Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5521-5540 of 6458 results.
Nausher Ali Sarder & others Vs. The State, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... are sentenced to transportation for life instead of death. 12. In the result, the appeal is dismissed but the sentence of death is commuted to transportation for life. Ed. ...... are sentenced to transportation for life instead of death. 12. In the result, the appeal is dismissed but the sentence of death is commuted to transportation for life. Ed. ......nsportation for life. Ed. ......Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent, Criminal Appeal No. 29 of 1986 (From the Judgment and order dated 11.2. 86 passed by the High Court Division, Circuit Bench, Jessore, in Death Refer..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Priyatosh Talukdar Vs. Asst. Custodian, Vested & Non-Resident Propty, Ctg & ors., 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....t. A. Y. Salehuzzaman, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record —For the Respondent No. 1. A. W. Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on -Record—For the Amicus Curiae. Ex parte—For the R...... order of the Executing Court is set aside and it is directed that the Execution Case No. 4 of 1967 be proceeded with and disposed of in the light of this judgment. No order as to cost. Ed. ......p; Fazle Munim CJ.- This appeal arises from First Appeal No. 28 of 1970 decided by a Bench of the High Court Division, Chittagong (Mohammad Habibur Rahman and Syed Mohammad Ali, JJ.) on 4th March 1984. Facts are: One Umesh Chandra Chowd......hman J A.T.M. Afzal J Priyatosh Talukdar…………………………..Appellant Vs Assistant Custodian, Vested and Non-Resident Property, Chittagong and others .............................Respondents ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70
The State Vs. Fazal and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....rt Division as would call for interference by this court. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Order of the Court By the majority decision the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......rt Division as would call for interference by this court. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Order of the Court By the majority decision the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......sion the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......hmed J M. H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J The State……………………………....Appellant Vs. Fazal and others………………....Respondents Judgment Ma..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Bangladesh Biman Corporation Vs. Syed Aftab Ali and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....h that of the Chief Justice. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the impugned decree is set aside and the suit is dismissed. The appeal is allowed. No order as to cost’s. Ed. ......h that of the Chief Justice. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the impugned decree is set aside and the suit is dismissed. The appeal is allowed. No order as to cost’s. Ed. ......(PC) 229; United Provinces Vs. Atiqa Begum, AIR 1984 PC 16. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate (Fakir Abdul Mannan, Advocate with him) instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advo......sent: F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A. T. M. Afzal J Bangladesh Biman Corporation..........Appellant Vs. Syed Aftab Ali and others……………….......Respondent Judgment May 14 1986. Cases Referred to- ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 97
State Vs. Lalu Miah and another, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....e King AIR 1949 P.C. 257 (259); H.S. Rathod vs. State of Gujrat AIR 1979 S.C. 1232. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record.- For the Appellant. Habib Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondents. Criminal Appeal No. 16 of 1985. (......sed Kabir and Lalu who are on bail are directed to surrender to their bail bonds at once and serve their sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 117; 1987 BLD (AD) 212. ......so Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 117; 1987 BLD (AD) 212. ......ision (Criminal) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J State..........................Appellant. Vs. Lalu Miah and another………………..Respondents. Judgment September 8, 1986. Result: The App..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Md. Ayub Vs. Bangladesh, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Md. Ayub…………………………..…&h...... appeal is, therefore, allowed in part and the impugned order of the High Court Division adding respondent No. 7 as a party is set aside. There will, however, be no order as to cost. Ed. ...... T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, M. A. Mahbub Miah, Advocate with him, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Rafiqul-ul-Huq, Senior Advocate, Moksudur Rahman, Senior Advocate with him instructed by Mohammad Ayub, Advocate-on-Record—For the Res...... Mohammad Ayub, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent Nos. 6 end 7. Not represented—For the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5. Civil Appeal No. 56 of 1986. (From the Judgment and Order dated 28-8-86 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Writ Petition No. 288 of 1..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Shafquat Haider & others Vs. M. Al-Amin and another, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondents. Civil Appeal No. 38 o......s order, however, does not restrain respondent No.1 from discharging his duties as Chairman of the company. The winding-up matter should be disposed of expeditiously. No order as to costs. Ed. ......-up matter should be disposed of expeditiously. No order as to costs. Ed. ......buddin Ahmed J M. H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Shafquat Haider & others………………….....Appellants. Vs. M. Al-Amin and another....................... Respondents Judgment August 13, 1986. Case..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 239
