Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Miah Mojibur Rahman Vs. Khondoker Nazmul Haque (Chiru) and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....responding to G.R. Case No. 193 of 1990 P.S .Khalishpur immediately and to enlarge him on bail to his satisfaction. The petitioner is permitted to add additional grounds. Ed. ......responding to G.R. Case No. 193 of 1990 P.S .Khalishpur immediately and to enlarge him on bail to his satisfaction. The petitioner is permitted to add additional grounds. Ed. ......responding to G.R. Case No. 193 of 1990 P.S .Khalishpur immediately and to enlarge him on bail to his satisfaction. The petitioner is permitted to add additional grounds. Ed. ......responding to G.R. Case No. 193 of 1990 P.S .Khalishpur immediately and to enlarge him on bail to his satisfaction. The petitioner is permitted to add additional grounds. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Alhaj Sona Ullah Vs. Aminur Rahman, Sec, Min. of Work, BD Secretariat, DHK & ors., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....sed on correct interpretation of law and we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......finalise the same; the High Court Division, after hearing; by judgment and order dated 14.01.2002 made the Rule absolute with the observations from the submission of the learned Assistant Attorney General, it is clear that so for no Gazette Notification has been published by the Government and a......sed on correct interpretation of law and we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......sed on correct interpretation of law and we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Md. Abdur Rahman Sikder Vs. Nur Mohammad Khan and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ngs under section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The submissions of Mr. Md. Majibur Rahman do not merit any consideration. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ngs under section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The submissions of Mr. Md. Majibur Rahman do not merit any consideration. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ngs under section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The submissions of Mr. Md. Majibur Rahman do not merit any consideration. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ngs under section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The submissions of Mr. Md. Majibur Rahman do not merit any consideration. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Fazlul Kader Chowdhury Vs. Cyma Zarrar and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Leave is granted to consider the same. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioner is directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......ding under section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ensued between the parties in view of a report dated 20.01.1998 submitted by the officer-in-charge, Dhanmondi, DMP, Dhaka in connection with General Diary No. 1194 dated 19.01.1998 of the said police station reporting apprehension of breach......Leave is granted to consider the same. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioner is directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......Leave is granted to consider the same. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioner is directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 154
State Vs. Md. Shahidul Islam @ H. M. Shahid, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... In view of the discussion made above, we do not find any illegality in the impugned judgment and order. The petition having no substance is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......tioner Vs. Md. Shahidul Islam @ H. M. Shahid..............Respondent Judgment November 23, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaque Khan, Additional Attorney General, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate- on-Record-For the Petitioner Not Represen...... In view of the discussion made above, we do not find any illegality in the impugned judgment and order. The petition having no substance is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ...... In view of the discussion made above, we do not find any illegality in the impugned judgment and order. The petition having no substance is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Shabbir Ahmed Chowdhury Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....find any legal grounds of quash the proceeding and as such the impugned order does not suffer from any error. The petition is found to be without any substance and is thus dismissed. Ed. ......find any legal grounds of quash the proceeding and as such the impugned order does not suffer from any error. The petition is found to be without any substance and is thus dismissed. Ed. ......find any legal grounds of quash the proceeding and as such the impugned order does not suffer from any error. The petition is found to be without any substance and is thus dismissed. Ed. ......find any legal grounds of quash the proceeding and as such the impugned order does not suffer from any error. The petition is found to be without any substance and is thus dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Abdul Wahed Vs. Arun Kumar Ganguly & others, 1999, 28 CLC (AD)
