Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Ananda and others Vs. State, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....not wanted in connection with any other case. The suo motu Rule for enhancement is discharged. Send down the L.C. records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 533.......i Police Station, Faridpur on 11.2.86 alleging that on 9.3.86 his daughter Afroza Begum alias Belly aged about 14 years went to Nasima's house to return a book. On her way back she met accused Swapan Kumar and one Montu who informed her that her elder sister Jahanara Begum became ill at her office......33.......not wanted in connection with any other case. The suo motu Rule for enhancement is discharged. Send down the L.C. records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 533...Category: Women and Children | Date: 24 May, 1989 | Hits: 143
Hazrat Ali & Abdur Rahman Vs. State, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....emned prisoner Hazrat Ali with the modification of sentence of both the condemned prisoners from death to imprisonment for life. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (HCD) (1990)177. ......dur Rahman passed on them on 26.5.85 in Session Case No.9 of 1983 under sections 302/34 of the Penal Code. 2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 11.10.82 the truck driver Sree Sapan Kumar Mitra and his helper Md. Mashiur Rahman left for Jessore with a truck bearing No Jessore T-813......l Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J Habibur Rahman Khan J Hazrat Ali & Abdur Rahman...............Condemned Prisoner & Appellant Vs. The State.........................................Respondent Judgment April 26......emned prisoner Hazrat Ali with the modification of sentence of both the condemned prisoners from death to imprisonment for life. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (HCD) (1990)177. ..Category: Evidence Law | Date: 26 Apr, 1989 | Hits: 152
Niropoma Ritchel Vs. Mohammad Abdul Jalil Mea & others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....and the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost and the suit is dismissed. Let the records of the case be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 467.......270/79 decreeing the plaintiffs suit for simple declaration of title. 2. The plaintiff filed a Suit for declaration of his title in the suit land stating, inter alia, that defendant No.1 Hemanta Kumar Areng while owned and possessed the Suit land entered into a contract to sell the suit land to...... Court Division (Dhaka Bench) (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Latifur Rahman J Dalil Uddin Ahmed J Niropoma Ritchel..............................................Appellant Vs. Mohammad Abdul Jalil Mea & others....................................Respondents Judgm......and the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost and the suit is dismissed. Let the records of the case be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 467...Category: Contract Law | Date: 13 Mar, 1989 | Hits: 941
Category: Women and Children | Date: 13 Dec, 1988 | Hits: 193
Jalaluddin Ahmed Chowdhury Vs. State, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....der of conviction and sentence passed by the Additional Divisional Special Judge is right. In the result, I dismiss the appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (1989) 87. ......rd. He also stated that the accountant and Cashier used lo maintain the account He denied the suggestion that he filed this case out of grudge falsely against the appellant. 5. P.W. 2 Shasanka Kumar Chakma, an Assessor, stated that he only knew that the appellant was suspended and stated Ur......(1989) 87. ......der of conviction and sentence passed by the Additional Divisional Special Judge is right. In the result, I dismiss the appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (1989) 87. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 23 Mar, 1988 | Hits: 32
Mrs. Sajeda Parvin Banu Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....is satisfied that the accused will indulge in prejudicial activities if he is allowed to remain at large. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 178; BCR 1988 (AD) 89. ...... The Province of East Bangal 1 DLR 29 = PLD 1949; A.K. Ahmed and twenty others Vs. The Government of East Bengal 3 DLR 50; Mahbub Anam Vs. Government of East Pakistan PLD 1959 Dhaka 774; Sontosh Kumar Banarjee Vs. Government of East Pakistan 18 DLR (HD) 18; Golam Kabir Vs. Government of Banglad......Division (Criminal) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mrs. Sajeda Parvin Banu...........................Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others.........Respondents Judgment March 20, ......is satisfied that the accused will indulge in prejudicial activities if he is allowed to remain at large. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 178; BCR 1988 (AD) 89. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 20 Mar, 1988 | Hits: 95
Reajuddin and another Vs. Azimuddin@ Abdul Aziz and others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....ent of the learned Lower Appellate Court it affirmed. In the result, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD)(1987) 228. ......ari Vs.Devendra Prasad Tewari, P.L.D. 1957 (Lah) 1951; Katikineni Venkata Gopala Narasshima Vs. Chitluri Verikataramayya, 1940 (Mad) 768; P.L.D. 1967 (Lah)1051; 19 DLR 349 PLD 1967(Lah) 2057; Santosh Kumar Chakraborty & ors. Vs.M. A. Motaleb & ors. 36 DLR (AD) 248. Lawyers Involved: ...... Bench (Civil Rivisional Jurisdiction) Present: AM Mahmudur Rahman J Reajuddin and another…………..............Plaintiff-Respondents-Petitioners Vs. Azimuddin @ Abdul Aziz and others…………………&h......erikataramayya, 1940 (Mad) 768; P.L.D. 1967 (Lah)1051; 19 DLR 349 PLD 1967(Lah) 2057; Santosh Kumar Chakraborty & ors. Vs.M. A. Motaleb & ors. 36 DLR (AD) 248. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdus Sobhan with Md. Abdus Satter Howlader and S.M.A. Malek—For the Petitioner. Mos..Category: Evidence Law | Date: 3 Apr, 1986 | Hits: 8
