Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Sec, Min of Food, Food Div., Govt. of Bangladesh, Dhaka & others Vs. M/s. MF Ltd, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....w that the lessee knew that the properties were liable to the octroi. 11. In the result, we find no substance in this appeal which is therefore dismissed. No order as to cost. Ed. ......Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J Latifur Rahman J Secretary, Ministry of Food, Food Division, Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka and others .......... Appellants. Vs. M/s. MF Limited, a Private company limited by shares........................Respondent ...... February 10th, 1992. Case Referred to- Pratap Singh vs. Krishna Gupta AIR 1966 SC 140. Lawyers Involved: AW Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney‑General, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate –on ‑Record -For the Appellants. Khondker Mahbubuddi......w that the lessee knew that the properties were liable to the octroi. 11. In the result, we find no substance in this appeal which is therefore dismissed. No order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Joynal Abedin and others Vs. Mafizur Rahman & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
...., the judgment of the learned Single Judge suffers from legal infirmity and the same is liable to be set aside. In the result, the appeal is allowed without cost. Ed. ...... ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Joynal Abedin and others…………….. Defendant‑Appellants Vs. Mafizur Rahman & others................. Plaintiff‑Respondents ......, the judgment of the learned Single Judge suffers from legal infirmity and the same is liable to be set aside. In the result, the appeal is allowed without cost. Ed. ......, the judgment of the learned Single Judge suffers from legal infirmity and the same is liable to be set aside. In the result, the appeal is allowed without cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Musa Ali Vs. Nur Ahmed and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ned Advocate for the respondents and have gone through them in this case. Order of the Court. By majority decision the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......mal J Latifur Rahman J Musa Ali ..................Appellant Vs. Nur Ahmed and others...................Respondents Judgment November 25, 1......ned Advocate for the respondents and have gone through them in this case. Order of the Court. By majority decision the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ned Advocate for the respondents and have gone through them in this case. Order of the Court. By majority decision the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Chanjury Talukder and another Vs. Chingneshay Magni and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ding on the plaintiff. For all the above reasons we do not find any merit in this appeal which is dismissed without costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 12 BLD (1992) (AD) 253. ......Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Chanjury Talukder and another .................................Appellants. Vs. Chingneshay Magni and others…………………………………….Respondents ......hers…………………………………….Respondents Judgment January 20, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑For the Appellants. Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advo......ding on the plaintiff. For all the above reasons we do not find any merit in this appeal which is dismissed without costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 12 BLD (1992) (AD) 253. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Madar Chandra Basu Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Madar Chandra Basu................Appellant Vs. The State .............Respondent. Judgment February 17th, 1992. ......ddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Madar Chandra Basu................Appellant Vs. The State .............Respondent. Judgment February 17t......dra Basu................Appellant Vs. The State .............Respondent. Judgment February 17th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Md. Monsur Ali, Advocate, (appeared with the leave of the Court) instructed by M Nowab Ali, Advoca......ircumstances of the case, the appeal is allowed. Let the appellant be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner concerned till commencement of the trial. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Jogendra Nath alias Govinda Sarker Vs. Amulya Chandra Sarker and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....others. The prayer for separate saham by defendants 7, 9 and 11 was refused as the suit was dismissed. In the result, therefore, the appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ...... Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Jogendra Nath alias Govinda Sarker ..........Plaintiff‑Appellant. Vs. Amulya Chandra Sarker and others ..........Defendant‑Respondents. ......llah Vs. Ananga Mohan AIR (29) 1942 Calcutta 571. Lawyers Involved: Kh. Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Mahbubey Alam, Advocate Supreme Court with him) instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑For the Appellant. Md. Ozair ......others. The prayer for separate saham by defendants 7, 9 and 11 was refused as the suit was dismissed. In the result, therefore, the appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Hussain Mohammad Ershad Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Hussain Mohammad Ershad...............Petitioner Vs. The State ………………………Respondent Judgment January 30, 1992 Lawyers Involved: ......ent here. Supreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Hussain Mohammad Ershad...............Petitioner Vs. The State ………………………Respondent Judgment January 30, 1992 Lawyers In......ad...............Petitioner Vs. The State ………………………Respondent Judgment January 30, 1992 Lawyers Involved: Moudud Ahmed, Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate‑onÂRecord ‑For the Petitioner. Aminul Huq, Attorney‑General (Abdu......smissed. Stay granted by this Court on 26.1.92 is vacated. No observation in the interlocutory proceedings binds the trial Court on the merit of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 88
