Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5601-5620 of 6822 results.
Rabeya Khatoon Vs. Bangladesh, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....mity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 9. ......mity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 9. ......mity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 9. ...... Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Rabeya Khatoon………….Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner and others......Respondents ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Bangladesh and others Vs. Nawab Abdul Malik Jute Mills Ltd., 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... error of law in making the Rule absolute and the same requires interference by us. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with Costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 7. ......LR (AD) 11. Lawyers Involved: MA Azim, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by Firoz Shah, Advocate on Record—for the Appellants. Rafique-ul Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 322 of 2001. (From the jud...... error of law in making the Rule absolute and the same requires interference by us. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with Costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 7. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Joynul Abedin J Bangladesh and others......................Appellants Vs. Nawab Abdul Malik Jute Mills Ltd........Respondent Judgment March 14, 2007. Resu..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Asaduzzaman (Md) Vs. Bangladesh, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
.... of in accordance with P.O. No. 26 of 1973 and the rules framed thereunder. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 144. ......torney General of the Gambia Vs. N' Jie 1961 (AC) 617 (634); All India Bank Employees Association V. The National Industrial Tribunal, Bombay, AIR 1962 (SC) 171. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, Khandaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate with him), instructed by Kazi......a AIR 1971 (SC) 966; Bidhu Bhusan Bagchi and another Vs. The State of West Bengal, AIR 1952 Calcutta 901; Vrajlal Manilal and Company Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh AIR 1970 (SC) 129 (135); M/s. Laxmi Khandsari Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1981 (SC) 873 (880); M/s. Sukhanandan Saran Dinesh Kumar V.......late Division (Civil) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Asaduzzaman (Md).....................……………………………...Appellant Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice & others.........Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 170
Rafiqul Alam (Md) Vs. Mustafa Kamal and others, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....ide the uncontested election of the appellant declared on 16 January 1988. A fresh poll is to be held for the Union Parishad. No cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 137.......ide the uncontested election of the appellant declared on 16 January 1988. A fresh poll is to be held for the Union Parishad. No cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 137.......1 DLR (AD) 6; Secretary of State Vs. Mask & Co., 44 C.W.N. 709; Wolverhampton New Waterworks Co. Vs. Hawkesford (6 C.B.N.S. 336); Neville Vs. London Express Newspaper (1919A.C.368); Monir Ahmed Khan Vs. Bozlu Mia, 1988 BLD 241; Jalaluddin Ahmed Vs. Matiur Rahman Khan, 41 DLR, 77; Mostafa Kamal...... Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Rafiqul Alam (Md)..………………………………………......................Appellant Vs. Mustafa Kamal and others……………………………………...............Respondents ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 173
Shubra Nandi Majumdar Vs. Begum Mahmuda Khatoon, 1989, 18 CLC (AD)
....different view. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. No cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 133. ......different view. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. No cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 133. ......Komalangi Ammal and another, AIR 1928 Madras 803; 46 CWN 374 P.C. Lawyers involved: S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by Kazi Ebadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate (M.A. Wahhab Miah, Advocate with him), instructed by Mohammad Ayub, Advocate-o......ion (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Shubra Nandi Majumdar……………………………................Appellant Vs. Begum Mahmuda Khatoon.....…………………………….....Respondent Judgment N..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Nurjahan Begum Vs. State, 1989, 18 CLC (AD)
....ut we do not think it appropriate at this belated stage to issue a Rule for enhancement of the sentence. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 130. ......ich she received injuries to which she succumbed later on………………………(11) Lawyers Involved: Mainul Hosein, Advocate, (Joynul Abedin, Advocate, with him), instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record. —For the Appellant B. Hossain, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed......dgment dated 4 February 1988, in Criminal Appeal No. 159 of 1984, Barisal. 2. Appellant is the wife of Abu Baker Siddique, Sub-Inspector and Second Officer of Banaripara Police Station. Mahmuda Khanom, the deceased, a young woman of 23 years, was 'Aya' of Banaripara Thana Health Complex, also ...... J ATM Afzal J Nurjahan Begum, wife of Abu Bakar Siddique, Sub-Inspector or Police, Banaripara Police Station, Dist. Bakerganj...........................………………........Appellant Vs. The State......………………………………................................Respondent..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Dr. Syed Matiur Rob Vs. Bangladesh and Others, 1989, 18 CLC (AD)