Alhaj Mamtaj Meah Vs. The State, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....of the case in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. Md. Abdul Jalil, J.—I agree Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 152. ......of the case in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. Md. Abdul Jalil, J.—I agree Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 152. ......ction) Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Md. Abdul Jalil J Alhaj Mamtaj Meah…………….……...........Petitioner Vs. The State.........................................Opposite party Judgment January......loth and General Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Commissioner, Delhi, AIR 1927 PC, 242; Colonial Sugar Refining Co. Vs. Irving, 1905 AC 369; Abul Hossain Sana Vs. Suwalal Agarwala, 14 DLR (SC) page 96; Abdus Salam Master Vs. The State, 36 DLR (AD) 58; Abdul Quader Chowdhury and others Vs. The State, 2..Category: Criminal Law, Procedural Law | Date: 30 Jan, 1986 | Hits: 1
Sakya Pada Barua & others Vs. The State and others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....urul Mostafa and Nurul Amin are discharged from their bail bonds. Md. Abdul Jalil J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 86. ....... Mriganka Ranjan Barua as informant lodged F.I.R. at P.S. Mirsarai on 16.11.76 to the effect that he made G.D. Entry No.138 dated 5-11-76 regarding kidnapping or killing of his brother Putul @ Tarit Kumar Barua. On enquiry the informant Dr. Mriganka Ranjan Barua has further found that accused Sakya...... (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Md. Abdul Jalil J Sakya Pada Barua & others.........................Petitioner Vs. The State and others .................................Opposite Party Judgment Jan......ng Co. Vs. Irving, 1905 AC 369 Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co., Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Commissioner, Delhi, AIR1927 PC 242; James Gardner Vs. Edward A. Lucas, (1878) 3 AC 582; Kazi Md. Wahidunnabi Vs. Abdus Sattar and others, 36 DLR 200; Purshotam Singh Vs. Narain Singh and State of Rajasthan, ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 12 Jan, 1986 | Hits: 1
Abdur Razzak & others Vs. The State, 1985, 14 CLC (HCD)
.... The order staying further proceedings of Special Tribunal Case No.17 of 1985 is vacated. Md. Abdul Jalil J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 22. ...... The order staying further proceedings of Special Tribunal Case No.17 of 1985 is vacated. Md. Abdul Jalil J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 22. ......Habibur Rahman J Md. Abdul Jalil J Abdur Razzak & others……………………………………Petitioners Vs. The State…………………………&h......he Customs Act, 1969 read with Import Control Act, 1950 and Martial Law Regulation No.18/82. The police investigated into the case and submitted charge-sheet against the 5 accused petitioners and one Abdus Sukur on 21.3.84 u/s. 156 (8) of the Customs Act read with Section 18 of Martial Law Regulatio..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 9 Sep, 1985 | Hits: 2
Abu Sayed & another Vs. The State, 1985, 14 CLC (HCD)
....l be set at liberty forthwith if not wanted in any other case. A.T.M. Afzal J.-I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 17. ......l be set at liberty forthwith if not wanted in any other case. A.T.M. Afzal J.-I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 17. ......a Bench) (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: A.T.M. Afzal J Amin-Ur-Rahman Khan J Abu Sayed & another…………..............Appellants Vs. The State…………………………&h......of torches flashed by the miscreants. They broke open the door of the hut of his younger brother Sattar who by that time had hidden himself inside the paddy basket (Dooli). They dragged out Abdus Sattar and killed him inside his hut by stabbing and inflicting multiple injuries. Then they s..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 13 Aug, 1985 | Hits: 1
Ranjit Kumar Rakshit Vs. Sudhir Kumar Chowdhury, 1985, 14 CLC (HCD)
.... amendment of the plaint. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 39. ......is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 39. ...... High Court Division (Chittagong Bench) (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Syed Mohammed Ali J Ranjit Kumar Rakshit....................................Petitioner Vs. Sudhir Kumar Chowdhury...........................Opposite-Party Judgment April 10...... amendment of the plaint. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 39. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 10 Apr, 1985 | Hits: 1
Habibur Rahman Talukder Vs. Shaha Alam Mia and others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....gations." I do not find any ground for interference in the matter. This Rule is, therefore, discharged with cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 71. ...... page 304; Dilumuddin Madbar and others Vs. Province of East Pakistan and others, 21 DLR at page 569. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Quaiyum with Moslem Ali Howlader Subodh Ranjan Dutta, and Tapan Kumar Chakraborty— For the Petitioner. Hemayetuddin Ahmed with Nurul Islam— For the......urt High Court Division (Barisal Bench) (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Daliluddin Ahmed J Habibur Rahman Talukder..............................Petitioner Vs. Shaha Alam Mia and others............................Opposite-Party Judgment Dece......gations." I do not find any ground for interference in the matter. This Rule is, therefore, discharged with cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 71. ..Category: Civil Law, Election Law | Date: 2 Dec, 1984 | Hits: 2
