Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Aminul Islam Vs. Mujibur Rahman and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... In the result, therefore, the appeal is allowed and the impugned judgment of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. This case is also reported in: 45 DLR (AD) (1993) 09 ......Criminal) MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Aminul Islam…………………..First Party Complainant‑Appellant Vs. Mujibur Rahman and others.............. Second Party‑Respondents Judgment ......l Misc. Case No. 44 of 1987 under section 561A Cr PC in the High Court Division, Dhaka on 12.4.87 for quashing the proceeding under section 145 Cr PC A rule was issued upon the appellant's father, Md. Ali Akbar who, however, died on 15 April, 1989 during the pendency of the Rule. As already noti...... In the result, therefore, the appeal is allowed and the impugned judgment of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. This case is also reported in: 45 DLR (AD) (1993) 09 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Abdul Wahab Vs. Ali Ahmed and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....& ors. Vs. Guranga Bejoy Das & ors., 1989 BLD (AD) 162. The impugned judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......d. ...... TH Khan, Sr. Advocate, (MA Wahab Miah Advocate with him), instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑ For the Appellant SC Das Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Respondent No. 1 Not Represe......& ors. Vs. Guranga Bejoy Das & ors., 1989 BLD (AD) 162. The impugned judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Hazrat Ali and others Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Hazrat Ali and others ......................................Condemned prisoners‑Appellants Vs. The State .....................Respondent Judgment August 6, 1991 Lawyers Involved...... MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Hazrat Ali and others ......................................Condemned prisoners‑Appellants Vs. The State .....................Respondent Judgment August 6, 1991 .....................................Condemned prisoners‑Appellants Vs. The State .....................Respondent Judgment August 6, 1991 Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdus Sobhan, Advocate, instructed by Md. Ataul Haque, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑ F......ntenced W imprisonment for life and conviction of Abdul Khaleque under sections 302/34 of the Penal Code is maintained but his sentence of death is commuted to imprisonment for life. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Dudu Mia Vs. Ekram Mia Chowdhury, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....sp; Ed. ......Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Dudu Mia, being dead his heirs; Md. Moezuddin and others……Defendant‑Appellant. Vs. Ekram Mia Chowdhury (Plaintiff in the suit) being dead his heirs; Mahmuda Khatun & o......p; Ed. ......sp; Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Pubali Bank Vs. The Chairman, First Labour Court, Dhaka and another, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....ect matter of the dispute till its final resolution is a Power apart from adjudicating and determining any industrial dispute. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 40; 12 BLD (AD) 72. ...... 12 BLD (AD) 72. ......ect matter of the dispute till its final resolution is a Power apart from adjudicating and determining any industrial dispute. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 40; 12 BLD (AD) 72. ......ect matter of the dispute till its final resolution is a Power apart from adjudicating and determining any industrial dispute. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 40; 12 BLD (AD) 72. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Abdul Mannan Vs. Jobeda Khatun & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
...., 1985 it refused to set aside its earlier direction to the trial Court for the disposal of the Order 9, rule 13 matter. In view of the above, the appeal is allowed. No costs. Ed. ......esent: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdul Mannan……………..........................Appellant Vs. Jobeda Khatun & others…………...............Respondents ......s heard and dismissed on 25th August, 1984. 2. Respondent No.1 filed a revisional application, Civil Revision No.773 of 1984, before the High Court Division. On 30th July, 1985 on his prayer Md. Altaf Hossain, J. of the High Court Division allowed the revisional application to go out of t......, 1985 it refused to set aside its earlier direction to the trial Court for the disposal of the Order 9, rule 13 matter. In view of the above, the appeal is allowed. No costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Nasrin Kader Siddiqui Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....rs Vs. Bangladesh 34 DLR (AD) 125; Alam Ara Huq Vs. Government of Bangladesh 42 DLR 98; Bushell's Case (1670), Vaughan 135; Fay Vs. Noia 372 US 391; Vaughan, at 156 124 Eng Rep, at 1016 9 Howell's State Trials, at 1023; King Vs. Governor of Lewes Prison, ex parte Doyle [1917] 2 KB 254 (269); Rex......ustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Nasrin Kader Siddiqui................ Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others………….. Respondents &nbs......er of warrant of commitment in custody. Hence, the order of detention is without any lawful authority, and on that score alone the detention of the detenu is liable to be set aside. Ed. ......er of warrant of commitment in custody. Hence, the order of detention is without any lawful authority, and on that score alone the detention of the detenu is liable to be set aside. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 365
