Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Mozahar Ali Howlader Vs. Lal Miah Talukder and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....rt Division is modified accordingly and it is directed that the accused‑petitioner be tried by the Sessions Judge and Ex‑officio Senior Special Judge, Jhalakati. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e Division (Criminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Mozahar Ali Howlader………………….Accused-Petitioner. Vs. Lal Miah Talukder and another…………………Respondent. Judgment July 9th, 1992. ......itioner. Vs. Lal Miah Talukder and another…………………Respondent. Judgment July 9th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Moksudor Rahman, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on- Record -For the Petitioner. Not Represented -Respondents. Cri......rt Division is modified accordingly and it is directed that the accused‑petitioner be tried by the Sessions Judge and Ex‑officio Senior Special Judge, Jhalakati. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 100
Habibur Rahman Vs. Sree Jogiswar Roy Chowdhury Chand and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....is outside of the net. For the above reasons we find no ment in the appeal. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) (1992) 247. ......Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latufur Rahman J Habibur Rahman being dead his heirs Saleha Begum and other ...................Appellants Vs. Sree Jogiswar Roy Chowdhury Chand and others…………………… Respondents Judgment ......nd and others…………………… Respondents Judgment April 23, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahabubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Mahbubey Alam, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate‑on-Record‑For the appellants. SR Pal, Senior Advocate, (Dr. Rafi......is outside of the net. For the above reasons we find no ment in the appeal. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) (1992) 247. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
AKM Mosharaf Hossain Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J AKM Mosharaf Hossain...............Accused‑Appellant Vs. The State.................Respondent Judgment March 8th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Rokunuddin ......d. ......ed‑Appellant Vs. The State.................Respondent Judgment March 8th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Rokunuddin Mahmud, Advocate (Mr. Tamizul Haque, Advocate with him), instructed by Md. Aftab Hussain, Advocate-On-Record-For the Appellant. M Shamsul Alam, Deputy Attorney‑Genera......are of the view that the appellant is entitled to bail. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. The appellant will remain on same bail granted by this Court earlier till commencement of the trial. Ed. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 92
Guiness Peat (Trading) Limited Vs. Md. Fazlur Rahman, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....thin the jurisdiction of the court where the plaint was filed. We find no good ground to interfere with the concurrent order of the courts below. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J and Latifur Rahman J Guiness Peat (Trading) Limited ………………..Appellant Vs. Md. Fazlur Rahman. ................ Respondents Judgment January 29th, 199......J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J and Latifur Rahman J Guiness Peat (Trading) Limited ………………..Appellant Vs. Md. Fazlur Rahman. ................ Respondents Judgment January 29th, 1992. C......thin the jurisdiction of the court where the plaint was filed. We find no good ground to interfere with the concurrent order of the courts below. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 88
Abdus Samad @ AKM Abdus Samad and others Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdus Samad @ AKM Abdus Samad and others................. Petitioners. Vs. The State................. Respondent Judgment &nb...... Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdus Samad @ AKM Abdus Samad and others................. Petitioners. Vs. The State................. Respondent Judgment ......bsp; Lawyers Involved: Sirajul Huq, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioners. Not Represented -For the Respondent...... with the finding of fact. The petition is dismissed. The order of conviction and sentence is maintained with the modification that it is under section 148 of the Penal Code. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Narayan Chandra Rajak Das Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....appellate Court's judgment was not a proper judgment of reversal. For all the above reasons, we do not find any merit in this appeal. Hence the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Narayan Chandra Rajak Das......... Appellant Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others………...Respondents Judgment ...... Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Narayan Chandra Rajak Das......... Appellant Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others………...Respondents Judgment November......appellate Court's judgment was not a proper judgment of reversal. For all the above reasons, we do not find any merit in this appeal. Hence the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Abul Khair Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....n (Criminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abul Khair...............Petitioner. Vs. The State .................Respondent Judgment April 29th, 1992. Lawyers Involved:......ellate Division (Criminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abul Khair...............Petitioner. Vs. The State .................Respondent Judgment April 29th, 1992. La...... Vs. The State .................Respondent Judgment April 29th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Ahmed Ali Advocate (appeared with leave of the Court) instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on -Record- For the Petitioner. B Hossain Advocate-on-Record-For th......elay will merit such commutation. We find no compelling extenuating circumstance in this case and therefore find no ground whatsoever to interfere. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Abdul Hamid Mollah Vs. Ali Mollah and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent No. 1. B. Hossain, Deputy Attorney‑General instructed by Zinnur Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent No. 2 (State). Criminal Appeal No. 21 of 1990. (From the Judgment and Order dated 24 Octob......esent: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdul Hamid Mollah................... Complainant-Appellant Vs. Ali Mollah and another…………………... Accuse......Court with him) instructed by M Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Maksumul Hakim, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court (Abdul Hamid, Advocate Supreme, Court with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent No. 1. B. Hossain, Deputy Att......order of acquittal and the alleged misreading of evidence has not affected the decision on merit. There has been no failure of justice. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Chairman, Kushtia Cooperative Industrial Union Ltd Vs. Mujibur Rahman & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....rim & ors Vs. Boota and others 8 DLR (WP Lahore 1965) 15. There are many others decisions Viz., Hoshiar Singh Vs. Gurbachan Singh, AIR 1962 SC 1089 (1093‑94), Bunna Prasad and others Vs. State of UP AIR 1968 SC 1348, to which we need not refer further. 11. There may be circumstan......Division (Civil) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Chairman, Kushtia Co‑operative Industrial Union Ltd .............Petitioner Vs. Mujibur Rahman & others...............Respondents Judgment June 10th, 199......ondent Nos. 1-3. SS Haider, Senior Advocate, instructed by Ranesh Chandra Maitra, Advocate‑on‑Record‑ For Respondent No. 4. Moazzem Hossain, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record - For the Respondent Nos. 5-6. Contempt Petition No. ...... the superior Court. Normally, therefore, an advocate's information will be honoured by the Court, unless a strong case for refusal is made out by the Court in its order of refusal. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 98