.... and 22.5.82 are not legal and proper. The learned Single Judge having correctly decided the case the same calls for no interference. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... and 22.5.82 are not legal and proper. The learned Single Judge having correctly decided the case the same calls for no interference. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... and 22.5.82 are not legal and proper. The learned Single Judge having correctly decided the case the same calls for no interference. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... and 22.5.82 are not legal and proper. The learned Single Judge having correctly decided the case the same calls for no interference. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Bangladesh Vs. Mst. Saleha Khatun and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Evidence Act is not available to the same. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with costs at all stages. Ed. .......Appellant Vs. Mst. Saleha Khatun and others ................Respondents Judgment July 31, 2006. Result: The appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: M. A. Azim, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant Sk. Razaque Ali, Senior A...... Evidence Act is not available to the same. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with costs at all stages. Ed. ...... Evidence Act is not available to the same. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with costs at all stages. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Anowarul Hoque Vs. Mohammad Tafazzal Mondal and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....k. 1000/- is to be deposited within one month. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioners are permitted to add additional grounds. Ed. ......k. 1000/- is to be deposited within one month. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioners are permitted to add additional grounds. Ed. ......k. 1000/- is to be deposited within one month. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioners are permitted to add additional grounds. Ed. ......k. 1000/- is to be deposited within one month. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioners are permitted to add additional grounds. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Md. Aslam Khan Vs. Haji Abdur Rahim and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... up the lacuna (7 BLT(AD)7). In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we do not find any merit in the appeal. Accordingly the same is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... up the lacuna (7 BLT(AD)7). In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we do not find any merit in the appeal. Accordingly the same is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... up the lacuna (7 BLT(AD)7). In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we do not find any merit in the appeal. Accordingly the same is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... up the lacuna (7 BLT(AD)7). In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we do not find any merit in the appeal. Accordingly the same is dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
BRDB and others Vs. Md. Idris Ali Akond and others, 1998, 27 CLC (AD)
.... of the plaintiff he was placed under suspension with effect from 27.7.1983; that the local head of administration, the Upazila Nirbahi Officer, Savar by a letter dated 4.8.1983 requested the Director General of B.R.D.B. to withdraw the plaintiffs suspension as his service performance ......laintiff he was placed under suspension with effect from 27.7.1983; that the local head of administration, the Upazila Nirbahi Officer, Savar by a letter dated 4.8.1983 requested the Director General of B.R.D.B. to withdraw the plaintiffs suspension as his service performance was satis......fication for making an order of remand as prayed for which will be a ceremony too idle to be permitted. In the result, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......fication for making an order of remand as prayed for which will be a ceremony too idle to be permitted. In the result, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Nur Hussain and other Vs. Jamuna Bank Ltd and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....e same day; that respondent No.2 is the Chairman and respondent No.3 is the Vice-Chairman and are the principal initiÂating sponsors of the respondent No.1 compaÂny; respondent No.4 is the Managing Director as well as the Chief Executive of respondent No.1 company and respondent No.5 is the Regist......ll disposal of the appeal in Civil Petition No.20 of 2004. The petitioners are also permitted to add additional ground in Civil Petition No. 20 of 2004. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... d) Respondent Nos.1 and 4; Jamuna Bank Limited and its Managing Director Mr. Saliman Khan Majlish. 29.1.2001 085373 STD 31000852 The Muslim Ltd (Landlord of JBL) Tk. 4,55,000.00 1.2.2001 085375 " ......ll disposal of the appeal in Civil Petition No.20 of 2004. The petitioners are also permitted to add additional ground in Civil Petition No. 20 of 2004. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 185
Wega Fashion Sweater (PVT.) Ltd. Vs. Syed Sajeda Hossain & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦Respondent (Civil Appeal No. 62 of 2004) Wega Fashion Sweater (Pvt.) Ltd. represented by its M.D. Md. Nurul Huda……………………………………Appellant Vs. Director Adjutand of Ansar & V.D.P. havÂing its office at Tikatuly & others ……………......d: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman. Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant (In Civil Appeal Nos. 62-63 of 2005). Fida M. Kamal, Additional Attorney General (A. H. M. Mushfiqur Rahman, Deputy Attorney General with him) instructed by Ahsanullah Patwa......tended that the writ petitioners have no locus standi to seek relief as prayed for in the writ petition. 4. The respondent No.1, Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land and respondent No. 5 Sub-Divisional Engineer, Public Works Department, Dhaka by filing joint af......No. 5350 of 2000. All the three appeals, viz C.A. Nos. 62-64 of 2004 are allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (AD) (2006) 187; III ADC (2006) 763. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Sekander Ali Howlader and others Vs. State, 1997, 26 CLC (AD)
