Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Sunil Kumar Biswas Vs. Mohammad Idris and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....right of Kol-karsha. In the result, we do not find any substance in any of the contentions raised by Mr. Khondker. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with cost. Ed. ......right of Kol-karsha. In the result, we do not find any substance in any of the contentions raised by Mr. Khondker. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with cost. Ed. ......ani 17 C. W. N. 1105: Dayamayee vs. Ananda Mohan Ray, 18 C.W.N. 971; Prassonna Dey vs. Ananda Chandra. 30 C.W.N. 231; Sris Chandra Mondal Vs. Bishu Pada Mondal, 42 C.W.N. 1011, Jamilee Vs. Mojibur Rahman, 5 D.L.R. 22 and Manik Promanik Vs. Ismail Pal, 12 D.L.R. 410 ; particularly the last one. T...... Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Sunil Kumar Biswas …………………….Appellant Vs. Mohammad Idris and others…………Respondents Judgment April 16, 1981 ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Dr. Jamshed Bakht Vs. Ameaur Rashid Chowdhury, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.....; Sanjibi Raddy vs. Konary Raddy, 1926 I.L.R. 49 Mad. 315; Ahmedbhai vs. Framji (1903) I.L.R. 28 Bom 228; Golapjan vs. Bholanath Khattry (1911) I.L.R. 38 Cal. 888. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. B.K. Das, Advocate, instr......r Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court In view of the decisions of the majority, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......r Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court In view of the decisions of the majority, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......n vs. Bholanath Khattry (1911) I.L.R. 38 Cal. 888. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. B.K. Das, Advocate, instructed by B.C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record,—For the Respondent. Judgment: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Md. Abdur Rouf and others Vs. Ahmuda Khatun and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J And Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Md. Abdur Rouf and others…………………….Appellants....... For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Trial Court are restored. Ed. ......ion 117(1)(c), upon the co-sharer tenants, the order of sub-division of the tenancy will be bad and not be binding on the non-notified co-sharer tenants. In support, Mr. Khan, relied on Begum Asia Rahman V. Abdul Basir Bhuiyan (1974) 26 D.L.R (SC) 58. Here, the provisions of section 88A of the B......ellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J And Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Md. Abdur Rouf and others…………………….Appellants Vs. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Bangladesh Freedom Fighters Welfare TrÂust Vs. Burhanuddin Chowdhury, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....pellant, a statutory body, is amenable to be impugned in the writ Jurisdiction of the High Court Division. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed without any orders as to costs. Ed. ......pellant, a statutory body, is amenable to be impugned in the writ Jurisdiction of the High Court Division. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed without any orders as to costs. Ed. ......pellant, a statutory body, is amenable to be impugned in the writ Jurisdiction of the High Court Division. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed without any orders as to costs. Ed. .................................Respondent Judgment June 11, 1979. Lawyers Involved: Syed Amirul Islam, Advocate, Faruque Ahmed, Advocate with him instructed by B.C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellant. Kazi Shahadat Hossain, Advocate.—F..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 112
A.S.A. Nur Vs. Registrar of Joint Stock Companies, Dacca, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ge and the Division Bench are set aside. The case is remitted back to the Company Judge for disposal of the matter in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ge and the Division Bench are set aside. The case is remitted back to the Company Judge for disposal of the matter in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......by the Registrar of Joint Stock Companies of Bangladesh. (d) As required by the Companies Act for the formation of a Private Limited Company, there were two subscribers Dr. Habibur Rahman, Chairman, Petro Bangla and Mr. S A. Azim, Director, Petro Bangla to the Memorandum and Art......lam, Advocate, instructed by Md, Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Ex-parte—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 20 of 1980. (From the Judgment and Order dated 30.4.79 passed by the High Court Division in Company Matter No. 10 of 1979.) ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 107
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Hasan Imam Chowdhury Vs. Govt. of BanglaÂdesh and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ion is pregnant with any new issue which requires adjudication in separate proceedings. In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ion is pregnant with any new issue which requires adjudication in separate proceedings. In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ion is pregnant with any new issue which requires adjudication in separate proceedings. In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......m J Rahul Islam J Badrul Haider Chbwdhury J Shaha-buddin Ahmed J Hasan Imam Chowdhury........................... Appellant Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh and others................. Respondents Judgment March 23, 1981. Lawyers Inv..