Mohammad Ali & others Vs. Circle Officer, (Revenue) Dhaka and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....tion of delay and ultimately found reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the appeal". All in all, it was done within the limits of its revisional powers. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Mohammad Ali & others…………………………………………..Plaintiff‑Petitioners. Vs. Circle Officer, (Revenue) Dhaka and others ..........…Defendants‑Respondents Judgment ...... (Revenue) Dhaka and others ..........…Defendants‑Respondents Judgment October 30, 1991 Lawyers Involved: TH Khan, Senior Advocate (MA Wahhab Miah Advocate, with him) instructed by Md. Aftab‑Hossain, Advocate‑on ‑Record ‑ For the Petitioners. B Hossain, Deputy Attorneyâ......tion of delay and ultimately found reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the appeal". All in all, it was done within the limits of its revisional powers. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 185
Babor Ali Molla and others Vs. State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Babor Ali Molla and others .....................Accused‑Appellants Vs. State ……………………………&hell......fzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Babor Ali Molla and others .....................Accused‑Appellants Vs. State …………………………&h......case and submitted final report on 9.3.82. Subsequent thereto the case was reopened on the prayer of the Inspector of Criminal investigation Department, Camp Jessore. During investigation on 2.9.82 Md. Ejahar Ali, a non‑appealing accused, made a confessional statement before PW 12 SM Jahru......t and order of the High Court Division are set aside and the appellants are acquitted. Let the appellants be set at liberty forthwith if not wanted in connection with any other Case. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Abdul Matin and others Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdul Matin and others........................................Appellants Vs. The State .......................................................Respondent Judgment Apri...... Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdul Matin and others........................................Appellants Vs. The State .......................................................Respondent Judgm................................................Respondent Judgment April 2, 1991. Lawyers Involved: TH Khan, Senior Advocate (MA Wahhab Miah, Advocate with him), instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate ‑ on ‑Record‑ For the Appellants, Md. Nowab A......ll continue on the same bail granted by this court earlier and if the trial starts in the meantime, the Sessions Judge, Sunamganj will be free to take them into custody during trial. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Pradhip Das alias Shambhu and others Vs. Kazal Das Sarma and others, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....sion is upheld, though on different grounds as given above. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without, however, any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 1. ...... Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Pradhip Das alias Shambhu and others ………..Judgment‑debtor‑Appellants Vs. Kazal Das Sarma and others ……………………Decree‑holder‑Respondents Judgmen......1918 (PC) 102; SM Bindubashini Chanda Vs. Al haj Jahanara Begum, 1982 BCR (AD) 181. Lawyers Involved: S R Paul, Senior Advocate, instructed by Shamsul Haque Siddique, Advocate-on‑Record. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑ For the Respondents. Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, ......sion is upheld, though on different grounds as given above. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without, however, any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 1. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Bangladesh Vs. Shamsuzzoha Nurul Amin Chowdhury and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ivision in Appeal from Original Decree No. 138 of l972). Judgment: Kemaluddin Hossain, J.—This appeal raises a complex question of interpretation of Section 20(5)(c)(ii) of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act 1950. The facts are that the plaintiff-respondents instituted a t...... J Fazle Munim J Bangladesh..................Appellant. Vs. Shamsuzzoha Nurul Amin Chowdhury and others....Respondents Judgment June 8, 197......uired for the disposal of the suit over and above the evidence already on record. The appeal is allowed with the modification set out above but without any order as to costs. Ed. ......uired for the disposal of the suit over and above the evidence already on record. The appeal is allowed with the modification set out above but without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 142
BD Jatiya Matshajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd. Vs. Chairman, Labour Court, Ctg & anr.,1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....nt. Vs. The Chairman, Labour Court, Chittagong & anr. ...Respondents Judgment May 5, 1976. Case Referred to: M/S Co-operative Milk Societies Union Ltd. Vs. State of West Bengal and others, 62 C.W.N. 405. Lawyers Involved: T. H. Khan, Senior ......hmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Fazle Munim, J. The Bangladesh Jatiya Matshajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd……...Appellant. Vs. The Chairman, Labour Court, Chittagong & anr. ...Respondents Judgment May ......idullah, Advocates instructed by S. S. Hoda, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellant. S. R. Pal, Senior Advocate (on 4. 5. 76) with A. K. M. Shafiqur Rahman, Advocate instructed by Md. M. R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent No. 2. Ex-parte—Respondent No......med the order of the Labour Court is set aside. The order of the Labour Court is also set aside and the petition of Respondent No. 2 is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 144
FM Rashiduzzaman Vs. Bahauddin Ahmed and another, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ent May 3, 1976. Cases referred to: H. H. B. Gill Vs. The King, A.I.R. 1948 (P. C.) 128; Matajagdobey Vs. H. C. Bhari, P.L.D. 1957 (S.C.) (India) 160; Syed Ahmad Vs. The State, 1958, 10 D. L. R. (S. C.) 12 PLD 1958 (S.C.) 27; Baijnath Vs. State of M.P. in A.I.R. 1966, ......B. Mahmud Hussain, C. J. Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain. J. D.C. Bhattacharya. J. FM Rashiduzzaman……….Appellant Vs. Bahauddin Ahmed and another…….Respondents Judgment May 3, 1976. ......ible for the loss of the promising life cannot be prosecuted as the said officer Bahauddin acted in the discharge of his official duty. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......ible for the loss of the promising life cannot be prosecuted as the said officer Bahauddin acted in the discharge of his official duty. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Tozammel Hussain Chowdhury Vs. State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
