Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 541-560 of 735 results.
Dira Dockyard and Engineers Ltd. & ors Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & ors, 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
....y Nos. 7, 8 and 9 (appellants No.2, 3 and 4 in Civil Appeal No. 64 of 1989). There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLC (AD) (2009) 166. ......bsp; Dira Dockyard and Engineers Ltd. and others...................Appellants Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha and others.....................Respondents Judgment November 19, 1994.&......y Nos. 7, 8 and 9 (appellants No.2, 3 and 4 in Civil Appeal No. 64 of 1989). There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLC (AD) (2009) 166. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 311
Sonali Bank Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, Narayangonj and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....ivision (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J Sonali Bank, Shilpa Bhaban Corporate Branch, Dhaka……..Petitioner Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, Narayangonj and others……........Respondents Judgment April 12, 2009. ......n (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J Sonali Bank, Shilpa Bhaban Corporate Branch, Dhaka……..Petitioner Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, Narayangonj and others……........Respondents Judgment April 12, 2009. L......e impugned judgment passed by the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 686, 62 DLR (AD) (2010) 231...Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 373
Cromvege Tannaries Ltd. & anr Vs. Joint Dist Judge & Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Dhaka, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....slam J Md. Abdul Matin J Md. Abdul Aziz J M/s. Cromvege Tannaries Ltd. and another......................................Petitioners Vs. Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Dhaka and others......Respondents Judgment April 22, 2009. ...... Md. Abdul Matin J Md. Abdul Aziz J M/s. Cromvege Tannaries Ltd. and another......................................Petitioners Vs. Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Dhaka and others......Respondents Judgment April 22, 2009. Ca......llegality or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division no interference is called for. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 594. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
City Bank Limited Vs. Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Barisal and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....m J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J The City Bank Limited…………………..................Petitioner Vs. Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Barisal and others….......Respondents Judgment January 25, ...... Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J The City Bank Limited…………………..................Petitioner Vs. Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Barisal and others….......Respondents Judgment January 25, 2009. ......here is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 563. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Shahadat Hossain Mina and others Vs. Governor, Bangladesh Bank and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 554, 19 BLT (AD) (2011) 158........Respondents (In all the cases) Judgment October 22, 2008. Cases Referred to- Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh vs. S.M. Fariduddin 21; Junnur Rahman vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha and others, 51 DLR (AD) 116; Delwar Hossain Mia (Md) and another vs. Bangladesh, repres......is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 554, 19 BLT (AD) (2011) 158...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Land Acquisition Officer, Pabna & Ors Vs. Al-haj Md. Abdul Latif Biswas & anr, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....of the discussion made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 62 DLR (AD) (2010) 255. ......…………Appellants Vs. Al-haj Md. Abdul Latif Biswas and another……………..Respondents Judgment May 7, 2007. Cases Referred To- Sayeda Mazada Khatun Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha 55 DLR (AD) 82 (85); Aminul Islam and others Vs. M/s. James Finly and Co. Ltd. 26 DLR (......of the discussion made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 62 DLR (AD) (2010) 255. ..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 249
M/s. IBTA Bangladesh (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....igh Court Division in Writ Petition No.1577 of 2004 rejecting the same summarily. 2. The writ petition was filed challenging constitutionality of sub-sections 2, 3 and 4 of Section 41 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 and also alleging violation of fundamental rights as are in Articles 27,......urt Division in Writ Petition No.1577 of 2004 rejecting the same summarily. 2. The writ petition was filed challenging constitutionality of sub-sections 2, 3 and 4 of Section 41 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 and also alleging violation of fundamental rights as are in Articles 27, 31, 4......, since reasonings assigned in rejecting the writ petition do not suffer from legal infirmity. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 98
Karuna Enterprise Vs. Joint District Judge, Artha-Rin-Adalat, Narayangonj & Ors., 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....san Ameen J Messers Karuna Enterprise, represented by its Proprietor A. K. M. Kutubuddin Khan……………Petitioner Vs. Joint District Judge, Artha-Rin-Adalat, Narayangonj and others………Respondents Judgment M......een J Messers Karuna Enterprise, represented by its Proprietor A. K. M. Kutubuddin Khan……………Petitioner Vs. Joint District Judge, Artha-Rin-Adalat, Narayangonj and others………Respondents Judgment May 10,......sion has committed no error of law in its judgment calling for interference by this Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Bhaja Krishna Barman and others Vs. Sree Raghunath Chandra Barman, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... background of the discussion made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... background of the discussion made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... background of the discussion made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Md. Murtuza Ali and another Vs. Renu Bibi alias Saifurnessa and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....6 and affirming the judgment and order dated 29.03.2006 of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.1805 of 1994 reversing the judgment and order dated 14.02.1994 of the then Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Sylhet in Miscellaneous Appeal No.31 of 1994 and affirming the judgment and orde......affirming the judgment and order dated 29.03.2006 of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.1805 of 1994 reversing the judgment and order dated 14.02.1994 of the then Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Sylhet in Miscellaneous Appeal No.31 of 1994 and affirming the judgment and order date...... to appeal. 11. We find no ground for reviewing the judgment of this court and accordingly the review petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 508. