Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5441-5460 of 6261 results.
Bangladesh Vs. Tan Kheng Heck and others, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
.... Officer and the Sessions Judge, Khulna. At this stage two separate applications under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure were moved before the High Court for quashing the proceedings and Rules were issued. The applications were opposed by the State by filing counter-affidavits affirmed ......17 DLR (SC) 153; Fazle Karim Vs. The State, PLD 1957 (WP) Lahore 857; Ghulam Qadir Khan Vs. The State, PLD 1963 Lahore 32; AIR 1938 Mad, 129; Raja Hoq Newaz Vs. Mohd. Afzal (1967) 19 DLR (SC) 369. Lawyers Involved: K.A., Bakr, Attorney-General with Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Assistant Attorney-Gene..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 95
....wn and the Writ petition was dismissed.
3. Mr. Fazlul Karim, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner has urged before us two of the four grounds. First, is that there was non-compliance with Rule 7(1)(2) and (3) framed under Presidential Order No.67 of 1972 and the second ground is that in ......¦..……Petitioner
Vs.
Secretary, MinisÂtry of Cabinet Affairs, EstablisÂhment Division, Government of Bangladesh & others……………Respondents
Judgment
March 9, 1978.
Lawyers Involved:
Md. Fazlul Karim, Advocate, Mahbubey Alam, Advocate, instructed by B.C. Panday..
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 72
Abdul Latif Mirza Vs. Government of BanglaÂdesh and other, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....e detaining authority or whether it means suspected on grounds which are in fact reasonable. No specific answer was, however, given to the said quesÂtion, as the judgment was rested on the view that Rule 26 of the Defence of India Rules, under which the impugned order of detention was made having f......rown PLD 1954 (FC) 1; Basanta Chandra Ghose Vs. Emperor, AIR 1945 FC 18; Narayan Singh Nathuram Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1952 (SC) 106; Ram Narayan Singh Vs. The State of Delhi, AIR 1953 (SC) 277. Lawyers Involved: Moudud Ahmed, Advocate, with Mainur Reza Chowdhury, Advocate instructed by S.S..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 408
Moyezuddin and another Vs. State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... The appeal is dismissed. The appellants are directed to surrender to their bail bonds and serve out the remainder of the sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 37. ......lants Vs. The State................................Respondent Judgment December 7, 1977. Cases Referred to- Adalat Vs. The Crown, 41 956; 8 DLR (FC) 69, PLD 1956 (FC) 171. Lawyers Involved: Khandaker Mahbubuddin Ahmad, Advocate instructed by A. Rab-11, Advocate-on-Rec..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Bangladesh Vs. Moslem Mia, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....te-on- Record - For the Appellant. Ex-parte - For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 139 of 1977. On appeal from the judgment and order dated July 26, 1970 passed by the High Court in Civil Rule No.729(f) of 1970. Judgment Rahul Islam J.- This appeal by special leave is from the ju......dent. Judgment March 16, 1978. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Case Referred to- Superintendent of CenÂtral Excise, Lyallpur Vs. Ch, Fakir MuhamÂmad (1958)10 DLR (SC) 168. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Assistant Attorney-General instructed by A.W. Mailik, Adv..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Md. Mohirruddin Vs. Md. Nazir Hossain Patwary & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 17.06.2002 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2542 of 2000 discharging the Rule. 3. Short facts are that the Opposite Party No. 1 instituted Miscellaneous Case No.2 o..................................................... Petitioner Vs. Md. Nazir Hossain Patwary & others ...................Respondents Judgment May 8, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the petitioner &..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Matiur Rahman Vs. Habibur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... holder in the suit land. 7. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. 8. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......resent: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Matiur Rahman....................... Petitioner Vs. Habibur Rahman and others .......Respondents Lawyers Involved: Abdul Quayum, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-o..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Md. Abdur Razzaque Vs. Chief Election Commissioner, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ad has fallen vacant as the petitioner was declared disqualified to hold the post for being a defaulter of bank loan in Writ Petition No.455 of 2003 by High Court Division and in the circumstances Rule 9(3) of the Union Parishad (Election) Rules, 1983 mandates holding of by election for the offi......ner, Election Commission Secretariat, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka and others…………………..... Respondents Judgment January2, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Baset Majumder, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Zahirul Islam, Ad..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 116
Sree Hare Krishna Das Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ssal but receiving no response he filed Writ Petition No. 396 of 1989 before the High Court Division challenging the impugned order of dismissal from the service and by order dated 30.10.1991' the Rule was made absolute directing the Principal Secretary to the President of Bangladesh to form a f......t, Govt. of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Bangabhaban, Dhaka and others ............Respondents. Judgment May 8, 2004. Case Referred to- 42 DLR (AD) 214. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Md. Abdul Ali Bhuiyan Vs. Jahura Khatun and Others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... the instance of the defendant-petitioner arises out of the judgment and order dated 19.1.2002 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1178 of 1990 discharging the Rule and thereby affirming the judgment and order dated 6.1.1990 passed by learned Subordinate Jud......he Rafanama having been raised earlier, the petitioner is not entitled to challenge the same at such belated stage…………………….(5) Lawyers Involved M.G. Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. Not represe..