Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5601-5620 of 6458 results.
Ful Chand Das and others Vs. Mohammad Hammad and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... Lawyers Involved: Hamidul Huq Chowdhury, Senior Advocate instructed by Miah Abdul Gafur, Advocate on Record—For the Appellants. K. A. Bakr, Senior Advocate, instructed by M.R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent No. 1. Ex-parte—Respondent N...... Lawyers Involved: Hamidul Huq Chowdhury, Senior Advocate instructed by Miah Abdul Gafur, Advocate on Record—For the Appellants. K. A. Bakr, Senior Advocate, instructed by M.R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent No. 1. Ex-parte—Respondent N......ent of the High Court Division is maintained. Consequently, this appeal stands dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (AD) 1983, 68. ......ent of the High Court Division is maintained. Consequently, this appeal stands dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (AD) 1983, 68. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 75
Abdul Alim and others Vs. A. K. Abdul Hoque and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... aside and the execution petition dismissed. Ed. ...... aside and the execution petition dismissed. Ed. ......Act. In this view, the appeal is allowed but in the facts of case we make no order as to costs. The decrees of courts below are set aside and the execution petition dismissed. Ed. ......sp; Abdus Salam, Senior Advocate, instructed by B.C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellants. Shafiqur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on- Record— For the Respondents. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Govt. of BanglaÂdesh Vs. Md. Arshad Ali, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....nd the writ petition is dismissed. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......nd the writ petition is dismissed. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......e sustained. Therefore, the appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and the writ petition is dismissed. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......e sustained. Therefore, the appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and the writ petition is dismissed. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 171
M/s. Everett OriÂent Lines Inc. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax Ctg Zone, Ctg, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....agong Zone, Chittagong……Respondents Judgment March, 11, 1982. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Advocate. Mohammad Hossain, Advocate instructed by S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Mahmudur Rahman, Advocate -instructed b......agong Zone, Chittagong……Respondents Judgment March, 11, 1982. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Advocate. Mohammad Hossain, Advocate instructed by S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Mahmudur Rahman, Advocate -instructed b......esult, therefore, both the appeals are allowed. The judgement of the High Court Division is set aside and the orders of the Tribunal are restored. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... March, 11, 1982. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Advocate. Mohammad Hossain, Advocate instructed by S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Mahmudur Rahman, Advocate -instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record — For the Respondent. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Messrs. Haji Noor Ali Sowdagar & Sons Ltd. Vs. Comm. of Sales, Tax, Ctg Zone, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ectly decided by the High Court Division. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......ectly decided by the High Court Division. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......hy;tention of the assessee cannot be accepted. In my opinion the question has been correctly decided by the High Court Division. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......;Respondent Judgment April 13, 1982. Lawyers Involved: M, Hassan, Advocate instructed by S.M, Huq, Advocate-on-Record, — For the Appellant, A.M. Mahmudur Rahman, Advocate instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Respondent. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Mofizur Rahman Khan Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... disposed of in these terms, without any cost. In the result, Civil Appeal Nos. 73 and 124 of 1981 are dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 321. ...... disposed of in these terms, without any cost. In the result, Civil Appeal Nos. 73 and 124 of 1981 are dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 321. ...... disposed of in these terms, without any cost. In the result, Civil Appeal Nos. 73 and 124 of 1981 are dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 321. ......AD) 321. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 188
Abdul Halim Mollah @ Monohar Mollah & anr Vs. Member, App Tribunal Dacca & ors., 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....he appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......he appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......nion is that such appeal cannot be entertained. I would, therefore, allow the appeal. Order of the Court By the majority judgment the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......70) 22 DLR S.C. 258. Lawyers Involved: Shaukat Ali Khan, Advocate, instructed by A. Basel Majumder, Advocate on Record—For the Appellants. Md. Moksudur Rahman, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate on Record—For the Respond..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 40
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Misfor Ali and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... the Writ Petition is dismissed. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ...... the Writ Petition is dismissed. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......ges, the appeal must succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and the Writ Petition is dismissed. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......llip;…………………………………Respondents Judgment March 18, 1982. Lawyers Involved: Matiur Rahman, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by M.R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record, —For the App..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 92
....er the question raised by the assessee for decision is a question of law, on an erroneous view of the provision of law, answered the question in the negative.