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Md. Matlabur Rahman & ors Vs. Madan Meah Chowdhury, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... Ed. ......h Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Order of the Court In view of the decision of the majority the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ......preme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Md. Matlabur Rahman & ors…………………………&hel......ondker, Senior Advocate A.K.M. Shafiqur Rahman with him instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-an-Record,—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 48 of 1979. (From the judgment and order dated 25-5-78 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 152 of 1980.) ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Amanullah Bhuiyan and others Vs. Abdul Hafiz and ors, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....m the date the decree is drawn and signed or it becomes executable. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1981 BLD (AD) 210. ......m the date the decree is drawn and signed or it becomes executable. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1981 BLD (AD) 210. ......aghubir Sahu vs. Ajodhya Sahu A.I.R 1945 Pat. 482; Ram Rattan vs. Parma Nand 50 C.W.N. 367. Lawyers Involved: A.W. Mian, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellants. Shafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate instructed by M.G. Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Respondents N...... Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Amanullah Bhuiyan and others…………….Appellants Vs. Abdul Hafiz and or..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Commissioner of Taxes & another Vs. M/s. Mullick BroÂthers, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....rom want of legal authority. In the result, therefore, this review appliÂcation is allowed and the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Referred in: ......rom want of legal authority. In the result, therefore, this review appliÂcation is allowed and the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Referred in: ......The Assessee received the laid memo on tube tame day, vide. AcknowledgeÂment slip.] (k) 19.2.71 By Memo No. 2107/I.C.I/380 the Income Tax Officer (Mr. Jahedur Rahman) issued reminder for the outÂstanding demand. [The laid Memo was received by the Ass......¦â€¦..Petitioner Vs. M/s. Mullick BroÂthers…………………………………………..Respondent Judgment February 2, 1981. Result: The review appliÂcation is allowed and the appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, with Muzammel Huq..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 98
Dr. Nurul Islam Vs. Bangladesh, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....S.C. 280; Bisnunrayan vs. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1965 S.C. 1967. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Mahmudul Islam, Jamiruddin Ahmed, K.Z. Alam with him, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Hug, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellant K.A.Bakr, Attorney-General and A.K. Bh......osts. The decision of the High Court Division is set aside and the impugned order declared to be of no lawful authority. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 201, 1981 BLD (AD) 140. ...... which reversed the decision of the High Court involved the consideration of the extent of discretionary power of the government. As to the exercise of discretionary power of the government, Hamoodur Rahman, J. observed: "The 'broad principles' upon which the grouping bad to be done under this c......uhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Dr. Nurul Islam………………………..Appellant Vs. Bangladesh, represenÂted by the Secretary, Ministry of Health and Population Control and others…………………………………………Respondent Judg..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 180
Musharraf Hossain Chy Vs. GM, Titas Gas Transmission & Dist. Co. Ltd. & ors., 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....llant (In C.A. No. 169 of 1979). S.R, Pal, Senior A. S. C. (Mohammadullah, A.S.C.) with A. Rab II, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents No. 1 & 2. Mozammel Huq Khan, Advocate, instruÂcted by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent 3. M. Nurullah, Advocate, instructed by ......view of the above observations, the appeal is dismissed, the Judgment and order of the High Court Division is upheld. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......t 3. M. Nurullah, Advocate, instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant (In C. A. No. 65 of 1980). Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, with K. Z. Alam, and Khalilur Rahman, Advocates, instructed by M, R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondents 1 & 2. Not ......stribution Co. Ltd. & ors...........Respondent And A.K.M. Ayub Ali..............................................................Appellant (In C.A. 65 of 1980). vs. Eastern Refinery Ltd. and others.....................................................Respondent Judgment June 12, 19..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Bangladesh Steamer Agents Association Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....& ors .............................................Respondent Judgment May 31, 1979. Lawyers involved: Hamidul Huq Chowdhury, with Asrarul Hussain, Senior Advocates, Md. Khalilur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by M. R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellan...... any lawful authority. Ed. ................................................Respondent Judgment May 31, 1979. Lawyers involved: Hamidul Huq Chowdhury, with Asrarul Hussain, Senior Advocates, Md. Khalilur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by M. R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellant. K.A......Pal, Senior Advocate, with S. C. Das, Advocate, Instructed by A. Rab-II, Advocate-on- Record.—For the Respondent Nos. 3 & 4. Civil Appeal No 36 of 1979 (From the Judgment and order dated 23.2.79 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1003 of 1978.) ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 110
