Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Md. Abul Kashem & others Vs. Montaz Ali Mondal & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....uhul Amin J. - This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 08.12.1999 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 240 of 1991 discharging the Rule. 2. The plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No. 274 of 1975 in the 1st Court of Subordinate......ent of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Messrs Al-Haj Oil Mills Ltd. Vs. Wilmer Trading (Pvt.) Ltd. & Ors., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....defendant No.2 and hence was the suit for declaration that the merchandise in question belongs to the plaintiff and for other ancillary reliefs. 4. On 01.03.2004 an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure was filed on behalf of the defendant Nos.1 and 2 praying to...... without having any cause of action and that the Respondent has been facing colossal financial loss as a result of pendency of the suit for nothing and as such the order of rejecting the plaint is absolutely legal. The submissions made on behalf of the petitioner merit consideration. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Aktaruzzaman alias Sahin Vs. Abdur Rashid Khan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ions for leave to appeal have been filed against the judgment dated November 3, 2004 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision Nos. 524, 614 and 615 of 1998 making absolute the Rule obtained in Civil Revision No. 524 of 1998 and discharging the Rule obtained in Civil Revision ......- These petitions for leave to appeal have been filed against the judgment dated November 3, 2004 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision Nos. 524, 614 and 615 of 1998 making absolute the Rule obtained in Civil Revision No. 524 of 1998 and discharging the Rule obtained in Ci..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
M.A. Sukkur Vs. Md. Zahirul Haque and another, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ation of the impugned judgment and order dated 17.05.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.152 of 2001 be stayed till disposal of the appeal. Ed. ......ation of the impugned judgment and order dated 17.05.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.152 of 2001 be stayed till disposal of the appeal. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Moulana Noor Mohammad Vs. Bangladesh Madrasha Education Board, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... with as prayed for. Stay granted earlier be further extended till disposal of the appeal. The Petitioner is directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ...... with as prayed for. Stay granted earlier be further extended till disposal of the appeal. The Petitioner is directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 139
Md. Nabiul Islam Chy Vs. Joint Regis, Div. Co-operative Office, Rajshahi & ors., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ain CJ. - The petitioner is seeking leave against the judgment and order dated 16.05.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in writ Petition No. 158 of 2004 discharging the Rule. 2. The petitioner obtained Rule under Article 102 of the Constitution calling upon the......e fully in agreement with the findings and decisions of the High court Division. In the aforesaid premises, we find no merit in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 162
Department of Narcotics Control Vs. Crown Beverage Ltd., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready within 3 (three) months from date for expeditious disposal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: III ADC (2006) 924. ......epresented by its Director General and another seek leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 15.03.2005 passed by the High Court Division in writ petition No. 6818 of 2004 making the rule absolute. 2. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 filed writ petition No. 6818 of 2004 for a direction upon th..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Jahangir Alam and ors., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ision in Writ petition Nos. 8254 of 2002 and 4344 of 2003 be stayed till disposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ...... other writ respondents seek leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 29.08.2004 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 8254 of 2002 making the rule absolute. In connected writ petition No. 4344 of 2003 the same Bench by order dated 29.08.2004 made..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 87
Md. Mofazzal Hossain Vs. Md. Muklesur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....laintiff filed this petition for leave to appeal impugning the judgment and decree dated 25.7.2004 passed by a single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3436 of 1993 making the Rule absolute upon reversing the judgment and decree dated 16.9.1993 passed by the learned Sub......iff filed this petition for leave to appeal impugning the judgment and decree dated 25.7.2004 passed by a single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3436 of 1993 making the Rule absolute upon reversing the judgment and decree dated 16.9.1993 passed by the learned Subordin..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Noor Uddin Vs. Alimuddin and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....min J: This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 29.06.2003 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.4300 of 2002 making the Rule absolute. 2. Short facts are that the plaintiffs instituted Partition Suit No.295 in th......: This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 29.06.2003 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.4300 of 2002 making the Rule absolute. 2. Short facts are that the plaintiffs instituted Partition Suit No.295 in the Cou..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 154
