Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Bulmayee Barmani Vs. Sree Madhuram Barman and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....petition for leave to appeal is directed against the Judgment and order dated 21.08.2002 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision Case No. 1815 of 1997 discharging the Rule obtained against the judgment and decree dated 10.10.1996 passed by the learned Subordinate Ju...... Accordingly there is no cogent reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 938. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Ali and Brothers & Marquis Pump Marketing and another Vs. Pedrollo NK Ltd. & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....03) of the 2nd Court of Additional District Judge, Chittagong in Civil (Title) Suit No.2 of 2003 allowing the prayer for temporary injunction upon rejecting the application filed under Order XXXIX, Rule 4 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The civil (title) suit was filed unde...... the judgments while disposing of the application for temporary injunction. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. The Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 934. ..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 201
Md. Samiul Haque and others Vs. Khairul Alam and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....J. -This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment dated March 13, 2004 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1862 of 1991 making absolute the Rule obtained against the judgment and decree dated March 6, 1991 of the Court of Subordinate Judge....... Ruhul Amin J. -This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment dated March 13, 2004 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1862 of 1991 making absolute the Rule obtained against the judgment and decree dated March 6, 1991 of the Court of Subo..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 18
S.M. Shakil Akhtar Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Katripakha & another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....eal are directed against the common judgment and order dated 11.07.2006 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 5972 of 2003 and 575 of 2004 discharging both the Rules with some directions and observations. 2. The case of the writ petitioner in Writ Pet......ately extended till disposal of the Rule restraining the writ respondents from leasing out the writ petitioner's plot of land to anybody. After hearing of the Writ Petition the Rule issued was made absolute and direction was given to the writ respondents to hand over possession of Plot No.9..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Mustaque Alam Chy & anr Vs. Court of Joint District & 2nd Artha Rin Adalat, Dhk, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....re of the said mortgage or for the sale of the mortgaged property to recover the money allegedly due. Such omission amounted to a relinquishment of a claim by the plaintiff under Order II Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ("the Code"). Therefore, the benefit of ......el for the petitioners to interfere with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 906. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 96
Bangladesh Vs. Miss Nasima Khatoon and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....made above we are inclined not to interfere. In the result the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 901. ......ew application filed thereafter was also rejected. They, therefore, moved the High Court Division in its writ jurisdiction. The High Court Division by the impugned judgment and order made the rule absolute setting aside the judgment and order of the Court of Settlement. Hence is this appeal. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Abdul Jalil Munshi & another Vs. Abu Bakr Siddique, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....urullah, Advocate, instructed by S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record–For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 7 of 1976 (From the Judgment and order dated 3.9.75 passed by the High Court Division Civil Rule No. 800 of 1975). Judgment Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J. - This appeal by special leav......rcising such power the court shall have to be satisfied that its action is likely to advance the cause of justice. If in a particular case, in the opinion of the court, the action of the plaintiff is absolutely frivolous or in enforcing such injunction great hardship or irreparable loss or injury ma..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Md. Abu Safa Vs. Abdul Momen Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....erest litigant is seeking leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 24th May, 2005 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2561 of 2005 making the Rule absolute. 2. The respondent Nos. 1-3 as writ petitioners filed the above writ peti...... litigant is seeking leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 24th May, 2005 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2561 of 2005 making the Rule absolute. 2. The respondent Nos. 1-3 as writ petitioners filed the above writ petition,..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Amal Krishna Chakrabarty Vs. Sekendar Mallik , 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....l Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 538 of 2005 (From the judgment and order dated April 13, 2004 passed by the High Court Division in Second Appeal No.76 of 1979 [heard along with the Civil Rule No. 1336(S) of 1982]). Judgment ...... 9. In the background of the discussions we find no substance in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 61. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 21
Ranjit and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
..... - This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 31.08.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 4511 of 2005 making the Rule absolute in part. 2. Short facts are that the petitioners are class three and class fou......his petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 31.08.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 4511 of 2005 making the Rule absolute in part. 2. Short facts are that the petitioners are class three and class four emp..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Billal Hossain and others Vs. Mofizur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....- This petition for leave to appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 23.2.2005 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division passed in Civil Revision No. 3050 of 2001 discharging the Rule obtained against the judgment and decree dated 22.3.2001 of the learned District Judge, Comill......rived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the side decision. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 54. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 19
