Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5421-5440 of 6284 results.
The State Vs. Fazal and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....rt Division as would call for interference by this court. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Order of the Court By the majority decision the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......ts Judgment March 12, 1987. Cases Referred to- AIR 1917 PC 25; Siraj Din v. Kala, 16 DLR, SC 95; A.I.R 1917 P.C. 25; 16 D.L.R (SC) 94. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate Sharifuddin Chakl......rt Division as would call for interference by this court. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Order of the Court By the majority decision the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ...... Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J The State……………………………....Appellant Vs. Fazal and others………………....Respondents J..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Bangladesh Biman Corporation Vs. Syed Aftab Ali and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....h that of the Chief Justice. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the impugned decree is set aside and the suit is dismissed. The appeal is allowed. No order as to cost’s. Ed. ..........Respondent Judgment May 14 1986. Cases Referred to- Nava Kumar vs. Radhashyam. AIR 1931 (PC) 229; United Provinces Vs. Atiqa Begum, AIR 1984 PC 16. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. R......h that of the Chief Justice. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the impugned decree is set aside and the suit is dismissed. The appeal is allowed. No order as to cost’s. Ed. ......sion (Civil) Present: F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A. T. M. Afzal J Bangladesh Biman Corporation..........Appellant Vs. Syed Aftab Ali and others……………….......Respondent Judgment May 14 1986. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 97
State Vs. Lalu Miah and another, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....sed Kabir and Lalu who are on bail are directed to surrender to their bail bonds at once and serve their sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 117; 1987 BLD (AD) 212. ....... 1125; Kauda Paduyachi vs. State of Tamil Nadu AIR 1972 S.C. 66(69); Bhuboni Sahu vs. The King AIR 1949 P.C. 257 (259); H.S. Rathod vs. State of Gujrat AIR 1979 S.C. 1232. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record.- For the Appellant. Habib Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab H......sed Kabir and Lalu who are on bail are directed to surrender to their bail bonds at once and serve their sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 117; 1987 BLD (AD) 212. ...... Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J State..........................Appellant. Vs. Lalu Miah and another………………..Respondents. Judgment September 8, 1986. R..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Md. Ayub Vs. Bangladesh, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... appeal is, therefore, allowed in part and the impugned order of the High Court Division adding respondent No. 7 as a party is set aside. There will, however, be no order as to cost. Ed. ...... Khaleque Bains vs. Government of Bangladesh, Civil Appeal No. 21 of 1986. Lawyers Involved: T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, M. A. Mahbub Miah, Advocate with him, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Rafiqul-ul-Huq, Senior Advocate, Moksud...... appeal is, therefore, allowed in part and the impugned order of the High Court Division adding respondent No. 7 as a party is set aside. There will, however, be no order as to cost. Ed. ...... Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Md. Ayub…………………………..……….Appellant Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works & others……...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Shafquat Haider & others Vs. M. Al-Amin and another, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....s order, however, does not restrain respondent No.1 from discharging his duties as Chairman of the company. The winding-up matter should be disposed of expeditiously. No order as to costs. Ed. ......ramount Talkies, AJR 1942 Bom. 119. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Res......s order, however, does not restrain respondent No.1 from discharging his duties as Chairman of the company. The winding-up matter should be disposed of expeditiously. No order as to costs. Ed. ...... Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Shafquat Haider & others………………….....Appellants. Vs. M. Al-Amin and another....................... Respondents Judgment August..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 239
Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....nd shall not act arbitrarily or in discriminatory manner. In these circumstances, writ jurisdiction is quite available to the lessee. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 85. ......Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) instructed by Kazi Ebadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. M. Nurullah, Attorney-General, M.M. Huq, Deputy Attorney-General with him instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondents Nos. 1 and 2. T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, M.R.......nd shall not act arbitrarily or in discriminatory manner. In these circumstances, writ jurisdiction is quite available to the lessee. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 85. ......vil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd.....................Appellant Vs. Bangladesh & others……………………………………………………………...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Feroza Majid and another Vs. Jiban Biman Corporation, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... the appellants. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. In view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 78. ......awyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Mahbubey Alam, Advocate, Supreme Court with him, instructed by Sajjadul Huq, Advocate on Record—For the Appellants. Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate, A. B. M. Khairul Huq Advocate, Supreme Court, with him instructed by Md. N...... the appellants. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. In view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 78. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J ATM Afzal J Feroza Majid and another……………….... Appellant Vs. Jiban Biman Corporation......................Respondent Result: The appeal is dismis..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 104
