Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5281-5300 of 6409 results.
Gopal Das Soni and another Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....d. This petition for leave to appeal is by the plaintiff-petitioners against the judgment and order dated August 14, 2000 of the High Court Division in Civil Revision 4302 of 1999 making the Rule absolute and consequent thereupon set aside the judgment and decree dated April 22,1999 of th...... This petition for leave to appeal is by the plaintiff-petitioners against the judgment and order dated August 14, 2000 of the High Court Division in Civil Revision 4302 of 1999 making the Rule absolute and consequent thereupon set aside the judgment and decree dated April 22,1999 of the 2nd ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Dawad Ali Sardar (Md) Vs. Kazi Mujibar Rahman and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ent and order dated 12-7-2002. Being aggrieved the accused respondent preferred Criminal Revision No. 686 of 2002 before the' High Court Division and the High Court Division after hearing made the Rule absolute and the judgments and order of conviction and sentence passed by the Courts below wer......nd order dated 12-7-2002. Being aggrieved the accused respondent preferred Criminal Revision No. 686 of 2002 before the' High Court Division and the High Court Division after hearing made the Rule absolute and the judgments and order of conviction and sentence passed by the Courts below were set..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 34
State Vs. Sailendra Chandra Borman, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... Judgment MM Ruhul Amin J. - This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 9-74998 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No.249 of 1997 making the Rule absolute and quashing the proceedings of Special Case No.7 of 1996 under sections 419/ 420/467/......udgment MM Ruhul Amin J. - This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 9-74998 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No.249 of 1997 making the Rule absolute and quashing the proceedings of Special Case No.7 of 1996 under sections 419/ 420/467/471/1..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Saimuddin (Md) Vs. Amjad Ali and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ivision under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure in Civil Revision No.5411 of 2003 and a learned Single Judge of the High Court Division by the impugned judgment and order discharged the Rule. 8. Hence is this petition. 9. In support of the petition Mr. Mostafa Niaz Moham......w as to payment of Court fees, if any, by the plaintiff. With the above observation, this petition is disposed of. Ed This case is also reported in: 13 BLC (AD) (2008) 40. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Shahe Alam (Md) Vs. Md. Golam Sarwar and others, 2000, 29 CLC (AD)
.... Tribunal who also upheld the decision of the Tribunal. The petitioner then moved the High Court Division in the present revisional application No. 2561 of 1999 and the. High Court Division issued Rule. Thereafter on 16-8-1999 an application was filed on behalf of respondent No. 1 praying for di......o substance in this petition. The petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (AD) (2000) 164. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 112
ASF Rahman and others Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others, 1999, 28 CLC (AD)
...., ASF Rahman, Salman F Rahman, Iqbal Ahmed and MA Qasem is from the judgment and order dated 9 May 1999 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 463 of 1998 discharging the Rule Nisi and awarding a cost of Taka 5000.00 to each of the contesting respondents. 2. The sali......for grant of leave in this case or to interfere with the ultimate decision of the High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (AD) (2000) 61. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 139
Moulana Delwar Hosain Saydee Vs. Sudhangshu Shekhor Halder and others, 2000, 29 CLC (AD)
.... official mark on their back. The counterfoils are also mandatorily required to be stamped with the official mark not on the back side but on the front side. He has also referred to Article 31(5), Rule 22(a)(i)(ii) and Article 36(4)(i) and (ii) and submits that the High Court Division did not co......icipation of Shahidul Islam in the election process. The Tribunal has merely found that by the unauthorised act of Shahidul Islam the whole election of this particular centre was vitiated. There is absolutely no finding by either the Tribunal or the High Court Division as to how and in what manne..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 126
Mozzammel Haq Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....he identity of the appellant or his proposer and second, the defect as to number of ward, if any, ought to have been allowed to be remedied, as has been provided in proviso (ii) of sub-rule (3) of Rule 16 of the Union Parishad (Election) Rules, 1976. 4. Mr. Ahmed Sobhan, Counsel for the ......e Rules, power to dismiss the appeal summarily. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (SC) (1978) 306. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Abdul Wahab Talukdar alias Mohammad & others Vs. State and another, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
.... For the reasons, we allowed the appeals, set aside the orders of the High Court and restore those orders of the Magistrate. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (SC) (1978) 278. ...... For the reasons, we allowed the appeals, set aside the orders of the High Court and restore those orders of the Magistrate. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (SC) (1978) 278. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Amal Kumar Moitra Vs. Md. Mashiur Rahman, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....tructed by B.C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record- For Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 123 of 1977 (On appeal from the judgment and order dated January 30, 1978 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Rule No. 719 of 1975) Judgement Ruhul Islam J.- This appeal by special leave arises out of the......ly. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs, the order of the High Court is set aside and that of the trial Court restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (SC) (1978) 244. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 142
