Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 5641-5660 of 5664 results.

State Vs. Abul Kalam, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....y;dent namely, Abul Kalam, son of late Abdur Rahim of Village-Charlapang, Police Station-Nabinagar, District-Brahmonbaria arrested and to release him on bail to his satisfaction.  Ed. ......y;dent namely, Abul Kalam, son of late Abdur Rahim of Village-Charlapang, Police Station-Nabinagar, District-Brahmonbaria arrested and to release him on bail to his satisfaction.  Ed. ...... Vs. Abul Kalam...................Respondent  Judgment August 3, 2005. Lawyers Involved:  Ramzan Ali, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Mr. B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner  Not represented-the Respondent.  ......sp;                 Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J  The State...........................Petitioner Vs. Abul Kalam...................Respondent  Judgment August 3, 2005. ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92

Panna Biswas Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

.... J  Judgment 19th May 2002 Panna Biswas…………………Petitioner Vs. The State..........................Respondent  Lawyers Involved:  Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner  Not represented-Respondent.  Crimi......rred by 324 days and the explanation given for the delay is not satisfactory.  This petition on merit as well as on point of limitation has got no leg to stand and hence is dismissed.  Ed ......rred by 324 days and the explanation given for the delay is not satisfactory.  This petition on merit as well as on point of limitation has got no leg to stand and hence is dismissed.  Ed ......sp; Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury J K. M. Hasan J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J  Judgment 19th May 2002 Panna Biswas…………………Petitioner Vs. The State..........................Respondent  Lawyers Involved:  Md. Nowab Ali, Ad..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 89

Enamul Haque Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....mises this petition merits no considera­tion and accordingly it is dismissed.  Ed. ......greement with the findings and decisions of the High Court Division. In the aforesaid premises this petition merits no considera­tion and accordingly it is dismissed.  Ed. ......greement with the findings and decisions of the High Court Division. In the aforesaid premises this petition merits no considera­tion and accordingly it is dismissed.  Ed. ......ion  (Criminal)  Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J  Enamul Haque... .............Petitioner Vs. The State..........Respondent  Judgment July 20, 2002. Lawy..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 81

Janata Bank Vs. Khalilur Rahman, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....Dhaka and others..........Petitioners Vs. Mr. Khalilur Rahman...................Respondent Judgment 19th June 2004 Lawyers Involved: Shamim Khaled Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Abu Siddique, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners Badruddoza, Advocate, instructed by A.K......ndamental Rule 29 we are of the view that the submission have no substance. We, therefore, do not like to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ndamental Rule 29 we are of the view that the submission have no substance. We, therefore, do not like to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......rul Kabir Chowdhury J Janata Bank, represented by its Chairman, Board of Directors, Janata Bank, 110, Motijheel Commercial Area, Police Station Motijheel, Dhaka and others..........Petitioners Vs. Mr. Khalilur Rahman...................Respondent Judgment 19th June 2004 Lawyers ..

Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 83

Srwardi Shaikh and others Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....ssed the appeal. Interference is not called for accord­ingly this petition for leave to appeal is dis­missed.  Ed. ......ecord, the learned Judges of the High Court Division rightly dismissed the appeal. Interference is not called for accord­ingly this petition for leave to appeal is dis­missed.  Ed. ......ecord, the learned Judges of the High Court Division rightly dismissed the appeal. Interference is not called for accord­ingly this petition for leave to appeal is dis­missed.  Ed. ......ppellate Division  (Criminal)  Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J  Srwardi Shaikh and others……….....Petitioners. Vs. The State……………..Respondent  Judgment 22nd July 2002&..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 99

Mazid Sheikh @ Mazid and others Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....uld not be proved beyond all reasonable doubt.  The points raised merit consideration. Accordingly leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for.   Ed ......uld not be proved beyond all reasonable doubt.  The points raised merit consideration. Accordingly leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for.   Ed ...... he came back from Dhaka and Stayed at Doulatdia Ghat in a Hotel; on the next day i.e. on 4th  Sravan, Monday he started for home with Tk. 900/- only keeping the rest amount with his nephew Abul Hossain, son of Helaluddin of village Jitka, P.S. and District Manikganj but he did not reach home; ...... Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J  Judgment 20th July 2002  Mazid Sheikh @ Mazid and others………………Petitioners. Vs. The State................................Respondent  Lawyers Involved:  A. K. M. Sh..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 121

Mashuq Mia @ Iqbal Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....nt reason to interfere with the same.  The appeal is dismissed.   Ed. ......sion right­ly convicted the appellant under section 324 of the Penal Code and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same.  The appeal is dismissed.   Ed. ......sion right­ly convicted the appellant under section 324 of the Penal Code and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same.  The appeal is dismissed.   Ed. ......vision  (Criminal)  Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J  Mashuq Mia @ Iqbal ...................Appellant. Vs. The State…...Respondent.  Judgment August 14, 2004.  ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 95

