Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5281-5300 of 5664 results.
Haji Md. Shariatullah Vs. Ashrafun Nessa Bibi and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....Division (Civil) Present: AM Sayem CJ Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Haji Md. Shariatullah......Appellant Vs. Ashrafun Nessa Bibi and others. ...Respondents......g regard to the considerations made above we find no substance in this appeal. It is accordingly dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 91. ....... ......p; Present: AM Sayem CJ Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Haji Md. Shariatullah......Appellant Vs. Ashrafun Nessa Bibi and others. ...Respondents Judgment July 3, 1975..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Khondkar Mohiuddin Vs. Syed Moin Ahmed, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
..... 375; Abdul Majid Vs. Khalil 12 D.L.R. (S.C.) 132. Lawyers Involved: S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate, with S.C. Das, Advocate, instructed by A. W. Mian, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Md. Nurul Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 100-D of 1968. (From t......dgment and decree of the High Court are set aside and the judgment and decree of the Court of Additional District Judge are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 85. ...... Judge are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 85. ......Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Khondkar Mohiuddin…………...Appellant. Vs. Syed Moin Ahmed…………....Respondent Judgment August 13, 1976. Cases referr..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Mozaffar Ahmed Vs. Md. Osman and anr, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....on (Civil) Present: Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Mozaffar Ahmed………...Appellant. Vs. Md. Osman and anr.........Respondents. Judgment &n...... is .barred by limitation. The appeal shall be disposed of on the evidence already on record. The appeal is disposed of in aforesaid terms without any order as to costs. Ed. ......isposed of in aforesaid terms without any order as to costs. Ed. ......late Division (Civil) Present: Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Mozaffar Ahmed………...Appellant. Vs. Md. Osman and anr.........Respondents. Judgment &nb..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 239
....l)
Present:
Syed AB Mahmud Husain CJ
Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J
Kemaluddin Hossain J
Lal Meah, being dead his heirs Momena Khatun & others………..Appellants.
Vs.
Haji Md. Ibrahim Meah and others......Respondents
Judgment
November 28, 1975.
Result:
The ...... call such additional evidence on the question as it may deem fit.
In the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 61. ......te—Respondent No. 2—5.
Civil Appeal No. 8 -D of 1970.
(From the Judgment and Decree date 24-2-1966 passed by the Dacca High Court in S. A. No. 1917 of 1961).
Judgment
Kemaluddin Hossain J.—This is a Defendant's appeal by special leave arising out of a suit for recovery of p......ion
(Civil)
Present:
Syed AB Mahmud Husain CJ
Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J
Kemaluddin Hossain J
Lal Meah, being dead his heirs Momena Khatun & others………..Appellants.
Vs.
Haji Md. Ibrahim Meah and others......Respondents
Judgment
November 28, 1975.
Re..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Syed Mofazzal Hossain Vs. The Election Commissioner and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....the setting aside of the election of the Vice-Chairman and the members is declared to have been without jurisdiction and as such void. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ......the setting aside of the election of the Vice-Chairman and the members is declared to have been without jurisdiction and as such void. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ...... void. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ......e Division (Civil) Present: Syed ABM Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Syed Mofazzal Hossain…………...Appellant. Vs. The Election Commissioner and others……..Respondents. Judgment November 24, 197..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Bangladesh Vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... Pakistan in Civil Re-vision Case No. 101 of 1968). Judgment: Kemaluddin Hossain, J.—Facts leading to the grant of Special leave to appeal are as follows: Respondent 1, Md. Abdur Razzak obtained a money decree against Respondent 2, Md. Belayet Ali Khan, a Government C......l subsist subject to the prior lien or charge of the Government and in accordance with the observation made herein. The appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Ed. ......J. Syed A. B. Mahmud Hussain, J. Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain, J. Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya. J. Bangladesh……Appellant. Vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another………. Respondents Judgment ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Abdul Quader Chowdhury and others Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for expeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ......section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for expeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ...... 866, M.S. Khawaja Vs. State, 17 DLR (SC) 153. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by A. Rab, Advocate-on-Record—For the appellants (In both the appeals). B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent (In both the appeals). Criminal Appeal Nos. 28 &...... Fazle Munim J Abdul Quader Chowdhury and others...............Appellants (In Criminal Appeal No. 28 of 1974). Sk. Sarwaruddin……..... Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 29 of 1974). Vs. The State ………………...Respondent Judgment February 10, 1976. Result: T..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 225
