Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5501-5520 of 5838 results.
Fakhruddin Mia and other Vs. Mohammad Khodabaksh Sheikh, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... K. Hossain J: The purchasers are the petitioners, and the leave petition arises out of a proceeding for pre-emption under section 96 of the East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act. 2. The point in dispute was whether the respondent, who w...... Present: Syed A.B M. Husain CJ Kemaluddin Hussain J D. C. Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Fakhruddin Mia and other.........................Petitioners. Vs. Mohammad Khodabaksh Sheikh... ……………Respondent ......th as second appellate court and a revisional court, except in certain well-defined exceptional circumstances. With this observation the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......th as second appellate court and a revisional court, except in certain well-defined exceptional circumstances. With this observation the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
K. M. Zaker Hossain Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J K. M. Zaker Hossain................Petitioner Vs. The State.............................Respondent Judgment Feb. 21, 1977. Lawyers......hmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J K. M. Zaker Hossain................Petitioner Vs. The State.............................Respondent Judgment Feb. 21, 197......ion and as such there was no question of prejudice. There is, therefore, no question of law which calls for our interference. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ion and as such there was no question of prejudice. There is, therefore, no question of law which calls for our interference. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Md. Abdur Rahim Mondal Vs. State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....nt: Syed AB Mahmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hosain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Md. Abdur Rahim Mondal............Appellant Vs. The State................. Respondent Judgment April 21, 1977. Result: The appeal is dism......l) Present: Syed AB Mahmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hosain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Md. Abdur Rahim Mondal............Appellant Vs. The State................. Respondent Judgment April 21, 1977. Result: The ap......upreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed AB Mahmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hosain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Md. Abdur Rahim Mondal............Appellant Vs. The State................. Respondent Ju......n of the appellant as well as of Pakistan Army in killing Saimuddin in the manner it were done. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 246. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Mansur Ali Vs. Bangladesh and another, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....ssion of these authorities is not called for. However, we would like to mention some of them. We think that the best enunciation of the principle is to be found in the case of G.A, Montario vs. The State of Ajmir, by the Supreme Court of India, reported in A.I.R. 1957 (S.C.) 113. The other ......ud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Mansur Ali............................. Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and another............... Respondent Judgment ......t Judgment February 23, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Md. Ansar Ali, Advocate, instructed by Md. A. Aziz, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. ...... For the reasons we allow the appeal, set aside the orders of the High Court Division, accept the reference of the Sessions Judge Dacca, and quash the proceedings. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Yusuf Sk. alias Sk Abu Yusuf Vs. Appellate Tribunal and another, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....tances into consideration. The right sentence is to be determined by the nature of criminal intent and the manner of perpetration of the crime…….(9 and 10) Cases Referred to- Ali Ahmed vs. State (1962) 14 DLR (SC) 81 (86) = PLR 1962 (SC) 102 (106); Hari Vishnu vs. Ahmed Ishaque AIR 1955 (......Mahmud Hossain CJ Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Yusuf Sk. alias Sk Abu Yusuf.................................Appellant. Vs. Appellate Tribunal and another............................... Respondent. Judgment A......14 DLR (SC) 81 (86) = PLR 1962 (SC) 102 (106); Hari Vishnu vs. Ahmed Ishaque AIR 1955 (SC) 233, Syed Yakoob vs. Radha Krishnan AIR 1964 (SC) 477. Lawyers Involved: Mainul Hossain, Advocate with Md. Joynal Abedin, Advocate, Mozammel Huq Khan, Advocate—For the Appellant. Sultan Hossain Khan......nths more. The sentences are accordingly modified. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with the modification of the sentence indicated. Ed. The Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 211. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Punjab Ali Pramanik and others Vs. Mohd. Mokarram Hossain, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....er to set aside the sale. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) (1977) 185. ......risdiction (Civil) Present: AB Mahmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Punjab Ali Pramanik and others.................Appellants. Vs. Mohd. Mokarram Hossain... ……………….Respondents Judgment March 4, 1976. Re...... cream He Bank Ltd. Vs. SardarKishan Singh, AIR 1963 Pun. 230; Income Tax, AIR 1955 S.C. 74 ; Shyamlal Vs Jagannath, AIR 1969 Cal 424; Fhtcrotts case (1883) 21 Ch. 519 (CA.); Abdur Rahim Vs. Syed Abu Md. Bark at AH LR55 IA 96—32 CWN 482-AIR 1928 ' P.C 16— ILR Cal. 519 ; Asmatunnessa Begum Vs. As......er to set aside the sale. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) (1977) 185. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Bangladesh and another Vs. M/S. A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....show its lawful authority to dispossess forcibly the company from the property upon an alleged plea of cancellation of the lease. For these reasons this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......azle Munim J Bangladesh and another……………………………………………Petitioners. Vs. M/S. A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others................. Respondents Judgm......show its lawful authority to dispossess forcibly the company from the property upon an alleged plea of cancellation of the lease. For these reasons this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......show its lawful authority to dispossess forcibly the company from the property upon an alleged plea of cancellation of the lease. For these reasons this petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Kumar Ram Narain Roy Chowdhury & anr. Vs. Sonatannessa Bibi & ors., 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....t any reciprocal arrangement between the two Governments in this regard. He has laid stress on what is said to be the governing principle in Public International Law, which is that one State cannot take measure on the territory of another State by enforcement of its national laws wit......Chowdhury J D.C. Bhattacharya J Kumar Ram Narain Roy Chowdhury & anr....................Appellants Vs. Sonatannessa Bibi & ors.......................................... Respondents ......e, is that the appeal is allowed, and the order of the Subordinate Judge dated 31-5-75 is set aside. There shall not however be any order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ......e, is that the appeal is allowed, and the order of the Subordinate Judge dated 31-5-75 is set aside. There shall not however be any order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Haji Abdul Motalib Sowdagar Vs. Faiz Ahmed Chowdhury and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....ejecting civil petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 141 of 1975. The Courts below were right in rejecting the petitioner's plea. There is no substance in this petition which is dismissed. Ed. ...... Syed A.B. Mahmud Hussain C J Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Haji Abdul Motalib Sowdagar...................Petitioner Vs. Faiz Ahmed Chowdhury and others…………….Respondents Judgment March 22, 1977. ...... Borough Council 1951(1) All E.R, 587. Lawyers Involved: M, H. Khandker, Senior Advocate — For the Petitioner. Mian Abdul Gafur, Advocate, instructed by B.C. Pandey, Advocate-on-Record. Md. A. Aziz, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appea......ejecting civil petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 141 of 1975. The Courts below were right in rejecting the petitioner's plea. There is no substance in this petition which is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Nurun Nabi Mondal and others Vs. Joynal Abedin Khondkar & ors, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....e provision. In the preamble generally certain facts are recited, which are the immediate occasion of the enactment. For its correct understanding, the contemporaneous social conditions and State of law as well as the mischief which sought to be remedied may be taken note &nbs......bsp; Nurun Nabi Mondal and others………………………..Appellants Vs. Joynal Abedin Khondkar & ors ………………&hellip......ll. 617; Union Bank Ltd., Vs. Mst. Ram Rati, AIR 1954 All. 595; Maniram Kolita vs. Keri Kolitani, LR 7 IA 115: ILR 5 Cal. 776; 19 WR 367—13 BLR 1 (FB). Lawyers Involved: Md. Golam Rabbani, Advocate, instructed by B. C. Panday, Advocate-on-record—for the Appellant......nbsp; ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Ashraf Ali Sikdar and another Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....ury J Kemaluddin Hossain J D. C. Bhattachary J Ashraf Ali Sikdar and another........................Appellant. Vs. The State........................ Respondent Judgment &n......sanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J D. C. Bhattachary J Ashraf Ali Sikdar and another........................Appellant. Vs. The State........................ Respondent Judgment &nbs......ondent Judgment June 14, 1976. Lawyers Involved: Md. Meser Ali, Senior Advocate, instructed by Aminul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellan......e instant case falls within the ambit of a special enactment, namely, the Bangladesh Scheduled Offences (Special Tribunals) Order, 1972. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Abul Hayat Choudhury Vs. Nurul Amin and ors., 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....pondent Nos. 13, 14 and 15 is set aside, but the order relating to the election of Respondent No. 2 is not interfered with Respondent No. 1 shall bear the costs of this appeal. Ed. ......ddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Abul Hayat Choudhury ......................................Appellant Vs. Nurul Amin and ors...........................................Respondents Judgment...... Judgment December 8, 1976. Lawyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmad, Md. Abdur Rouf, Advocate Khademul Islam Chowdhury, instructed by A. Rab-II Advocate-on-Record- For ......pondent Nos. 13, 14 and 15 is set aside, but the order relating to the election of Respondent No. 2 is not interfered with Respondent No. 1 shall bear the costs of this appeal. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 141
Mohiuddin Khan and others Vs. Pakistan River Steamer Ltd. and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....eral provision and as such valid and lawful. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed, but in the circumstances of the case there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... (Civil) Present: Syed A.B. Mahmud Hussain CJ Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Mohiuddin Khan and others......................Appellants. Vs. Pakistan River Steamer Ltd. and others. ...Respondents Judgment January ......eral provision and as such valid and lawful. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed, but in the circumstances of the case there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ......eral provision and as such valid and lawful. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed, but in the circumstances of the case there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 138
Bangladesh Vs. Abdul Khaleque and ors., 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....he matter in the manner indicated above. The appeal No. 26 of 1976 subject to the observation made above is dismissed. We however make no order as to costs in all the appeals. Ed. ......yed A. B. Mahmud Husain CJ Ahsan-uddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Fazle Munim J Bangladesh.....................................................Appellant. Vs. Abdul Khaleque and ors.................................. Respondents. (In C. A.......istant Attorney-General, instructed by S. S, Hoda Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Miah Abdul Gafur, Advocate—For the Respondent. M. H. Khandker, Sr. Advocate, with Md. Mannan, Advocate, instructed by Md. A. Aziz, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellant. ......he matter in the manner indicated above. The appeal No. 26 of 1976 subject to the observation made above is dismissed. We however make no order as to costs in all the appeals. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Akhtar Hossain Khan & others Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....nuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hosain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Fazle Mumin J Akhtar Hossain Khan & others .................Appellants. Vs. The State..............................................Respondent Judgment August 26, 19......C J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hosain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Fazle Mumin J Akhtar Hossain Khan & others .................Appellants. Vs. The State..............................................Respondent Judgment ......4 affirmed—Qudrutullah VS. Bareilly Municipality, AIR 1974 SC 396; referred A. Malek vs. Abdur Rahman, (1976) 19 DLR3I8; Sona vs. State, (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 55. Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Karim, Advocate with Abul n, Advocate, instructed by B. C. Panday, ate-on-Re......which charge-sheet has been, submitted and cognizance has been taken under P.O. 50 after its repeal is' be tried by the Special Magistrate or the Special Tribunal as the case may be. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 113
