Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
State Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs (II), 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....er Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others ......................Respondents Judgment October 25, 2010. Result: The Rule is disposed of with observations. Cases Referred To- State Vs. Secretary, Ministry ...........................Respondents Judgment October 25, 2010. Result: The Rule is disposed of with observations. Cases Referred To- State Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice & Parliamentary Affairs and others, 29 BLD 656. Lawyers Involved: Md. M..Category: Women and Children | Date: 25 Oct, 2010 | Hits: 141
British American Tobacco Bangladesh Company Ltd. Vs. Begum Shamsun Nahar, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....of People's Republic of Bangladesh is directed against the judgment and order dated 19-8-2008 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3544 of 2005 discharging the Rule and affirming the judgÂment and order dated 10-5-2005 passed by the learned Joint District J......int……………………………..(13) Cases Referred to- Abul Khair Vs. Pubali Bank, 53 DLR (AD) 62; Vishaka Vs. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1997 SC 3011 and Bangladesh National Women Lawyers Association (BNWLA) Vs. Bangladesh, 14 BLC 694 at page 706. Lawyers Involved: Sig..Category: Women and Children | Date: 13 Oct, 2010 | Hits: 21
Deen Mohammad Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
.... Deen Mohammad………………...................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others………………….Respondents Judgment October 12, 2010. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Md. Yaqub Vs. Bangladesh Bank, 5 MLR (AD) 137; MA K......gment October 12, 2010. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Md. Yaqub Vs. Bangladesh Bank, 5 MLR (AD) 137; MA Khaleque Vs. Bangladesh Bank, 5 BLC (AD) 85. Lawyers Involved: Rokonuddin Mahmud with Mustafizur Rahman Khan, Advocates - For the Petitioner..Category: Banking Law | Date: 12 Oct, 2010 | Hits: 423
Ayub Ali Sheikh alias Buna Vs. State, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....ss his detention is required in connection with any other case. Send down the Lower Court Record at once. Communicate the order at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 63 DLR (2011) 55.......lt: The appeal is allowed. Cases Referred to- State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Premsing, 2009 CrLJ (SC) 786; Sheikh Zakir Vs. State of Bihar, AIR 1983 (SC) 911; Al-Amin Vs. State 51 DLR 154. Lawyers Involved: Alhaj ABM Nurul Islam, Senior Advocate with Md. Giasuddin Ahmed and Elida Yeasm..Category: Women and Children | Date: 11 Oct, 2010 | Hits: 154
Nurul Majid Mahmood Humayun Vs. Brigadier General Hassan PSC (Rtd.) and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....putes" of the RPO 1972. The Respondent No.1was nominated by Jatiyo Party, which is a registered political party having a registered and reserved symbol "PLOUGH". Under the law and Rules, as amended, prior to the elections the parties are permitted to jointly and severally contest......r SS Khanna Vs. Brig. FJ Dillon, AIR 1964 SC 497;Tara Kant Banerjee Vs. Puddo Money Dossee, (1865) 10 MIA 476:5 WR 63; Jugannath Rac-Dani Vs. Ram Bharosa, LR 60IA 49; 37 CWN 321; AIR 1933 PC 33. Lawyers Involved: Muhammad Mohsen Rashid, Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubar Rahman, Advocat..Category: Civil Law, Election Law | Date: 7 Oct, 2010 | Hits: 8
Khurshed Alam Vs. Abul Kalam and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....h J. - This petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated the 1st day of March, 2011 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2022 of 2007 making the Rule absolute. 2. Facts relevant to disposal of this petition for leave to appeal, in short, ar...... Vs. Abul Kalam and others………………………Respondents Judgment October 7, 2010. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Zulfiqur Bulbul Chowdhury, Advocate instructed by Syed Mahbubar Rahman, Advoc..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: 7 Oct, 2010 | Hits: 177
