Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Governor, Bangladesh Bank & others Vs. Shamsul Huda Khan and another, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
.... Vs. Shamsul Huda Khan and another……………..Respondents (In C.A. No. 26 of 1974). And Mozammel Huq Khan and another…………..Respondents (In C.A. No. 27 of 1974). And Md. Nurul Huq & another……………………....Respondents (In C.A. No. 28 of 1974) Judgment ......rightly declared by the High Court Division to be without jurisdiction and of no legal effect. The appeals are dismissed, but without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......rightly declared by the High Court Division to be without jurisdiction and of no legal effect. The appeals are dismissed, but without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......Division (Civil) Present: A. M. Sayem CJ A. B. Mahmud Husain J M. A. Jabir J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Governor, Bangladesh Bank & others…......Appellant (In all the Appeals). Vs. Shamsul Huda Khan and another……………..Respondents (In C.A. No. 26 of 1974). And ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Badal Rani Misra alias Badal Rani Goswami and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....d. The case of Gordon, Dadds & co. supports the contention of the learned Attorney-General. There is accordingly no merit in this appeal which is dismissed but without any order as to cost. Ed. ......d. The case of Gordon, Dadds & co. supports the contention of the learned Attorney-General. There is accordingly no merit in this appeal which is dismissed but without any order as to cost. Ed. ......orders in the matter without seeking approval of Government, which was unnecessary. Reference in this connection has been made to the decision in the case of Mst. AH Begum and ors. Vs. Badrul Islam Ali Khan and others reported in A.I.R. 1938 Privy Council 184. As regards the powers of a statutory ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: AM Sayem CJ ABM Husain J MA Jabir J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Badal Rani Misra alias Badal Rani Goswami and others………..Appellants. Vs. Bangladesh and others …………….Respondents Judgment May 2, 1975. Lawyers inv..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Osman Gani Mondal Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and others, 1974, 3 CLC (AD)
....ani Mondal……………….....Petitioner Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and others…......Respondents Judgment April 26, 1974. Result: The petition is dismissed. Lawyers involved: Md. Ansar Ali, Advocate, instructed by Mohammad A. Aziz, Advocate-on-Record. —For the Petitioner. ......d by the learned Additional Attorney-General thus succeeds. This petition which was lodged on the 14th day of May, 1973 is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 61. ......……………….....Petitioner Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and others…......Respondents Judgment April 26, 1974. Result: The petition is dismissed. Lawyers involved: Md. Ansar Ali, Advocate, instructed by Mohammad A. Aziz, Advocate-on-Record. —For the Petitioner. Syed Is......(1975) 61. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 148
Saokat Ali and others Vs. Shamsun Bibi and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....nally. We find no substance in the only contention raised in support of this petition, which is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 DLR (AD) (1975) 59. ......nally. We find no substance in the only contention raised in support of this petition, which is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 DLR (AD) (1975) 59. ...... ...... Present: A. M. Sayem CJ A. B. Mahmud Husain J M.A. Jabir J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Saokat Ali and others…………...Petitioners. Vs. Shamsun Bibi and others……….....Respondents Judgment J..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Bangladesh Enemy Property Management Board and ors. Vs. Md. Abdul Majid, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....ppellate Division (Civil) Present: AB Mahmud Husain J MA Jabir J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Bangladesh Enemy Property Management Board and ors………….... .Appellants. Vs. Md. Abdul Majid…………..... Respondent Judgment March 27, 1975. Cases Referred to- ......view of what have been stated above, the appeal is allowed and the judgment and order passed by the learned Judges of the High Court Division are set aside. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......desh Enemy Property Management Board and ors………….... .Appellants. Vs. Md. Abdul Majid…………..... Respondent Judgment March 27, 1975. Cases Referred to- M. M. Mansur Ali Vs. Aradendu Shekhar Chatterjee. (1959) 21 DLR (SC) 20; Daulatpur Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Province o......urt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: AB Mahmud Husain J MA Jabir J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Bangladesh Enemy Property Management Board and ors………….... .Appellants. Vs. Md. Abdul Majid…………..... Respondent Judgment March 27, 1975. Cases Referred..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 125