5. In support of the contention Mr. A.M. Mahmudur Rahman, the learned Advocate submitted that the gross profit shown by the assessee, upon......er the question raised by the assessee for decision is a question of law, on an erroneous view of the provision of law, answered the question in the negative.
5. In support of the contention Mr. A.M. Mahmudur Rahman, the learned Advocate submitted that the gross profit shown by the assessee, upon......dgment and order by the High Court Division are set aside. The appeals are allowed without any order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD)(1982) 298; 3 BLD (AD) 1983, 48.
......td. 28 DLR (AD) 141.
Lawyers Involved:
Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, AdvoÂcate-on Record—For the Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 34 of 1981).
A M Mahmudur Rahman, Advocate instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on Record.—For the Appellant (In Civil A..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Matiur Rahman, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... Md. Matiur Rahman ……………………………..Respondent Judgment March 4, 1982. Case Referred To- M.A. Hai vs. Trading Corporation (1980) 32 DLR (AD) 46. Lawyers Involved: A.W Bhuiya...... Md. Matiur Rahman ……………………………..Respondent Judgment March 4, 1982. Case Referred To- M.A. Hai vs. Trading Corporation (1980) 32 DLR (AD) 46. Lawyers Involved: A.W Bhuiya......ourt Division is set aside and the Writ Petition is dismissed with the modification that; the punishment is altered to compulsory retirement. No order as to costs. Ed. ......s and Rural Development and another ………………………………………...Appellants. Vs. Md. Matiur Rahman ……………………………..Res..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 87
....€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦.. Respondents
Judgment
September 11, 1981.
Result:
The appeal is allowed.
Lawyers Involved:
Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, M. Hoque, Advocate with him, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the AppeÂllants.
......€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦.. Respondents
Judgment
September 11, 1981.
Result:
The appeal is allowed.
Lawyers Involved:
Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, M. Hoque, Advocate with him, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the AppeÂllants.
......persona! hearing has, in any way, prejudiced the respondent.
For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:
......persona! hearing has, in any way, prejudiced the respondent.
For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:
..
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Abu Bakkar Vs. Nazir Ahmed, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....7 years on the expiry of which the mortgagor may get back possession by an application to the Sub divisional MaÂgistrate……….(5 and 6). Lawyers Involved: A. K. M Shafiqur Rahman, Advocate M. Giasuddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate on-Record—For the Appellan......7 years on the expiry of which the mortgagor may get back possession by an application to the Sub divisional MaÂgistrate……….(5 and 6). Lawyers Involved: A. K. M Shafiqur Rahman, Advocate M. Giasuddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate on-Record—For the Appellan......sion are set aside and those of the lower appellate court are restored. The respondent shall pay costs of the appeal to the appellant. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD)(1982) 237. ......od not exceeding 7 years on the expiry of which the mortgagor may get back possession by an application to the Sub divisional MaÂgistrate……….(5 and 6). Lawyers Involved: A. K. M Shafiqur Rahman, Advocate M. Giasuddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate on-Recordâ€..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Khondker Moshtaque Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....eration and also of his age. The Special Martial Law Court directed that the proceeÂdings of the case be submitted to the Chief Martial law Administrator for review as required under Regulation 4 of M.L.R. 1 of 1975. In the first case the order was passed on 24-2-1977 and in the second case on 31-3......eration and also of his age. The Special Martial Law Court directed that the proceeÂdings of the case be submitted to the Chief Martial law Administrator for review as required under Regulation 4 of M.L.R. 1 of 1975. In the first case the order was passed on 24-2-1977 and in the second case on 31-3......w Court and the order of Government on review are set aside, The orders of convicÂtion passed on the appellant ate hereby quashed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) (1982) 222. ......peals are allowed. Cases Referred to- (1978) 30 DLR(AD)207; (1980) 32 DLR (AD) 216; Kh Ehteshamuddin Vs. Bangladesh (1981) 33 DLR (AD) 154; Queen Vs. Huggins 1895, I QBD 563; State Vs. Zia-Ur-Rahman PLD 1973 (SC) 49; Federation of Pakistan Vs. Saeed Ahmed PLD (SC) 151; Jamil Huq Vs. Banglade..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 287
Lebu Mia Vs. Ganesh Chandra Nath and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....al below and remit the case back to the said Court of appeal below for its disposal in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 220.......al below and remit the case back to the said Court of appeal below for its disposal in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 220.......al below and remit the case back to the said Court of appeal below for its disposal in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 220.......estion of pre-maturity was raised at the appellate stage but by then the document had been registered and so the pre-maturity could be said to have been cured……..(3) Case Referred to- Abdur Rahman @ Abdul Rahman Vs. Maklis Ali, 31 DLR (AD) 118. Lawyers Involved: Md. Hannan, Advocate,..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 65