Orascom Telecom Bangladesh Limited Vs. National Board of Revenue and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....ner Vs. National Board of Revenue, represented by its Chairman, Segunbagicha, Dhaka and others..........................Respondents Judgment October 7, 2010. Result: The Rule is discharged. Case Referred to- Messers Chemico Ltd. Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 1......vt.) Ltd. Vs. T & T Board and others, 48 DLR (AD) 20; Trading Corporation of Bangladesh (TCB) Vs. The Commissioner, Customs, Excise and VAT Commissionarate, Chittagong (unreported decision). Lawyers Involved: Rokon Uddin Mahmud with, Md. Asaduzzaman, Advocates - For the petitioner. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 7 Oct, 2010 | Hits: 174
Abul Kashem (Md.) Vs. Anti-Corruption Commission and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....ul Hoque J Abul Kashem (Md.)............Petitioner Vs. Anti-Corruption Commission and others.....................Respondents Judgment October 5, 2010. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Anti-Corruption Commission Vs. Abul Kalam Shamsu......Shamsuddin, 14 MLR (AD) 153; Niranjan Mitra Vs. Monju Dey, 8 BLC (AD) 142; Md. Jahangir Hossain Howlader Vs. CMM, Dhaka, 26 BLD 83 = 58 DLR 106; Mohammad Abdus Sattar Khan Vs. State, 30 BLD 181. Lawyers Involved: Moudud Ahmed, Senior Advocate with Abul Kalam Patwary and Madhu Maloti Chowdh..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: 5 Oct, 2010 | Hits: 182
Ain O Salish Kendra Vs. Bangladesh, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
.... Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Labour and Manpower, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others….............Respondents Judgment September 5, 2010. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred To- HM Ershad Vs. Bangladesh, 21 BLD (AD) 69 and State V...... Vs. Bangladesh, 21 BLD (AD) 69 and State Vs. Metropolitan Police Commissioner, 60 DLR 660; M.C. Mehta Vs. State of T.N. and others, (1996) 6 Supreme Court Cases 756; State Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Law Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others, 30 BLD 369. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Naim Ahmed..Category: Women and Children | Date: 5 Sep, 2010 | Hits: 261
Hasura Begum Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....e Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and others………………………Respondents Judgment August 24, 2010. Result: The Rule is disposed of. The Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Ain, 2000 (Act No. VIII of 2000); sections......amp; 13) Cases Referred to- Ramesh Kumari Vs. State (NCT of Delhi), AIR 2006 Supreme Court 1322; State of Haryana and others Vs. Ch. Bhajan Lal and others, AIR 1992 Supreme Court 604. Lawyers Involved: Md. Sultan Uddin, Advocate - For the petitioner. Syed Haider Ali, Advocate -..Category: Women and Children | Date: 24 Aug, 2010 | Hits: 187
Prime Global Ltd and others Vs. Artha Ain Adalat No.4, Dhaka and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....ears of the exparte decree against it when as per its own statements on oath in Paragraph-6 of its Writ petition No. 3434 of 2007 it impliedly admitted that at least on 19-2-2005 (through a notice of Rule in Writ Petition No. 5510 of 2004) it came to know about the pendency of the Artha Rin Suit No.......s.................Responded Judgment August 23, 2010. Result: The rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Abul Khair Miah Vs. Abdul Latif Sarker, 32 DLR (AD) 167. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam with Md. Asaduzzaman with Anita Rahman and Nazia Kabir, Advoca..Category: Banking Law | Date: 23 Aug, 2010 | Hits: 2
Abdur Rashid Gazi Vs. Nur Ali Gazi and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....bdur Rashid Gazi……………………….Petitioner Vs. Nur Ali Gazi and others……………………….Opposite Parties Judgment August 10, 2010. Result: The Rule is discharged. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 1908); section 115 The concu......nd others Vs. Lutfe Ali Chowdhury and others, 49 DLR (AD) 73 = 2 BLC (AD) 33= 17 BLD (AD) 66; Bina Rani Dey and another Vs. Santosh Chandra Dey,51 DLR (AD) 81 = 21 BLD (AD) 99; 34 DLR (AD) 61. Lawyers Involved: Harendra Nath Nondy, Advocate - For the Petitioner. Bivash Chandra Bis..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 10 Aug, 2010 | Hits: 4
Ferdous Khan @ Alamgir Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd. and another, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦......................Petitioner Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd. and another………………………Opposite party Judgment August 1, 2010. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Punjtih Ali's case, 29 DLR (SC) 185. Lawyers......another………………………Opposite party Judgment August 1, 2010. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Punjtih Ali's case, 29 DLR (SC) 185. Lawyers Involved: Nikhilesh Dutta, Advotae - For the Petitioner Shaheen Ahmed, Advocate - ..Category: Banking Law | Date: 1 Aug, 2010 | Hits: 657