State Vs. Divisional Special Judge, Khulna Division and anr, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
..... Ed. ...... CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J The State, represented by the Solicitor, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh ......... ......Appellant Vs. Divisional Special Judge, Khulna Division and anr...........Respondents Judgement...... aside and it is held that the Senior Special Judges got power to transfer the cases which they had earlier transferred to the Divisional Special Judge. The appeal is allowed. Ed. ...... aside and it is held that the Senior Special Judges got power to transfer the cases which they had earlier transferred to the Divisional Special Judge. The appeal is allowed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 118
BD Chemical Industries Corporation & another Vs. M/s Sattar Match Works & ors, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....in respect of any goods or description of goods which is identical with a trade mark belonging to different proprietor and (either already on the register or already registered in any (Acceding State or a non‑Acceding State) to which section 82A for the time being applies) in respect o...... Rahman J Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation and another………………………………. Appellants Vs. M/s Sattar Match Works and others ..........Respondents (In CA 100/1990) ......s Corporation and others…………. Respondents (In CA 36/1991) Judgment March 4th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: M Zahir, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant (In CA 100/1990) Khandker Mahbubudd......a period of six months from the date of filing of the application. Civil Appeal No. 36 of 1991 is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost in either of the appeals. Ed. ..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 227
Shamsuddin Ahmed, Advocate Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....as enrolled as an Advocate of the then High Court at Dhaka in 1966 under the East Pakistan Legal Practitioners and Bar Council Act, 1965‑Act 3 of 1965. Bangladesh was declared an Independent State with effect from the 26th day of March 1971 by the Proclamation of Independence issued on 10t......; Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law and ......For the Appellant. Aminul Haque, Attorney‑ General, (AW Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney General and Sharifuddin Chaklader, Assistant Attorney‑General, with him), instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑For the Respondents. Civil Appeal No. ...... Advocate of the Appellate Division of the Bangladesh High Court from 3.8.72 and of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court from 16.12.72. The Appeal is allowed. No cost. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 92
Ishaque Khan (Md) and another Vs. Trading Corporation of Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....rospective effect, but it will be effective from the date it was passed, namely 4.5.1987. Subject to this observation, the appeal is dismissed without, however, any order as to cost. Ed. ......) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Latifur Rahman J Ishaque Khan (Md) and another…………..Appellants Vs. Trading Corporation of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Principal Office, Kawra...... Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rab‑I, Advocate‑on‑Record, Supreme Court‑‑For the Appellants. Quazi A T Monwaruddin, Advocate Supreme Court, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate‑on ‑Record‑‑For the Respondent. Civil Ap......rospective effect, but it will be effective from the date it was passed, namely 4.5.1987. Subject to this observation, the appeal is dismissed without, however, any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Fazlur Rahman Molla Vs. Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ult, we accept the appellant's contention and hold that his conviction is without any evidence. The appeal is allowed and the impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ...... CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Latifur Rahman J Fazlur Rahman Molla ...................Appellant Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice Division and anoth......ult, we accept the appellant's contention and hold that his conviction is without any evidence. The appeal is allowed and the impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......ult, we accept the appellant's contention and hold that his conviction is without any evidence. The appeal is allowed and the impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Shaikh Shahidul Islam Vs. State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Shaikh Shahidul Islam……………....……Accused‑Appellant (in both the Appeals) Vs. State .......................Respondent Judgment February 24th, 1992. Lawyers ...... Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Shaikh Shahidul Islam……………....……Accused‑Appellant (in both the Appeals) Vs. State .......................Respondent Judgment February 24th, 1992. ......will continue to remain on the same bail already granted by this Court until commencement of the trial, if any. The trial Court will pass necessary orders as deemed fit at that time. Ed. ......will continue to remain on the same bail already granted by this Court until commencement of the trial, if any. The trial Court will pass necessary orders as deemed fit at that time. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 150
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Rafiqul Islam (Md) Vs. Mir Abdul Ali, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
.... record, the result of the judgment under review need not be disturbed. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 176. ......upreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Rafiqul Islam (Md)………………………..Appellant Vs. Mir Abdul Ali................Respondent Judgment December 12, 1991. Result: The a......nd up to the challenge thrown up by the defendant on other grounds. So, the impugned judgment under review need not be disturbed. The appeal is dismissed……….(12,17,18) Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate ‑ For the Appellant. Dr. Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by ...... record, the result of the judgment under review need not be disturbed. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 176. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
State Vs. Abdul Mannan @ A Mannan and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....preme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J State, represented by the Solicitor to the Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh ............ should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ...... should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ...... should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Siddique Munshi Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal Latifur Rahman J Siddique Munshi ...................Appellant Vs. The State .........................Respondent Judgment October 24th, 1991. Cases Refer......iminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal Latifur Rahman J Siddique Munshi ...................Appellant Vs. The State .........................Respondent Judgment October 24th, 1991. ...... Duga Mia vs. Crown 7 DLR 395; Shahed Ali Vs. State 13 DLR 414 and Sadik Vs. State (1971) PLD (SC) 713. Lawyers Involved: Serajul Huq, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑For the Appellant. M Shamsul ......e same Judge. However, departure from this practice has caused no prejudice to the appellant. 13. In the result, we do not find anything to interfere. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69