Haji Tajamal Ali being dead his heirs: Kamarunnesa & ors. Vs. Abdus Sattar & ors, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....iguity" within the meaning of section 9 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act. 8. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without, however, any order as to cost. Ed. ......iguity" within the meaning of section 9 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act. 8. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without, however, any order as to cost. Ed. ......iguity" within the meaning of section 9 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act. 8. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without, however, any order as to cost. Ed. ...... March 31, 1982 Cases Referred To- Akhtarun Nesa vs. Habibullah (1979) 31 DLR (AD) 88; Ahmed Hossain vs. Basharat Ali (1980) 32 DLR (AD) 54. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqur Rahman, Sr. Advocate, instructed by Zinnur Ahmed, Advocate on-Record—For the Appellants. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Bangladesh Vs. Hon'ble Judge, Prize Court, HCD, Supreme Court Building, Dacca, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ons but such reason has no support in law. The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. ......ons but such reason has no support in law. The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. ......e learned Attorney-General are found unacceptable, not because it lack reasons but such reason has no support in law. The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. ......e learned Attorney-General are found unacceptable, not because it lack reasons but such reason has no support in law. The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 116
Bangladesh & others Vs. A. K. M. Zahangir Hossain, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Bangladesh & others…………………………………….Appellants Vs. A. K. M. Zahangir Hossain………………………………………………... Respondent (In Civil Ap......Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Bangladesh & others…………………………………….Appellants Vs. A. K. M. Zahangir Hossain………………………………………………... Respondent (In Civil Ap...... member of the said 'disciplined force' if he has been illegally dismissed, removed, discharged, reduced in rank or comÂpulsorily retired. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 173. ......………. AppeÂllant Vs. Government of Bangladesh & others………………………………………………. Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 39 of 1979). And S.M. Khalilur Rahman …....Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh & others…………………….....Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 188
General Manager Jamuna Oil ComÂpany Ltd. Vs. Golap Rahman & another, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......dinance shows that the Court itself either cannot compel the attendance of such member or extract his advice. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......unim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J General Manager Jamuna Oil Company Ltd........................Appellant Vs. Golap Rahman & another….......................... Respondent Judgment June 15, ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Bangladesh Vs. Winifred Rubi & ors., 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... 7. In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. And the Judgement of the High Court Division are set aside and the writ petition is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost. Ed. ...... 7. In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. And the Judgement of the High Court Division are set aside and the writ petition is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost. Ed. ...... 7. In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. And the Judgement of the High Court Division are set aside and the writ petition is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost. Ed. ...... Lawyers Involved: K. A, Bakr, Attorney General, A.W. Bhuiyan, Deputy Attorney General, with him, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants, Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate-on Record—For the Respondent Nos. 1-3. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 65
Md. Habibur Rahman & ors. Vs. Hasen Ali Mondal and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ourt Division is set aside and the Writ Petition dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......ourt Division is set aside and the Writ Petition dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......atal so as to nullify the notification issued on February 4, 1980. The appeal is allowed. The order of the High Court Division is set aside and the Writ Petition dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......ivision (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ F. K. M. A. Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Md. Habibur Rahman & ors………………………. Appellant..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 100
15421541153915381537153615351534153315311525152415231522152115201518151715161515