Abdur Razzaque & anr Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......bsp; is dismissed. Ed. ...... F.K.M.A. Munim J Abdur Razzaque & anr………………..Appellants. Vs. The State............................Respondent Judgment Jan. 14, 1976. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
The Com. of Income-tax Chittagong zone, Ctg. Vs. M/s Everett Orient Line Corpn, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ocate, Supreme Court, instructed by A.M. Khan Chowdhury Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Asrarul Hosain, Senior Advocate will Mohammad Hassan, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent in C.A. No. 15-D/71 S.R. Pal, Sen......ght in so far it allowed the three assessees' initial depreciation under s. 10(2)(vi) of the Act. We find no reason to interfere. All the three appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......o interfere. All the three appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J. Kemaluddin Hossain, J. Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya, J. The Commissioner of Income-tax Chittagong zone, Chittagong.............Appellant. Vs. M/s. Everett Orient Line Corporation and others........... Respondents Judgment ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 134
Government of Bangladesh & ors Vs. M/s. Samir & Co, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....d, Additional Attorney-General, with Mahmudul Islam, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by A.W. Mallik, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellants. Ahmadur Rahman Khan, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nurul, Huq, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 10 of 1972. (From......ct, and therefore no question of irregular exercise of jurisdiction does arise in this case. The result therefore is that this appeal is dismissed but there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... this appeal is dismissed but there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ppellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed A.B.M. Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J D. C. Bhattacharya J Government of Bangladesh & ors........Appellant Vs. M/s. Samir & Co…………..Respondent Judgment November 20, 1975. Cases ref..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 258
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Dacca Zone Vs. M/s. Gulistan Cinema Co., 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....urally. from them, it is neither arbitrary nor capricious. There is hardly any to disturb this finding of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ......urally. from them, it is neither arbitrary nor capricious. There is hardly any to disturb this finding of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ny order as to costs. Ed. ...... A. B. Mahmud Hussain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Dacca Zone........Appellant Vs. M/s. Gulistan Cinema Co...................Respondents Judgment 17th..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 126
Matilal Sikder & ors Vs. Benodini Dasi, being dead her heirs Bepin B Das & ors, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ordinate Judge are restored. As there is no appearance on behalf of the respondent there; shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 5. ......ordinate Judge are restored. As there is no appearance on behalf of the respondent there; shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 5. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: A. M. Sayem CJ S. A. B. Mahmud Hussain J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debash Chandra Bhattacharya J Matilal Sikder & ors……....... A. B. Mahmud Hussain J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debash Chandra Bhattacharya J Matilal Sikder & ors……... Appellants Vs. Benodini Dasi, being dead her heirs Bepin Behari Das and others.........Respondents ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Ayub Ali Howladar Vs. Election Tribunal Bagerhat, Khulna and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... in this Division. We do not find any error in the conclusion of the Tribunal, nor in the decision of the High Court Division. The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... in this Division. We do not find any error in the conclusion of the Tribunal, nor in the decision of the High Court Division. The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs. Ed. ......cision of the High Court Division. The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs. Ed. ......4(C) of the Evidence Act. The quantum of evidence necessary to rebut the presumption is a question more of fact than law. 9. Some decisions have been cited from the Bar. They are: Niaz Ahmed Vs. Azimuddin 19 D.L.R. (S.C.) 388; Abdus Sattar Rana Vs. S.M. Zaidi, 20 DLR (S.C.) 292 ; Rahis Mi..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 101