...., C. J. Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain. J. D.C. Bhattacharya. J. Tozammel Hussain Chowdhury……..... Appellant Vs. State…………...Respondent. Judgment ......ud Hussain, C. J. Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain. J. D.C. Bhattacharya. J. Tozammel Hussain Chowdhury……..... Appellant Vs. State…………...Respondent. Judgment &n......ng so the High Court committed no illegality. In the result the appeal stands dismissed. The appellant is directed to surrender to his bail to serve out the sentence. Ed. ......ng so the High Court committed no illegality. In the result the appeal stands dismissed. The appellant is directed to surrender to his bail to serve out the sentence. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
M.A. Zaher and others Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and another, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....g the appellant Khurshed Alam Khan for abetment of the offence of contempt of court and sentencing him therefor. In the result this appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ussain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Fazle Munim J M.A. Zaher………...Appellant And Haji Jalal Ahmed …….... Appellant And Md. Khurshed Alam Khan………….Appellant Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and another……..Respondent Judgment April 27, 1976. Result: ......n Criminal) Present: Syed AB Mahmud Hussain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Fazle Munim J M.A. Zaher………...Appellant And Haji Jalal Ahmed …….... Appellant And Md. Khurshed Alam Khan………….Appellant Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and another……..Responde......g the appellant Khurshed Alam Khan for abetment of the offence of contempt of court and sentencing him therefor. In the result this appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 142
Sirajuddin alias Siraj Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... A. B. Mahmud Hussain, C.J. Ahsanuddin Chowdhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain, J. D.C. Bhattacharya, J. Sirajuddin alias Siraj…...Appellant. Vs. The State ……...Respondent. Judgment Nov. 20, 1975. Cases Referred to: ......sent: Syed A. B. Mahmud Hussain, C.J. Ahsanuddin Chowdhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain, J. D.C. Bhattacharya, J. Sirajuddin alias Siraj…...Appellant. Vs. The State ……...Respondent. Judgment Nov. 20, 1975. Cases ......Vs. Ajudhia (2 Allahabad (644), In re-Natesa Mudaliar, A.I.R. 1945 Madras, 330. Sital Vs. Emperor AIR 1942 Oudh. 214. Reg. Vs. Tukay Bin Tamana, I.L.R. 1 Bombay 214. Lawyers Involved: Md. Behatar Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. M.A. Rouf, Senior Advocat......e find no reason for reversal of the decisions of courts below and hence dismiss the appeal. The appellant must now surrender to his bail and serve out the remainder of the sentence. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Swami Joytirghananda Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Khulna and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....er discharging the Rule are set aside and the Petition No. 245 of 1966 is restored to file for hearing according to law. There shall, however, be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ...... Present: Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain, J. Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya, J. Swami Joytirghananda………..….Appellant. Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Khulna and others…………..Respondents. ......er discharging the Rule are set aside and the Petition No. 245 of 1966 is restored to file for hearing according to law. There shall, however, be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ......er discharging the Rule are set aside and the Petition No. 245 of 1966 is restored to file for hearing according to law. There shall, however, be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Dacca Improvement Trust Vs. Waliullah and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....……....Respondents Judgment January 29, 1976. Cases Referred to: Jagadish Bhargava Vs. Jawaharlal Bhargava and others A.I.R. 1961(S.C.) 832; Secretary of State for India Vs. Mask & Co. L. B. 67 I. A. 222 = A.I.R. 1940 P.C 105; Abdul Rouf and others ...... Mahmud Husain, C. J. Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. D. C. Bhattacharya, J. Fazle Munim, J. Dacca Improvement Trust…………….Appellant. Vs. Waliullah and others……………....Respondents Judg...... a formal decree, as a matter of fact, was prepared after the filing of the said appeal. The result, therefore, is that the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... a formal decree, as a matter of fact, was prepared after the filing of the said appeal. The result, therefore, is that the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca Vs. M/S. Ata Hossain Khan Ltd., 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....that this appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court are set aside and that of the Appellate Tribunal restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 141.......) Present: Syed AB Mahmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Commissioner of Income-Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca......Appellant. Vs. M/s. Ata Hossain Khan Ltd....... Respondent. Judgment November 19, 1975. Result: ......d Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (1952-21 ITR 79 at page 81). Lawyers Involved: A.W. Chowdhury, Senior Advocate, instructed by A. M. Khan Chowdhury, Advocate-on-Record -For the Appellant. Md. Hasan, Advocate, instructed by S.M. Huq Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civil Appea......that this appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court are set aside and that of the Appellate Tribunal restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 141...Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 164