Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5561-5580 of 6409 results.
....wn and the Writ petition was dismissed.
3. Mr. Fazlul Karim, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner has urged before us two of the four grounds. First, is that there was non-compliance with Rule 7(1)(2) and (3) framed under Presidential Order No.67 of 1972 and the second ground is that in ......Order No.67 of 1972. In this view of the matter the contention of Mr. Karim fails. We find no merit in this petition. It is dismissed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 64.
..
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 72
Abdul Latif Mirza Vs. Government of Bangladesh and other, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....e detaining authority or whether it means suspected on grounds which are in fact reasonable. No specific answer was, however, given to the said question, as the judgment was rested on the view that Rule 26 of the Defence of India Rules, under which the impugned order of detention was made having f...... already held that as the detention of the appellant is not sustainable in law on other grounds stated above I would allow this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 1. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 408
Moyezuddin and another Vs. State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... The appeal is dismissed. The appellants are directed to surrender to their bail bonds and serve out the remainder of the sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 37. ...... The appeal is dismissed. The appellants are directed to surrender to their bail bonds and serve out the remainder of the sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 37. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Bangladesh Vs. Moslem Mia, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....te-on- Record - For the Appellant. Ex-parte - For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 139 of 1977. On appeal from the judgment and order dated July 26, 1970 passed by the High Court in Civil Rule No.729(f) of 1970. Judgment Rahul Islam J.- This appeal by special leave is from the ju......dinary litigant. We do not find any substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. We make no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 45. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Md. Mohirruddin Vs. Md. Nazir Hossain Patwary & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 17.06.2002 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2542 of 2000 discharging the Rule. 3. Short facts are that the Opposite Party No. 1 instituted Miscellaneous Case No.2 o......e find that the view taken by the High Court Division is a correct one. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 420. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Matiur Rahman Vs. Habibur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... holder in the suit land. 7. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. 8. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......d defendant No. 3 as the petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 3rd August, 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1740 of 1995 making the rule absolute setting aside the order dated 30.1.1995 adding the petitioner as a party under Order 1 rul..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Md. Abdur Razzaque Vs. Chief Election Commissioner, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ad has fallen vacant as the petitioner was declared disqualified to hold the post for being a defaulter of bank loan in Writ Petition No.455 of 2003 by High Court Division and in the circumstances Rule 9(3) of the Union Parishad (Election) Rules, 1983 mandates holding of by election for the offi......ter, there is no substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for petitioner. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 416. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 116
Sree Hare Krishna Das Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ssal but receiving no response he filed Writ Petition No. 396 of 1989 before the High Court Division challenging the impugned order of dismissal from the service and by order dated 30.10.1991' the Rule was made absolute directing the Principal Secretary to the President of Bangladesh to form a f......iving no response he filed Writ Petition No. 396 of 1989 before the High Court Division challenging the impugned order of dismissal from the service and by order dated 30.10.1991' the Rule was made absolute directing the Principal Secretary to the President of Bangladesh to form a forum for revie..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Md. Abdul Ali Bhuiyan Vs. Jahura Khatun and Others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... the instance of the defendant-petitioner arises out of the judgment and order dated 19.1.2002 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1178 of 1990 discharging the Rule and thereby affirming the judgment and order dated 6.1.1990 passed by learned Subordinate Jud......s any instance of misreading and non-reading. So the concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the courts below can not be disturbed. The leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Md. Firozul Islam and others Vs. Md. Helalul Islam and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....J.- Defendant-petitioners seek leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 15.04.2003 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 492 of 2001 discharging the Rule. 2. The facts leading to the leave petition are that the predecessor of the respondent......he submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, having no leg to stand the leave petition is without any substance. 