Shahidul Hoq @ Md. Shahidul Hoq Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....; Md. Tafazzul Islam J.- This petition for leave to appeal arises out of the judgment dated 18.7.2004 of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 4555 of 2002 making the Rule absolute which was obtained against the judgment and decree dated 15.1.2001 of the learned Su......p; Md. Tafazzul Islam J.- This petition for leave to appeal arises out of the judgment dated 18.7.2004 of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 4555 of 2002 making the Rule absolute which was obtained against the judgment and decree dated 15.1.2001 of the learned Subordi..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Mvi. Md. Shafiqur Rahman and another Vs. Ambia Khatoon and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....Tafazzul Islam J. - This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court Division dated 10.1.2004 passed in Civil Revision No.1436 of 2002 discharging the Rule obtained against the order dated 30.1.2002 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, 2nd Cou......ny illegality or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 49. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Bijoy Kumar Sarbabidya Vs. Government of Bangladesh & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....not point at any error or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 44. ......s also made for declaration of title on the basis of adverse possession and the plaintiff in the plaint merely prayer for passing a decree declaring the title of the plaintiff in the suit land as its absolute owner though in order to make out a case of adverse possession it must be pleaded that adve..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Chairman, Raisree (North) Union Parishad & anr Vs. Abdul Khaleque & anr., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....and 5 have filed this petition for leave to appeal impugning the judgment and order dated 24.3.2004 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3102 of 1994 making the Rule absolute. The above Rule arose out the judgment and decree dated 19.7.1994 passed by the learn...... have filed this petition for leave to appeal impugning the judgment and order dated 24.3.2004 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3102 of 1994 making the Rule absolute. The above Rule arose out the judgment and decree dated 19.7.1994 passed by the learned Su..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Atiqullah alias Atik Vs. Mohammad Safiquddin, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Amin J.- This petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment of May 4, 2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.1227 of 1999 making the Rule absolute upon setting aside the judgment and decree dated March 21, 1999 of the 3rd Court of A...... J.- This petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment of May 4, 2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.1227 of 1999 making the Rule absolute upon setting aside the judgment and decree dated March 21, 1999 of the 3rd Court of Additi..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Government of Bangladesh & others Vs. Jahangir Alam & others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....y leave are directed against the common judgment and order dated 29.08.2004 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 8254 of 2002 and 4344 of 2003 making both the Rules absolute. 2. The appeals involve in all 76 respondents. These respondent as writ-......e are directed against the common judgment and order dated 29.08.2004 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 8254 of 2002 and 4344 of 2003 making both the Rules absolute. 2. The appeals involve in all 76 respondents. These respondent as writ-petiti..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 146
Shushil Chandra Nath Vs. Shanjib Kanti Nath and another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....p; Md. Ruhul Amin J. - Plaintiff obtained leave to appeal against the judgment dated February 13, 2002 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.4173 of 1994 making the Rule absolute obtained against the judgment and decree dated September 8, 1994 of the 1st Court of......sp;Md. Ruhul Amin J. - Plaintiff obtained leave to appeal against the judgment dated February 13, 2002 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.4173 of 1994 making the Rule absolute obtained against the judgment and decree dated September 8, 1994 of the 1st Court of Subo..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Bangladesh Vs. Mostafizur Rahman, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....Powers Act, 1974 (Act No. XIV of 1974), briefly, the Act. A Division Bench of the High Court Division delivered a split judgment on 20.03.1991 whereupon the matter was referred to third Judge and the Rule Nisi issued in the writ petition finally discharged by majority judgment and order dated 09.1......morbid view of the law as quoted above will be clear to any discerning person acquainted with the development of the law. It must be made clear that the law which we have declared has never granted absolute power either to the Government or to the President to make an order of detention even in th..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 107
State Vs. Md. Rafique Ahmed, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....on of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh is directed against the judgment and order dated 18.09.2004 passed by High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 3880 of 2003 making the Rule absolute quashing the impugned proceeding of Metro, Special Case No.5 of 2000 arising out of ......the People’s Republic of Bangladesh is directed against the judgment and order dated 18.09.2004 passed by High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 3880 of 2003 making the Rule absolute quashing the impugned proceeding of Metro, Special Case No.5 of 2000 arising out of GR. No..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62