Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5441-5460 of 5813 results.
Tozammel Hussain Chowdhury Vs. State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....instructed by B.C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondent. Criminal appeal No. 3 of 1975. (From the judgment and order dated 24-7-1972 passed by the erstwhile High Court of Bangladesh in Criminal Appeal No. 581 of 1966). Judgment: Ahsanuddin Chowdhury, J.&md......ud Hussain, C. J. Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain. J. D.C. Bhattacharya. J. Tozammel Hussain Chowdhury……..... Appellant Vs. State…………...Respondent. Judgment &n......ng so the High Court committed no illegality. In the result the appeal stands dismissed. The appellant is directed to surrender to his bail to serve out the sentence. Ed. ......ng so the High Court committed no illegality. In the result the appeal stands dismissed. The appellant is directed to surrender to his bail to serve out the sentence. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
M.A. Zaher and others Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and another, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....man, Narayanganj Municipality, (2) The Narayanganj Municipal Committee, (3) The Commissioner, Dacca Division and Controlling Authority of Municipal Committees and (4) Government of East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) in the Fourth Court of the Munsif, Narayanganj for permanent injunction restraining them......ussain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Fazle Munim J M.A. Zaher………...Appellant And Haji Jalal Ahmed …….... Appellant And Md. Khurshed Alam Khan………….Appellant Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and another……..Respondent Judgment April 27, 1976. Result: ......ember. The meeting of the Municipal Committee was held at 10 A.M. on the 10th December, 1966 as scheduled. In that meeting on the proposal of Mr. M.A. Zaher, appellant in Appeal No. 6-D of 1971, Haji Jalaluddin Ahmed, appellant in Appeal No. 7-D of 1971 was declared elected unopposed as Vice-Chairma......: ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 142
Swami Joytirghananda Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Khulna and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....er discharging the Rule are set aside and the Petition No. 245 of 1966 is restored to file for hearing according to law. There shall, however, be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ...... Present: Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain, J. Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya, J. Swami Joytirghananda………..….Appellant. Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Khulna and others…………..Respondents. ......er discharging the Rule are set aside and the Petition No. 245 of 1966 is restored to file for hearing according to law. There shall, however, be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ....... Judgment, Dec 9, 1975. Lawyers Involved: B.N. Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by A. Rab-II, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Faqeer Shahabuddin Ahmed, Attorney-General, instructed by A.M. Khan Chowdhury, Advocate -on-Record.—For the Resp..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Jardine Henderson Ltd. Calcutta, India Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Chittagong, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....f another Indian Company, namely, Kanknarrah Co. Ltd., hereinafter referred to' as- the managed company which operated several mills in India and also owned some godowns, situated in Pakistan, now Bangladesh. In accordance with the terms of the agreement the appellant was vested with the power o......Hossain J. D.C. Bhattacharya, J. Fazle Munim, J. Jardine Henderson Ltd. Calcutta, India………………...Appellants in both the appeals. Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Chittagong…………....Responden......pinion that the High Court took the correct view in answering the question referred to it under section 66(1) of the Income-tax Act. Both the appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......pinion that the High Court took the correct view in answering the question referred to it under section 66(1) of the Income-tax Act. Both the appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Messres A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....28 DLR (AD) 120. ......t Appellate Division (Civil) Present: AB Mahmud Husain J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hussain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Government of Bangladesh......Appellant. Vs. Messrs A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others…….Respondents Judgement March 15, 1976......sturb the decision of the High Court Division. Subject to the observation made above, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 120. ........Appellant. Vs. Messrs A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others…….Respondents Judgement March 15, 1976. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Faqeer Shahabuddin Ahmed, Attorney-General with Mahmudul Islam, Assistant Attorney-General—For the Appellant. Shah..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Karnaphuli Rayon and Chemical Ltd. Vs. The Govt. of Bangladesh and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....shy;nufacture by the appellant Company is declared to have been issued without lawful authority and was of no legal effect. There shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ......d Hussain CJ Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Karnaphuli Rayon and Chemical Ltd…………....Appellant. Vs. The Govt. of Bangladesh and others…………….....Resp......shy;nufacture by the appellant Company is declared to have been issued without lawful authority and was of no legal effect. There shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ......g (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 43T— PLD 1971 SC 205. Lawyers Involved: M. Habibur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by A. Bakkar, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Addl. Attorney-General, with Mahmudul Islam, Asstt. Attorney-General, instructed by S...Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Khondkar Mohiuddin Vs. Syed Moin Ahmed, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....dgment and decree of the High Court are set aside and the judgment and decree of the Court of Additional District Judge are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 85. ......Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Khondkar Mohiuddin…………...Appellant. Vs. Syed Moin Ahmed…………....Respondent Judgment August 13, 1976. Cases referr......dgment and decree of the High Court are set aside and the judgment and decree of the Court of Additional District Judge are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 85. ......Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Khondkar Mohiuddin…………...Appellant. Vs. Syed Moin Ahmed…………....Respondent Judgment August 13, 1976. Cases referred to: Mt. Dur..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Mozaffar Ahmed Vs. Md. Osman and anr, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... is .barred by limitation. The appeal shall be disposed of on the evidence already on record. The appeal is disposed of in aforesaid terms without any order as to costs. Ed. ......late Division (Civil) Present: Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Mozaffar Ahmed………...Appellant. Vs. Md. Osman and anr.........Respondents. Judgment &nb...... is .barred by limitation. The appeal shall be disposed of on the evidence already on record. The appeal is disposed of in aforesaid terms without any order as to costs. Ed. ......osts. Ed. ..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 239
Azizur Rahman and another Vs. Sree Kailash Chand Burmecha and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....the basis of what is just and convenient in each case. The result therefore is that this appeal fails and is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 65. ......ion (Civil) Present: Syed AB Mahmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hosain J Debash Chandra Bhattacharya J Azizur Rahman and another………….Appellants Vs. Sree Kailash Chand Burmecha and others………..Respondents Judgment August 26, 197......the basis of what is just and convenient in each case. The result therefore is that this appeal fails and is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 65. ......4, PLD 1969 Dacca 946; Mt. Tulsha Devi Vs. Shah Chironjeelal and others AIR 1943 All. 1; Anadilal and others Vs. Ram Sarup and others, AIR 1936 All 495. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by A. Rab-II, Advocate-on-Record —For the Appellants. B. N. Chowdh..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
.... call such additional evidence on the question as it may deem fit.
In the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 61. ......ion
(Civil)
Present:
Syed AB Mahmud Husain CJ
Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J
Kemaluddin Hossain J
Lal Meah, being dead his heirs Momena Khatun & others………..Appellants.
Vs.
Haji Md. Ibrahim Meah and others......Respondents
Judgment
November 28, 1975.
Re...... call such additional evidence on the question as it may deem fit.
In the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 61. ...... 17 DLR (SC) 392.
Lawyers Involved:
B. N. Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by A. Rab-II, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant.
M.H. Khandker, Senior Advocate, instructed by Daliluddin Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent No. 1.
Ex parte—Respondent No. 2—5.