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Kohinoor Chowdhury Vs. Sree Kamada Ranjan Bhattacharja and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ere is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 488. ......ere is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 488. ......ere is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 488. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Ferastullah Sarder Vs. Md. Mobarak Ali Gazi and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....d decree dated 12.11.1994 passed in Title Appeal No.209 of 1991 heard and disposed of analogously with the Title Appeal No.201 of 19961 dismissing the appeal by the learned Subordinate Judge Artha Rin Adalat, Khulna affirming the judgment and decree dated 13.06.1993 passed in Title Suit No......ee dated 12.11.1994 passed in Title Appeal No.209 of 1991 heard and disposed of analogously with the Title Appeal No.201 of 19961 dismissing the appeal by the learned Subordinate Judge Artha Rin Adalat, Khulna affirming the judgment and decree dated 13.06.1993 passed in Title Suit No.56 of......t finding which calls for no interference by this Court. We find no merit in these petitions which are accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 456. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Md. Nazir Hossain Khan and another Vs. Md. Mujal Mollah, 1998, 27 CLC (AD)
....fore in allowing the appeal without any order as to costs. The lower appellate Court's judgment and decree are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 822. ......fore in allowing the appeal without any order as to costs. The lower appellate Court's judgment and decree are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 822. ......fore in allowing the appeal without any order as to costs. The lower appellate Court's judgment and decree are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 822. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Md. Lal Miah Vs. Md. Anwar Hossain @ Anu, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....5.07.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2651 of 1999 making the Rule absolute challenging judgment and decree dated 28.04.1999 passed by the learned 5th Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Mymensingh in O.C. Appeal No.311 of 1997 allowing the appeal reversing those dat......005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2651 of 1999 making the Rule absolute challenging judgment and decree dated 28.04.1999 passed by the learned 5th Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Mymensingh in O.C. Appeal No.311 of 1997 allowing the appeal reversing those dated 04.......e, the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner deserve no consideration. Accordingly, the petition dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 409. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Md. Kamal Uddin Akand Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Abdul Matin J Md. Kamal Uddin Akand…………………………….... Petitioner Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others………………………&......Joynul Abedin J Md. Abdul Matin J Md. Kamal Uddin Akand…………………………….... Petitioner Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others………………………&hellip......there is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 383. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Mozharul Islam Chowdhury, Advocate Vs. Dilip Kumar Roy and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....on of the kabala deed registered through Court in favour of the decree holder appellant; that the Title Execution Case No. 20 of 1986 was transferred to the Subordinate Judge, Commercial Court and Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka at the instance of respondent No.1 and renumbered as Title Execution C......the kabala deed registered through Court in favour of the decree holder appellant; that the Title Execution Case No. 20 of 1986 was transferred to the Subordinate Judge, Commercial Court and Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka at the instance of respondent No.1 and renumbered as Title Execution Case No......pugned judgment of the High Court Division are set aside. In the result, this appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 150. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Humayun Hossain Khan Vs. Bangladesh, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
.... judgment and order dated 8-1-2008 passed in Writ Petition No. 6107 of 2004 by the High Court Division discharging the Rule. 2. The Rule arises out of an order dated 4-10-2004 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.3, Dhaka, in Artha Rin Suit No. 32 of 2004 rejecting the application filed by t......ent and order dated 8-1-2008 passed in Writ Petition No. 6107 of 2004 by the High Court Division discharging the Rule. 2. The Rule arises out of an order dated 4-10-2004 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.3, Dhaka, in Artha Rin Suit No. 32 of 2004 rejecting the application filed by the def......e. Thus we do not find any merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (AD) (2009) 92. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Kamrunnessa Nilufar and another Vs. Mahmudul Faruque and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....ssed the appeal. We therefore, find no reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLC (AD) (2009) 87. ......ssed the appeal. We therefore, find no reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLC (AD) (2009) 87. ......ssed the appeal. We therefore, find no reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLC (AD) (2009) 87. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Ranjit Sarker and ors. Vs. Sree Sukhendu Bikash Biswas & ors., 1996, 25 CLC (AD)
....ppeal may be heard by any Division Bench of the High Court Division other than the one which heard the matter earlier. Ed. This Case is also reported in: II ADC (2005) 581; 17 BLD (AD) 58. ......ppeal may be heard by any Division Bench of the High Court Division other than the one which heard the matter earlier. Ed. This Case is also reported in: II ADC (2005) 581; 17 BLD (AD) 58. ......ppeal may be heard by any Division Bench of the High Court Division other than the one which heard the matter earlier. Ed. This Case is also reported in: II ADC (2005) 581; 17 BLD (AD) 58. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
ACKO Industries and Cold Storage Ltd. and another Vs. Pubali Bank Ltd. & others, 1997, 26 CLC (AD)
....n Bench of the High Court Division rejecting the Memo of Appeal, F. A. T. No. 177 of 1996, on the ground that the half of decretal amount which were required to be deposited under the provision of Artha Rin Adalat Act, 1992 was not paid in time before filing the Memo of appeal. 2. The re......h of the High Court Division rejecting the Memo of Appeal, F. A. T. No. 177 of 1996, on the ground that the half of decretal amount which were required to be deposited under the provision of Artha Rin Adalat Act, 1992 was not paid in time before filing the Memo of appeal. 2. The relevant...... order of the High Court Division and direct the High Court Division to register the appellants appeal preferred before him. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 380. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 87
34433416338833773374336333613357335633463344333633263302329732853282327332643231