.... their sentence is reduced to the period already undergone by each of them. The sentence of fine will remain. The accused-appellants may be released from their respective bail bonds. Ed. ......ssain, Senior Advocate, (both the appeals)(Mohammad Ziauddin Ahmed, Advocate, with him), instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants B. Hossain, Deputy Attorney General (both the appeals), instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record-For the Responden...... their sentence is reduced to the period already undergone by each of them. The sentence of fine will remain. The accused-appellants may be released from their respective bail bonds. Ed. ...... their sentence is reduced to the period already undergone by each of them. The sentence of fine will remain. The accused-appellants may be released from their respective bail bonds. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Rokanuddin Sheikh Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t the appellant, reducing the sentence to the period of imprisonment already undergone by the appellant. The appellant Rokanuddin Sheikh be discharged from the bail bond. Ed. ......gment August 1, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Shamsul Huda Manik, Advocate instructed by Md. A/tab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant Golam Kibria, Deputy Attorney General, (Khandker Gulzar Hossain, Deputy Attorney General with him) instructed by Mrs. Sufia Khatu......t the appellant, reducing the sentence to the period of imprisonment already undergone by the appellant. The appellant Rokanuddin Sheikh be discharged from the bail bond. Ed. ......t the appellant, reducing the sentence to the period of imprisonment already undergone by the appellant. The appellant Rokanuddin Sheikh be discharged from the bail bond. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 31
S.M. Redwan Vs. Md. Rezaul Islam, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....counsel of the petitioner merit considÂeration. Leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The Petitioner is permitted to add additionÂal grounds. Ed. ......counsel of the petitioner merit considÂeration. Leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The Petitioner is permitted to add additionÂal grounds. Ed. ......counsel of the petitioner merit considÂeration. Leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The Petitioner is permitted to add additionÂal grounds. Ed. ......counsel of the petitioner merit considÂeration. Leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The Petitioner is permitted to add additionÂal grounds. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Bangladesh Shipping Corporation & others Vs. Mohammad Hossain & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... senior clerk on 10.01.1984 and both were promoted as Assistant General Managers on 29.01.1989 and therefore, they are junior to the writ petitioner. The further case is that the Board of Directors of BSC framed Service Regulations in Directors of BSC framed Service Regulations in ......at the writ petitioner joined the service of Bangladesh Shipping Corporation (shortly BSC) as Probation Officer in 1979. He was confirmed as Assistant Manager in 1980 and was promoted as Assistant General Manager on 02.04.1988. Thereafter, he completed 9 (nine) months training in Netherland and ...... committed error of law in making the Rule absolute and as such judgment of High Court Division requires interference. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ...... committed error of law in making the Rule absolute and as such judgment of High Court Division requires interference. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Md. Akbor Hossain and others Vs. Md. Safiruddin and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... are of the view that the High Court Division on correct appreciation of law and facts gave its decision which does not call for any interference. The petitions are dismissed. Ed. ...... are of the view that the High Court Division on correct appreciation of law and facts gave its decision which does not call for any interference. The petitions are dismissed. Ed. ...... are of the view that the High Court Division on correct appreciation of law and facts gave its decision which does not call for any interference. The petitions are dismissed. Ed. ...... are of the view that the High Court Division on correct appreciation of law and facts gave its decision which does not call for any interference. The petitions are dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and others Vs. BSEHR, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....h, calling for any interference by this Court. 17. On the reasons made above, the appeal is liable to be dismissed and hence it is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......cretary for the Enforcement of Human Rights (BSEHR) and others....Respondents Judgment August 8, 2004 Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razaque Khan, learned Additional Attorney General, instructed by Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Sigma Huda......h, calling for any interference by this Court. 17. On the reasons made above, the appeal is liable to be dismissed and hence it is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......h, calling for any interference by this Court. 17. On the reasons made above, the appeal is liable to be dismissed and hence it is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 150
Mst. Jahanara Khatun Vs. Md. Nurul Islam, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ereinabove the conÂtentions, so made, in our view, are of no merit. In view of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed.......ereinabove the conÂtentions, so made, in our view, are of no merit. In view of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed.......ereinabove the conÂtentions, so made, in our view, are of no merit. In view of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed.......ereinabove the conÂtentions, so made, in our view, are of no merit. In view of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed...Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 180