Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 541-560 of 947 results.
Mohar Ali Bhuiyan Vs. Michir Ali Bhuiyan and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....se of misreading or non-consideration of evidence was made out. We find no substance in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 15 MLR (AD) (2010) 500.......he short fact of the defendant's case is that, C.S. recorded tenant of the suit land including other lands was one Nanda Bhuiyan who died leaving 3 sons and 3 daughters. His property was divided in 3 shares, one son and one daughter got one share as per family amicable arrangement. In such way from ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20
Sonali Bank Vs. Meghna Vegetable Oil Industries Ltd. & ors., 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....wing the defendant Nos.1 and 2 to file a written statement advised. We find no substance in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VII ADC (2010) 644.......'ka' group and 'kha’ group. All the enterprises of Meghna Group of Industries are loanees of Sonali Bank Ltd. In consequence of bifurcation and interchanging of positions of share holder-Directors, shares were transferred to give effect to the new arrangement with consent of Sonali Bank Ltd. The o..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Shishir Kanti Pal and others Vs. Nur Muhammad and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... impugned Judgment and decree calling for interference by the Court. In the result, this Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 440.......mar Pal died leaving behind three sons defendant No. 8 (predecessor of petitioner Nos. 4 and 5) Chitta Ranjan Pal and Sushil Pal as his heirs and thereafter Chitta Ranjan and Sushil transferred their shares to the defendant No. 8 and left for India. Ram Kumar Pal died leaving behind four sons defend..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Osi Meah Sowdager Vs. Tulsidham Akherar Madan Mahan Narasingha and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....er Suit No. 130 of 1976 settled the suit land with Raimohan and Harimohan by a patta dated 28-7-1933, the certified copy of which has been marked as Ext B (1). Thereafter, one Jogo Maya purchased the major portion of the interest of Raimohan and Harimohan by kabala dated 25-8- 1948 in respect of plo......the learned 1st Court of Subordinate Judge, Chittagong for his information and necessary action. Send down the lower Court records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002)409...Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Ekushey Television Ltd. and another Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....older of a licence to furnish any information which the commission considers necessary with regard to the proposed or existing use of a radio apparatus, its installation and maintenance. And also any major change in the apparatus; (q) to take any other action that is necessary for the development......is petition it has been stated, inter alia, that Ekushey Television Ltd. shortly, ETV Ltd., was incorporated on 1‑7‑1998 under the Companies Act, 1994, and is a private limited company limited by shares. The petitioner is represented by its Chairman, Abdus Salam, a non‑resident Bangladeshi p..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: | Hits: 230
Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury Vs. Hamidul Huq, MD, UCBL and another, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....within August 17, 2003 at the latest and also requested them to ensure that the accounts for the years in question are sent to the shareholders and also directed them to publish the notice in the two major national dailies, one in English and the other in vernacular, within the next two/three days a......ne amounting to Taka 2000 to be paid within one month from date, in default, each of them to suffer simple imprisonment for 15 (fifteen) days. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 73...Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 158
Karam Ali Vs. State, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... to apprehend the miscreants, who had assembled to commit dacoity at the Kumudini Jute Godown at Narayanganj. All these witnesses uniformly and consistently supported the prosecution case without any major contradiction in their evidence. We do not find any reason to disbelieve their corroborative e......and the Honurable Chairman of the Law Commission of Bangladesh for favour of their kind perusal. Send down the lower Court records at once Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 378...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Nur Hossain (Md) Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Land and others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....stances of the case we find no substance in this writ petition and accordingly, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 275. ......stances of the case we find no substance in this writ petition and accordingly, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 275. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Ganesh Chandra Das Vs. Arati Acharjya, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....arned Advocate for the petitioner, argued supporting all the grounds mentioned in the revisional application, and submits that all the 3 children of the plaintiff opposite party have become adult and major by this time and they are serving in Garment Factories and the plaintiff opposite party is als......d down the original records at once with a copy of this judgment to the learned District Judge, Chittagong for necessary action accordingly. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002)348. ..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 186
Mirza Abdul Bari Beg and Others Vs. Zahidannessa and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....he High Court returning the memorandum of appeal for presentation before the proper Court. Suit was for partition. Issue was what should be the value of the suit for the purpose of jurisdiction. By a majority decision, it was held that value of the share of the plaintiff would be the value of the su......y the Court and it passed an order for delivery of possession by removal of the huts. A Division Bench dismissed the appeal in the view that all the co-sharers had demanded actual possession of their shares and the Court by its final decree directed actual possession to be given. 12. Now I will s..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29
