Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5581-5586 of 5586 results.
Abul Kalam Azad Vs. Govt of BD, represented by the DC, Dinajpur & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....fter consideration of all the facts and materials exercised its discretion we do not find any reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......d Fazlul Karim, J. Md. Hamidul Haque, J.Md. Tafazzul Islam, J. Abul Kalam Azad.....................Petitioner. Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dinajpur and others........Respondents. Judgment 8 November 2003 Lawyers Involved: Md. ......g the impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division dated 30.4.2002. The High Court Division by its judgment and order dated 18.6.2002 rejected the application summarily as there was no legal ground for review of the judgment. 6. Condonation of delay is a. matter of dis&sh..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 133
Anil Ranjan Deb Vs. Yoshodalal Amritalal Shaha Banik & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....hy;charged. 5. Mr. Mahbubey Alam, the learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner, contended that the dispute between the plaintiff and defendants as tenants as to ownership of the property that is whether the suit premises belonged to Amritalal Shah Banik or to the joint family h......late Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J. Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J. Anil Ranjan Deb......................Petitioner. Vs. Yoshodalal Amritalal Shaha Banik and others.....................Respondents. Judgment 9 November 2003 Lawyers In......ioner being tenant under the plaintiff defaulted to pay rent on the basis of existing relationship as landlord and tenant between the parties. It was further contended that there is no legal infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division in affirming the findings and decisions o..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, UCBL & anr Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ered by the Court. 15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain C.J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim J. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J. Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, United Commercial Bank Ltd and another ....Appellants. Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury.... Respondents Judgment June 27, ......f AGM of the Bank. It further appears that after the introduction of section 15 Ka Ka to the Bank Company Act, 1991 one of the shareholders of the Bank filed a Writ Petition challenging the legality of the aforesaid Act which is registered as Writ Petition No. 4809 of 2003 in the High Cour..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Syed Ehsanul Hussain & ors Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Corporation herein as petitioner filed the aforesaid Miscellaneous Case under the Special Provision as laid down in President Order No. 7 of 1973 praying for permission for sale of the mortgaged property including the structures situated thereon for recovery of Tk. 17,11,503.08 (taka......y, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......med. The learned Trial Court inspite of the fact that the respondent failed to adduce any evidence in support of the claim for the aforesaid amount passed the aforesaid judgment and order illegally. Further the learned Advocate-on-Record submits that the respondent is entitled to claim onl..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Md. Nurul Hoque Miah Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....s. 19. In that view of the observation and direction as above, this appeal is, accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 53. ......mad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Nurul Hoque Miah……………………....Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment and others………………………………………………….Respondents Judgment May ......xes. The Ministry of Establishment agreed with the claim of the appellant but did not execution the orders in accordance with law. The said order of the Ministry of Establishment dated 10.8.2000 is illegal and void as it is violation of natural justice and Articles 26, 27, 29(1), 135(2) and 140(2)(c..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 162
Director of Housing and Settlement Vs. Abdul Majid Howlader & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e, Dhaka in Title Suit No. 191 of 1996 decreeing the same. The suit has been filed seeking declaration of title and for further reliefs that the plaintiff-Respondent Nos. 1-19 are entitled to get the property described in the schedule attached to the plaint release from acquisition and the Housing a......is Case is also Reported in: 24 BLD (AD) 56, 9 MLR (AD) 73. ......se made by the Respondents was totally misconceived one since under the law they were not entitled to have the property released. Accordingly suit so filed seeking release of the property was not legally well advised one as well as was not entertainable in law. It has been held in the case of Al..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 189
326325324323307303