Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
State Vs. Divisional Special Judge, Khulna Division and anr, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... aside and it is held that the Senior Special Judges got power to transfer the cases which they had earlier transferred to the Divisional Special Judge. The appeal is allowed. Ed. ...... aside and it is held that the Senior Special Judges got power to transfer the cases which they had earlier transferred to the Divisional Special Judge. The appeal is allowed. Ed. ...... aside and it is held that the Senior Special Judges got power to transfer the cases which they had earlier transferred to the Divisional Special Judge. The appeal is allowed. Ed. ......tafa Kamal J The State, represented by the Solicitor, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh ......... ......Appellant Vs. Divisional Special Judge, Khulna Division and anr...........Respondents Judgement May 3rd, 1992. Lawyers Involved: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 118
BD Chemical InÂdustries Corporation & another Vs. M/s Sattar Match Works & ors, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....a period of six months from the date of filing of the application. Civil Appeal No. 36 of 1991 is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost in either of the appeals. Ed. ......a period of six months from the date of filing of the application. Civil Appeal No. 36 of 1991 is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost in either of the appeals. Ed. ......a period of six months from the date of filing of the application. Civil Appeal No. 36 of 1991 is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost in either of the appeals. Ed. ......(Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Karnal J Latifur Rahman J Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation and another……………………………&..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 227
Shamsuddin Ahmed, Advocate Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Advocate of the Appellate Division of the Bangladesh High Court from 3.8.72 and of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court from 16.12.72. The Appeal is allowed. No cost. Ed. ...... Advocate of the Appellate Division of the Bangladesh High Court from 3.8.72 and of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court from 16.12.72. The Appeal is allowed. No cost. Ed. ...... Advocate of the Appellate Division of the Bangladesh High Court from 3.8.72 and of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court from 16.12.72. The Appeal is allowed. No cost. Ed. ......; Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and another .....................Respondent Judgm..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 92
Muhammad Muslim Ali Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... found that further inquiry was held in accordance with the Rules. There is thus no substance in this petition which is dismissed after condoning the delay in filing the same. Ed. ......n J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Muhammad Muslim Ali………………………Petitioner &...... found that further inquiry was held in accordance with the Rules. There is thus no substance in this petition which is dismissed after condoning the delay in filing the same. Ed. ......; Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment and others……………Respondents Judgment May 2..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 123
Shaikh Shahidul Islam Vs. State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....will continue to remain on the same bail already granted by this Court until commencement of the trial, if any. The trial Court will pass necessary orders as deemed fit at that time. Ed. ......will continue to remain on the same bail already granted by this Court until commencement of the trial, if any. The trial Court will pass necessary orders as deemed fit at that time. Ed. ......will continue to remain on the same bail already granted by this Court until commencement of the trial, if any. The trial Court will pass necessary orders as deemed fit at that time. Ed. ......cord‑For the Appellant. B Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Respondent in both the appeals Criminal Appeal No. 21 & 22 of 1991. (From the Judgment and Order dated 21 August 1991 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Criminal Misc. Case No...Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 150
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Rafiqul Islam (Md) Vs. Mir Abdul Ali, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
.... record, the result of the judgment under review need not be disturbed. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 176. ......ppellate Division (Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Rafiqul Islam (Md)………………………..Appellant Vs. Mir Abdul Ali................Respondent Judgment December 12, 1991. Result: The appeal is dismisse...... record, the result of the judgment under review need not be disturbed. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 176. ...... was wrong. However, the Courts below discarded the plaintiff’s sale-deed on other ground. Section 47 of the Registration Act is attracted only when the two competing documents are otherwise at par and stand on the same footing. The plaintiff’s document will fail simply because it could not stan..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
State Vs. Abdul Mannan @ A Mannan and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ...... should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ...... should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ......tifur Rahman J State, represented by the Solicitor to the Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh ......................Petitioner. Vs Abdul Mannan @ A Mannan and others..................................................Respondents Judgment Novembe..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Siddique Munshi Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....e same Judge. However, departure from this practice has caused no prejudice to the appellant. 13. In the result, we do not find anything to interfere. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. .....................Appellant Vs. The State .........................Respondent Judgment October 24th, 1991. Cases Referred To: Duga Mia vs. Crown 7 DLR 395; Shahed Ali Vs. State 13 DLR 414 and Sadik Vs. State (1971) PLD (SC) 713. Lawyers Involved: S......e same Judge. However, departure from this practice has caused no prejudice to the appellant. 