Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5181-5200 of 5813 results.
Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Abdur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... appellant No. 1. Ed........ Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and other.................................Appellants. Vs. Abdur Rahman and others...........................................Respondents. Judgment ......itration Appellate Tribunal. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost to be paid by the appellant No. 1. Ed.......itration Appellate Tribunal. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost to be paid by the appellant No. 1. Ed...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Shahjahan Gazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Ed. ......cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ..................Petitioners Vs Md. Shahjahan Gazi..................................................Respondent Judgment 27 July 2002 Cases Referred To- Sk. All Ahmed vs. Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of Bangladesh, 40 DLR (AD) 170. La..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Ed. ...... (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Government of Bangladesh and others .....................Appellants Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque...............................................Respondent Judgm......stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ...... Assistant Attorney General with him), instructed by Md. Ahsanullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Khaled Ahmed, Advocate-on Record- For the Respondent Civil Appeal No.283 of 2002 (From the..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Md. Anarul Islam and others Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he company may proceed against the accused-appellants for the allegations in the petition of complaint in the appropriate forum and in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......riminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Anarul Islam and others................. Appellant Vs. The State and another…………………….........Respondents. Judgment No......he company may proceed against the accused-appellants for the allegations in the petition of complaint in the appropriate forum and in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......te an offence of Cheating and Criminal breach of trust. The proceeding is accordingly quashed……..(9, 10 & 11) Cases Referred to- Nasiruddin Mahmud and others Vs. Momtazuddin Ahmed and another 4 BLD (1984) AD 97; Md. Yameen and another Vs. K.A. Bashar and others 6 BLD ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited Vs. Janata Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....R. A. Jute Mills Limited….......Petitioner Vs. Janata Bank and others........ Respondents Judgment 5 January, 2006 Case Referred To- Idris Miah vs. Bangladesh and others 10 BLC (2005) HCD 728. Lawyers Involved: Saiful Reza, Advocate......uhul Amin J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited….......Petitioner Vs. Janata Bank and others........ Respondents Judgment 5 January, 2006 ......t the High Court Division correctly decided the matter and as such it does not call for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......Bangladesh and others 10 BLC (2005) HCD 728. Lawyers Involved: Saiful Reza, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Shamim Khaled Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Abu Siddique, Advocate-on-Record- For Respondent No. 1 &nbs..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 121
....J
Md. Tafazzul Islam J
Messers Chemico Laboratories Ltd. represented by its Chairman of Tikapara Ghoramara Rajshahi...................Petitioner
Vs.
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Finance Internal Resources Division and others.......Present:
Md. Ruhul Amin J
MM Ruhul Amin J
Md. Tafazzul Islam J
Messers Chemico Laboratories Ltd. represented by its Chairman of Tikapara Ghoramara Rajshahi...................Petitioner
Vs.
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of F......ayment of VAT which the petitioner avoided to pay is an appealable order in our view, the High Court Division rightly refused to issue the Rule.
6. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
......ayment of VAT which the petitioner avoided to pay is an appealable order in our view, the High Court Division rightly refused to issue the Rule.
6. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Md. Ashaduzzaman Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ision (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Ashaduzzaman................ Petitioner. Vs. Bangladesh, representedby the Secretary, Ministry of local Government, Engineering and Rural Develo......ellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Ashaduzzaman................ Petitioner. Vs. Bangladesh, representedby the Secretary, Ministry of local Government, Engineering and R......pal amount he borrowed from the Bank. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......pal amount he borrowed from the Bank. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Md. Saifur Rahman Emam Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....resent: Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ M.M. Ruhul Amin J Arnirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Saifur Rahman Emam................. Petitioner Vs. The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development, Bang......ision (Civil) Present: Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ M.M. Ruhul Amin J Arnirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Saifur Rahman Emam................. Petitioner Vs. The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government......ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Md. Habibur Rahman Vs. M/S. Uttara Bank Ltd., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....Respondents Judgment July 31, 2005. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred to- Union of India and another vs. Ladulal Jain AIR 1963 SC, 1681. M/s. Anwar and Brothers vs. Bangladesh Shipping Corporation (1995) 15 BLD (HCD) 447. Lawyers Involved: Abdus Samad, Seni......(AD) 59. ......our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ......our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Md. Shafique Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ent: Mainur Reza Chowdhury J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Md. Shafique Ahmed........................................ Petitioner Vs Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and ot......area in question and his appointing authority is authorized under the law to curtail the area or jurisdiction in view of the decision of this Division reported in the case of Kazi Md. Aminul Islam Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Law 16 BLD (AD)110 and in the case of Moulvi Md. Khourshid Alam Vs. Bang......-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Al-haj Mohammad Seraj-ud-Dowla and others Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of works, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....est bidder for Tk. 84,00,000/- (Tk. eighty four lacs) only; that Abdul Khaleque Bain was a citizen of Pakistan and the plaintiff No. 1 has created deeds from Abdul Khaleque Bain by bringing him to Bangladesh; that the terms and conditions of section 8 and 9 (D) of the tender form were not applic...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain J Al-haj Mohammad Seraj-ud-Dowla and others.................................Petitioners. Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of works...................................................Respo......ommitted any error or illegality and no case for interference by this Division has been made out, we find no merit in the petition for leave to appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......ommitted any error or illegality and no case for interference by this Division has been made out, we find no merit in the petition for leave to appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Messres MS Jafar Vs. Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca & others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
