Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5241-5260 of 6458 results.
Md. Nurul Amin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... error in the decision. This petition, therefore, being bereft of substance stands dismissed. Ed. ......has been mentioned above, we do not find that the High Court Division committed any error in the decision. This petition, therefore, being bereft of substance stands dismissed. Ed. ......has been mentioned above, we do not find that the High Court Division committed any error in the decision. This petition, therefore, being bereft of substance stands dismissed. Ed. ......awyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-Respondent Criminal Petition for leave to Appeal No. 85 of 2004 (From the Judgment and Order dated 15.02.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 163..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Mahbubur Rahman Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ka Collectorate Building, Dhaka.........Respondent Judgment August 1, 2004. Result: The leave petition is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented-Respondent. Criminal Pet...... made on behalf of the petitioner we do not find any ground to lay our hands. There being no substance in the petition, the said leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... also Reported in: ......k, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented-Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 193 of 2003 (Form the Judgment and Order dated 03.08.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 777 of 1987) ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Mizanur Rahman alias Mithu and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....d Criminal Appeal No. 1243 of 2000) Judgement: Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- Mizanur Rahman alias Mithu and Masud Uddin alias Md. Masud Uddin alias Badal, the two convict petitioners seek leave to appeal against the judgment ......granted to consider the same. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ...... ......rt Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Mizanur Rahman alias Mithu and another……....Petitioner Vs The State………&h..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Chair, Board of Int. and Secondary Education, Jessore and others Vs. Nazir Ahmed, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......lity. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......et Hossain and others Vs. Bangladesh Oil, Gas and Mineral Corporation, 51 DLR, 104; 4 BLC (AD) 65; Secretary, Ministry of Communications, Road and Road Transport Division and another Vs. Md. Azizur Rahman and others, 46 DLR (AD) 19. Lawyers Involved: Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advoca...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Chairman, Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Jessore and others …..Appellants. Vs. Md. Nazir A..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Bangladesh Bank & others Vs. Messers Fabrica Nacional De Monedy Timbre & others, 1998, 27 CLC (AD)
.......Respondents Judgment April 1, 1997. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent Nos. 1-2 K. S. Nabi, Attorney Gener......ive body of lawyers may consider the matter and move the Government if found necessary. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......eal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......dvocate, instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent Nos. 1-2 K. S. Nabi, Attorney General and Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate-Amicus Curiae. Not represented-Respondent No. 3. C..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Mona alias Zillur Rahman Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... This petition for leave to appeal loses merits for consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......satisfactory. So the delay is not condoned. Therefore, both on merits and on delay. This petition for leave to appeal loses merits for consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......d. ......Judgment: Abu Sayeed Ahammed J. - Accused convict seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 29-3-2001 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 283 of 1998 by a Division Bench of the High..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Md. Nurul Amin Vs. Md. Ismail and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M.A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Nurul Amin .............................Petitioner Vs. Md. Ismail and other.............) months. The petitioner is permitted to add additional grounds. However, the proceedings before the lower Court below shall continue in accordance with law. Ed. ......) months. The petitioner is permitted to add additional grounds. However, the proceedings before the lower Court below shall continue in accordance with law. Ed. ......Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M.A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Nurul Amin .............................Petitioner Vs. Md. Ismail and other........................Respondents Judgement January 16, 2005. Lawyer..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Chief Engin, Dredger Direct, BD Water Dev. Board. Vs. Chairman, 2nd Lbour Court, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....easons, we find no substance in this appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed without any orders to costs. Ed. ......ed to be taken away without issuing a show cause. 17. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed without any orders to costs. Ed. ......ed to be taken away without issuing a show cause. 17. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed without any orders to costs. Ed. ......ivil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed A hammed J Chief Engineer Dredger directorate, Bangladesh Water Dev. Board, Narayangonj and others…………….. Appellants (In both Appeals) Vs C..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Kanai Lal Roy Vs. Swaraswati Roy, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....l itself in question and prove it by adducing evidence". There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......e with law by giving opportunity to the concerned party to produce the will itself in question and prove it by adducing evidence". There is no order as to cost. Ed. ....................Appellant Vs. Swaraswati Roy alias Srimati Swaraswati Roy and others............Respondents Judgment October 31, 2004 Lawyers Involved: M.K. Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant ......Present Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzal Islam J Kanai Lal Roy.... ..............Appellant Vs. Swaraswati Roy alias Srimati Swaraswati Roy and others............Respondents Judgment October 31, 2004 Lawyers Involved..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Shamsul Huq Sarker Vs. Enamul Huq Sarker and ors., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....on decided the case correctly and no interference is called for. In the premises we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......on decided the case correctly and no interference is called for. In the premises we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......on decided the case correctly and no interference is called for. In the premises we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ...... Syed J. R Mudassir Husain CJ M. M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Shamsul Huq Sarker...............................Appellant vs Enamul Huq Sarker and ors.....................Respondent Judgment March 8, 2006 Lawyers Involved..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Trading Corporation of Bangladesh Vs. Md.Abdul Halim Bhuiyan & others (31), 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....usain CJ M. M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Trading Corporation of Bangladesh, TCB Bhaban, Kawran Bazar, Dhaka .........Appellant (in all the cases) vs Md.Abdul Halim Bhuiyan & others (31)..............Respondents (in Civil Appeal No. 56 of 2005).......ty in the impugned orders. The High Court Division, therefore, was not justified in making the Rules absolute. All the appeals are allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ty in the impugned orders. The High Court Division, therefore, was not justified in making the Rules absolute. All the appeals are allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ed by A. S. M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1 Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-5 (in all the cases) Civil Appeal Nos. 56-86 of 2005 (From the Judgment and order dated 12,04.