Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5341-5360 of 6123 results.
M/s Hajee Mohammad Ali & Sons Vs. Burma Eastern Ltd. & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 41. ......others Vs. Abdul Hamid Khan and others (1965) 17 DLR (SC) 550; Abul Khair Mia Vs. Abdul Latif Sardar (1980) 32 DLR 167. Lawyers Involved: Maksumul Hakim, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellant. Altaf Hussain, instructed by Syed Sakhawat All,......) (1986) 41. ......dgment of the High Court DiviÂsion is set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 41. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Md. Jashimuddin Vs. The State, 1985, 14 CLC (AD)
....wed, judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and the case is remanded back to the High Court Division for rehearing on merit. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 35. ...... R.G. Jadav vs. State of Bombay, AIR 1960 (SC) 748; Dahu Raut's case, 62 Ind, App. (AIR 1935 P.C. 89). Lawyers Involved: Miah Abdul Gafur Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellant. M. Moazzem Hossain, Deputy Attorney-GeÂneral, instructed by M.R. Khan, Advocate-on- Record—For the Responden......wed, judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and the case is remanded back to the High Court Division for rehearing on merit. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 35. ......wed, judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and the case is remanded back to the High Court Division for rehearing on merit. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 35. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Farruk Ahmed Vs. Abdul Kader Chowdhury and others, 1985, 14 CLC (AD)
....ondents who are enlarged on bail will now surrender to their bail bond and fresh prayer for bail may be made before the Sessions Judge. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 18. ......aint petition on 16. 1. 80 disclosing some new facts, which came to his knowledge after lodging the F.I.R. This petition was marked C.R. Case No. 32 of 1980 and it was forwarded to Mr. A.K. M. Delwar Hossain, Magistrate, 1st Class, for examination of witnesses. The learned Magistrate after examining......DLR (AD) (1986) 18. ......ondents who are enlarged on bail will now surrender to their bail bond and fresh prayer for bail may be made before the Sessions Judge. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 18. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 105
Mst. Esarunnessa Bibi Vs. Md. Amir Hossain, 1985, 14 CLC (AD)
..... Judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Appellate Court below are restored. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 1. ......R (AD) (1986) 1. ...... (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Mst. Esarunnessa Bibi being dead her heirs Amjad Hossain & others……………… Appellants Vs. Md. Amir Hossain………………………………….. Respondents Judgment Septemb....... Judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Appellate Court below are restored. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 1. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Jabed Ali Sarker Vs. Dr. Sultan Ahmed and another, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....question of fact and since this has been decided by the Courts below, we find no substance in the contention of the learned Counsel. This appeal is accordingly dismissed with cost. ......med. Additional Attorney General, M. Nurullah, Advocate, instructed by S. M. Haq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Rufiq-ul-Huq, Advocate (T. Islam, Advocate with him) instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on- Record—(For the Respondent No. 1). Ex-parte—Responden......v respondent No. 1 we find consideration as to whether the burden of proof on the charge of forgery have been duly discharged. 12. It has been held in the case of Abdul Majid and others Vs. Khaiil Ahmed, reported in P.L.D. 1955 F.C. 38 that "the High Court has no jurisdiction to......question of fact and since this has been decided by the Courts below, we find no substance in the contention of the learned Counsel. This appeal is accordingly dismissed with cost. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 113
Governor, Bangladesh Bank & others Vs. Shamsul Huda Khan and another, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....rightly declared by the High Court Division to be without jurisdiction and of no legal effect. The appeals are dismissed, but without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......hamÂmad Khan, 12 D.L.R. (S.C.) page 50; High Court, Calcutta and another Vs. Amal Kumar Roy and others, A.I.R. 1962 S.C. page 1704. Lawyers involved: S. R. Pal, Senior Advocate with Dr. Ahmed Hossain, Advocate, instructed by Aminul Huq, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant (In all the appea......Division (Civil) Present: A. M. Sayem CJ A. B. Mahmud Husain J M. A. Jabir J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Governor, Bangladesh Bank & others…......Appellant (In all the Appeals). Vs. Shamsul Huda Khan and another……………..ResponÂdents (In C.A. No. 26 of 1974). And ......he expressions "terms and conditions admissible to him immediately beÂfore the 10th August, 1953 as if they included his chance of promotion into a different and higher service, namely, as Assistant Secretary and Under Secretary in the Civil Secretariat. The Supreme Court held that upon the resÂ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Osman Gani Mondal Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and others, 1974, 3 CLC (AD)