The State Vs. Abdul Karim Sarkar, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
.... with the record duly attested by the learned Deputy Attorney General. Muhammad Abdul Wahab J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 26. ......his Court room while he was holding trial of a criminal case in presence of Mr. Nurul Islam, Advocate, Mr. Nurul Haque or Huda, G.R.O. and C.S.-in-charge, Mr. Abdul Awal, Bench Clerk (Criminal), Naba Kumar Mahanto, Court police, Abul Kalam Azad, Process Server and the litigant public with intent to ......on (Rangpur Bench) (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Mustafa Kamal J Md. Abdul Wahab J The State..................................................Appellant Vs. Abdul Karim Sarkar....................................Respondent Judgment Novembe...... with the record duly attested by the learned Deputy Attorney General. Muhammad Abdul Wahab J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 26. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 28 Nov, 1984 | Hits: 1
Zaheda Bewa & anothers Vs. The State, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
..... Let the records be sent back immediately. Mohammad Abdul Wahab J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 66. ....... Let the records be sent back immediately. Mohammad Abdul Wahab J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 66. ......ivision (Rangpur Bench) (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Mustafa Kamal J Md. Abdul Wahab J Zaheda Bewa & anothers…...................Petitioner Vs. The State...........................................Respondent Judgment October 2......d the place of occurrence on the same day at 9-30 A.M. and held inquest on the dead body of deceased Mukul as identified by the informant. He sent the dead body to the morgue through P.W.10 constable Abdus Samad and constable Fakrul Huda. He prepared seizure list and seized some articles. On the sam..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 25 Oct, 1984 | Hits: 6
Arjuman Ali Vs. Abdus Samad & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
.... as not being entertainable under Section 526 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 62. ...... as not being entertainable under Section 526 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 62. ......ion (Sylhet Bench) (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rouf J Md. Abdul Muttalib J Arjuman Ali................................Informant-Petitioner Vs. Abdus Samad & others.................Opposite-Parties Judgment August 2, 1984......(Sylhet Bench) (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rouf J Md. Abdul Muttalib J Arjuman Ali................................Informant-Petitioner Vs. Abdus Samad & others.................Opposite-Parties Judgment August 2, 1984. Re..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 2 Aug, 1984 | Hits: 1
Bipin Chandra Ray Vs. Bunchuki Barmani, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....from any error of law and there is no scope for revision. The Rule is accordingly discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 49. ......d thus gave a cause of action for this suit. 3. The defendant No.1 denied the case of the plaintiff and also denied the right and possession of the plaintiff in respect of the lands left by Pran Kumar. His case was that in his infancy he was adopted as son by Pran Kumar after observing all the ...... High Court Division (Rangpur Bench) (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Amin-Ur-Rahman Khan J Bipin Chandra Ray...................................Petitioner Vs. Bunchuki Barmani.............................Opposite-Party Judgment July 31, 198......from any error of law and there is no scope for revision. The Rule is accordingly discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 49. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 31 Jul, 1984 | Hits: 2
Abdul Hashem Vs. Saleh Ahmed & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
.... suit thereafter will proceed in its usual course. Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 303 ...... Saleh Ahmed & others. ...................Opposite parties Judgment July 10, 1984. Result: The rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Mir Hasmat Ali Vs. Birendra Kumar Ghosh and others reported in 16 DLR page 239A. Lawyers Involved: S C. Das—For ......eme Court High Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: F. H M. Habibur Rahman J S Mohammad Ali J Abdul Hashem.............................Petitioner Vs. Saleh Ahmed & others. ...................Opposite parties Judgment July 10, 1...... suit thereafter will proceed in its usual course. Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 303 ..Category: Contract Law, Property Law | Date: 10 Jul, 1984 | Hits: 5
Azizur Rahman & others Vs. Jugal Kishori Sarkar & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
..... Rajshahi (Sadar) with a direction to dispute of the suit as early as possible. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 351 ........Plaintiff-Opposite Party Judgment June 20, 1984. Result: The rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Khirode Ch. Goshal Vs. Saroda 21 CLJ 525; Bota Krishna Vs. Akhoy Kumar, 15 CWN 450; Md. Magdu Bhuya Vs. Jabbar Huq (1959), 11 DLR 355; Habibulla Vs. Movi. Salek (196......ivision (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Amin Ur Rahmnn Khan J Azizur Rahman & others...…………………..Defdt-Petitioner Vs. Jugal Kishori Sarkar & others.............Plaintiff-Opposite Party Judgment J....... Rajshahi (Sadar) with a direction to dispute of the suit as early as possible. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 351 ..Category: Family Law | Date: 20 Jun, 1984 | Hits: 2
Category: Procedural Law | Date: 2 Apr, 1984 | Hits: 105