Goutam Ranjan Sen and other Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....sp;Dulichand Omraolal vs. Bangladesh (1981) 33 D.L.R (AD) 30. Lawyers Involved: B.N. Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by A- Rib-II, Advocate on Record—For the Appellants. Md. Moksudor Rahman, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by A W. Mian, Advocate-on- Record.—F......rt, in that, the decision of the High Court is confirmed subject to this modification that the suit shall remain stayed so long the suit property. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......Omraolal vs. Bangladesh (1981) 33 D.L.R (AD) 30. Lawyers Involved: B.N. Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by A- Rib-II, Advocate on Record—For the Appellants. Md. Moksudor Rahman, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by A W. Mian, Advocate-on- Record.—For the Respon......; Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Goutam Ranjan Sen and other............... Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others………&h..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Khandaker Ehtehshamuddin Ahmed @ Iqbal Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....at the order passed by this Division staying execution of the sentence to continue for further ten days from the date of this order. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) (1981) 154. ......at the order passed by this Division staying execution of the sentence to continue for further ten days from the date of this order. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) (1981) 154. ......h 27, 1980. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Cases Refereed to- Halima Khatun vs. Bangladesh, 30 DLR (SC) 207, Asma Jilani vs. GovernÂment of Punjab, PLD 1972 (SC) 139, State vs. Zia-ur-Rahman, PLD 1973 (SC) 49, Federation of Pakistan vs. Saeed Ahmed, PLD 1974 (SC) 151, State vs. Dosso......eported in: 33 DLR (AD) (1981) 154. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 292
Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Abdur Rab, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....reme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J KM Subhan J Bangladesh and others.................Appellants Vs. Md. Abdur Rab…………………………….Respondent Judgment January 31, 1979. Res...... the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. The order of the High Court Division is set aside and the writ re-called. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) (19781) 143. ...... the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. The order of the High Court Division is set aside and the writ re-called. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) (19781) 143. ......is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) (19781) 143. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Nurunnessa and ors Vs. Babr Ali Bepari and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....edule lands of the plaint. The parties will have opportunity to prove the poÂwer of attorney in the manner indicated above and in accordance with law, we, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. ......edule lands of the plaint. The parties will have opportunity to prove the poÂwer of attorney in the manner indicated above and in accordance with law, we, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. ......edule lands of the plaint. The parties will have opportunity to prove the poÂwer of attorney in the manner indicated above and in accordance with law, we, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. ......w, we, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 128
Abdus Samad & ors Vs. Md. Sohrab Ali and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... Shahabuddin Ahmed J Abdus Samad & ors…………………………………Appellant Vs. Md. Sohrab Ali and others..................... Respondents Judgment March......ge cannot be sustained, therefore, the appeal is allowed with costs and the Judgment of the High Court set aside. Judgment and order of the lower Appellate Court are restored. Ed. ......ge cannot be sustained, therefore, the appeal is allowed with costs and the Judgment of the High Court set aside. Judgment and order of the lower Appellate Court are restored. Ed. ......hmed J Abdus Samad & ors…………………………………Appellant Vs. Md. Sohrab Ali and others..................... Respondents Judgment March 18, 1980. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Khadomul Islam Chowdhury Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....….Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others ……………………………..Respondents Judgment July 21, 1980. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate instructed by Md. Shafiqur Rahman, Advocate-on- Record—For the Appellant. Abdus Sobhan, Additional Attorney G......for disposal in accordance with law. Let the operation of the order dated 12th July. 1979 be stayed till the disposal of the matter in the High Court Division There will no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Vs. Bangladesh and others ……………………………..Respondents Judgment July 21, 1980. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate instructed by Md. Shafiqur Rahman, Advocate-on- Record—For the Appellant. Abdus Sobhan, Additional Attorney General, with ......sion (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Khadomul Islam Chowdhury…………………….Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others ……………………………..Respondents Judgment July 21, 1980. Lawyers ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 160
Shamuj Ali and other Vs. Kamalarma Bibi and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....the appellate court if appeal is preferred from the decree of reversal of the first appellate court. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......the appellate court if appeal is preferred from the decree of reversal of the first appellate court. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: .......R. 1921 Bom 67; bhaunath, A.I.R. 1934 Pat. 246(2). Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, InstrucÂted by Abu Backkar, Advocate-on-Record. — For the Appellants. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Zinnur Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Respondent No. 1.......n: ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 111