....oner Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and others…......Respondents Judgment April 26, 1974. Result: The petition is dismissed. Lawyers involved: Md. Ansar Ali, Advocate, instructed by Mohammad A. Aziz, Advocate-on-Record. —For the Petitioner. Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Additional Attor......d by the learned Additional Attorney-General thus sucÂceeds. This petition which was lodged on the 14th day of May, 1973 is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 61. ......(1975) 61. ......d by the learned Additional Attorney-General thus sucÂceeds. This petition which was lodged on the 14th day of May, 1973 is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 61. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 148
Saokat Ali and others Vs. Shamsun Bibi and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....nally. We find no substance in the only contention raised in support of this petition, which is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 DLR (AD) (1975) 59. ......dar, 15 DLR 634; Umar Din Vs. Fazal Din, PLR 5 Lah. 196; Visheswar Vs. Durgappa, AIR 1940 Bom. 339; Vithoba Kadhar Vs. Madhar jemedar, (1918) ILR 42 Bom. 344. Lawyers involved: Akram Hossain Amin, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Not represented—the Respondents. ...... Present: A. M. Sayem CJ A. B. Mahmud Husain J M.A. Jabir J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Saokat Ali and others…………...Petitioners. Vs. Shamsun Bibi and others……….....Respondents Judgment J......nally. We find no substance in the only contention raised in support of this petition, which is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 DLR (AD) (1975) 59. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Jamdhar Khan Vs. The State, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....of a sum of Rs. 915/- by the petitioner. There is no merit in this petition and the Leave prayed for is refused. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 35. ......llip;……………………....Respondent Judgment February 28, 1973. Lawyers involved: Abdul Hamid, Advocate, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Petitioner. Not represented—the Respon......Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed A. B. Mahmud Husain J M. A. Jabir J Jamdhar Khan……………….....Appellant. Vs. The State………………………....Res......of a sum of Rs. 915/- by the petitioner. There is no merit in this petition and the Leave prayed for is refused. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 35. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Lutfun Nahar Begum Vs. The State, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....al is allowed and the order of commitment of the appellant is set aside. The appellant is discharged from the bail bond. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 29. ......h Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, 1952 SCR (India) 526; Emperor Vs. Lalit Mohan, (1911) ILR 38 Cal. 559; In re Periyaswami Moopan, 1981 1LR 54 Mad. 75; Joygun Bibi Vs. State, 12 DLR (SC) 156; Maqbool Hossain Vs. State, (1962) 12 DLR (SC) 217; Pakala Narayan Swami Vs. King Emperor, LR 1939 IA LXVI 6...... ......al is allowed and the order of commitment of the appellant is set aside. The appellant is discharged from the bail bond. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 29. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Shamsuddin Ahmed @ Tofa Mia & others Vs. Abdul Latif Bhuiyan, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....actment of the Transfer of Property Act, it is the statute; the former view found favour with the majority of the learned Judges of the Full Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Begum vs. Mohammad Yakub. ILR 16 All. 344; and this view was approved by the Privy Council in a later case. O......of the High Court Division is set aside and those of the Courts below are restored. Ed. ......ofa Mia & others……………………………………………………Appellants Vs. Abdul Latif Bhuiyan, being dead, his heirs: Asia Khatun and ors………&...... the facts of this case. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and those of the Courts below are restored. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Bangladesh Bank Vs. Debendra Nath Dutta, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....view of the above, the appeal is allowed, the decision of the Appellate Beach is set aside and that of the company Judge restored. However, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......de and that of the company Judge restored. However, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......aluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Bangladesh Bank .................................Appellant Vs. Debendra Nath Dutta ……………………...........d an application under section 66/1) of the Banking Companies Ordinance, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Ordinance') for the public examination of the respondent who was the former Secretary of Patuakhali Bank Limited (in liquidation), before the erstwhile High Court of East Paki..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Sunil Kumar Biswas Vs. Mohammad Idris and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Sunil Kumar Biswas …………………….Appellant Vs. Mohammad Idris and others…………Respondents Judgment April......entions raised by Mr. Khondker. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with cost. Ed. ...... Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Sunil Kumar Biswas …………………….Appellant Vs. Mohammad Idris and others…………Respondents Judgment ......right of Kol-karsha. In the result, we do not find any substance in any of the contentions raised by Mr. Khondker. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Sanjib Kumar Bose and another Vs. Syed Shamsuddin Ahmed and another, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....h Court Division must be reversed. The appeal is allowed, judgment and decree of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the trial court are restored. No order as to cost. Ed. ......h him, instructed by Abu Backkar, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellants. Khondaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Mahbubey Alam, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Respondent No. 1. Ex-parte—Respondent No. ......on (Civil) Present: Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Sanjib Kumar Bose and another.....................Appellant Vs. Syed Shamsuddin Ahmed and another…………….Respondents ......h Court Division must be reversed. The appeal is allowed, judgment and decree of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the trial court are restored. No order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Dr. Jamshed Bakht Vs. Ameaur Rashid Chowdhury, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....r Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court In view of the decisions of the majority, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......r Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court In view of the decisions of the majority, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ...... Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Dr. Jamshed Bakht……………………….. Appellant Vs. Ameaur Rashid Chowdhury…………………Respondent...... of the facts of the case. The appellant Dr. Jamshed Bakht was the Chief Medical Officer, Sylhet District Medical Association and a private Medical Practitioner. He was an Assistant Surgeon, Secretary of the Red Cross, etc. He was also a teacher in Sylhet Medical School when it was starte..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Md. Abdur Rouf and others Vs. Ahmuda Khatun and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
..... For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Trial Court are restored. Ed. ......f the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Trial Court are restored. Ed. ...... Fazle Munim J And Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Md. Abdur Rouf and others…………………….Appellants Vs. Ahmuda Khatun and others...................Respondents Judgment July 10, ....... For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Trial Court are restored. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Bangladesh Freedom Fighters Welfare TrÂust Vs. Burhanuddin Chowdhury, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....pellant, a statutory body, is amenable to be impugned in the writ Jurisdiction of the High Court Division. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed without any orders as to costs. Ed. ......rt Division. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed without any orders as to costs. Ed. ......pellant, a statutory body, is amenable to be impugned in the writ Jurisdiction of the High Court Division. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed without any orders as to costs. Ed. ......pellant, a statutory body, is amenable to be impugned in the writ Jurisdiction of the High Court Division. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed without any orders as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 112
A.S.A. Nur Vs. Registrar of Joint Stock Companies, Dacca, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ge and the Division Bench are set aside. The case is remitted back to the Company Judge for disposal of the matter in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......sposal of the matter in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ip;…………………………………………………………..Appellant. Vs. Registrar of Joint Stock Companies, Dacca………………......d lights were transferred to the Petroleum Corporation. By virtue of such transfer the share holding interests of Jamuna Oil Company were represented by the Petroleum Corporation and its Secretary, Mr, A.S.A Nur, the appellant in this case. Thus there are only 2 shareholders of the Jam..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 107
....ler the appeal is allowed.
The application filed by the
appellants under Order VII rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure is allowed
We make no Order as to costs.
Ed.
......ent
March
10, 1981.
Lawyers Involved:
Hamidul
Huq Chowdhury, Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury, Senior Advocates, with
A.N.M. Skahidullah, Advocate, with him instructed by Md. Aftab
Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants.
Rafiqur
Rahman, Senior Advocate instru......unim J
Ruhul
Islam J
Badrul
Haider Chowdhury J
Shahabuddin Ahmed J
Baitul Aman Co-operative Housing
Society Ltd. and another.....................Appellant
Vs.
Muhammad Shamsur Rahman and
others………………&helli......ler the appeal is allowed.
The application filed by the
appellants under Order VII rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure is allowed
We make no Order as to costs.
Ed.
..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Mohd. Jabed Ali and others Vs. Rakhal Chandra Mondal and others , 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....e dealing with the application under section 96 of the Act for preemption. Therefore, we do not find any substance in these appeals. The appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......, we do not find any substance in these appeals. The appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......sain CJ Ruhul Islam J K.M. Subhan J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Mohd. Jabed Ali and others.................................... Appellants. (For all the appeals) Vs. Rakhal Chandra Mondal and others..........................Respondents (In C.A. Nos. 143 ......e dealing with the application under section 96 of the Act for preemption. Therefore, we do not find any substance in these appeals. The appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 49
16001598159515921588158715851584158015791574157315721571157015691568156715661565