Mackinnon Mackenzie & C. (Pak.) Ltd Vs. Com. of Taxes Ctg (South) Zone, Chtg, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... incurred for carrying on the business in this country. The High Court Division's answer to the question referred to is upheld. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Mackinnon Mackenzie & Company (Pakistan) Ltd.. ..................………………Appellant Vs. Commissioner of Taxes Chittagong (South) Zone, Chittagong ................Responde...... Commissioner of Income‑Tax, Kerala Vs Malayalam Plantations Ltd. [1964] 53 ITR (SC) 140 (150). Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate -on‑Record‑ For the Appellant. Moksudur ...... incurred for carrying on the business in this country. The High Court Division's answer to the question referred to is upheld. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 84
SA Sultan Vs. The State and another, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....e Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J SA Sultan ............................Accused‑Appellant Vs. The State and another................Respondents Judgment November 20, 1991. Result: The app......39. ......For the Appellant. M Shamsul Alam, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by SU Chaklader, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑ For the State (Respondent No. 1). Sirajul Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑ For the Respondent No. 2. Criminal Appeal No. 16 of......case has been made out and we do not think it fit and proper to quash the proceeding at this stage. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) (1992) 139. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Afsaruddin Ahmed Vs. Banque Indosuez, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....pliedly considered the case being one of exceptional circumstances as the documents which ought to have been filed with the plaint as per rule 14 of the said Order were not filed. From the Concise Statement filed by the plaintiff‑respondent we find that on 14.9.88 another suit being Title ......d.......................................Defendant‑Appellant Vs. Banque Indosuez having Its Local Office at 47, Motijheel Commercial Area, Dhaka ............. Khandakar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate‑on‑Record‑ For the Appellant. Rafiqul‑Ul‑Huq, Senior Advocate (Md. Fazlul Huq, Advocate with him), Instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate‑on ‑Rec......of the Code of Civil Procedure and thereby correctly held that this rule is directory and not mandatory. In the result, this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 150
Mujibur Rahman (Md) Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....Commissioner for India Vs. IM W, AIR 1948 PC 121; Pakistan Vs. Mrs. AV Issacs 22 DLR (SC) 371; United Provinces Vs. Atiqua Begum AIR 1941 FC 16; JB Chopra Vs. Union of India AIR 1987 SC 357 (Para 2); State of Bihar Vs. Kameshwar Singh, AIR 1952(SC) 252; Chandra Mohan Vs. State of UP, AIR 1966 (SC) 1...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Mujibur Rahman (Md)……………………………………. Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others……….. Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 35 of 1987) ...... 117 RR 32 at p.41: 11 Moo PC 347 & Attorney‑General for Ontario Vs. Attorney General for Canada, 1921 AC 571 (583). Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑onÂRecord‑For the Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 35 of 1987). A...... the Supreme Court which exercises the judicial power of the State. I concur again with the decision of my learned brother, MH Rahman J. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 111. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 203
Dr. Ahmed Hussain Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... called undemocratic. It is provided in the Constitution itself. The amendment is not also violative of Article 28. Clause (4) in Article 28 provides that nothing in that Article shall prevent the State, which expression includes Parliament, from making special provision in favour of women. We f...... Latifur Rahman J Dr. Ahmed Hussain ..................Petitioner. Vs. Bangladesh and others…...........Respondents Judgment March 2, 1992......p; Vs. Bangladesh and others…...........Respondents Judgment March 2, 1992 Lawyers Involved: Dr. Ahmed Hussain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑For the Petitioner. AW Bhuiyan, Additi...... shall prevent the State, which expression includes Parliament, from making special provision in favour of women. We find no merit in this petition and, accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 191
Jamuna Oil Company Limited and another Vs.SK Dey and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....d judgment of the High Court Division as well as the decree passed by the two Courts below. The appeal is, therefore, allowed and the suit of respondent No. 1 is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ...... (Civil) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Jamuna Oil Company Limited and another................Appellants Vs. SK Dey and another.............................................Respondents Judgmen......th him), instructed by Mr. Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑For the Appellants. Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate (Shafique Ahmed, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑ For Respondent No. 1. Syed Ishtia......d judgment of the High Court Division as well as the decree passed by the two Courts below. The appeal is, therefore, allowed and the suit of respondent No. 1 is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Abdus Sattar Vs. Abdul Rahman @ Abdur Rahman and others , 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....oneous assumption that there ought to have been evidence to show that the shebait knew about their possession from before. 14. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in the Secretary of State for India Vs. Debendra Lai Khan 38 CWN 285 pointed out that for adverse possession the ......sent: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdus Sattar ......................Plaintiff‑Appellant Vs. Abdul Rahman @ Abdur Rahman and others .............Defendant‑Respondent Ju......ate and MA Matin Advocate Supreme Court with him) instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate‑ on‑ Record ‑For the Appellant. BK Das, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑ For the Respondents 1‑ 4. Ex......ating to the finding of adverse possession made by the High Court Division, the appeal cannot succeed in any case. In the result, therefore, the appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Chand Mia and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....f‑appellant. Hence the order portion of the lower appellate Court needs modification. The appeal is, therefore, allowed but with no cost. The plaintiffs suit is decreed. Ed. ......;…………………………………………………………Appellant Vs. Chand Mia and others ..............................................................Respond........Respondents Judgment August 7, 1991. Lawyers Involved: AW Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney ‑General, (B Hossain, Deputy Attorney‑ General, with him), instructed by Md. Ayub, Advocate on Record ‑ For the Appellant. Mahfuzur Rahman, Advocate, Supreme ......f‑appellant. Hence the order portion of the lower appellate Court needs modification. The appeal is, therefore, allowed but with no cost. The plaintiffs suit is decreed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 56
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Aziz Molla, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ng out or otherwise transferring all kinds of lands including waste lands in their khas possession on a large scale with a view to get a greater benefit out of the provisions of the East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Bill 1948, when enacted and put into operation. It was apprehended t...... Latifur Rahman J Government of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Bakerganj ..............Appellants. Vs. Aziz Molla being dead his heirs: Md. Mozibur Rahman & others .............................t of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Bakerganj ..............Appellants. Vs. Aziz Molla being dead his heirs: Md. Mozibur Rahman & others .......................Respondents Judgment August 7......ant‑Government is illegal, without jurisdiction and not binding upon the plaintiffs. Order of the Court By a majority decision the appeal is allowed without cost. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 178
Sahera Khatun and another Vs. Anwara Khatun and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....rected himself to an extent causing an error in the decision and/or resulting in a failure of justice. There is thus no substance in this appeal which is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......buddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Sahera Khatun and another............................Defendant‑Appellant. Vs. Anwara Khatun and others.............................Plaintiff‑Respondents J....................Plaintiff‑Respondents Judgment January 15, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahbubey Alam with him) instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑‑ For the Appellant. Nurul Hu......rected himself to an extent causing an error in the decision and/or resulting in a failure of justice. There is thus no substance in this appeal which is dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Anis and Co. and others, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....Chittagong. The said Cement was loaded from the Port Umm Qasr, Iraq from 14.7.90 onwards on board the Ship MV Banglar Kiron belonging to the Bangladesh Shipping Corporation which was chartered by the State Enterprise for Water Transport, Baghdad. The original sale by M/s Transclear to M/s Nidera bei....... ......ers .......................Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 23 of 1991) Judgment August 29, 1991. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney General, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑ For the Appellants (In Civil Appeal No. 22 of 1991) M ......peals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Order of the Court By majority decision the appeals are allowed without cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) (1992) 65. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Fazaruddin Vs. Maijuddin and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... in the paternal property to the respondents, who are strangers, without serving any notice upon him. He claimed pre‑emption by filing Misc. Cases Nos. 121 of 1974 and 174 of 1974 under section 96, State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, in the 1st Court of Munsif, Dhaka. By one sale deed, 1.70 ¾ acre......me Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Latifur Rahman J Fazaruddin ..... Pre‑emptor‑Appellant. (In both the appeals) Vs. Maijuddin and others…. Pre‑emptee’s ‑Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 52 of 1989). ...... M Nurullah, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑ For the Appellant (in both the appeals). Alimuzzaman Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain Advocate‑on‑Record ‑ For Respondent No.1 (In Civil Appeal No. 52 of 1989) ......gle Judge is not correct. 10. In the result, both the appeals are allowed. Judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the appellate court is restored. No order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Abdul Mannan and others Vs. State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdul Mannan and others .........................Accused‑Appellants. Vs. State ....... .............................................Respondent Judgment July 9,......nal) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdul Mannan and others .........................Accused‑Appellants. Vs. State ....... .............................................Respondent Judgment .........................Accused‑Appellants. Vs. State ....... .............................................Respondent Judgment July 9, 1991 Lawyer Involved: Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record-For the Appellants. B. Hossain, Deputy At......ult, therefore, the appeal is allowed and the order of conviction and sentence passed against the appellants is set aside. They may now be released from their respective bail bonds. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60