M/s Amin Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....e of the enactment of the Basic Democracies Order. We, therefore, do not find any substance in all these appeals which are dismissed, but there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ......………Appellant (In Appeal No. 6 of 1972). M/s Carpet Allied Products Ltd………………. Appellant (In Appeal No. 7 of 1972). Vs. Bangladesh and another.................... Respondents in all the appeals Judgmen......e 157; Attorney General vs. Prince Ernest Augustus of Hanover, 1957 A.C. 436 same case 1957 (1) All. E.R. 49; M/s Speed Bird Navigation Company and another vs. Bangladesh in (1975) 27 D.L.R. 170; Md. Rejaul Haque vs. Bangladesh m (1976) 28 D.L.R. 38. Lawyers Involved: M.H. Khand......e of the enactment of the Basic Democracies Order. We, therefore, do not find any substance in all these appeals which are dismissed, but there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 244
Serajuddin Bepari & ors Vs. Mizanur Rahman & ors, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... must claim, inter alia, a legal right, and allege an injury which is not ordinarily reparable by monetary compensation; with these observations, these petitions are dismissed. Ed. ...... Fazle Munim J Serajuddin Bepari & ors……………………………………….Petitioners. Vs. Mizanur Rahman & ors...............Respondents, (in C.P. No 3/77. Bangladesh......-General, with A. W. Bhuiyan, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by B, Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent Nos. 7-8. Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Shafiqur Rahman, Advocate —For Respondent Nos. 1-6. In C.P. No. 4of 1977. ...... must claim, inter alia, a legal right, and allege an injury which is not ordinarily reparable by monetary compensation; with these observations, these petitions are dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Bangladesh Small Industries Corporation, Dacca Vs. Mahbub Hossain Chowdhury, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....80, Life Insurance Corporation of India vs. Sunil Kumar Mukherjee, AIR 1964 SC 849; Rathaur vs. Divisional Manager Life Insurance Corporation of India, AIR 1961 All 502; Rangachari Vs. Secretary of State, AIR 1937 PC 27; Venkata Rao Vs. Secretary of State, AIR 1937 PC 31 ; Kruse Vs. Johnon, (189......sent: Syed AB Mahmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Bangladesh Small Industries Corporation, Dacca..............Appellant Vs. Mahbub Hossain Chowdhury.........................................Respondent Result: T...... on the ground of the violation of the principle of natural justice. 90. Learned Attorney-General has also cited an unreported decision of the High Court Division of this Court in the case of Dr. Md. Abdul Muttalib Vs. University of Dacca and others, to which one of us was a party, where the val......e the scope of the leave order and so we abstain from entering into it. In the result this appeal is dismissed with no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 41. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 170
Bangladesh Vs. Abdul Mannan and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....Collector of Rangoon, 39 IA 197—ILR 40 Cal. 13 (PC); Sand Back Charity Trustees Vs. N.S. Railway Co., 1897 (3) 19 QBD-1; Cohence Moore Vs. Akesseh Tayee—A.I.R. 1935 P.C. 5 Hari Miah Vs. State—10 D.L.R. 123; Hari Miah Vs. State—11 D.L.R. (S)C) 368 same case P.L.D. 1959 S.C........ Mahmud Hussain C J Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J D. C. Bhattacharya J Bangladesh..........................................Appellant. Vs. Abdul Mannan and others....................... Respondents Judgment Jan. ......s, L.R. 63 IA 180. Lawyers Involved: Faqeer Shahabuddin Ahmed, Attorney-General with M/S. Ronadhir Sen, Deputy Attorney-General, Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Assistant Attorney-General, Md. Ismailuddin Sarker, Assistant Attorney-General (appeared on 21-8-75) instructed by A.W. Mian. ......rder as to costs the decision of the High Court is set aside and the case is sent back to the High Court Division for treating the matter as an appeal and dispose it of accordingly. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 135
Abul Layes Vs. Mst. Anwara Khatun & legal representatives: Abu Sayed Ahmed & ors, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....is to be noted here that the impugned order against which the Writ Petition was filed was passed on the ground that the property in question was forfeited to the Government under section 75A of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act. The Government treated the transaction between the appellant and ...... Ed. ......s: Abu Sayed Ahmed and others. ………..Respondents Judgment August 18, 1976 Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Advocate instructed by S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Md. Yeasin, Advocate, instructed by Md. A. Aziz, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent Nos. 3, and 1. ......ises. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs althrough. The judgement of the High Court is hereby set-aside and those of the Trial Court and the first appellate Court are restored. Ed. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 76
930928927926924923922921919918917915914913912911910909906905