Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Jalaluddin Ahmed and others Vs. Md. Selim Hossain and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....king the rule absolute reversing those dated 24th May, 2006 of the District Judge, Narayangonj in Civil Revision No.37 of 2006, who by judgment and order dated 23rd January, 2006 reversed that of the Artha Rin Adalat, Narayangonj in Miscellaneous Case No. 23 of 2005. 2. The Rupali bank Limite......he rule absolute reversing those dated 24th May, 2006 of the District Judge, Narayangonj in Civil Revision No.37 of 2006, who by judgment and order dated 23rd January, 2006 reversed that of the Artha Rin Adalat, Narayangonj in Miscellaneous Case No. 23 of 2005. 2. The Rupali bank Limited inst...... the way if they file a fresh suit, for recovery of the suit property. This leave petition is dismissed with the above observations. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VII ADC (2010) 291. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Mohammad Mujibul Hoque Vs. Shamsul Alam and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....tion of the learned counsel for the petitioner. There is no merit in this petition. The application is dismissed accordingly. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VII (ADC) (2010) 233. ......tion of the learned counsel for the petitioner. There is no merit in this petition. The application is dismissed accordingly. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VII (ADC) (2010) 233. ......tion of the learned counsel for the petitioner. There is no merit in this petition. The application is dismissed accordingly. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VII (ADC) (2010) 233. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 21
Janata Bank Vs. M/S. Natun Pragoti Paribahan Sangstha and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
.... order as to costs. The appellant may however consider the prayer of the respondents in accordance with law if found tenable. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VII (ADC) (2010) 201. ...... order as to costs. The appellant may however consider the prayer of the respondents in accordance with law if found tenable. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VII (ADC) (2010) 201. ...... order as to costs. The appellant may however consider the prayer of the respondents in accordance with law if found tenable. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VII (ADC) (2010) 201. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 98
Tanvir Ul Islam Vs. General Manger, Credit Information Bureau, Bangladesh Bank, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....ly misconceived. The petitioner being director of the companies comes within the mischief of Section 5(Ga Ga) and 27 Ka Ka of the Act, 1991. The definition of loan as provided in Section 2 of the Artha Rin Ain, 2003 (shortly, the Ain) also includes a guarantor. Thus, it is clear that the legisla......conceived. The petitioner being director of the companies comes within the mischief of Section 5(Ga Ga) and 27 Ka Ka of the Act, 1991. The definition of loan as provided in Section 2 of the Artha Rin Ain, 2003 (shortly, the Ain) also includes a guarantor. Thus, it is clear that the legislature i...... report has been prepared accordingly. We find substance in this submission. Accordingly these leave petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VII (ADC) (2010) 197...Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 216
Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 84
Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 356
Abdus Samad Sheikh and another Vs. Khaleda Begum and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....nction of further Taka 3 crore as loan facility by the Bank as assured the plaintiff sustained loss and the defendant Bank in order to realise its outstanding loan from the plaintiff industry filed Artha Rin Adalat Suit No. 10 of 2006 now pending in the Court of Artha Rin Adalat, Barisal and the c......on of further Taka 3 crore as loan facility by the Bank as assured the plaintiff sustained loss and the defendant Bank in order to realise its outstanding loan from the plaintiff industry filed Artha Rin Adalat Suit No. 10 of 2006 now pending in the Court of Artha Rin Adalat, Barisal and the claimed......onal application. We find no substance in this leave petition which is accordingly dismissed with the above observation. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 24. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 94
M/S. R.M. Salt Crushing Industries Vs. Sonali Bank, Cox's Bazar Branch & others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....ment and order dated 20.11.2007 passed in Writ Petition No.4219 of 2005 by the High Court Division discharging the Rule. 2. The writ petitioner has challenged the filing and continuation of Artha Rin Suit No.73 of 2004 now pending in the Artha Rin Adalat, Cox's Bazar. The Artha Rin Suit h......nd order dated 20.11.2007 passed in Writ Petition No.4219 of 2005 by the High Court Division discharging the Rule. 2. The writ petitioner has challenged the filing and continuation of Artha Rin Suit No.73 of 2004 now pending in the Artha Rin Adalat, Cox's Bazar. The Artha Rin Suit has bee......urisdiction. There is no illegality in the impugned judgment and order. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 1012. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 136
M/s International Trade Promotors Vs. Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No. 1 Dhaka & ors, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... CJ Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abdul Matin J M/s International Trade Promotors…………………......Petitioners Vs. The Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No. 1 Dhaka and others………..Respondents Judgment ...... Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abdul Matin J M/s International Trade Promotors…………………......Petitioners Vs. The Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No. 1 Dhaka and others………..Respondents Judgment July ......there is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 306. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 191
Md. Rafique and another Vs. Md. Musa and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 228. ...... substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 228. ...... substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 228. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 92
M/S. United Leather International Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....sp; Md. Joynul Abedin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J M/S. United Leather International….........Petitioner Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others.......Respondents Judgment &n......sp; Md. Joynul Abedin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J M/S. United Leather International….........Petitioner Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others.......Respondents Judgment &n...... interference. We do not find any merit in this leave petition. Accordingly, the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 978. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 152
Sonali Bank, Sadarghat Corporate Branch, Dhaka Vs. Mrs. Hazera Islam and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