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Ahmed Nazir, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....e the Proclamation of Emergency issued on the 28th December, 1974 and the Constitution (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1975 dated the 25th January, 1975 effected changes in the said Constitution. Ed. ......e the Proclamation of Emergency issued on the 28th December, 1974 and the Constitution (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1975 dated the 25th January, 1975 effected changes in the said Constitution. Ed. ......lip;.... Respondent Judgment March 19, 1975. Cases Referred to- Sandal Singh Vs. District Magistrate and Superintendent, Dehra Dun A.I.R. 1934 (Allahabad) 148; Mehboob Ali Malik Vs. The Province of West Pakistan (1963) 15 DLR (WP) 129, P.L.D. 1963 (WP); Government of...... Present: AM Sayem CJ AB Mahmud Husain J Muhammad Abdullah Jabir J Government of Bangladesh represented by Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs.....Appellant. Vs. Ahmed Nazir………….... Respondent Judgment March..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Adam Ali Sardar and others Vs. The State and another, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
.... A. B. Mahmud Husain, J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 37. ...... A. B. Mahmud Husain, J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 37. ......e is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 37. ......ate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed A.B. Mahmud Husain J M. A. Jabir J Adam Ali Sardar and others…………….... Appellants. Vs. The State and another……………………&he..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 49
Jamdhar Khan Vs. The State, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....of a sum of Rs. 915/- by the petitioner. There is no merit in this petition and the Leave prayed for is refused. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 35. ......of a sum of Rs. 915/- by the petitioner. There is no merit in this petition and the Leave prayed for is refused. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 35. ......of a sum of Rs. 915/- by the petitioner. There is no merit in this petition and the Leave prayed for is refused. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 35. ......Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed A. B. Mahmud Husain J M. A. Jabir J Jamdhar Khan……………….....Appellant. Vs. The State………………………....Res..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Lutfun Nahar Begum Vs. The State, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....antial, to connect the appellant with the murders. There is no direct evidence in this case against her. The learned Deputy Attorney General referred to certain passages in the evidences of P. W. 2 Md. Solaiir an, P. W. 3 Dulia Mia. P. W. 10 Sepoy Yakub Ali and P. W. 20 Serajul Islam Kazmi which,......al is allowed and the order of commitment of the appellant is set aside. The appellant is discharged from the bail bond. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) (1975) 29. ......ballav Saha Vs. Gopiballav Saha, 11 DLR (SC) 394; Mozhanil Huq Vs. Ishaque Sardar, 14 DLR (SC) 251. Lawyers involved: Khan Bahadur Naziruddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Mr. Behtar Ali, Advocate-on-Record — For the Appellant. A. T. M. Masud, Deputy Atto...... ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Abdul Matin Munshi Vs. Idris Pandiat and ors., 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....r for dismissal. 2. True prosecution case in short is as follows: On 1st Baishakh, 1375 B.S., corresponding to 14th April, 1968, while deceased Shamsul Huq and his elder brother P.W. 2 Md. Tajul Islam were proceeding at about 7 A.M. towards Kaliatoli Bazar for marketing, they were su......;tion 307/34. The result, therefore, is that both the appeals are dismissed subject to the modification of the Penal Code to that under section 302/34 and 307/34 of the Penal Code. Ed. ......;tion 307/34. The result, therefore, is that both the appeals are dismissed subject to the modification of the Penal Code to that under section 302/34 and 307/34 of the Penal Code. Ed. ...... Court Appellate Division (Criminal) A. M. Sayem CJ Syed A. B. Mahmud Husain J Abdullah Jabir J Abdul Matin Munshi...............Appellant. Vs. Idris Pandiat and ors .............Respondents. Idris Pandit and others …..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Solicitor, Government of Bangladesh Vs. Syed Sanwar Ali and others, 1974, 33 CLC (AD)