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Md. Firozul Islam and others Vs. Md. Helalul Islam and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....J.- Defendant-petitioners seek leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 15.04.2003 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 492 of 2001 discharging the Rule. 2. The facts leading to the leave petition are that the predecessor of the respondent......wdhury J Md. Firozul Islam and others.................... Petitioners Vs. Md. Helalul Islam and others ...............Respondents Judgment May 8, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record- For the petitioners Not r..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Osimuddin, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....0 of 1993) Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This is plaintiffs appeal, by leave, against the judgment dated December 13, 1995 of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.2130 of 1993 making the Rule absolute which was obtained against the judgment and decree dated May 30, 1993 of the Court of ......Vs. East Bengal Commercial Bank Ltd. and another AIR I960, Calcutta, 309. Ananta Kumar Bepari vs. Jamini Mohan Das and others 4 DLR, 487. Chapala Sundari Devi vs. Wahed Ali and others 11 DLR, 376. Lawyers Involved: Jainal Abedin, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-R..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Azizullah @ Azizur Rahman Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ioned Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others…….........Respondents Judgment February 23, 2003. The Bangladesh Supreme Court (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988, Order XXVI, rule 4 Review is not a matter of rehearing the Appeal as appeal is ......e Court requiring interference. The Petition having not been filed according to rule 4 of Order XXVI of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988, is not maintainable. Lawyers Involved: S. M. Zillul Haque, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Badsha Miah (Md) Vs. Sonali Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n of the appellant on 13-8-1997 and, as such, the appellant's Tribunal Case is not barred by limitation and the order refusing to grant financial benefits to the appellant is violative of Note 4 of Rule 72 of Bangladesh Service Rules (BSR) Part 1 and also in violation of Article 27 of the Consti......iah (Md)...............Appellant vs Sonali Bank and others.......Respondents Judgment June 15th, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Firoz Shall, Advocate-on-Rec..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 103
M Sahabuddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 12th January, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No, 12532 of 2003 discharging the Rule, which arose out of the proceeding in Druta Bichar Tribunal Case No. 5 of 2003 corresponding t......p;………………..Respondent Judgment May 11, 2005. Case Referred To- Abdul Kader Chowdhury and others vs State 28 DLR (AD) 38. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate,(AKM Zahirul Hoque, Advocate with him) ins..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Bangladesh Vs. AKM Enayetullah, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment, is from the judgment and order dated 25th June 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 4134 of 2002 making the Rule absolute. 2. The short facts for disposal of the appeal are that, the respondent as Wri......nted by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment............... Appellant vs AKM Enayetullah.............................Respondent Judgment December 6, 2004. Lawyers Involved: AJ Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by Firoz Shah, A..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Mustafizur Rahman Vs. Md. Amjad Hossain, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....; Md Ruhul Amin J.- This is defendant's appeal by leave against the judgment of June 12, 2002 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2214 of 1994 making the Rule absolute upon setting aside the judgment and decree dated January 30, 1994 of the Court of Joi......75; Rokeya Khatun vs Alijan @ Alijan Bepari and others 34 DLR (AD) 266; Harmes and another vs Hinkson AIR 1946 PC 156 and Paresh Chandra Bhowmick vs Hiralal Nath and others 36 DLR (AD) 156. Lawyers Involved: ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Mahb..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Tahedul Islam (Md) and others Vs. Md. Mojibar Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....bsp; Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This is defendants' appeal by leave against the judgment dated June 24, 1996 of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 809 of 1991 making the Rule absolute and thereupon setting aside the judgment and decree dated 29-8-1990 of the Court of D......430; Sunil Krishna Banik and others vs Kailash Chandra Saha and others 1984 BLD (AD) 320 = 36 DLR (AD) 220; Mohammad Ali Akhand vs Bahatan Nessa and others 1998 BLD (AD) 50 = 3 BLC (AD) 177. Lawyers Involved: Md Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Abdul Mazid Khan (Md) Advocate Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....d Abdul Mazid Khan, Advocate seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 21-11-2005 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 6008 of 2005 discharging the Rule. 2. The petitioner as informant lodged a First Information Report with Habigonj Police ........Petitioner vs State and another... .........Respondents Judgment March 21st, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, (Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate with him)..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Farida Akhter and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... heard analoÂgously as the same arose out of the single judgment and order dated 30-5-2005 passed upon hearing of the aforesaid writ petitions together and disposed of accordingly, disÂcharging the Rules without any order as to costs and directing exclusion of time from 4th January, 2005 when the ......hamapakan Dorairagan AIR 1951 SC 226; Union Krisan vs Andhra Pradesh AIR 1993 SC 2178; Kudrat-e-Elahi Panir vs Bangladesh 44 DLR (AD) 319 and Deepchand vs State of Uttar Pradesh (AIR 1959 SC 664). Lawyers Involved: M Zahir, Senior Advocate (Sigma Huda, Advocate with him), instructed by Syed Ma..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 221
19431942194019381936193119301929191819171916191519141913191219111910190919081907