making the Rule absolute upon setting aside the judgment and order dated March 11, 1989 of the Court of Subord..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
S.M. Nurul Islam Vs. Padma Oil Company Limited and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....eing aggrieved the respondent No.2 preferred Title Appeal No. 266 of 1998 and after hearing the above appeal was dismissed. The respondent No.2 then moved the High Court Division and obtained Rule in civil Revision No. 2514 of 2000 and after hearing a Single Bench of the High Court Div......sed. The respondent No.2 then moved the High Court Division and obtained Rule in civil Revision No. 2514 of 2000 and after hearing a Single Bench of the High Court Division made the Rule absolute. The petitioner then filed Civil Petition No. 1621 of 2002 before this Division which, aft..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Md. Shahidur Islam and others Vs. Md. Habibur Rahman and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ammad Fazlul Karim J.- This petition for Leave to Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 04.07.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 171 of 2000 making the Rule absolute setting aside the judgment and decree dated 18.08.1999 passed by the Additional Distr...... Fazlul Karim J.- This petition for Leave to Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 04.07.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 171 of 2000 making the Rule absolute setting aside the judgment and decree dated 18.08.1999 passed by the Additional District J..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Sylvia Akter Nazma Vs. M. M. Ishak, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ns. Thereafter, the accused husband filed an application under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the High Court Division for quashing the proceeding of the case and obtained the Rule. 4. The High Court Division upon hearing made the Rule absolute and quashed Nari-o-Shis......ion 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the High Court Division for quashing the proceeding of the case and obtained the Rule. 4. The High Court Division upon hearing made the Rule absolute and quashed Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Case No. 750 of 2003 pending before the Nari-O-Shishu N..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Md. Serajul Islam Vs. Shaikh Hayet Ali and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....decision. There is therefore no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. The Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 1001. ......din J.- This petition for leave to appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 5.5.2003 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2469 of 2000 making the rule absolute and thus dismissing the Title Suit No. 27 of 1998 filed by the plaintiff petitioner which ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Matiar Rahman Vs. Assist Custodian of Enemy Property Lands & Buildings, Bakerganj, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....t Court of Additional District Judge, Bakerganj in Miscellaneous Case No. 5 of 1980 allowing the same. The aforesaid miscellaneous case was registered upon an application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure by the respondent herein in Title Appeal No. 166 of 1973 seek......ade hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. 26. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. The Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 991. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Abdur Rahman and others Vs. Sultan @ Sultan & others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....he record. The learned Munsif acted illegally and with material irregularity in not holding that this order was subject to review under order 49, rule 1 C.P.C. In this view of the matter the Rule was made absolute and the order dated 27.5.1975 was set aside and the Court directed the Muns......learned Munsif acted illegally and with material irregularity in not holding that this order was subject to review under order 49, rule 1 C.P.C. In this view of the matter the Rule was made absolute and the order dated 27.5.1975 was set aside and the Court directed the Munsif recommence t..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Md. Rezaul Karim Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....d. Joynul Abedin J. - This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.08.2006 and 29.08.2006 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Suo Moto Rule No. 3196 of 2005 issued in Criminal Appeal No. 3128 of 2004 against the petitioner, the I......gh Court Division in Suo Moto Rule No. 3196 of 2005 issued in Criminal Appeal No. 3128 of 2004 against the petitioner, the Investigating Officer in the case, Md. Rezaul Karim, making the Rule absolute directing for taking stern action against him. 2. Short fact leading to the filing ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Md. Kamruzzaman alias Rentu Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ion for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 29th January, 2007 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No. 244 of 2002 discharging the Rule with modification of sentences reducing to 1(one) year from 2 (two) years rigorous imprisonmen......ation by 15 days. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 261. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Dr. Hafizur Rahman and another Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ve to appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 17-01-2004 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.7242 of 2001 discharging the Rule. The case was filed seeking quashing of the proceedings of G.R. Case No. 382 of 2000 of the Co......y;stance in this petition and find no other alternative but to dismiss the same. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 258. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Alhaj Mostafizur Rahman Vs. Rezaul Hoque, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....al District Judge, 2nd Court, Noakhali in Civil Revision Case No. 4 of 2005 affirming order dated 12.1.2005 passed by the Joint District Judge, 2nd Court, Noakhali in violation case under Order 39, Rule 3(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure being Miscellaneous Case No. 30 of 2003 should not be set ......osal of the rule. There is, therefore, no warrant in law to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 255. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Md. Abdul Karim Vs. Md. Nurul Islam and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....orrect decision. There is, therefore, no warrant in law to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 252. ......is petition for leave to appeal has arisen out of the judgment and order dated 26.6.2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 6589 of 2002 making the rule absolute thereby reversing the judgment and order dated 21.10.2002 passed by the Joint District Jud..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20
Abdul Mannan Vs. Md. Sohrab Hossain & others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....M. Ruhul Amin J.- This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 08.08.2008 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2920 of 2002 discharging the Rule. 2. Short facts are that the pre-emptor filed Miscellaneous Case No. 4 of 1998 i......t find any substance in this petition. The petition is dismissed with cost of Tk. 5, 000/- (five thousand) Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 250. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Sanat Kumar Dhar and others Vs. Aminul Haque and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....f the Additional Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Mymensingh in Other Class Suit No.70 of 1992 decreeing the same. The High Court Division by the judgment as mentioned hereinbefore upon making the Rule absolute reversed the judgment of the appellate Court. 2. The suit was filed seek...... Additional Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Mymensingh in Other Class Suit No.70 of 1992 decreeing the same. The High Court Division by the judgment as mentioned hereinbefore upon making the Rule absolute reversed the judgment of the appellate Court. 2. The suit was filed seeking d..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Md. Delwar Hossain Akter & another Vs. Md. Nazrul Islam Khan & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 08.05.2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3 794 of 2000 discharging the Rule. 2. Short facts are that the plaintiffs filed Title Suit No.86 of 1991 in the 2nd Court...... is no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 242 ; 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 265. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Md. Ziarat Hossain Vs. Md. Jaher Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Islam J. - This petition for leave to appeal arises out of judgment dated 4.1.2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision 3313 of 1999 making absolute the Rule which was obtained against the judgment and decree dated 19.8.1999 passed by the learned Senio......p;Md. Tafazzul Islam J. - This petition for leave to appeal arises out of judgment dated 4.1.2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision 3313 of 1999 making absolute the Rule which was obtained against the judgment and decree dated 19.8.1999 passed by the..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Md. Abdul Muttalib Vs. Md. Abdul Wahab, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 19.03.2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1386 of 2002 discharging the Rule. 2. The plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No. 44 of 1994 in the Court of Senior Assistan......decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 237. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Wali Miah Sodagor Jame Masjid and Madrasha Vs. Abdul Hoque and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....Fazlul Karim J.- This petition for Leave to Appeal is directed against the order dated 31.08.2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3529 of 2005 issuing Rule and calling upon the respondent to show cause as to why the judgment and order dated 09.05.200......ach the High Court Division for early disposal of the Rule, if they so desire. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 234. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
25922591258825862585258325822581257725752573257225712570256925682566256525642563