Shaw Wallace Bangladesh Ltd. Vs. Abdul Hakim and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....llant Vs. Abdul Hakim and another..........Respondent  Judgment 28th July 2004  Lawyers Involved:  Abdul Momen Chowdhury, Advocate (M. R. Hasan, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- for the Appellant.   Abdus Sobhan, Senior Advocate...... or part thereof from 15th of April, 1971 till alleged termi­nation of his service on 18th January, 1993.  The appeal is accordingly allowed in part without any order as to costs.  Ed ...... Abdul Hakim and another..........Respondent  Judgment 28th July 2004  Lawyers Involved:  Abdul Momen Chowdhury, Advocate (M. R. Hasan, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- for the Appellant.   Abdus Sobhan, Senior Advocate, instruct......ppellate Division  (Civil)  Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J  Shaw Wallace Bangladesh Ltd..........Appellant Vs. Abdul Hakim and another..........Respondent  Judgment 28th July 2004  Lawyers Inv..

Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 130

Jobayer Hossain and others Vs. Noor Hafez and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....xclusive possession………..(8)  Lawyers Involved:  Khandakar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Abdus Salam Khan, Senior Advocate within him), instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants  Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate (A......ithout any order as  to  costs. Accordingly the suit is remanded to the trial Court for disposal in accordance with law and in the light of the observations made above.  Ed. ......eme Court Appellate Division  (Civil)  Present: Mahmudul Amin Choudhury C J Mohammad Gholam Rabbani J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J  Jobayer Hossain and others.......Appellants Vs. Noor Hafez and another............Respondents&...... (Civil)  Present: Mahmudul Amin Choudhury C J Mohammad Gholam Rabbani J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J  Jobayer Hossain and others.......Appellants Vs. Noor Hafez and another............Respondents  Judgment 20 November 20..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43

M/S. Concord Engineers & Construction Ltd Vs. Chief Engineer Road & Highways Dept, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....chindra Lal Das and others Vs. Hriday Ranjan Das being dead his heirs: Bimal Kanti Das and others, 40 DLR(AD) 56.  Lawyers Involved:  Rafique-Ul-Haq, Senior Advocate instructed by Mvi Md. Wahidullah Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant.  Fida M. Kamal, Additional Attorney Gen...... We do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the unreasoned impugned judgment and order.  For the reason aforesaid, this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs.  Ed. ......11.1992 of the Subordinate Judge, First Court, Dhaka in Miscellaneous Case No. 71 of 1991 declaring the award dated 21.9.1991 signed and delivered by the sole  Arbitrator Mr. Justice Sultan Hossain Khan making the same a rule of the Court to be without jurisdiction and a nullity in the eye......p; Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain, C.J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M.A. Aziz, J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury, J  M/S. Concord Engineers and Construction Ltd.........Appellant. Vs. The Chief Engineer Road and Highways Department, Government of the People's Republic Bang..

Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 229

Khalilur Rahman A.S. P. S. B Dhaka Vs. Md. Kamrul Ahsan and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)

....ccordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (AD) (2010) 486. ......discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (AD) (2010) 486. ......discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (AD) (2010) 486. ......reme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Khalilur Rahman A.S. P. S. B Dhaka............................Appellant Vs. Md. Kamrul  Ahsan and others.................Respondents Judgment July 5, 2005. ..

Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 152

Syed Afzal Nowab Vs. G. M. Yousuf and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....l Nowab ...........Plaintiff-Appellant Vs. G. M. Yousuf and others... Defendant-Respondents.  Judgment 2nd June 1997  Lawyers Involved:  M.A. Wahab Miah, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-On-Record...........For the Appellant  Sirajuddin Ahmed, Advocate-......e in Bangladesh, the ques­tion of forming any opinion by the Government is not at all relevant.  For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs.  Ed. ...............Plaintiff-Appellant Vs. G. M. Yousuf and others... Defendant-Respondents.  Judgment 2nd June 1997  Lawyers Involved:  M.A. Wahab Miah, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-On-Record...........For the Appellant  Sirajuddin Ahmed, Advocate-On-Record ......urt Appellate Division (Civil)  Present: A.T.M. Afzal C J Latifur Rahman J Mohammad Abdur Rouf J Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J  Syed Afzal Nowab ...........Plaintiff-Appellant Vs. G. M. Yousuf and others... Defendant-Respondents.  Judgment 2nd June 1997  Lawyer..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 128

Abdul Malek and oth­ers Vs. Faiz Ahmed and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

.... the High Court Division. We find no substance in the appeal, which is accord­ingly dismissed without any order as to cost.  Ed. ......Mouza. The other lands of khatian No. 78 were in the name of the father of the plain­tiffs and brother Nazir Ahmed. This Munsur Ahmed died leaving behind plain­tiffs No. 1,2 and 3 Nazir Ahmed Anwar Ahmed and Abul Hossain, Nazir Ahmed sold his share to plaintiff No. 1 and Anwar Ahmed and Abul......s of khatian No. 78 were in the name of the father of the plain­tiffs and brother Nazir Ahmed. This Munsur Ahmed died leaving behind plain­tiffs No. 1,2 and 3 Nazir Ahmed Anwar Ahmed and Abul Hossain, Nazir Ahmed sold his share to plaintiff No. 1 and Anwar Ahmed and Abul Hossain sold their s......y order as to cost.  Ed. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73

