Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5641-5660 of 5670 results.
Hriday Ranjan Dey & another Vs. Niranjan Dey and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
.... property. The Court of appeal below also found the suit land originally possessed by Baisnab was succeeded by his son Abhoy charan and Anada and thus Jituram or his successive heirs neither have any interest nor had possession in the suit land. Apart from PWs. supporting the possession of the pla......he High Court Division are set aside and those of the learned District Judge duly affirming those of the learned Munsif are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 16. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 112
Moulana Serajul Haque Vs. Md. Saifullah, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....espect of the suit property showing Romesh Chandra as executant. In fact Romesh Chandra had no right, title or possession in the suit property. The plaintiff could not claim any right, title and interest or possession in the suit property on the basis of said forged and collusive kabala and the......t Division are hereby set aside and those of the learned District Judge, Chandpur passed in Title Appeal No. 139 1994 and 140 of 1994 are restored. There is no order of costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 175
Md. Motiruddin Mondal @ Matiar Rahman Mondal & ors Vs. Full Mohammed Mollah & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....st the judgment and order dated 23.08.2001 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1998 of 1999 making the Rule absolute. 2. Short facts are that the predecessor-in-interest of respondent Nos. 1,2 and 3 as plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No. 1005 of 1984 for decla......n proper perspective and after assigning cogent reasons arrived at a correct conclusion and hence does not require interference by us. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Abdul Matlib and others Vs. Abdul Malik, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ument of Mr. T.H. Khan. Accordingly, we allow the appeal by setting aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division and affirm those of the courts below. No order as to cost. Ed. ......his case". 3. Facts of the case, briefly, are that the respondent as pre-emptor instituted a Miscellaneous Case No. 7 of 1992 for preemption of the case land under Section 96 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act as contiguous land owner by inheritance stating inter alia th..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 56
Md. Abdul Jalil Khan Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rit consideration. Moreover, the petition is also delayed by 444 days but the reasons for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. The criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ...... Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain C J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Abdul Jalil Khan…………Petitioner Vs. The State.................Respondent Judgment 23rd June 2004 Lawyers Involved: Dr. M. Za..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 94
State Vs. Abul Kalam, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....y;dent namely, Abul Kalam, son of late Abdur Rahim of Village-Charlapang, Police Station-Nabinagar, District-Brahmonbaria arrested and to release him on bail to his satisfaction. Ed. ......nbsp; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J The State...........................Petitioner Vs. Abul Kalam...................Respondent..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Panna Biswas Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rred by 324 days and the explanation given for the delay is not satisfactory. This petition on merit as well as on point of limitation has got no leg to stand and hence is dismissed. Ed ......ent: Mainur Reza Chowdhury J K. M. Hasan J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Judgment 19th May 2002 Panna Biswas…………………Petitioner Vs. The State..........................Respondent Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Enamul Haque Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....greement with the findings and decisions of the High Court Division. In the aforesaid premises this petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ...... (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Enamul Haque... .............Petitioner Vs. The State..........Respondent Judgment July 20, 2002. Lawyers Involved:&n..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Srwardi Shaikh and others Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ecord, the learned Judges of the High Court Division rightly dismissed the appeal. Interference is not called for accordingly this petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......Division (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Srwardi Shaikh and others……….....Petitioners. Vs. The State……………..Respondent Judgment 22nd July 2002 La..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Ali Akbor Khan Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ntitled to be discharged from the charge framed against him. 6. In the afore state of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. Ed. ......p; Ali Akbor Khan.................Petitioner Vs. The State.........................Respondent Judgment &n..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Mazid Sheikh @ Mazid and others Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....uld not be proved beyond all reasonable doubt. The points raised merit consideration. Accordingly leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed ......in J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Judgment 20th July 2002 Mazid Sheikh @ Mazid and others………………Petitioners. Vs. The State................................Respondent Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Shahidul Hu..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Mashuq Mia @ Iqbal Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sion rightly convicted the appellant under section 324 of the Penal Code and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ...... (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Mashuq Mia @ Iqbal ...................Appellant. Vs. The State…...Respondent. Judgment August 14, 2004. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 95
National Board of Revenue and others Vs. Mustafizur Rahman, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....ith reference to the relevant provisions of the concerned SRO. In view of the above matter, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......he respondent filed another application on 27.7.1996 to the said Minister for permission to import 400 tons of duplex board from South Korea and the said application was forwarded by the Ministry for State, Labour and Manpower for special consideration on 7.8.1996 with endorsement to enquire into th..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Mohiuddin and others Vs. Shwkat Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....s of fact arrived at by both the courts below. 6. Mr. T. H. Khan, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 1 submits, inter alia, that Amir Ali, the predecessor in interest of the plaintiffs was admittedly the owner of the property and that there being no evidence......to interfere with the same. 12. On the reasonings stated above, we do not find any substance in this appeal, which is, therefore, dismissed of contest without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Jobayer Hossain and others Vs. Noor Hafez and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n disturbing the concurrent finding of fact arrived at by the Courts below holding that the claim of title on the basis of the award over the suit land have no legal value creating any title and interest over the suit land and that the plaintiff on the basis of alleged purchase from Jalal Ahmed......ithout any order as to costs. Accordingly the suit is remanded to the trial Court for disposal in accordance with law and in the light of the observations made above. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
M/S. Concord Engineers & Construction Ltd Vs. Chief Engineer Road & Highways Dept, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nt of Bangladesh acting through the Ministry of Communication asked the Chief Engineer of the respondents to cancel the contract dated 3.9.1990 for construction of the flyover in the greater national interest and to communicate the same to the appellant. The Chief Engineer by his letter dated 2...... We do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the unreasoned impugned judgment and order. For the reason aforesaid, this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 229
Khalilur Rahman A.S. P. S. B Dhaka Vs. Md. Kamrul Ahsan and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (AD) (2010) 486. ......discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (AD) (2010) 486. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 152
Syed Afzal Nowab Vs. G. M. Yousuf and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
..... He argued that admittedly the appellant being outside Bangladesh for six years it is necessary for the Government to form an opinion that his residence outside Bangladesh is prejudicial to the interest of Bangladesh before treating the property as an abandoned property. In the facts and ......e in Bangladesh, the question of forming any opinion by the Government is not at all relevant. For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 128
National Bank Limited Vs. Pragati Industries Limited, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ey Suit for refund of Tk.4.81,250/-paid to the defendant-petitioner for the price of certain undelivered goods and for compensation at the rate of 20% thereon, in total for a sum of Tk.5,77,500/- and interest and costs at the rate of 20% per annum till realization. The defendant in its written state......nd any error of law and as such it does not call for our interference. 19. In the result the appeal fails. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Shafiqur Rahman and others Vs. Mahbub Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e plaint with Abdur Rahim and Nur Ali by a registered patta being No. 2515 dated 7.7.1896 on acceptance of a registered kabulyat being No.2516. Abdur Rahim and Nur Ali are common predecessors-in-interest of both plaintiffs and defendants. After taking settlement Abdur Rahim possessed southern 1...... the khatians that Abdur Rahim possessed land of RS Plot No.408 exclusively while Nur Ali possessed land of RS Plot No.407 exclusively by amicable partition. Thereafter, BS record of rights under the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act was prepared accordingly in respect of RS Plot No. 408 in the name..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
371369368365363362361360357356355354351350349347346345340337