State Vs. Rashid Ahmed & others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....ce and manner of the occurrence by convincing and overwhelming evidence. There is no material contradiction in their evidence which may belittle the prosecution case in any manner. We do not find any major discrepancy in the evidence of the eye-witnesses on any material point. The stray discrepancie......hittagong and the Deputy Commissioner, Chittagong for their information and necessary action. Send down the lower Court records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 333. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Shamsul Haque (Md) Vs. State, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....al corroboration, if her evidence is found otherwise believable and trustworthy and does suffer from any infirmity and inherent disqualification. But we find in the present case contradictions are so major as stated above evidence of the prosecution cannot be believed. Moreover, her non-examination ......is acquitted of the charge brought against him and he be discharged from him bail bond. Send down the lower Court records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 255. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Delwar Hossain Khan Vs. Alhaj Rustum Ali & others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....lled and vacated. The executing Court is directed to take steps for expeditious restoration of possession to the claimants. Communicate. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 328. ......a Kamini Chowdhurani, who died leaving a son, Sudhanya Roy Chowdhury. Three sons, namely Sunil, Anil and Makhan, survived Sudhanya. Anil died unmarried and Makhan died at the hands of Pak Army. Their shares devolved upon Sunil, who die leaving two sons Danu and Manuj. Manuj led no family life. Danu ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Abdul Muhit and others Vs. Social Investment Bank Limited (SIBL) and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....Advocate did not press the petitioner’s case for protecting the interest of the alternate directors as minority shareholders under section 233 on ground of being discriminated and prejudiced by the majority shareholders. 18. Mr. Rokanuddin Mahmud, the learned Advocate for the respondent No. 4, ......estment Bank Limited, hereinafter referred to as SIBL, was incorporated and registered on 5-7-1995 under the Companies Act, 1994 with an authorised share capital of Taka 1 crore divided into ten lakh shares of Taka 100 (Annexure A). 3. The SIBL has four types of directors— Group-A Bangladesh Sp..Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 208
....sented by the Congress). They thought, the Muslims would be able to escape out of this low position if separate arrangements and provisions are made for them. The spectrum of economic deprivation was major element in this thought. The use of history in this way had its contribution in mobilizing the......he certificate asked for, which is hereby issued.
There is however, no Order as to cost.
Sheikh Md. Zakir Hossain J.- I agree.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 63 DLR (2011) 565.
..
Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 482
Protima Sen and others Vs. Chitra Rani Dey and another, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....of the order of the Court. Communicate the order to the learned Court below immediately for his information and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 218. ......e learned Advocate further submits that the value of the buying up share of the suit property is made on the basis of the Commissioner’s report after allotting sahams to the contending parties when shares of the parties are determined and value thereof assessed i.e. only at the stage of final decr..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Tanveerul Haque Vs. Unistar Shipping Limited and ors., 1999, 18 CLC (HCD)
....ly when by operation of law i.e. under section 108 above he automatically ceased to be a director. It further appears that Group A Director of both the Companies hold 65% shares and thus they holding majority shares holding of the Company under section 291 of the Companies Act, 1994, are responsible......mad Imtiaz, the Group A shareholders and the defendant Nos.1-3 i.e. Mr. Tanveerul Hoque, Mr. Masihuddin Ahmed, Mr. Kamal Rashid Chowdhury, the group B Shareholders, each group holding equal number of shares. Mr. Mohammad Iqbal was Chairman of the Board of Directors of the plaintiff No.1 and petition..Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 197
Muslim (Md) Vs. Abdul Motaleb and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....ored. The order of status quo in respect of the possession granted earlier by this Court is vacated. Send down the lower Court records. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 196.......Abdul Majid the original owner died leaving 3 sons and 4 daughters including Jamina Khatoon who became the owner of the suit land along with other land measuring 8.12 acres of land according to legal shares. Jamina Khatoon daughter of late Abdul Majid became owner in possession of the suit land alon..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
SM Nasirul Haque Vs. Omar Faruque Chowdhury and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....e point reserved his verdict as hereunder- “Secondly, a Full Bench of the High Court in the case of ‘Brindaban Chandra Chowdhury Vs. Rezia Begum’; 16 DLR 77 examined this question and by majority decision held that these two terms, ‘Non-Agricultural land’ and ‘holding’; are syno......an No. 324 of a village in the District of DI Khan, comprising of 54 Khasras and measuring 2664 kanals 1 marla in area were jointly owned and possessed by two brothers, Samunder and Qalandar in equal shares, and the rest half belonged to Alamgir Khan, Muhammad Muzaffar Khan, the appellant, purchased..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Ahsan Karim Jinnah Vs. Meghna Insurance Company Limited & others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
.... Following the aforesaid situation prevailing in the Company respondent Nos.2 and 6 personally came to the office of the petitioner and demanded that he must support their group, otherwise they being majority on the Board would remove him as the Vice-Chairman of the Company. The petitioner having fa......ny”). 2. The Company was incorporated on 18-3-1996 as a public limited company with an authorised capital of Taka 20,00,00,000.00 (taka twenty crore) divided into 20,00,000 (twenty lac) ordinary shares of Taka 100.00 (taka one hundred) each, The Company has 17 (seventeen) sponsor share-holders...Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 203
43024285427042634239423542214215420642054203420242014199419341814180414841284118