7. The leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Osimuddin, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....0 of 1993) Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This is plaintiffs appeal, by leave, against the judgment dated December 13, 1995 of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.2130 of 1993 making the Rule absolute which was obtained against the judgment and decree dated May 30, 1993 of the Court of ......1993) Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This is plaintiffs appeal, by leave, against the judgment dated December 13, 1995 of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.2130 of 1993 making the Rule absolute which was obtained against the judgment and decree dated May 30, 1993 of the Court of Distr..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Azizullah @ Azizur Rahman Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ioned Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others…….........Respondents Judgment February 23, 2003. The Bangladesh Supreme Court (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988, Order XXVI, rule 4 Review is not a matter of rehearing the Appeal as appeal is ...... by Subordinate Judge, Lakshmipur, who allowed the appeal by his judgment and decree dated 30-11-1985. Then the plaintiff-respondent moved the High Court Division in revision and the Rule was made absolute by judgment and order dated 9-3-1997. Against the aforesaid judgment and order of the High..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Badsha Miah (Md) Vs. Sonali Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n of the appellant on 13-8-1997 and, as such, the appellant's Tribunal Case is not barred by limitation and the order refusing to grant financial benefits to the appellant is violative of Note 4 of Rule 72 of Bangladesh Service Rules (BSR) Part 1 and also in violation of Article 27 of the Consti......cisions arrived at by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal and, as such, we find no substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 103
M Sahabuddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 12th January, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No, 12532 of 2003 discharging the Rule, which arose out of the proceeding in Druta Bichar Tribunal Case No. 5 of 2003 corresponding t......nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Bangladesh Vs. AKM Enayetullah, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment, is from the judgment and order dated 25th June 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 4134 of 2002 making the Rule absolute. 2. The short facts for disposal of the appeal are that, the respondent as Wri......sh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment, is from the judgment and order dated 25th June 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 4134 of 2002 making the Rule absolute. 2. The short facts for disposal of the appeal are that, the respondent as Writ pet..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Mustafizur Rahman Vs. Md. Amjad Hossain, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....; Md Ruhul Amin J.- This is defendant's appeal by leave against the judgment of June 12, 2002 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2214 of 1994 making the Rule absolute upon setting aside the judgment and decree dated January 30, 1994 of the Court of Joi......p; Md Ruhul Amin J.- This is defendant's appeal by leave against the judgment of June 12, 2002 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2214 of 1994 making the Rule absolute upon setting aside the judgment and decree dated January 30, 1994 of the Court of Joint Di..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Tahedul Islam (Md) and others Vs. Md. Mojibar Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....bsp; Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This is defendants' appeal by leave against the judgment dated June 24, 1996 of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 809 of 1991 making the Rule absolute and thereupon setting aside the judgment and decree dated 29-8-1990 of the Court of D......nbsp; Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This is defendants' appeal by leave against the judgment dated June 24, 1996 of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 809 of 1991 making the Rule absolute and thereupon setting aside the judgment and decree dated 29-8-1990 of the Court of Distri..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Abdul Mazid Khan (Md) Advocate Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....d Abdul Mazid Khan, Advocate seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 21-11-2005 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 6008 of 2005 discharging the Rule. 2. The petitioner as informant lodged a First Information Report with Habigonj Police ......g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Farida Akhter and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... heard analogously as the same arose out of the single judgment and order dated 30-5-2005 passed upon hearing of the aforesaid writ petitions together and disposed of accordingly, discharging the Rules without any order as to costs and directing exclusion of time from 4th January, 2005 when the ......could not be a member of Parliament in the reserved seats only because they are not members of any particular political party seriously prejudicing their fundamental rights. The impugned Amendment is absolutely in contravention of the basic feature of the Constitution inasmuch as, it does not reflec..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 221
Abdul Kashem Vs. Amirun Nahar and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Pre-emptee-petitioner Abul Kashem seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 27-8-2002 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 4924 of 1991 discharging the Rule. 2. The predecessor of the deceased pre-emptor Amirun Nahar instituted Miscellane...... view of the discussion made above, the petition is found to be without merit. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 86. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
19421940193819361931193019291918191719161915191419131912191119101909190819071904