Rehana Begum and another Vs. State, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....sult, the appeal is dismissed. Send down the Lower Court Record at once. Communicate the order at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 MLR (HCD) (2011) 75; 30 BLD (HCD) (2010) 448. ......; 2009 Cr.L.J. 788 (SC) A; Sharad Birdhichand Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra, (1984) 4 SCC 116: 1984 SCC (Cri) 487; Ratan Singh Vs. State of Hariyana Prodesh, (1997) 4 SCC 161: 1997 SCC (Crl) 525. Lawyers Involved: Md. Shamsuddin, Advocate - For the appellants. Md. Mosharraf Hossain Sarder..Category: Women and Children | Date: 1 Aug, 2010 | Hits: 227
Md. Zahirul Islam Vs. Adamjee Jute Mills Ltd., 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
.... Zahirul Islam…………………………Petitioner Vs. Adamjee Jute Mills Ltd……………………………Opposite Parties Judgment July 20, 2010. Result: The Rule is made absolute. In a suit for causing losses or damages, the plaintiff is required to g......tance of damages suffered by him and the exact loss caused to him for which the defendant is liable to be called upon to answer his demand.............(17) Case Referred to- 7 MLR 13. Lawyers Involved: A.K.M. Shafiuddin, Advocate - For the petitioner. Jamaluddin Ahmed..Category: Limitation Law | Date: 20 Jul, 2010 | Hits: 38
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 18 Jul, 2010 | Hits: 5
Mohi Ahmed Chowdhury Vs. Kashipur Tea Estate Company Limited and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....ip;……………Respondents Judgment July 18, 2010. Result: The application is rejected. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908); Order XLI Rule 19 An application for readmission of appeal under Rule 19 of Order XLI is applicable till......llip;…………(4) Cases Referred to- Pasanda Bibi Vs. Sunaruddis, 4 DLR 157; Rejendra Lur Vs. Mahaslev, 27 DLR 232; Md. Adil Uddin Vs. Md. Adiluddin, 33 DLR 89. Lawyers Involved: SK. Sharifuddin, Advocate - For the Appellant. K. S. Salah Uddin A..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 18 Jul, 2010 | Hits: 140
Sonali Bank Vs. Sheikh Anis Uddin Ahmed, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....limitation canÂnot be wiped out. On such type of application unusual long delay of 9 years 5 months 5 days canÂnot be condoned………………(4) Lawyers Involved: No one appears. Civil Rule No.379 (f) of 2002 with First Appeal No. 841 of 1991. Judgment Sharif Uddin Chaklader J.-...... to the other side after prescribed period of limitation canÂnot be wiped out. On such type of application unusual long delay of 9 years 5 months 5 days canÂnot be condoned………………(4) Lawyers Involved: No one appears. Civil Rule No.379 (f) of 2002 with First Appeal No. 841 of 1..Category: Civil Law | Date: 15 Jul, 2010 | Hits: 49
Abeda Khatun and others Vs. Md. Idris Mia and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....€¦â€¦â€¦Defendant-Petitioners Vs. Md. Idris Mia son of late Korban Ali and others…………………Defendant-opposite parties Judgment July 14, 2010. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Harunor Rashid Talukder Vs Md. Mahbubur Rahman ......te. Cases Referred to- Harunor Rashid Talukder Vs Md. Mahbubur Rahman Talukder and others, 1 MLR (AD) 286; Punjab Ali Pramanik and others Vs. Mohd. Mokarram Hossain, 29 DLR (SC) 185. Lawyers Involved: Md. Ashraful Alam, Advocate - For the Petitioner. Shamsuddin Babul wit..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 14 Jul, 2010 | Hits: 3
Ziaur Rahman (Md.) Vs. Artha Rin Adalat & others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....d: Pankaj Kumar Kundu, Advocate - For the Petitioner. Jahangir Alam, Advocate - For the Respondent No.2. Writ Petition No. 6396 of 2008. Judgment Nazmun Ara Sultana J.- This Rule Nisi was issued calling in question the orders dated 25-04-2007 and 23-07-2008 passed by the Ar......n also his right to challenge that order before the High Court Division cannot be denied on the plea that he did not surÂrender before the Court which passed that order………………(13) Lawyers Involved: Pankaj Kumar Kundu, Advocate - For the Petitioner. Jahangir Alam, Advoc..Category: Civil Law | Date: 14 Jul, 2010 | Hits: 48