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 4919, 4920, 4921..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Mainul Islam Vs. State and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....al Petition No. 189 of 2003) The State & others...............Respondent (In Criminal Petition No. 190 of 2003) Judgment October 14, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab all, Advocate on Record-For the Petitioner(In both the Cases) Abdul Basel Ma......e find that the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner do not inspire us to lay our hands. The petitions thus appear to be bereft of substance and hence are dismissed. Ed. ......rmation Report with Shirajdikhan Police Station in the District of Munshiganj stating, inter alia, that on 29.08.1994 while Hashimunnessa Khanam elder sister of his wife Dr. Fatema Khanam and Ataur Rahman Toni son of Hashimunnessa Khanam were going to Gudaraghat from their house at Goperpur the ......2003) Not represented-Respondent Nos. 7 &8 (In Criminal Petition No. 190 of 2003) Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 189 & 190 of 2003 (From the Judgment and Order Dated 26.11.2002 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 527 of 2000 an..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Abdul Mannan alias A. Mannan Vs. Mosammat Nurbanu & another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... criminal leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......pports the evidence of P.Ws 1 and 2 strongly. We find no infirmity in the Judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the criminal leave petition is dismissed. Ed. .................Petitioner Vs Mosammat Nurbanu & another ....................................Respondent Judgment November 8, 2003 Lawyers Involved: Obaidur Rahman Mustafa, Advocate instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner N......tafa, Advocate instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not Respondent-Respondent Criminal Petition for leave to Appeal No. 130 of 2003 (From Judgment and Order dated 7th May. 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No. 1156 of 2..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Samar Uddin and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... a period of 6 (Six) months from date. Ed. ...... Modaris Ullah of village Goyghar, PS. and District Moulavibazar be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet for a period of 6 (Six) months from date. Ed. ......o suffer rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and a fine of TK. 1000/- in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year more. 2. The prosecution case, in short, is that one Habibur Rahman, as informant, lodged First Information Report on 2.7.1994 stating inter alia that in t......Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: K. M. Hasan C J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Hamidul Haque J Md.Tafazzul Islam J Samar Uddin and another...........................Petitioner Vs The State……&hellip..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Farukur Rahman @ Farook and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ip;………………Respondent (In all cases) Judgment August 12, 2003. Lawyers Involved: Mujubur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab AH, Advocate-on- Record-For the Appellants (In all cases) Borhanuddin, Deputy Att......ce to the appellants before us. In the aforesaid premises, we are of the view that the appellants are entitled of get benefit of doubt. As a result, all the appeals are allowed. Ed. ...... Ed. ...... Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Md. Ataur Rahman Khan, Advocate-on- Record-For the Respondents (In Crl. A. No. 15-16/2001) Criminal Appeal No. 14-16 of 2001 (From the Judgment and Order dated 9th December, 1998 passed by the High Court Division in Death Reference No. 22 of ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Md. Golam Murtuza @ Isphil Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....al is allowed and the accused-appellant is set at liberty if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ......ions Jude is erroneous and can not be sustained in law. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the accused-appellant is set at liberty if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ......of imprisonment for life dated 22-4-1993 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Rajshahi in Session Case No. 105 of 1991. 2. The prosecution case, in nutshell, is that informant P.W. 1 Abdur Rahman of village Kashimpur under police Station Godagari Rajshahi lodged with Godagari P.S an......r the Appellants M.A. Rouf, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No.13 of 2002 (From the Judgment and Order dated 14th November, 2000 passed by the High Court Division, in Criminal Appeal No.772 o..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Delip Kumar Shaha Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ion is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ...... and accordingly dismissed the appeal. Since the High Court Division in its judgment considered all the points as raised, the criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......and also to pay a fine of Tk. 500/- (five hundred) each and in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one moth more each. 3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the informant Anisur Rahman, A Sub-Inspector of police D.B. Branch, Bogra, along with 2 constables on 5.2.1996 at about ......awyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not Respondent-Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 142 of 2003 (From Judgment and Order dated 22nd January, 2002 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 557 of..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Habibur Rahman alias Habu and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ioner Vs The State..............................Respondents Judgment August 31, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented-Respondent. ......But the courts below did not consider this vital aspect of the prosecution case. Petitioners are directed to prepare the paper book out of court in accordance with rules. Ed. ...... ...... Appellate Division (Criminal) Present Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Habibur Rahman alias Habu and others......................Petitioner Vs The State...........................Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 31
BUET Vs. Dr. Nizamuddin & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... For the reasons and discussions made above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... a disputed question of fact it cannot be considered in a writ petition. For the reasons and discussions made above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......p;………………………………..Respondents Judgment January 30, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mr. Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on- Record-For the Appellants ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Bangladesh University of Engineering & Technology and others.........Appellants vs Dr. Nizamuddin & others……&hel..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Sree Subas Chandra Sarker , 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order of costs. Ed. ......llate Court. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order of costs. Ed. ......llate Court. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order of costs. Ed. ...... (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J The Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet and others..........................Appellants. vs Sree Subas Chandra Sarker being de..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
20762075207420722071206920682065206320612060205920562055205420532052205120492047