Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Bangladesh Bank and others Vs. Mohammad Abdul Mannan, 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
....unal is set aside and that of the Administrative Tribunal is restored. Parties are to bear their respective costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 46 DLR (AD) (1994) 1. ......h Bank and others........ Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 79 of 1992) Judgment July 12, 1993. Cases Referred to- Abdul Hannan Sikder and Ershad Ali Vs. Bangladesh Bank 31 DLR (AD) 298; Abdul Majid Vs. Mushafee Ahmed 17 DLR (SC) 63; Gholam. Sar......unal is set aside and that of the Administrative Tribunal is restored. Parties are to bear their respective costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 46 DLR (AD) (1994) 1. ...... Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Bangladesh Bank and others ....... Appellants Vs. Mohammad Abdul Mannan............ ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 149
Sharif Nurul Ambia Vs. Dhaka City Corporation represented by its Mayor and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....this order. The respondent Nos. 1 and 5 are directed to stop construction of the multi-storied building and to demolish the structure, if any, already constructed. Ed. ......ent No. 1. Mainul Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent No. 5. AKM Nurul Islam, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent Nos. 2 & 6. Ex parte—Respondent Nos......this order. The respondent Nos. 1 and 5 are directed to stop construction of the multi-storied building and to demolish the structure, if any, already constructed. Ed. ......in J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sharif Nurul Ambia.....................................Appellant Vs Dhaka City Corporation represented by its Mayor and others.......................... Respondents Judgment July 19, 2004. Th..Category: Environmental Law | Date: | Hits: 293
Sheikh Farid (Md) & others Vs. Abdul Wadud Sikder and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....is lack of evidence to show that he possessed the land denying title of Karuna Moyee Dasi or her sons to their knowledge. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... Division was correct in holding that the plaintiff did not acquire title in the suit land by adverse possession……….((9, 10 & 11) Case Referred To: Mir Laik Ali vs. Standard Vacuum Oil Company (ESSO) and Abdur Razzak, 16 DLR (SC) 287. Lawyers Invol......is lack of evidence to show that he possessed the land denying title of Karuna Moyee Dasi or her sons to their knowledge. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......ion (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sheikh Farid (Md) & others. ............. Appellants Vs. Abdul Wadud Sikder and others...................Respondents Judgment March 16, 2006. Adverse Po..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Selim (Md) and others Vs. Syedul Haque Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nt case. 8. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......nt case. 8. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......nt case. 8. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Serajul Islam & others Vs. Md. Abdur Razzaque Chowdhury and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....tly affirmed the decision of the lower appellate Court as the final court of fact. In such view of the matter, this petition merits no consideration Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......blication of the S. A. record...(8) Lawyers Involved: Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioners. Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent Nos. 1-3. Not represented—Respondent Nos......tly affirmed the decision of the lower appellate Court as the final court of fact. In such view of the matter, this petition merits no consideration Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury J SJR Mudassir Husain J Serajul Islam & others ...................Petitioners Vs. Md. Abdur Razzaque Chowdhury and another.................Respondents Judgment April 15, 2002. The State..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Kader Textiles (Pvt) Ltd. and another Vs. Md. Lehajuddin Miah, and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ection 233 of the Company law and thus in passing the impugned judgment and order. Therefore, we do not find merits in this leave petition. Accordingly, this leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......shareholders of the petitioner No.1 Company, hereinafter shortly called the company. The deceased respondent No.1 purchased 1,875 shares out of 6000 shares of the Company. Respondent No. 2 Md. Abed Ali purchased 1,875 shares and Abdul Kader, respondent No.3 held 375 shares and Md. Chand Mia, res......ection 233 of the Company law and thus in passing the impugned judgment and order. Therefore, we do not find merits in this leave petition. Accordingly, this leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......eme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: M Reza Chowdhury CJ Syed JR Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Kader Textiles (Pvt) Ltd. and another................Petitioners Vs. Md. Lehajuddin Miah, and others..........Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Anwar Hossain Vs. Mainul Hosein & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... question. All the appeals are therefore, allowed. There is no order as to costs. The connected civil petition is disposed of in the light of the Judgment in the appeals. Ed. ...... question. All the appeals are therefore, allowed. There is no order as to costs. The connected civil petition is disposed of in the light of the Judgment in the appeals. Ed. ...... question. All the appeals are therefore, allowed. There is no order as to costs. The connected civil petition is disposed of in the light of the Judgment in the appeals. Ed. ......ection with the affairs of the Republic or of any local authority but in connection with the business of the Ittefaq Group of Publications Ltd. In his capacity as Executive Director of the Company and as the Printer, Publisher and Editor of the Daily Ittefaq while he was a Minister. Since..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Akhtar Begum & others Vs. Mahmudul Haque, Advocate and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....above-established principles of law on the subject, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... 262, Mela and another vs. Labhu and another, AIR 1955 Punjab 97; AIR 1920 Patna 82, AIR 1924 Lahore 608, AIR 1943 Madras 645, AIR 1956 Hyderabad 133. Lawyers Involved: AJ Mohammad Ali, Senior Advocate instructed by Ahsanullah Patwary Advocate-on-Record— For the Petitioners......above-established principles of law on the subject, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......azlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul K Chowdhury J Akhtar Begum & others…....................................Petitioners Vs. Mahmudul Haque, Advocate and others... .............Respondents Judgment February 5, 2005. The Speci..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Harendra Nath Mahali Vs. Ramesh Chandra Haider and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... reconveyance at all stages. 18. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of. Ed. ......;………….(16) Cases Referred to- Biswaswar Roy vs. Joytennessa and others,13 DLR 287; Shafi Khan vs. Mannujan Hussain and others, 35 DLR (AD) 225; Muzaffar Ali Bepari vs. Omar All and others, 1 BLC (AD) 25. Lawyers Involved: Harendra Nat...... reconveyance at all stages. 18. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of. Ed. ......hul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Harendra Nath Mahali…………………………… Appellant Vs. Ramesh Chandra Haider and others...............Respondents Judgment March 16, 2006. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Afia Begum and others Vs. Abdul Baset Mia & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
..... In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......le. The pre-emptor is a co-sharer to the case holding by purchase. Prayer for pre-emption is not maintainable……………(13) Case Referred to- Md Abbas Ali vs Md Osman Ali (Minor) and others 37 DLR 324. Lawyers Involved: Chowdhury Md. ....... In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Nur Amin and others Vs. Abdul Quddus and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....lower appellate Court. 13. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ......h has caused the petitioner long three years. This is highly deprecated. …………….(12) Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. NI Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record—For......lower appellate Court. 13. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ......st of Taka 5,000. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Abdur Rahim (Md) Vs. Bengal Bricks Industries Ltd. & anr, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....itioner. 14. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the Judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. In view of the above, the leave petitions are dismissed. Ed....... He has obviously no right and title in the suit property. Consequently, he is not a necessary party to the suit for eviction of the monthly tenant. ………(10) Lawyers Involved: AJ Mohammad Ali, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on- Record—For the Petitioner (......itioner. 14. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the Judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. In view of the above, the leave petitions are dismissed. Ed....... 2003. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Order I rule 10 The High Court Division found the petitioner as an unauthorised occupant under a monthly tenant. He has obviously no right and title in the suit property. Consequently, he is not a necessary party to the suit for eviction o..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 72
Abdur Rashid Sarker (Md) and others Vs. Dines Chandra Das and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....im earlier. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... form raising the question of defect of parties at the stage of cross examination of the witness ………..(21) Cases Referred to- Abdus Samad and others vs. Md Shorab Ali and others 1981 BLD (AD) 77 = 33 DLR (AD) 113; Jalaluddin Fakir vs. Shajahan All Molla and oth......im earlier. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Shahudul Haque, IG Police and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....the unqualified apology and to censure the appellants in modifying of the sentence imposed on them. The appeals are, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ocate with him), instructed by ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 12 of 2004). Ozair Farooq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mr. Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants (In Criminal Appeal No. 16 of 2004). Sajja......the unqualified apology and to censure the appellants in modifying of the sentence imposed on them. The appeals are, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Division (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul K Chowdhury J Shahudul Haque, IG Police and others..................Appellants Vs. State............................Responde..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Supreme Court of Bangladesh, Appellate Division, Dhaka Vs. Election Commission, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Senior Member of the Bar and also as an Officer of this Court and we sound word of caution to him for the future. With the aforesaid observations, the Rule is disposed of. Ed. ......how cause as to why they shall not be proceeded with for committing contempt of this Division. 2. The facts giving rise to the Rule are, in brief: 3. Alhaj Advocate Mohammad Rahmat Ali MP and another filed Writ Petition No. 9157 of 2005 calling in question the decision of t......Senior Member of the Bar and also as an Officer of this Court and we sound word of caution to him for the future. With the aforesaid observations, the Rule is disposed of. Ed. ...... Supreme Court of Bangladesh, Appellate Division, Dhaka.........................Petitioner Vs. Election Commission represented by the Chairman (Chief Election Commissioner) and anr.......Respondents Judgment April 17, 2006. Cont..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Agrani Bank and other Vs. Essential Garments Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....petition. 23. In the background of our discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......petition. 23. In the background of our discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......petition. 23. In the background of our discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Agrani Bank and other........................Appellants Vs. Essential Garments Ltd. and others..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Abdul Mannan Vs. Tayeb Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rit. 16. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Abdul Mannan……………………….Appellant Vs. Tayeb Ali and others........................Respondents Judgment March 1, 2006. Th......rit. 16. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......esent: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Abdul Mannan……………………….Appellant Vs. Tayeb Ali and others........................Respondents Judgment March 1, 2006. The Co..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Fatema Khatun and others Vs. Abdul Quddus, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 721. ......Cases, 901; AIR 1932 Allahabad, 596; 13 CWN, 160; Md Zaki Khan and others vs. Munnu Sahu and another AIR 1925 Oudh 407; Ghulam Abbas vs .Razia Begum and others AIR 1951 Allahabad 86 (FB); Md. Meher Ali Mondal vs. Md Karam Ali Sarkar 17 DLR 365; Abdur Rahman vs. Baser Ali and others 21 DLR 599; A...... appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 721. ......7) 721. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Government of Bangladesh and another Vs. Md. Afsar Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ition No. 43 of 1996 making the Rule absolute is hereby set aside and the judgment and order dated 1-5-1995 passed by the Court of Settlement in case No. 869 of 1987 is restored. Ed. ......t: Md Ruhul Amin J Syed JR Mudassir Husain J MM Ruhul Amin J Government of Bangladesh and another.......................Appellants Vs. Md. Afsar Ali and others.......................Respondents Judgement October 21, 2003. ......ition No. 43 of 1996 making the Rule absolute is hereby set aside and the judgment and order dated 1-5-1995 passed by the Court of Settlement in case No. 869 of 1987 is restored. Ed. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md Ruhul Amin J Syed JR Mudassir Husain J MM Ruhul Amin J Government of Bangladesh and another.......................Appellants Vs. Md. Afsar Ali and others...........Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Bangladesh Telecommunication Regulatory Commission Vs. Ekushey Television Ltd., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ns aforesaid, with the above observations the appeals are, accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. The impugned judgment and orders of the High Court Division are hereby set aside. Ed. ......nvolved: Fida M Kamal, Senior Advocate, (MA Azim Khair, Advocate with him), instructed by Ahsanullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant (Civil Appeal No. 385 0f 2003). AJ Mohammad Ali, Attorney-General (Adilur Rahman, Deputy Attorney-General with him), instructed by Sufia Khatun,......ns aforesaid, with the above observations the appeals are, accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. The impugned judgment and orders of the High Court Division are hereby set aside. Ed. ...... Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, (Rokanuddin Mahmud, Senior Advocate with him), instructed by ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent No. 1 (Civil Appeal Nos. 383, 385-387 of 2003) and Respondent No. 10. (Civil Appeal Nos. 384 of 2003). Not represented—Respondent Nos. 2-5 (Ci..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: | Hits: 266