M/S. Zaman and Co. Vs. Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries Corporation and ors., 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries Corporation and ors………...Respondents Judgment August 24, 1986. Cases Referred to- Md. Chand Miah Sowdagar Vs SMH Rahman 1985 BLD 337; Kalu Vs. Sowaria 27 1C 703. Lawyers Inv......cation for review is dismissed for, hit non-appearance he should rush to the Court, law says within fifteen days, for its restoration. The appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......sts. Ed. ......ate Division (Civil) Present: F.K.M A. Munim J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal. J M/S. Zaman and Co. represented by its Proprietor N. Zaman…………....Appellant ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....7 SC. 2149 ; Kekhraj S. Lalvani Vs. Dy. Custodian AIR 1966 (SC) 334; Har Shanker AIR 1973 (SC) 1121; M/s. Momin Motor Vs. Regional Transport Authority PLD 1962 108; Chairman Chittagong Pourashava Vs. Md. Amjad Khan 1980 B.S C.R. 54; M/S. Radha Krishna Agarwal Vi. State of Bihar and others AIR 1977 P......nd shall not act arbitrarily or in discriminatory manner. In these circumstances, writ jurisdiction is quite available to the lessee. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 85. ......d. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 85. ......r AIR 1973 (SC) 1121; M/s. Momin Motor Vs. Regional Transport Authority PLD 1962 108; Chairman Chittagong Pourashava Vs. Md. Amjad Khan 1980 B.S C.R. 54; M/S. Radha Krishna Agarwal Vi. State of Bihar and others AIR 1977 Patna 65; Shitla Prasad vs. M. Sadiullah and others AIR 1975 (All) 344 (F.B) Pur..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Feroza Majid and another Vs. Jiban Biman Corporation, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....Supreme Court with him, instructed by Sajjadul Huq, Advocate on Record—For the Appellants. Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate, A. B. M. Khairul Huq Advocate, Supreme Court, with him instructed by Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate on Record—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 6 of 1985. (From ...... the appellants. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. In view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 78. ...... the appellants. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. In view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 78. ......ed in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 78. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 104
Sree Monoranjan Banik & anr Vs. Sree Nitya Ranjan Karmakar & ors., 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....ar & others………………………………Respondent Judgment September 22, 1986. Cases Referred To- Md. Jabed Ali and others v. Rakhal Chandra Mondal and others, 33 DLR (AD) 309; Khairullah Bhuiyan v......the Transfer of Property Act. The impugned order does not call for any interference. The petitioner is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1987 BLD (AD) 122. ......by the High Court Division, Camilla in Civil Revision No. 218 of 1984.) Judgment M.H. Rahman J.- Pre-emptors are the petitioners. Admitted case of the parties is that a non-agricultural......ion (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim C J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Sree Monoranjan Banik and another……………………………&..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Sree Gopal Chandra Mondal and another Vs. Lasman Dasi & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....e suit property. The High Court Division correctly affirmed the decision of the appellate court. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......e suit property. The High Court Division correctly affirmed the decision of the appellate court. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......costs. Ed. ......vision (Civil) Present: F.K.M.A.Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A. T. M. Afzal J Sree Gopal Chandra Mondal and another.........................Appellants Vs. Lasman Dasi & ot..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Comm Taxes, Dhaka (East Zone) Vs. M/S. Macneil & Kilburn Ltd., Adamjee Ct, Dhaka, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....s. C.I.T. AIR 1965 S.C. 65; C.I.T. Vs. Chari & Chari Ltd. AIR 1966 S.C. 34; Karam Chand Thapra 80 I.T.R. 167. Lawyers Involved: Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellant. Exparte —For Responden...... In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Tribunal is restored. There will be no order as to costs Ed. ...... Vs M/S. Macneil & Kilburn Ltd., Adamjee Court, Dhaka....................Respondent Judgment August 3, 1986. Cases Referred To- AIR 1932 (PC) 138: C.I.T Vs. K Rahman & Co. Ltd 1980 B.T.D. 242: C.I.T. vs. Vizir Sultan & Son 36.I.T.R. Goderaj Co vs. C......1986. Cases Referred To- AIR 1932 (PC) 138: C.I.T Vs. K Rahman & Co. Ltd 1980 B.T.D. 242: C.I.T. vs. Vizir Sultan & Son 36.I.T.R. Goderaj Co vs. C.I.T. 37 I.T.R. 381; Karam Chand Tahapar and Bros. P. Ltd. vs. C.I.T. 80 ITR. (SC) 167 A.I.R. 1932 138 (P.C.) C.I.T Vs. K Rahman..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Dira Dockyard & Engineers Ltd. & ors Vs.Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & ors, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....s. Industrial Development Bank. (1966) 18 DLR (SC) 354; PLD 1966 SC 1938. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate on Record—For the Appellants. A KM. Nazrul lslam, Advocate......in Article 33 of the Order. For the reasons stated above, we are of the view that the appeal must fail. It is accordingly dismissed but there will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......er as to costs. Ed. ...... (Civil) Present: F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Present: Dira Dockyard and Engineers Ltd. and others.... Appellants Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha &..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Siraj Miah & another Vs. State & another, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....nd allow the appeal. The appellants are acquitted of the charge leveled against them. Let them be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. ......nd allow the appeal. The appellants are acquitted of the charge leveled against them. Let them be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. ......ision, Comilla Bench in Criminal appeal No. 83 of 1983). Judgment: M H. Rahman J. - In a trial for house-trespass and mischief by fire on a dwelling hut the trial cou...... General, instructed by Zinnur, Advocate-on- Record.—For the Respondent No. 1. Ex-parte—For the Respondent No. 2. Criminal Appeal No. 29 of 1985. (From the judgment and order dated 29th September, 1983 passed by the High Court Division, Comilla Bench in Criminal ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Sufia Khanam Chowdhury Vs. Faizun Nesa Chowdhury, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....such amendment to be necessary in the interest of justice. The learned Single Judge is found to have rightly relied upon the decisions of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Keramat Ali V Md. Yunus 15 DLR SC 120 and the Indian Supreme Court in the case of A. K. Gupta and Sons Ltd V. Dam......irection for amendment of the plaint is set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. With this modification the appeals are dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ere will be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Nesa Chowdhury...........................Respondent (in both the cases) Judgment July 23, 1986. Cases Referred to- Kalu Ram AIR 1932 All. 485 (F-B); Sri Krishna Chanda ILR 55 All. 791; Daibaki Lal. (1965) 17 DLR (F-B) 119; Katia Pillai. AIR 1929 Mad 393; Petherp..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Chunnu Mia Vs. Monindra Lal Roy & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....C. 123; Sridhar Suar AIR 1976 (SC) 1860; Srimath D. P. Desikar AIR 1936 (P.C.) 183; Atyam Veerraju AIR 1966 (SC) 629. Lawyers Involved: Sheikh Afzalur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Ranadhir Sen, Advocate, instructed......rgument was advanced before the High Court Division with regard to the merit of the settlement. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......ssed with costs. Ed. ......ip;………Appellant Vs. Monindra Lal Roy & others……Respondents Judgment June 29, 1986. Cases Referred to- Hunoomanpersaud Panday (1856) 6 M.I.A. 393 (PC) Prosunno Kumari Debya (1874-75) 2 I.A. 145 (PC); Maharanee S. Debya ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Hazera Begum and others Vs. Roushan Ara Begum and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....vendralal 38 C.W.N. PC 285; Adiluddin 5 PLR (Dae) 302; Lala Hera Chand 1942 A.I.R P.C. 64; Radhamoni 27 I.A. P,C 136; Bharat Pillai 46 IA. 285; Pillai AIR 1942 Mad. 622; Bhavrao 23 Bom. 137; Siddik Md. Sha AIR 1930 P.C 57; Secy, of State vs. D.L. Khan 61 I A, 78 (P.C) =38 C.W.N. 285; Maharaja Sr......r with the judgment of Badrul Haider Chowdhury J. Order of the Court By a majority decision, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Ed. ......ivision (Civil) Present: F.K.M.A Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Hazera Begum and others………………………Appellants ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Nur Muhammad & others Vs. Moulvi Moinuddin Ahmed & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
.... Fazle Munim CJ.— This appeal arises from Civil Revision No. 128 of 1978 decided by a Bench of the High Court Division, Chittagong (Mr. Justice Fazle Husain Mohammad Habibur Rahman and Mr. Justice Md. Abdul Jalil) on 21st January 1985. 2. Appellants who are plaintiffs filed O.S. No. 19 of 197......r Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) 1. ......f 1978). Judgment Fazle Munim CJ.— This appeal arises from Civil Revision No. 128 of 1978 decided by a Bench of the High Court Division, Chittagong (Mr. Justice Fazle Husain Mohammad Habibur Rahman and Mr. Justice Md. Abdul Jalil) on 21st January 1985. 2. Appellants who are plaintiffs f......ich a Court barred to try. The Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908) Or. VII, r 11 Public Purpose Natural Justice Section 14A of the (Emergency) Requisition of Property Act has, in clear and unmistakable terms put an express embargo on entertainment of any suit or application against an..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Muslimuddin & others Vs. The State, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
.... of 1982. Judgment Fazle Munim CJ.-This appeal arises from Criminal Appeal No. 3 of 1982 decided by a Bench of the High Court Division, Dhaka (Mr. Justice Amirul Islam Chowdhury and Mr Justice Md. Altaf Hossain) on 30th May, 1983. 2 Facts as stated in the ejahar which was recorded by Offic......nts is set aside and all of them are acquitted and it is directed that they be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other case. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 311. .......1, the solitary eyewitness of the evidence, extremely doubtful. There is no doubt (of the fact) that accused Muslimuddin has been elected Chairman by defeating two. others candidates, Fazlur Rahman and Abdul Hye and that Abdul Hye is an accused in a Criminal case instituted by Muslimuddin...... allsowed. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (V of 1898), section 154 Criminal Trial The fundamental principle of a criminal trial is that the accused shall be presumed innocent and that he is not required to prove his innocence. The entire burden of proof of his guilt lies on ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 56
16511650164916481647164616451644164316421641164016391638163716361635163416321631