Civil..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Syed Mofazzal Hossain Vs. The Election Commissioner and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
.... J.— This appeal by Special Leave is against an order of a Bench of the High Court Division summarily rejecting an application under Article 102(2) of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and refusing to interfere with the judgment of an Election Tribunal which set aside the e......e Division (Civil) Present: Syed ABM Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Syed Mofazzal Hossain…………...Appellant. Vs. The Election Commissioner and others……..Respondents. Judgment November 24, 197......the setting aside of the election of the Vice-Chairman and the members is declared to have been without jurisdiction and as such void. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ......the setting aside of the election of the Vice-Chairman and the members is declared to have been without jurisdiction and as such void. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Bangladesh Vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....Civil) Present: A. M. Sayem, C. J. Syed A. B. Mahmud Hussain, J. Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain, J. Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya. J. Bangladesh……Appellant. Vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another…&hel......J. Syed A. B. Mahmud Hussain, J. Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain, J. Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya. J. Bangladesh……Appellant. Vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another………. Respondents Judgment ......l subsist subject to the prior lien or charge of the Government and in accordance with the observation made herein. The appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ......l subsist subject to the prior lien or charge of the Government and in accordance with the observation made herein. The appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Abdul Quader Chowdhury and others Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ion In Criminal Revision No. 360 of 1969). Judgment Ahsanuddin Chowdhury, J.—These two appeals, by special leave, arise out of a single judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Bangladesh refusing in exercise of powers under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to q...... Fazle Munim J Abdul Quader Chowdhury and others...............Appellants (In Criminal Appeal No. 28 of 1974). Sk. Sarwaruddin……..... Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 29 of 1974). Vs. The State ………………...Respondent Judgment February 10, 1976. Result: T......section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for expeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ......) 317, Gianchand Vs. State, 1968 Pakistan Criminal Law Journal (SC) 764, R.P. Kapur Vs. State, AIR 1960 (SC) 866, M.S. Khawaja Vs. State, 17 DLR (SC) 153. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by A. Rab, Advocate-on-Record—For the appellants (In both the appeals)..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 225
Abdur Razzaque & anr Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... Cr.P.C. and on conclusion of the trial they were found guilty and convicted under section 19(A) & (f) of the Arms Act read with President's Order No. 50 of 1972, namely, Bangladesh Scheduled Offences (Special Tribunals) Order and sentenced to rigorous imprison...... F.K.M.A. Munim J Abdur Razzaque & anr………………..Appellants. Vs. The State............................Respondent Judgment Jan. 14, 1976. ......that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......nt Judgment Jan. 14, 1976. Lawyers Involved: Aleem-Al-Razee, Advocate, instructed by S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Rccord.—For the Appellants. Faqeer Shahabuddin Ahmed, Attorney-General, instructed by A.M. Khan Chowdhury, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respon..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Government of Bangladesh & ors Vs. M/s. Samir & Co, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ct, and therefore no question of irregular exercise of jurisdiction does arise in this case. The result therefore is that this appeal is dismissed but there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ppellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed A.B.M. Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J D. C. Bhattacharya J Government of Bangladesh & ors........Appellant Vs. M/s. Samir & Co…………..Respondent Judgment November 20, 1975. Cases ref......ct, and therefore no question of irregular exercise of jurisdiction does arise in this case. The result therefore is that this appeal is dismissed but there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ......hakur, reported in A.I.R. 1931 Bom 539; The Governor General of India in Council Vs. Bilas Singh, and Nalini Ranjan Guha Vs. Union of India, A.I.R. 1954 Cal. 462. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Additional Attorney-General, with Mahmudul Islam, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by A..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 258