.... the Writ Petition was filed challenging the order dated 24.9.2007 (Annexure-“D" to the Writ Petition) and order dated 22.11.2004 (Annexure "B" to the Writ Petition) passed in Artha Jari Case No. 94 of 2004 of Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka rejecting the application of the Wri......g the order dated 24.9.2007 (Annexure-“D" to the Writ Petition) and order dated 22.11.2004 (Annexure "B" to the Writ Petition) passed in Artha Jari Case No. 94 of 2004 of Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka rejecting the application of the Writ Petitioners under section 57 of the A......ingly the appeal is allowed and the judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 975. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Most. Rokeya Begum Vs. Dr. Md. Golam Kibria, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....e present petitioner) and Other Class Suit No. 55 of 1991 (filed by the present respondent). The appeals were ultimately heard by the learned subordinate Judge (at present Joint District Judge) and Artha Rin Adalat. Jamalpur. 7. Against the judgment and decree dated 21.04.1992 passed in o......ent petitioner) and Other Class Suit No. 55 of 1991 (filed by the present respondent). The appeals were ultimately heard by the learned subordinate Judge (at present Joint District Judge) and Artha Rin Adalat. Jamalpur. 7. Against the judgment and decree dated 21.04.1992 passed in other C......and its author was not examined before the Court. We find no merit in these petitions which are accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 968. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Sree Jagannath Bairagy Vs. Sree Sree Kanailal Jew Bigraha and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....2008 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.5583 of 2000 discharging the Rule affirming the judgment and decree dated 31.08.2000 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Additional Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka in Title Appeal No. 221 of 1995. 2. The facts, in short, are th......passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.5583 of 2000 discharging the Rule affirming the judgment and decree dated 31.08.2000 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Additional Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka in Title Appeal No. 221 of 1995. 2. The facts, in short, are that the......made out calling for interference by this Court. We find no substance in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 939. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 110
M/S M.M. Steel Mills Ltd & anr Vs. Judge, First Artha Rin Adalat, Ctg & anr, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....d Fazlul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J M/S M.M. Steel Mills Limited and another….............Petitioners Vs. The Judge, First Artha Rin Adalat, Chittagong and another….........Respondents Judgment April ......ul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J M/S M.M. Steel Mills Limited and another….............Petitioners Vs. The Judge, First Artha Rin Adalat, Chittagong and another….........Respondents Judgment April 27, 20......dance with law and therefore no interference is called for. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 875. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 99
K. M. Muzahid Islam Vs. Bangladesh, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....a Division Bench of the High Court Division discharging the Rule. 2. The petitioner hereof filed the Writ Petition No.1426 of 2006 challenging the Order No.11 dated 05.02.2006 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat, 2nd Court, Dhaka, in Artha Rin Execution Case No.490 of 2005 rejecting the petiti......sion Bench of the High Court Division discharging the Rule. 2. The petitioner hereof filed the Writ Petition No.1426 of 2006 challenging the Order No.11 dated 05.02.2006 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat, 2nd Court, Dhaka, in Artha Rin Execution Case No.490 of 2005 rejecting the petitioner's......in. Thus we do not find any merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 865. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 140
Abdul Mannan and others Vs. Borhan Uddin Chowdhury and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....st the aforesaid judgment and decree the plaintiff preferred Title Appeal No.120 of 1997 before the learned District Judge, Sylhet, which was heard on transfer by the Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Sylhet, who by the judgment and decree dated 22.7.2002 dismissed the appeal and r......e aforesaid judgment and decree the plaintiff preferred Title Appeal No.120 of 1997 before the learned District Judge, Sylhet, which was heard on transfer by the Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Sylhet, who by the judgment and decree dated 22.7.2002 dismissed the appeal and remande......ved at a correct decision. We therefore find no reason to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 862. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Saiful Hoque Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....হয় ।" It is further contended that the said case was allowed on 1.4.1987 and execution case being Decree Jari Case No.9 of 1988 was started which is now pending in the Artha Rin Adalat, Pabna, hence the suit is liable to be dismissed. 4. The plaintiff petition......;য় ।" It is further contended that the said case was allowed on 1.4.1987 and execution case being Decree Jari Case No.9 of 1988 was started which is now pending in the Artha Rin Adalat, Pabna, hence the suit is liable to be dismissed. 4. The plaintiff petitioner th......at a correct decision. We therefore find no reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 187. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 53
M/S M. A Salam and Co. Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Limited, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....itioner filed writ petition No.4070 of 2008 stating, inter alia, that the execution case was once disposed of finally on compromise and thereafter it was again restored by the Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat concerned illegally and as such all the orders passed in this execution case......shy;er filed writ petition No.4070 of 2008 stating, inter alia, that the execution case was once disposed of finally on compromise and thereafter it was again restored by the Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat concerned illegally and as such all the orders passed in this execution case after......nbsp; agreement by paying the decreetal amount. We find no substance in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 797. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Mrs. Zinnatul Ara & ors Vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....ed in Writ Petition No. 7492 of 2005 discharging the Rule. 2. Facts, in brief, are that the petitioners filed the above writ petition calling in question the provisions section 12(3) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003, the notice for auction sale of the properties of the petitioners publis......Writ Petition No. 7492 of 2005 discharging the Rule. 2. Facts, in brief, are that the petitioners filed the above writ petition calling in question the provisions section 12(3) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003, the notice for auction sale of the properties of the petitioners published in......there is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 88