.... Criminal Appeal No. 2 of 1974). Subhas Chandra Ghose…… Respondent (In Criminal Appeal No. 3 of 1974). Alam Shaikh & another……. Respondent (In Criminal Appeal No. 4 of 1974). Md. Tara Miah …………………..Respondents. (In Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 1974). Khalil M......y of the circumstances indicated in the preceding paragraph can be shown to have rendered the proceeding relating to him coram non judice. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (AD) 16. ......resent: AM Sayem CJ AB Mahmud Hussain J Muhammad Abdullah Jabir J Ahsanuddin J Solicitor, Government of Bangladesh…………...Appellant (In all the appeals) Vs. Syed Sanwar Ali……………... Respondents (In Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 1974). Dr. Abdul Malek…………...... (Criminal) Present: AM Sayem CJ AB Mahmud Hussain J Muhammad Abdullah Jabir J Ahsanuddin J Solicitor, Government of Bangladesh…………...Appellant (In all the appeals) Vs. Syed Sanwar Ali……………... Respondents (In Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 1974). Dr. Abdu..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Abdur Rashid Vs. The State, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....de. The prisoner is found not guilty of the charge under section 302 of the Penal Code against him. He is acquitted of the said charge and is directed to be set at liberty forthwith. Ed. ......de. The prisoner is found not guilty of the charge under section 302 of the Penal Code against him. He is acquitted of the said charge and is directed to be set at liberty forthwith. Ed. ......ed Dao blows on Maleka and then ran away towards east. The remaining two witnesses are P. W. 3 Dr. Salahuddin who held the post-mortem examination on the dead body of Maleka and P.W. 6 Mir Murtaza Ali who investigated the case and submitted charge-sheet against the prisoner. The Doctor found the......Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: A. M. Sayem CJ A. B. Mahmud Husain J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Abdur Rashid……Appellant Vs. The State ……… Respondent Judgment February 25, 197..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Shamsuddin Ahmed @ Tofa Mia & others Vs. Abdul Latif Bhuiyan, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ah 18 C.W.N. 890, Kheyali Prosad vs. Mullick N. Islam 20 C.W.N. 1048; Radhakishan Toshniwal vs. Shidhar Ramchandra. A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 1368; Ram Saran Lai vs. Domini Kuer AIR. 1961 SC 1747 Begum vs. Md. Yakub ILR 16 All. 344; Sitaram Bhaurao vs. Jiaul Hasan Khan AIR 1923 P.C. 41; Jadu Lal Sahu vs...... the facts of this case. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and those of the Courts below are restored. Ed. ......e plaintiff instituted Title Suit No. 124 of 1962 in the second court of Munsif at Brahmanbaria for pre-emption under the Mohammedan Law against the appellants stating, inter alias, that one Jonah Ali Daroga owner for the suit plots in tenure right sold half of the property to the responden......ofa Mia & others……………………………………………………Appellants Vs. Abdul Latif Bhuiyan, being dead, his heirs: Asia Khatun and ors………&..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Sunil Kumar Biswas Vs. Mohammad Idris and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....right of Kol-karsha. In the result, we do not find any substance in any of the contentions raised by Mr. Khondker. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with cost. Ed. ......right of Kol-karsha. In the result, we do not find any substance in any of the contentions raised by Mr. Khondker. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with cost. Ed. ......right of Kol-karsha. In the result, we do not find any substance in any of the contentions raised by Mr. Khondker. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with cost. Ed. ...... Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Sunil Kumar Biswas …………………….Appellant Vs. Mohammad Idris and others…………Respondents Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Sanjib Kumar Bose and another Vs. Syed Shamsuddin Ahmed and another, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... Vs. Syed Shamsuddin Ahmed and another…………….Respondents Judgment April 22, 1981 Lawyers Involved: S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate, Md. Yasin, Advocate, with him, instructed by Abu Backkar, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Ap......h Court Division must be reversed. The appeal is allowed, judgment and decree of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the trial court are restored. No order as to cost. Ed. ......h Court Division must be reversed. The appeal is allowed, judgment and decree of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the trial court are restored. No order as to cost. Ed. ......on (Civil) Present: Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Sanjib Kumar Bose and another.....................Appellant Vs. Syed Shamsuddin Ahmed and another…………….Respondents ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Dr. Jamshed Bakht Vs. Ameaur Rashid Chowdhury, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.....; Sanjibi Raddy vs. Konary Raddy, 1926 I.L.R. 49 Mad. 315; Ahmedbhai vs. Framji (1903) I.L.R. 28 Bom 228; Golapjan vs. Bholanath Khattry (1911) I.L.R. 38 Cal. 888. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. B.K. Das, Advocate, instr......r Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court In view of the decisions of the majority, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......ent Judgment September 3, 1980. Cases Referred to- Kimber vs. The Press Association Limited 1 QB.(l&93) 1 Q.B. 65; Voni Madho Prosad Singh vs. M. WajidAli A.t.R. 1937 All 90; Bishum Porshad Norain Singh vs. Phulman Singh, 19 C. W. N. 935; C.R. Crowd...... Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Dr. Jamshed Bakht……………………….. Appellant Vs. Ameaur Rashid Chowdhury…………………Respondent..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Md. Abdur Rouf and others Vs. Ahmuda Khatun and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J And Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Md. Abdur Rouf and others…………………….Appellants....... For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Trial Court are restored. Ed. ......d and structures. Thus, while the appellants were possessing the said land in Ejmali with Sakina Bai the latter sold the B' schedule land and structures for the sum of Tk. 25, 000/- to one Keramat Ali, predecessor in-interest of the respondents Nos. 1-6 by a sale deed dated October 30, 1972 and ...... Fazle Munim J And Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Md. Abdur Rouf and others…………………….Appellants Vs. Ahmuda Khatun and others...................Respondents Judgment July 10, ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Mohd. Jabed Ali and others Vs. Rakhal Chandra Mondal and others , 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....e dealing with the application under section 96 of the Act for preemption. Therefore, we do not find any substance in these appeals. The appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......e dealing with the application under section 96 of the Act for preemption. Therefore, we do not find any substance in these appeals. The appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......eme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul Islam J K.M. Subhan J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Mohd. Jabed Ali and others.................................... Appellants. (For all the appeals) Vs. ......sain CJ Ruhul Islam J K.M. Subhan J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Mohd. Jabed Ali and others.................................... Appellants. (For all the appeals) Vs. Rakhal Chandra Mondal and others..........................Respondents (In C.A. Nos. 143 ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 49
Amanullah Bhuiyan and others Vs. Abdul Hafiz and ors, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....m the date the decree is drawn and signed or it becomes executable. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1981 BLD (AD) 210. ......m the date the decree is drawn and signed or it becomes executable. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1981 BLD (AD) 210. ......m the date the decree is drawn and signed or it becomes executable. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1981 BLD (AD) 210. ...... Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Amanullah Bhuiyan and others…………….Appellants Vs. Abdul Hafiz and ors…..........................Respondents Judgment ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Commissioner of Taxes & another Vs. M/s. Mullick Brothers, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....rom want of legal authority. In the result, therefore, this review application is allowed and the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Referred in: ......rom want of legal authority. In the result, therefore, this review application is allowed and the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Referred in: ....... H. Khan, Senior Advocate, with Muzammel Huq Bunyan, Rabia Bhuiyan, Advocates, instructed by B. Hossain Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioner. Asrarul Hossain Senior, Senior Advocate with C.R. Ali, Advocate, instructed, by Abu Bakkar, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civil Review ...... (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Commissioner of Taxes & another……………………..Petitioner Vs. M/s. Mullick Brothers…………………………………………..Respondent Judg..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 98