.... No. 95 of 1970 claiming a sum of Rs. 1,35,000/-due on a contract for the construction of Rajshahi Medical College. The suit was pending after liberation and on application filed by the Government of Bangladesh, under Article 3(2) of the Bangladesh (Legal Proceedings) (Special Order), 1972, briefly ......late Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Messers MS Jafar...................................................... Appellant Vs. Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca & others ……………..Respondents Judgment ......point of view we do not find any substance in this point. This appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ourt, Dacca & others ……………..Respondents Judgment July 28, 1980. Result: The appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, with Jamiruddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by S.M. Huq, Advocate-on-Recordâ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Com. of In. Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca Vs. M/S. Badridas Full-chand, Saidpur, Rangpur, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....eal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is hereby set aside and the answer of the question under section 66 (1) must be in the negative. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Commissioner of Income Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca ……………………..Appellant. Vs. M/S. Badridas Full-chand, Saidpur, Rangpur... ……………&h......eal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is hereby set aside and the answer of the question under section 66 (1) must be in the negative. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ....... There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Udaypur Halima Darul Ulum Madrasha and others Vs. Bangladesh, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....hahabuddin Ahmed J Udaypur Halima Darul Ulum Madrasha and others ……………………………….Appellant. Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land Administration and Land Reform...... J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Udaypur Halima Darul Ulum Madrasha and others ……………………………….Appellant. Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land Administration and ......ust succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court Division is set aside. Let the Government proceed in accordance with law. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......h law. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
....ates to the income for the period 1365 B.S. suffers from want of jurisdiction. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the question is answered in the negative. We make no order as to costs.
Ed.
......ppellate Division
(Civil)
Present:
FKMA Munim J
Ruhul Islam J
Shahabuddin Ahmed J
Jamal Soap Factory, Narayanganj……………………………....................Appellant.
Vs.
Commissioner of InÂcome-Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca..................Respondent
Judgment.
J......ates to the income for the period 1365 B.S. suffers from want of jurisdiction. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the question is answered in the negative. We make no order as to costs.
Ed.
......llowed and the question is answered in the negative. We make no order as to costs.
Ed.
..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 78
People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Sri Sri Madan Gopal Jew Bigraha and ors., 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J People's Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet and others ..........Appellants. ......Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet and others ..........Appellants. Vs. Sri Sri Madan Gopal Jew Bigraha and ors. ...........Respondents. Judgment ...... of the first appellate Court is empowered to question validity of Hate Court and restore that of the trial Court recording abatement of the suit, There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......s. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury & others Vs. Gani Ahmed and others, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....is is a question of fact and hardly arises in this appeal by speÂcial leave. For the foregoing reason, we dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 1. ...... 1. ......is is a question of fact and hardly arises in this appeal by speÂcial leave. For the foregoing reason, we dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 1. ......osts. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 1. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abdus Subhan &. others, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 255....... Ruhul Islam J KM Subhan J Govt. of Bangladesh, reÂpresented by the Secretary, Public Works and Urban Development, Secretariat Buildings, Dacca & another………………..Petitioners Vs. Md. Abdus Subhan & others……………...Respondents. Judgment December 14, 1979.......n of P.O. 16 of 1972 is illegal and as such the provision of M.L.R. VII 1977 has no application. The petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 255.......n of P.O. 16 of 1972 is illegal and as such the provision of M.L.R. VII 1977 has no application. The petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 255...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Bangladesh Vs. Hail Abdul Gani Biswas and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
.... (AD) (1980) 233 ......ent: Kemaluddin Hussain CJ F. K. M. A Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Bangladesh………………………… Appellant in all the appeals Vs. Hail Abdul Gani Biswas and others..................Respondents Judgment March 9, 1980. ......ion of the High Court Division set aside and remitted back to the High Court Division for disposal. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 233 ...... in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 233 ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Belayet Hossain and another Vs. Md. Abu Taher and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....side and the case is remitted back to the High Court Division for disposal in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 231. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Belayet Hossain and another.................. Appellants. Vs. Md. Abu Taher and others................... Respondents. Judgment January 16, 1980. ......side and the case is remitted back to the High Court Division for disposal in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 231. ......ration of a proceeding under section 96 of the state Acquisition and Tenancy Act disposed of ex-parte, is not appealable. Lawyers Involved: Nizamuddin Haider, Advocate instructed by Shahabuddin Ahmed, Advocate-on Record- For the Appellants. Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate instructed by..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 55
13041301129912971296129512941293129212901289128812871284128312791277127612741273