Master Abdul Aziz Vs. Abani Mohan Mukherjee and others, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....w under order 47 rule 1 CPC. (b) Whether the respondent Abani who is an Indian and such an enemy alien could defend the appeal by filing a Vokalotnama in view of the Defence of Pakistan Rules.” 3. Mr. Moinul Huq, learned counsel for the appellant contended that the Or......i. Reliable materials were also filed before the High Court to show that the representation made on 31.7.70 by the appellant regarding the death of respondent on the basis of death certificate was absolutely false inasmuch as respondent Abani did not die. There was, therefore no question of abat..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 116
Mrs. Halima Khatun Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....le Munim, J.—Civil Petition No. 171 of 1977 arises from the judgment and order of the Division Bench of the High Court passed in Writ Petition No. 82 of 1977 on June 21, 1977, discharging the Rule on the ground that as the question whether the properly involved was abandoned property ......er the petitions have abated not cannot be in the affirmative. The petitions are, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (SC) (1978) 207. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 307
Faridul Alam Vs. State and another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....instance of the petitioner Faridul Alam, an accused under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the judgment and order dated 28-3-2005 of the High Court Division discharging the Rule in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 10039 of 2004. 2. The respondent No.2 Kaji Md Abu Tayeb l......made above, we do not find any grounds to interfere. The criminal petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (AD) (2009) 93; 16 BLT (AD) 51; 13 BLC (AD) 61. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 138
Taher and others Vs. Md. Abdul Kuddus and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....Ruhul Amin J. - This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 30-7-2006 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No. 1395 of 1993 discharging the Rule. 2. Prosecution case, in brief, is that the informant on the murder of his brother, Abd...... finding of the High Court Division and the Court of Session. With this observation the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLT (AD) (2008) 277. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Abdul Jabbar (Md) Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh & others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... MM Ruhul Amin J.- This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 8-5-2007 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.7427 of 2006 discharging the Rule. 2. Short facts are that the writ petitioner as Chairman of the Managing Committee of Sankar......ew of the discussion made above, we are of the view that the High Court Division upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. The petition is dismissed Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Azizul Hoque Vs. State and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....e same. The informant then preferred Criminal Revision No.549 of 2003 before the High Court Division challenging the above order dated 31-7-2002 and the High Court Division, after hearing, made the Rule absolute, 3. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the....... The informant then preferred Criminal Revision No.549 of 2003 before the High Court Division challenging the above order dated 31-7-2002 and the High Court Division, after hearing, made the Rule absolute, 3. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the High ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Salahuddin Talukder, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ants arose out of Civil Petition No. 888 of 2002 filed against the judgment and order dated 15th and 16th April, 2002 of the High Court Division passed in Writ Petition No. 5981 of 2000 making the Rule absolute declaring section 8 of the Non-Cadre Class-I and II, Gazetted Officer (Customs Excise......arose out of Civil Petition No. 888 of 2002 filed against the judgment and order dated 15th and 16th April, 2002 of the High Court Division passed in Writ Petition No. 5981 of 2000 making the Rule absolute declaring section 8 of the Non-Cadre Class-I and II, Gazetted Officer (Customs Excise and ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 133
Government of Bangladesh and another Vs. Sheikh Hasina and another, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....t the time of the commission of the offence….(103) The offence under section 385/109 of the Penal Code or the offences created by various laws mentioned in rules 14 or 15 of the Emergency Power Rules, 2007 can be tried under the said Rules. Neither the Emergency Power Ordinance nor the Rules c...... Judgment Md. Abdul Matin J.- This civil appeal on leave is directed against the judgment and order 6-2-2008 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 6576 of 2007 making the Rule absolute and quashing the proceeding of Metropolitan Sessions Case No. 2576 of 2007 under sections 3..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 254
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Shamsul Huda and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....taining the opinion of the learned Chief Justice of Bangladesh about the appointment of concerned six Judges through the Attorney-General at the time of hearing and further directing that all other Rules being Writ Petition Nos. 1543 of d 2003, 2975 of 2003 and 3217 of 2003 should come up in the ......ections and guidelines, the appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court Division appealed against is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 108. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 124
A. B. M. Shamsuddin Vs. Mahmuda Selina and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... obtain the kabala executed and registered by the said defendant. 4. Thereafter, the defendant-respondent made two applications on 16-04-1998 and 17-06-1998 before the Court under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure for rejection of the plaint. The plaintiff-petitioner withou......ngs and decisions as arrived at by the High Court Division. In the aforesaid premises, we find no merit in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 41
23872386238523842382238023782376237523732371237023682367236523642363236023592356