Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
AKM Fazlul Haq and anothers Vs. People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....ently, any deviation therefrom would call for interference by this Court. When the classification appears to be unreasonable and arbitrary it is to be regarded as an infringement of the equality clause. ...... (17, 25 &26) Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaq, Senior Advocate and Tanvir..Category: Administrative Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 5
Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 1
M/S Helal Jute Press Ltd Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
....erties provided the owners thereof did not reside outside Bangladesh for any purpose which in the opinion of the government was prejudicial to the interest of Bangladesh. Mr. Islam has submitted that clause (II)(a) of Article. 2(1) is to be read in the context of the definition of abandone..Category: Abandoned Properties Law | Date: | Hits: 7
Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 2
Shamsun Nahar Begum on behalf of the detenu Khalequzzaman Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....e of peaceful condition in any part of Bangladesh or the maintenance of supplies and the services essential to the life of the community" and in that case the Government may make the order under clause (a) directing that such person be detained or the Government can pass number of others as enu..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 1
Md. Moshiur Rahman Khan Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....ed before expiry 32 (Government) may direct the Administrator to relinquish the functions taken over by him in favour of the Executive Committee. (3) Upon the appointment of an Administrator under clause (a) or clause (b) of sub section (2), the members of the Executive Committee shall be deemed ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 72
Joynal Abedin Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....not be exercised to quash the Judgment. The Rule fails. In the result, the Rule is discharged. Let the LCR sent down immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 64 DLR (HCD) (2012) 393. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Engineer Shaikh Rubaiyet Islam Vs. Bangladesh & others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....e between the parties in respect of the works in question. In order to settle the dispute, the Chief Engineer of Mongla Port Authority-respondent No.4 was appointed as Sole Arbitrator as per terms of clause 25 of Conditions of Contract of the Bangladesh Tender Form No.2911 inspite of written objecti..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 96
Sunil Kumar Ghosh & others Vs. State & others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....965 the President of Pakistan proclaimed emergency in the country and on that very day he promulgated the Defence of Pakistan Ordinance (Ordinance No.XXIII of 1965) in exercise of his power under clause (4) of Article 30 read with clause (2) of Article 131 of the Constitution. It authorised th..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Baby Masum and another Vs. Bangladesh Film Development Corporation and other, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
....omplaint it can be considered in this case, as it is not a defence material, rather it very much forms part of the complaint. 24. From the copy the said admitted contract, we find from the various clauses that terms and conditions were included with regard to making of the film, the money payable..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Category: Environmental Law | Date: | Hits: 434
Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 228
Md. Fazlul Haque and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
....the plot except annex-Z(4) to the supplementary affidavit-in-opposition, which are minutes of land allotment committee’s meeting held on 11.3.1995 in the Ministry of Housing. In the last portion of clause 8 of the said minutes it has been mentioned with reference to an inquiry that Abeda Khatun wa..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Md. Arfan Khan Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
....ined the Rule by suppressing material facts relating to service of notice. 12. On careful examination of the Immigration Ordinance, 1982 it appears that section 13 (1) of the same is a prohibitory clause which puts a complete bar on transferring or assigning to any other person or entity to use t..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 407
Md. Akkas Ali Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....case, we find no merit in the Rule. The Rule, therefore, fails. Accordingly, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 BLD (HCD) (2010) 390. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 261
Doon Valley Rice Limited Vs. MV Yue Yang and others, 1996, 25 CLC (HCD)
....al Shriraj and others (4) may be referred. In Shib Deo Misra and others Vs. Ram Prasad and others (5) it was held that plaint is not void merely because it does not contain the verification clause as required by the Code of Civil Procedure. The omission to verify it is a mere irregularity,..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 258
Chittagong Dry Dock Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Taxes, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
....rtioned amongst the partners of the firm and they alone shall be entitled to have the amount carried forwarded and set off; and (b) any loss which has been apportioned amongst the partners under clause (a) shall not be carried forward and set off. ………………………. …………..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 107
Abdul Matin Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
....as not being permitted by law." It has been, also, laid down in paragraph No.11: A suit may be specifically barred by law and, in such an event, the matter would come under the express terms of clause (d) of rule 11 of Order VII of the Code. But, even in a case where a suit is not permitted by..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 69
M. Anwar Hossain and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....is still executory, he cannot be compartmentalised within the ‘past and closed criteria’. Additionally, the petitioner’s case involved questions of his “citizen’s rights” protected by clause (b) in the Appellate Division’s catalogue printed above. 148. The petitioner’s entitle..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 154