Golam Hafez Mia Vs. Khadem Ali Meah, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....9 DLR 333; Tarangini Debi 19 DLR 57; Keramat Ali Vs. Mohammad Yunus, 15 DLR (SC) 130. Lawyers Involved: M. Nurullah, Advocate, instructed by S.M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Md. Fazlul Karim, Advocate instructed by A, W. Mian, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civ......s of the arrival of the records in the court below, shall be dismissed with cost. The cost of this appeal shall abide the result of the suit. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 311. ...... appeal shall abide the result of the suit. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 311. ......t Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed ABM Hussain CJ Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Golam Hafez Mia……………………………… Appellant. Vs. Khadem Ali Meah .........................Respondent Judgment November 17, 1977. Resu..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Amir Sultan Ali Hyder Vs. Md. K. Alam alias S. Alam & others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....ellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed ABM Husain CJ Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Amir Sultan Ali Hyder................................ Appellant. Vs. Md. K. Alam alias S. Alam & others............. Respondents Judgment July 1, 1977. R...... not be binding on the Courts below. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed. We, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1977) 29 DLR (SC) 295.......appointing him as Mutwalli. “To The Commissioner of Wakfs, Government of East Pakistan. Dacca. Sir, I beg most respectfully to state that my father Md. Amir Ali, Mutwalli of Salamat Hossain Wakf Estate has expired on 5-4-67 in the Rajshahi Medical College Hospital, In accordance ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed ABM Husain CJ Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Amir Sultan Ali Hyder................................ Appellant. Vs. Md. K. Alam alias S. Alam & others............. Respondents Judgment July 1, 197..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 182
Mannujan Begum Vs. A. Samad Molla & others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... unsustainable. The appeal is, therefore, allowed and the orders of stay passed by the learned Sub Ordinate Judge are set aside. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... unsustainable. The appeal is, therefore, allowed and the orders of stay passed by the learned Sub Ordinate Judge are set aside. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......dge are set aside. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. .......A.B. Mahmud Husain C J K. Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Mannujan Begum………………………..Appellant. Vs. A. Samad Molla & others................... Respondents. Judgment Nov...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Bikash Ranjan Das Vs. The Chairman, Second Labour Court, Dacca and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... Vs. The Chairman, Second Labour Court, Dacca and others..............Respondents Judgment June 14, 1977. Lawyers Involved: B.N. Chowdhury, Advocate, with Md. Ismail Khan, Advocate, instructed by S. M. Huq Advocate-on-record—For the peti......c tribunal or not. That a different conclusion is possible is no ground for interference. We therefore do not find any good reason to grant leave. This petition is dismissed. Ed. ......reason to grant leave. This petition is dismissed. Ed. .......M. Hussain CJ A. Chowdhury J K. Hossain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Fazal Munim J Bikash Ranjan Das…………............ Petitioner. Vs. The Chairman, Second Labour Court, Dacca and others..............Respondents Jud..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 151
Md. Shaukat Ali Mia Vs. Administrator of Wakfs and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed A.B.M. Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Md. Shaukat Ali Mia…………………………......r of Wakfs, for its disposal in the manner indicated above, and in accordance with law. The costs of this appeal shall abide the result of proceeding before the Administrator. Ed. ......hy;fore the Administrator. Ed. ...... D.C. Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Md. Shaukat Ali Mia………………………………….. Appellant. Vs. Administrator of Wakfs and others ……….....Respondent. Judgme..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
The State Vs. Fazu Kazi alias Kazi Fazlur Rahman and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....boration thereof. It is not, however, necessary that independent evidence by itself should be sufficient to sustain a conviction. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......boration thereof. It is not, however, necessary that independent evidence by itself should be sufficient to sustain a conviction. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ...... the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ...... (Criminal) Present: Syed A.B.M. Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Fazle Munim J The State.....................Appellant. Vs. Fazu Kazi alias Kazi Fazlur Rahman and others .................Respondents. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Afsar Ali Moral Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....bsp; January 20, 1977. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate with Md. Abdur Rahim, Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Abu Bakkar, Advocate on-Record.—For P...... to transportation for life under section 364 B.P.C. In our view the sentence passed should be read as one passed under section 303/109 B.PC instead of under Section 364 B.P. Code. Ed. ...... as one passed under section 303/109 B.PC instead of under Section 364 B.P. Code. Ed. ......tion 364. The law in respect of the charge for the offence of abduction followed by murder and the recovery of the dead body has been clearly laid down by this court in the case of Hafez Abul Khair Vs. The State in Criminal Appeal No. 4 of 1975 of this court. Needless to say that the decision of..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
955954953949947946945944943942941940939938937935934933932931