Ayub Ali Howladar Vs. Election Tribunal Bagerhat, Khulna and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... in this Division. We do not find any error in the conclusion of the Tribunal, nor in the decision of the High Court Division. The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs. Ed. ......4(C) of the Evidence Act. The quantum of evidence necessary to rebut the presumption is a question more of fact than law. 9. Some decisions have been cited from the Bar. They are: Niaz Ahmed Vs. Azimuddin 19 D.L.R. (S.C.) 388; Abdus Sattar Rana Vs. S.M. Zaidi, 20 DLR (S.C.) 292 ; Rahis Mi...... in this Division. We do not find any error in the conclusion of the Tribunal, nor in the decision of the High Court Division. The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs. Ed. ......on; 144(C) of the Evidence Act. The quantum of evidence necessary to rebut the presumption is a question more of fact than law. 9. Some decisions have been cited from the Bar. They are: Niaz Ahmed Vs. Azimuddin 19 D.L.R. (S.C.) 388; Abdus Sattar Rana Vs. S.M. Zaidi, 20 DLR (S.C.) 292 ; Rah..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 101
Amir Sultan Ali Hyder Vs. Md. K. Alam alias S. Alam & others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....DLR.442; Azizul Huq Vs. M/S. Hanif Ltd. and others, (1955) 7 DLR; 287; Aswad Mia and another vs. Shahidulla Mia, (1958) PLR Dacca 1163; Anil Das and others Vs. Mostaque Ahmed, (1966) 18 DLR 86; IDBP (Bangladesh) Vs. M/S. Master Industries, (1974) 36 DLR 157 and Bangladesh Fisheries Society Ltd. Vs. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed ABM Husain CJ Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Amir Sultan Ali Hyder................................ Appellant. Vs. Md. K. Alam alias S. Alam & others............. Respondents Judgment July 1, 197...... not be binding on the Courts below. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed. We, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1977) 29 DLR (SC) 295.......li Khan and anothers, (1952) 4 DLR.442; Azizul Huq Vs. M/S. Hanif Ltd. and others, (1955) 7 DLR; 287; Aswad Mia and another vs. Shahidulla Mia, (1958) PLR Dacca 1163; Anil Das and others Vs. Mostaque Ahmed, (1966) 18 DLR 86; IDBP (Bangladesh) Vs. M/S. Master Industries, (1974) 36 DLR 157 and Banglad..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 182
Nuruzzaman Chowdhury Vs. Asrarul Hoque Chowdhury and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....e appeal as per judgment dated 22-6-1966. The accounting will be made according to the directions given by the High Court in its judgment. In the result the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Fazle Munim J KM Subhan J Nuruzzaman Chowdhury…………………………………….Appellant Vs. Asrarul Hoque Chowdhury and others……………...Respondents. Judgement April 7, 19......e appeal as per judgment dated 22-6-1966. The accounting will be made according to the directions given by the High Court in its judgment. In the result the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......thers……………...Respondents. Judgement April 7, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Mozammel Hoque, Senior Advocate, instructed, by Abdur Rab-II, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Ahmed Sobhan, Senior Advocate, M.A. Rouf, Advocate with him, instructed by S.M. Huq, Advocate-on-Rec..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Bikash Ranjan Das Vs. The Chairman, Second Labour Court, Dacca and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....Not represented—Respondents. Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 123 of 1977. (From the Judgment and order dated the 28th January, 1977 passed by the High Court of Bangladesh in Writ Petition No. 355 of 1975) Judgment: .......M. Hussain CJ A. Chowdhury J K. Hossain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Fazal Munim J Bikash Ranjan Das…………............ Petitioner. Vs. The Chairman, Second Labour Court, Dacca and others..............Respondents Jud......c tribunal or not. That a different conclusion is possible is no ground for interference. We therefore do not find any good reason to grant leave. This petition is dismissed. Ed. ......c tribunal or not. That a different conclusion is possible is no ground for interference. We therefore do not find any good reason to grant leave. This petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 151
Md. Shaukat Ali Mia Vs. Administrator of Wakfs and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....r of Wakfs, for its disposal in the manner indicated above, and in accordance with law. The costs of this appeal shall abide the result of proceeding before the Administrator. Ed. ...... D.C. Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Md. Shaukat Ali Mia………………………………….. Appellant. Vs. Administrator of Wakfs and others ……….....Respondent. Judgme......r of Wakfs, for its disposal in the manner indicated above, and in accordance with law. The costs of this appeal shall abide the result of proceeding before the Administrator. Ed. ......Appellant. Vs. Administrator of Wakfs and others ……….....Respondent. Judgment May 31, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate, with Zahir, Advocate & Md. Akkas Ali, Advocate, instructed by Abdur Rab I..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
968967963959957956954953950949947946945944942939937936934933