National Bank Limited Vs. Pragati Industries Limited, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....nk Limited ............Appellant. Vs. Pragati Industries Limited..... Respondent.  Judgment 8th August 2005   Lawyers Involved:  Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant  Shafique Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Su......nd any error of law and as such it does not call for our interference.  19.  In the result the appeal fails. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs.  Ed. ...... ............Appellant. Vs. Pragati Industries Limited..... Respondent.  Judgment 8th August 2005   Lawyers Involved:  Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant  Shafique Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Subrata Chow......Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil)  Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain, C.J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim J. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.  National Bank Limited ............Appellant. Vs. Pragati Industries Limited..... Respondent.  Judgment 8th August 2005   Lawye..

Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 108

Chairman, BADC, Dhaka Vs. S.M. Ali Imam and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....here is no order as to costs.  Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 83. ......ind merit in the appeal.  Accordingly the appeal is allowed.  There is no order as to costs.  Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 83. ......dul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate (M. A. Sobhan, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-record- For the Appellant.  Serajul Haq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-record- For Respondent No. 1.   Not represented- Respondent No......  Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Chairman, Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation, Dhaka..........Appellant. Vs. S.M. Ali Imam and others.... Respondents   Judgment March 12, 200..

Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 109

Kamal Uddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....State   represented   by   the   Deputy Commissioner, Comilla….......Respondent.  Judgment 12 December 2005   Lawyers Involved:  Md. Rafiqul Islam Mia, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab All, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner......commit any error in passing the impugned judgment and order.  15. In view of-the discussion made above we do not find any substance in the petition.  The petition is dismissed.  Ed. ......tating, inter alia, that he along with Mizan Mia and Ayub Ali (cited as witness Nos. 1 and 5 in FIR) while going to the bus terminal and came near the house of the accused petitioner they met accused Hossain to whom the aforesaid Ayub Ali demanded his dues of Tk. 1500/- and then the accused became e......eme Court Appellate Division (Criminal)  Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain C.J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim J. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.  Kamal Uddin.........................Petitioner. Vs. The   State   represented   by   the   Deputy..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 103

State Vs. Mofizuddin and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....rrect decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the same.  Accordingly, the petition is dis­missed.  Ed. ......nd correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the same.  Accordingly, the petition is dis­missed.  Ed. ......nd correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the same.  Accordingly, the petition is dis­missed.  Ed. ......inal)  Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim J. M.M. Ruhul Amin J. Md. Tafazzul Islam J. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.  The State.................................Petitioner. Vs. Mofizuddin and others ......... Respondents. Judgment 29 November 2005  Criminal Petit..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 83

Ismat Zerin Khan Vs. The World Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....mplete Justice at such stage of the suit…….(21)  Cases Referred to-  Fazlur Rahman Vs. Rajab Ali and others 30 DLR (SC) 30; Guineess Peal (Trading) Limited Vs. Md. Fazlur Rahman 44 DLR (AD) 242; Rupali Bank Ltd Vs. Haji Md. Arab Ali and oth­ers 7 MLR (AD) ...... order of the High Court Division and the trial Court is hereby directed to hear the suit on all issues includ­ing the issue regarding maintainability in accordance with law.  Ed. ......; Federation of Pakistan Vs. Ali Hasan (PLD 1967 SC 249).  Lawyers Involved:  T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate (Abdus Sobhan, Senior Advocate with him), instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant.  Rafique-ul-Huq, Senior Advocate instruct...... (Civil)  Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Ismat Zerin Khan....................Appellant. Vs. The World Bank and others..................Respondent.  Judgment Augus..

Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 211

Anil Ranjan Deb Vs. Yoshodalal Amritalal Shaha Banik & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....the High Court Division and in such view of the matter the petition merits no consideration.   Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......agreement with the findings and deci­sions arrived at by the High Court Division and in such view of the matter the petition merits no consideration.   Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......bsp;                               Syed J R Modassir Hossain, J: Anil Ranjan Deb defendant-petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and orde......ordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54

Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, UCBL & anr Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....ered by the Court.  15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division.  In the result, the appeal is dismissed.  Ed. ......ered by the Court.  15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division.  In the result, the appeal is dismissed.  Ed. ......ing Director, United Commercial Bank Ltd and another ....Appellants. Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury.... Respondents  Judgment June 27, 2005   Lawyers Involved:   Dr. Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, (Rokanuddin Mahmud, Senior Advocate with him), instructed by Sufia Khatun,......riminal)  Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain C.J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim J. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.  Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, United Commercial Bank Ltd and another ....Appellants. Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury.... Respondents  Judgment June 27, 2005   Lawyers Inv..

Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 118