Bhulu Miah and others Vs. Begum Shakhina Khatun and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....Husain CJ. - The defendant-petitioners are seeking leave against the judgment and order dated 1st February, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in civil Revision No. 1806 of 2004 making the Rule absolute by sending the suit back to the lower appellate Court on remand. 2. The predec......n CJ. - The defendant-petitioners are seeking leave against the judgment and order dated 1st February, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in civil Revision No. 1806 of 2004 making the Rule absolute by sending the suit back to the lower appellate Court on remand. 2. The predecessor..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Dr. Mohammad Sarwar Ramiz and others Vs. Dr. Shyam Sundar Kundu (FCPS) & ors, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ecommendation they have been so appointed and that in the writ petition it was alleged that the aforesaid selection of candidates has been done in violation of Bangladesh Civil Service Recruitment Rules, 1981 as amended in 1988, in short, the Rules and it was alleged that the aforesaid appointee......ondents filed Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 612 of 2005 against the Judgment and order dated 28.03.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1735 of 2004 making the rule absolute. 2. Against the aforesaid judgment and order Bangladesh represented by the Secretar..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Md. Belayet Hossain Vs. Abul Fayez Md. Abdullah and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....r Chowdhury J.- The petitioner Md. Belayet Hossain seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 5.4.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 4754 of 2003 and Civil Rule No. 08(R) of 2004 arising out of the said civil revision discharging as infructuous and also d......such view of the Matter we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned advocate. In view of the discussions made above leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Fulbaria Market Dokandar Malik Samity Vs. Khatigrastha Dokandar Kallyan Samity, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....eir possession they filed the aforesaid Title Suit No.115 of 1998 in the 4th Court of the Assistant Judge, Dhaka for permanent injunction and also filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure for temporary injunction, so that they could not be e...... be deposited within one month. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Status quo granted earlier be extended for further 6 (six) months from date. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Md. Idrisur Rahman Vs. Syed Shahidur Rahman and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....4 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2454 of 2004 be stayed for 6(six) months. The petitioner is directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......upreme Court of Bangladesh in this petition seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 02.02.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2554 of 2004 making the rule absolute. 1. The facts, in short, are that the respondent No. 1 instituted Writ Petition No...Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 97
Nurun Nabi Mullah and others Vs. Abdul Karim, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... Md. Ruhul Amin J. - This is plaintiffs' appeal by leave against the judgment and order dated July 16, 2001 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 232 of 1999 making the Rule absolute upon setting aside the judgment and decree of September 15, 1998 of the 3rd Court of ......Ruhul Amin J. - This is plaintiffs' appeal by leave against the judgment and order dated July 16, 2001 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 232 of 1999 making the Rule absolute upon setting aside the judgment and decree of September 15, 1998 of the 3rd Court of Addit..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 40
Abdul Quddus Vs. Raquib Ali being dead his legal heirs Aziruddin and others , 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....to be deposited within one month. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Stay granted earlier be extended for further 6 (six) months from the date. Ed. ......to be deposited within one month. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Stay granted earlier be extended for further 6 (six) months from the date. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
M/S Ashraf Vs. Md. Zahangir Alam & ors, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....nted earlier in Civil Petition No.223 of 2005 be extended for further 6 (six) months from date. The petitioners are directed to make the appeals ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ...... to appeal in Civil Petition for leave to appeal No. 223 of 2005 against the judgment and order dated 04.01.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1463 of 2004 making the rule absolute. 2. Civil Petition for leave to appeal No. 490 of 2005 has been filed by Bangladesh..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 97
GM, Rangpur Palli Bidyut Samity Vs. Md. Ali Reza, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Amin J. - This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 5-1-2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 5360 of 2000 making the Rule absolute. 2. Short facts are that the plaintiff instituted Other Suit No. 48 of 1998 in the......J. - This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 5-1-2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 5360 of 2000 making the Rule absolute. 2. Short facts are that the plaintiff instituted Other Suit No. 48 of 1998 in the Cour..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 181
Sudhir Kumar Das and other Vs. Abdul Malek Mia and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... 13. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... 13. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 112