Sree Monoranjan Banik & anr Vs. Sree Nitya Ranjan Karmakar & ors., 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....the Transfer of Property Act. The impugned order does not call for any interference. The petitioner is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1987 BLD (AD) 122. ......the Transfer of Property Act. The impugned order does not call for any interference. The petitioner is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1987 BLD (AD) 122. ......the Transfer of Property Act. The impugned order does not call for any interference. The petitioner is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1987 BLD (AD) 122. ...... MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Sree Monoranjan Banik and another……………………………….Petitioners Vs. Sree Nitya Ranjan Karmakar & others………………&..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Comm Taxes, Dhaka (East Zone) Vs. M/S. Macneil & Kilburn Ltd., Adamjee Ct, Dhaka, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Tribunal is restored. There will be no order as to costs Ed. ...... In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Tribunal is restored. There will be no order as to costs Ed. ...... In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Tribunal is restored. There will be no order as to costs Ed. ...... Vs M/S. Macneil & Kilburn Ltd., Adamjee Court, Dhaka....................Respondent Judgment August 3, 1986. Cases Referred To- AIR 1932 (PC) 138: C.I.T Vs. K Rahman & Co. Ltd 1980 B.T.D. 242: C.I.T. vs. Vizir Sultan & Son 36.I.T.R. Goderaj Co ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Dira Dockyard & Engineers Ltd. & ors Vs.Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & ors, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....in Article 33 of the Order. For the reasons stated above, we are of the view that the appeal must fail. It is accordingly dismissed but there will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......hy;trial Development Bank. (1966) 18 DLR (SC) 354; PLD 1966 SC 1938. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate on Record—For the Appellants. A KM. Nazrul lslam, Advocate instructe......in Article 33 of the Order. For the reasons stated above, we are of the view that the appeal must fail. It is accordingly dismissed but there will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Present: Dira Dockyard and Engineers Ltd. and others.... Appellants Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & others…………Respondent ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Siraj Miah & another Vs. State & another, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....nd allow the appeal. The appellants are acquitted of the charge leveled against them. Let them be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. ......ts fencing and started beating him by fists and blows. When P.W.1 raised alarm the accused persons threatened and compelled him to keep quiet and tit at the southeast corner of the hut. The accused Hossain took away one steel trunk containing Caries, petty-coats, blouses etc. Tk 550/- in cash an......nd allow the appeal. The appellants are acquitted of the charge leveled against them. Let them be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. ......d J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Siraj Miah & another………………………………Appellants Vs. State & another……………………&helli..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Sufia Khanam Chowdhury Vs. Faizun Nesa Chowdhury, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....irection for amendment of the plaint is set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. With this modification the appeals are dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......irection for amendment of the plaint is set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. With this modification the appeals are dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......irection for amendment of the plaint is set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. With this modification the appeals are dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... M. H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Sufia Khanam Chowdhury………………………….Appellant (in both the cases) Vs. Faizun Nesa Chowdhury...........................Respondent (in both the cases) ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Chunnu Mia Vs. Monindra Lal Roy & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....rgument was advanced before the High Court Division with regard to the merit of the settlement. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......ridhar Suar AIR 1976 (SC) 1860; Srimath D. P. Desikar AIR 1936 (P.C.) 183; Atyam Veerraju AIR 1966 (SC) 629. Lawyers Involved: Sheikh Afzalur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Ranadhir Sen, Advocate, instructed by Syed S......rgument was advanced before the High Court Division with regard to the merit of the settlement. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......nim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J Chunnu Mia………………………Appellant Vs. Monindra Lal Roy & others……Respondents Judgment June 29, ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Hazera Begum and others Vs. Roushan Ara Begum and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....r with the judgment of Badrul Haider Chowdhury J. Order of the Court By a majority decision, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......r with the judgment of Badrul Haider Chowdhury J. Order of the Court By a majority decision, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......r with the judgment of Badrul Haider Chowdhury J. Order of the Court By a majority decision, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......sp; Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Hazera Begum and others………………………Appellants Vs. Roushan Ara Begum and others……………Respondents ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Narendra Nath Basu Roy and another Vs. Municipal Committee, Mymensingh, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....s landlord and tenant. And there ends the matter. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:39 DLR (AD) 16. ......s landlord and tenant. And there ends the matter. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:39 DLR (AD) 16. ......s landlord and tenant. And there ends the matter. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:39 DLR (AD) 16. ...... Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Narendra Nath Basu Roy and another……………………………Appellants Vs. Municipal Committee, Mymensingh................................Respondents Judgment A..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Nur Muhammad & others Vs. Moulvi Moinuddin Ahmed & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....r Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) 1. ......r Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) 1. ......r Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) 1. ......ion (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Nur Muhammad & others.....................Appellants Vs. Moulvi Moinuddin Ahmed & others.........Respondents Judgment February 18, 1986. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Muslimuddin & others Vs. The State, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....nts is set aside and all of them are acquitted and it is directed that they be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other case. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 311. ...... Case Referred To- Safdar Ali Vs. Crown, 5 DLR (FC) 107. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record —For the Appellants. B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 58 of 1983. From the Ju......nts is set aside and all of them are acquitted and it is directed that they be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other case. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 311. ......on (Criminal) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Muslimuddin & others………………………Appellants Vs. The State………………………………….Respondent Judgment Feb 20, 1986. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 56
Waliullah Munshi Vs. Lodu Mia Patwary & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....1979 of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Lakshmipur will now proceed in accordance with law. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed.This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 308 ......mad Ali, Advocate with him instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record. — For the appellant. T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, M. A. Wahhab Mia, Advocate with him instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on- Record— For respondent No. 1. EX-parte- Respondent Nos. 2-5. Civil App......1979 of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Lakshmipur will now proceed in accordance with law. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed.This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 308 ......Appellate Division (Civil) Present: F.K.M.A.Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H. Rahman J Waliullah Munshi…………………………... Appellant Vs. Lodu Mia Patwary & others………………..Respondent Judgment January 19, 1986...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Mrs. Amena Hoque Vs. Rajab Ali & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....Sessions Judge are hereby set aside. The proceeding of S.T. Case No. 232 of 1983 will commence from the stage where it was on 22.12.83. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 303 ......ion 339C Cr.P.C. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Habibur Rahman Khan, Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondent Nos. 1-15. A.W. Mollik, Advocate-on-Record—Fo......Sessions Judge are hereby set aside. The proceeding of S.T. Case No. 232 of 1983 will commence from the stage where it was on 22.12.83. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 303 ......ivision (Criminal) Present: F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J Mrs. Amena Hoque……………………………………Appellant Vs. Rajab Ali & others……………………………….……Respondents Judgment Apri..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Ghyasuddin Ahmed Vs. Q.N. Faruque & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
.... of the learned Company Judge are modified accordingly. The appeal is allowed is part. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 296 ...... in Matter No. 13 of 1986.) Judgment: Fazle Muim CJ.-This appeal arises from, Matter No. 13 of 1985 and was decided by the Company Judge of the High Court Division, Dhaka (Mr. Justice Sultan Hossain Khan) on 20th November 1985. 2. On 17th April 1985 respondents filled an application unde...... of the learned Company Judge are modified accordingly. The appeal is allowed is part. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 296 ...... F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Ghyasuddin Ahmed ……………………………………………...Appellant Vs. Q.N. Faruque & others........................................Respondents Judgment March..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 111
16491648164716461645164316421641163916381637163616351634163316321631163016291628