Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5221-5240 of 5838 results.
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ...... (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Government of Bangladesh and others .....................Appellants Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque...............................................Respondent Judgm......bsp; Government of Bangladesh, 4 BLC (AD) 213. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney General, (Faisal H. Khan, Assistant Attorney General with him), instructed by Md. Ahsanullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants T.H.......stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Md. Anarul Islam and others Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....p; Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Anarul Islam and others................. Appellant Vs. The State and another…………………….........Respondents. Judgment November 23, 2......riminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Anarul Islam and others................. Appellant Vs. The State and another…………………….........Respondents. Judgment No...... ......he company may proceed against the accused-appellants for the allegations in the petition of complaint in the appropriate forum and in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited Vs. Janata Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t the High Court Division correctly decided the matter and as such it does not call for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......uhul Amin J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited….......Petitioner Vs. Janata Bank and others........ Respondents Judgment 5 January, 2006 ......l for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......t the High Court Division correctly decided the matter and as such it does not call for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Md. Habibur Rahman Vs. M/S. Uttara Bank Ltd., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ......(AD) 59. ...... Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ......our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Md. Shafique Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......area in question and his appointing authority is authorized under the law to curtail the area or jurisdiction in view of the decision of this Division reported in the case of Kazi Md. Aminul Islam Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Law 16 BLD (AD)110 and in the case of Moulvi Md. Khourshid Alam Vs. Bang...... Ed. ......-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Messres MS Jafar Vs. Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca & others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....point of view we do not find any substance in this point. This appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......late Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Messers MS Jafar...................................................... Appellant Vs. Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca & others ……………..Respondents Judgment ......point of view we do not find any substance in this point. This appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......point of view we do not find any substance in this point. This appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Com. of In. Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca Vs. M/S. Badridas Full-chand, Saidpur, Rangpur, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....eal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is hereby set aside and the answer of the question under section 66 (1) must be in the negative. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Commissioner of Income Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca ……………………..Appellant. Vs. M/S. Badridas Full-chand, Saidpur, Rangpur... ……………&h...... Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Md Asghar Muhammad Yunus & Co. (1968) 18 Taxation, 89; Commissioner of Income tax vs. D.A. Chetti and Co., 1948 I.T.R., 404; Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Md. Asgar Mohammad Yunus & Co. P.L.D, 1968 Karachi 805; Mohabir Glass Manufacturing Co. vs. C.I......eal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is hereby set aside and the answer of the question under section 66 (1) must be in the negative. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Udaypur Halima Darul Ulum Madrasha and others Vs. Bangladesh, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ust succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court Division is set aside. Let the Government proceed in accordance with law. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ...... J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Udaypur Halima Darul Ulum Madrasha and others ……………………………….Appellant. Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land Administration and ......lip;………Respondents Judgment July 29.1980. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (N. H. Khondaker, Advocate with him), instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellant. Md. Moksudur Rahman, Deputy A......ust succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court Division is set aside. Let the Government proceed in accordance with law. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Jamal Soap Factory, Narayanganj Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....ates to the income for the period 1365 B.S. suffers from want of jurisdiction. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the question is answered in the negative. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......ppellate Division (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim J Ruhul Islam J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Jamal Soap Factory, Narayanganj……………………………....................Appellant. Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca..................Respondent Judgment. J......ates to the income for the period 1365 B.S. suffers from want of jurisdiction. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the question is answered in the negative. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......ates to the income for the period 1365 B.S. suffers from want of jurisdiction. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the question is answered in the negative. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 78
People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Sri Sri Madan Gopal Jew Bigraha and ors., 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... before the trial Court or the learned Judge, was necessary and whether the learned Judge was correct in holding that the suit challenging acquisition of property under any of the provisions of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act could be maintained if the preparation of the compensation ......Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet and others ..........Appellants. Vs. Sri Sri Madan Gopal Jew Bigraha and ors. ...........Respondents. Judgment ......es Referred to- Jalil Ahmed vs. The Province of East Pakistan (1967) 19 DLR 106; Tanvir Ahmed Siddiky Vs. The Province of East Pakistan (1968)20 DLR (SC) 144. Lawyers Involve: Md. Moksudur Rahman, Dy. Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on- Record —Fo...... of the first appellate Court is empowered to question validity of Hate Court and restore that of the trial Court recording abatement of the suit, There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury & others Vs. Gani Ahmed and others, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....is is a question of fact and hardly arises in this appeal by special leave. For the foregoing reason, we dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 1. ...... 1. ......is is a question of fact and hardly arises in this appeal by special leave. For the foregoing reason, we dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 1. ......is is a question of fact and hardly arises in this appeal by special leave. For the foregoing reason, we dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 1. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Abdul Jabbar Khan @ Jabbar Khan & ors Vs. State and another, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
.... Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain, C J. Ruhul Islam, J., Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Abdul Jabbar Khan @ Jabbar Khan & ors ……..Appellants. Vs. State and another.......................................... Respondents Judgment January 24, ......Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain, C J. Ruhul Islam, J., Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Abdul Jabbar Khan @ Jabbar Khan & ors ……..Appellants. Vs. State and another.......................................... Respondents Judgment Janua......, 22 Cal. 131 ; Sheonandan Mahton vs. Emperor, 19 Cr.LJ. 263 ; Subal Chandra Nama Das vs. Abdullah Sheikh, 30 CWN 546 ; Jogesh Chandra Sarkar vs Abdul Gani, 18 Cr.LJ. 626. Lawyers Involved: Md. Meser All, Senior Advocate instructed by S.M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. M......oned in the original complaint petition and sent up for trial by the police and he will be guided by the principles enunciated above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 247 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Bangladesh Vs. Hail Abdul Gani Biswas and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....habuddin Ahmed J Bangladesh………………………… Appellant in all the appeals Vs. Hail Abdul Gani Biswas and others..................Respondents Judgment March 9, 1980. The State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 (Act XXVII of 1951), sections 95, 95(A) The Constitution ......ent: Kemaluddin Hussain CJ F. K. M. A Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Bangladesh………………………… Appellant in all the appeals Vs. Hail Abdul Gani Biswas and others..................Respondents Judgment March 9, 1980. ......ion of the High Court Division set aside and remitted back to the High Court Division for disposal. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 233 ......ion of the High Court Division set aside and remitted back to the High Court Division for disposal. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 233 ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Belayet Hossain and another Vs. Md. Abu Taher and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
.... Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Belayet Hossain and another.................. Appellants. Vs. Md. Abu Taher and others................... Respondents. Judgment January 16, 1980. The State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 (Act XXVII of 1951) section 96 The Code of Civil Procedur...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Belayet Hossain and another.................. Appellants. Vs. Md. Abu Taher and others................... Respondents. Judgment January 16, 1980. ......e Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Belayet Hossain and another.................. Appellants. Vs. Md. Abu Taher and others................... Respondents. Judgment January 16, 1980. The Sta......side and the case is remitted back to the High Court Division for disposal in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 231. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Wahid Ali and ors Vs. State, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....ourt Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain, C.J Ruhul Islam J., Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Wahid Ali and ors........................ Appellants. Vs State…………………………………Respondent Judgment January 29, 1980. The Spec......detained for taking cognizance under Special Powers Act". 3. After hearing the learned Counsel on both sides we find that this case is fully covered by our decision in the case of Seraj Mia Vs. Bangladesh (C. A. 107 of 1977) decided on April 25, 1978. In the Seraj Mia's case it has been he......e the orders of the High Court and that of the Sessions Judge and direct that the proceedings are to continue in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 229 ......e the orders of the High Court and that of the Sessions Judge and direct that the proceedings are to continue in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 229 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 33
M/s. Hossain Ahmed Vs. M/s. H. D Hossain & Brothers, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....s stipulations that the authority reserves the right to reject any bid without assigning any reason and is not bound to accept the lowest bid…………..(10) Cases Referred to- Ramphal Vs. State of Bihar, AIR 1954 (Pat.) 235; K. N. Guruswami Vs. State of Mysore, PLD 1956 (S.C.—India), 5......Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul Islam J KM Subhan J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J M/s. Hossain Ahmed represented by its proprietor Hossain Ahmed…… ...Appellant Vs. M/s. H. D Hossain & Brothers represented by its proprietor Md. Delwar Hossain and others. …......KM Subhan J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J M/s. Hossain Ahmed represented by its proprietor Hossain Ahmed…… ...Appellant Vs. M/s. H. D Hossain & Brothers represented by its proprietor Md. Delwar Hossain and others. ….. Respondents Judgment November 28, 1979. The Specific R...... allowed with cost and the order of the High Court Division in staying the operation of the order of the District Judge is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 223 ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 94
Nasiruddin Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh & ors, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....t Division and remit the case back to it for decision in the light of the observation made above. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 216 ......) 216 ......udges did hot refer to the facts involved in any one of the writ petitions before them and decided the question of the application of aforesaid Martial Law Regulation on them. Facts in brief are that Md. Ahmad Hasan got a lease for 99 years from the Government in 1963 of plot No. 10-A/4-6, Mirpur Ho......t Division and remit the case back to it for decision in the light of the observation made above. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 216 ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 157
Sayed Ali Vs. Sree Gopal Chandra Das and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....ithout any order as to costs and remit the case to the Court of first instance to dispose of the matter in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 212. ...... (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Sayed Ali........................................................Appellant. Vs. Sree Gopal Chandra Das and others…….....Respondents Judgment March 11, 1980. Th......ithout any order as to costs and remit the case to the Court of first instance to dispose of the matter in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 212. ......ithout any order as to costs and remit the case to the Court of first instance to dispose of the matter in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 212. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 96
Abu Taleb Mridha Vs. State, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....eme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Abu Taleb Mridha... Appellant. Vs. State...Respondent Judgment February 14, 1980. The Bangladesh Scheduled Offence (S.T) Order......09 ......xclusively by Special Tribunal………..(6) Case Referred to Anwar Ahmed Vs. State in Criminal Appeal Nos. 29 and 30 of 1977. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqul Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record — For the Appellant. Abdus Sobhan, Additional Attorney-Gen......se and the Court has quashed the proceedings on merit as against that accused. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 209 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Abdur Rashid Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Cabinet Affairs, Establishment Div & ors, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....ion interpreting Article 7 of the President's Order No. 67 of 1972 and Rule 7 of the Rules framed thereunder. In the facts of this case the decision of the Supreme Court of India in the case of the State of Madras vs. A.R. Sreenivasam A.I.R, 1966 (S.C.) 1827 relied upon by the learned Counsel, has......e Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain, C. J., Ruhul Islam, J. Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Abdur Rashid...... ………………………..Appellant. Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Cabinet Affairs, Establishment Division & ors...........Respondents ....... He further submitted that Article 7 of the President's Order No. 67 of 1972 and Rule 7 of the Rules framed there-under sufficiently indicate, as held by this Division in the case of Bangladesh vs. Md. Abu Taker 31 DLR (AD) 33, that Article 7 of the President's Order No. 67 of 1972 provides for ......ere will be no order as to costs. Order of the Court By Majority view the appeal is dismissed but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 201 ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 70
12991297129612921290128812871284128312791277127512741273127212711270126912681267