....for making complete justice in a matter. In view of the above, we dismiss both the appeals, without making any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 126. ......61 (SC) 1457; Hazi Waziullah Vs. Addl. Deputy Commissioner 1989 BLD (AD) 135. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him), instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellants (In both the appeals) A. W. Bhuiyan, Addition......cept any such declaration without examining at least one witness to prove the declaration and the circumstance leading to such declaration……………..(16) Cases Referred to- Abdur Rahman Khan Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Jessore, PLD 1968 Dhaka 367; Tanbir Ahmed Siddiky Vs. Province of Ea......drul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Dr. Syed Matiur Rob being dead his heirs Shamsun Nahar & others (in both the appeals) ……...Appellants Vs. Bangladesh and Others (in both the appeals)................................Respondents Ju..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Kazi Shamsul Huq & others Vs. Robeya Begum & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....r in the review application shall apply and the provision of Article 182(5) of the Limitation Act is not applicable. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... 1960 Rajasthan 249; L. Bengali Mai and others Vs. Baijnath Prasad and others, AIR 1942 Allahabad 338. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Sen......nd others, AIR 1942 Allahabad 338. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Harendra Nath Nandi, Advocate with him) instructed by......: Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ M.M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Kazi Shamsul Huq & others………………Appellants Vs. Robeya Begum & others………………Respondents ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Sonar Bangla Service Station Vs. Government of the People's Republic of BD, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....doning the delay. 12. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no substance in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......doning the delay. 12. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no substance in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......doning the delay. 12. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no substance in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 205
Sree Amulya Ratan Chowdhury& ors Vs. Sreemati Shaibalini Ghose & ors., 1998, 27 CLC (AD)
..... In view of the discussion made above we find no way but to dismiss these appeals. 17. In the result, therefore, the appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ....... In view of the discussion made above we find no way but to dismiss these appeals. 17. In the result, therefore, the appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ....... In view of the discussion made above we find no way but to dismiss these appeals. 17. In the result, therefore, the appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ....... In view of the discussion made above we find no way but to dismiss these appeals. 17. In the result, therefore, the appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Md. Sadequr Rahman Vs. Munawar Jute Mills Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....d legal basis and as such not sustainable in law. The direction for refund is not legally sustainable. 14. The appeal is thus allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......d legal basis and as such not sustainable in law. The direction for refund is not legally sustainable. 14. The appeal is thus allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......d legal basis and as such not sustainable in law. The direction for refund is not legally sustainable. 14. The appeal is thus allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......d legal basis and as such not sustainable in law. The direction for refund is not legally sustainable. 14. The appeal is thus allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Selim A Khan Vs. Md. Harun Malik and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t of the High Court Division and we do not find that there is any error of law calling for interference by us. In view of the discussion made above the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Md. Harun Malik and another.....................Respondent Judgment January 2, 2005. Lawyers Involved: M. A. Samad, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-Respondent Criminal Pet......ssed. Ed. ......t of the High Court Division and we do not find that there is any error of law calling for interference by us. In view of the discussion made above the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 30
S. M. Emdadul Hossain (Bulbul) Vs. Jinnur Hosain and another, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... order dated 26.07.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 8491 of 2001 is stayed for a period of 6 (six) months from dated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......s also Reported in: ......: August 8, 2004. Result: Leave is granted. Lawyers Involved: Mansurul Hoq Chowdhury, Advocate instructed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Shorful Islam Khan, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1. Not r......iminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J S. M. Emdadul Hossain (Bulbul).................................Petitioner Vs. Jinnur Hosain and another.........................Respondent Order: August 8, 2004. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Md. Nurul Amin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....has been mentioned above, we do not find that the High Court Division committed any error in the decision. This petition, therefore, being bereft of substance stands dismissed. Ed. ......has been mentioned above, we do not find that the High Court Division committed any error in the decision. This petition, therefore, being bereft of substance stands dismissed. Ed. ......has been mentioned above, we do not find that the High Court Division committed any error in the decision. This petition, therefore, being bereft of substance stands dismissed. Ed. ......has been mentioned above, we do not find that the High Court Division committed any error in the decision. This petition, therefore, being bereft of substance stands dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Md. Golam Mostafa alias Gholam Mostafa and others Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....sideration. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Let the order of stay granted earlier be extended for further 6(six) months from date. Ed. ......stafa and others..............Petitioner Vs The State...............................Respondent Judgement February 29, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Kazi Shahadat Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner ......sideration. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Let the order of stay granted earlier be extended for further 6(six) months from date. Ed. ......sideration. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Let the order of stay granted earlier be extended for further 6(six) months from date. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Chair, Board of Int. and Secondary Education, Jessore and others Vs. Nazir Ahmed, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....lity. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......ses Referred to- Government of India and another vs. C. A. Balakrishnan and others, AIR 1975 (SC) 1498; Ram Sewak Prasad Vs. State of U. P and others, AIR 1991 (SC) 1818; ANM Belayet Hossain and others Vs. Bangladesh Oil, Gas and Mineral Corporation, 51 DLR, 104; 4 BLC (AD) 65; Sec......lity. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Chairman, Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Jessore and others …..Appellants. Vs. Md. Nazir Ahmed and another...................Respondents Judgment Ma..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Bangladesh Bank & others Vs. Messers Fabrica Nacional De Monedy Timbre & others, 1998, 27 CLC (AD)
....ive body of lawyers may consider the matter and move the Government if found necessary. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ents Judgment April 1, 1997. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent Nos. 1-2 K. S. Nabi, Attorney General &n......ive body of lawyers may consider the matter and move the Government if found necessary. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ive body of lawyers may consider the matter and move the Government if found necessary. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Mona alias Zillur Rahman Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....satisfactory. So the delay is not condoned. Therefore, both on merits and on delay. This petition for leave to appeal loses merits for consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......its for consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......satisfactory. So the delay is not condoned. Therefore, both on merits and on delay. This petition for leave to appeal loses merits for consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......satisfactory. So the delay is not condoned. Therefore, both on merits and on delay. This petition for leave to appeal loses merits for consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Md. Nurul Amin Vs. Md. Ismail and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....) months. The petitioner is permitted to add additional grounds. However, the proceedings before the lower Court below shall continue in accordance with law. Ed. ......ddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on- Record-For the Petitioner. Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate, (Dr. A. K. M. Ali, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Altab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-for the Respondent No. 1 Not Represented-Respondent No. 2 ...... Nurul Amin .............................Petitioner Vs. Md. Ismail and other........................Respondents Judgement January 16, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Khandaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on- Record-For ...... Present Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M.A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Nurul Amin .............................Petitioner Vs. Md. Ismail and other........................Respondents Judgement January 1..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Mohammad Salim Ahmed @ Md. Salim Miah Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nd order of conviction. We in facts and circumstances do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The petition having no substance is dismissed. Ed. ......s imprisonment for 14 (fourteen) years and to pay fine of TK. 5,000/- in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 2 (two) years more. 2. The facts, in short, are that one Md. Farooq Hossain an employee of Zaman and Company on 11.09.1996 at about 3.45 P.M. was returning with his co......nd order of conviction. We in facts and circumstances do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The petition having no substance is dismissed. Ed. ......nd order of conviction. We in facts and circumstances do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The petition having no substance is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 52
20962095209220902089208820872085208420832081207920772076207320722071206920682067