13. In the result, we do not find anything to interfere. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ...... Vs. The State .........................Respondent Judgment October 24th, 1991. Cases Referred To: Duga Mia vs. Crown 7 DLR 395; Shahed Ali Vs. State 13 DLR 414 and Sadik Vs. State (1971) PLD (SC) 713. Lawyers Involved: Serajul Huq, Senior Advoc..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Sec, Min of Food, Food Div., Govt. of Bangladesh, Dhaka & others Vs. M/s. MF Ltd, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....w that the lessee knew that the properties were liable to the octroi. 11. In the result, we find no substance in this appeal which is therefore dismissed. No order as to cost. Ed. ......w that the lessee knew that the properties were liable to the octroi. 11. In the result, we find no substance in this appeal which is therefore dismissed. No order as to cost. Ed. ......w that the lessee knew that the properties were liable to the octroi. 11. In the result, we find no substance in this appeal which is therefore dismissed. No order as to cost. Ed. ......Division (Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J Latifur Rahman J Secretary, Ministry of Food, Food Division, Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka and others .......... Appellants. Vs. M/s. MF Limited, a Private company limite..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Joynal Abedin and others Vs. Mafizur Rahman & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
...., the judgment of the learned Single Judge suffers from legal infirmity and the same is liable to be set aside. In the result, the appeal is allowed without cost. Ed. ...... appellate Court whereby the judgment and decree of the trial Court was reversed arising out of a suit for simple partition. 2. The case, of the plaintiffs, inter alia, was that Jinnat Ali, predecessor of the plaintiff respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and others was 16 annas owner of suit pr......, the judgment of the learned Single Judge suffers from legal infirmity and the same is liable to be set aside. In the result, the appeal is allowed without cost. Ed. ......) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Joynal Abedin and others…………….. Defendant‑Appellants Vs. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Musa Ali Vs. Nur Ahmed and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ned Advocate for the respondents and have gone through them in this case. Order of the Court. By majority decision the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Musa Ali ..................Appellant  ......ned Advocate for the respondents and have gone through them in this case. Order of the Court. By majority decision the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ahman J Musa Ali ..................Appellant Vs. Nur Ahmed and others...................Respondents Judgment November 25, 1990 Lawyers I..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Chanjury Talukder and another Vs. Chingneshay Magni and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ding on the plaintiff. For all the above reasons we do not find any merit in this appeal which is dismissed without costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 12 BLD (1992) (AD) 253. ......ding on the plaintiff. For all the above reasons we do not find any merit in this appeal which is dismissed without costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 12 BLD (1992) (AD) 253. ......ding on the plaintiff. For all the above reasons we do not find any merit in this appeal which is dismissed without costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 12 BLD (1992) (AD) 253. ......ourt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Chanjury Talukder and another .................................Appellants. Vs. Chingneshay Magni a..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Madar Chandra Basu Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ircumstances of the case, the appeal is allowed. Let the appellant be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner concerned till commencement of the trial. Ed. ..................Appellant Vs. The State .............Respondent. Judgment February 17th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Md. Monsur Ali, Advocate, (appeared with the leave of the Court) instructed by M Nowab Ali, Advocate‑on&......ircumstances of the case, the appeal is allowed. Let the appellant be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner concerned till commencement of the trial. Ed. ......minal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Madar Chandra Basu................Appellant Vs. The State .............Respondent...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Jogendra Nath alias Govinda Sarker Vs. Amulya Chandra Sarker and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....others. The prayer for separate saham by defendants 7, 9 and 11 was refused as the suit was dismissed. In the result, therefore, the appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ......#8209;sharers on demand, instituted the suit for partition and separate allotment in respect of his 1/3rd share of the land in Schedule viz 4.30 acres of land. 4. Defendant No. 6 Akbar Ali Mandal died during the pendency of the suit and his heirs were brought on record as defendants......9;sharers on demand, instituted the suit for partition and separate allotment in respect of his 1/3rd share of the land in Schedule viz 4.30 acres of land. 4. Defendant No. 6 Akbar Ali Mandal died during the pendency of the suit and his heirs were brought on record as defendants 6(K...... MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Jogendra Nath alias Govinda Sarker ..........Plaintiff‑Appellant. Vs. Amulya Chandra Sarker and others ..........Defendant‑Respondents. Judgment A..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Hussain Mohammad Ershad Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....smissed. Stay granted by this Court on 26.1.92 is vacated. No observation in the interlocutory proceedings binds the trial Court on the merit of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......smissed. Stay granted by this Court on 26.1.92 is vacated. No observation in the interlocutory proceedings binds the trial Court on the merit of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......smissed. Stay granted by this Court on 26.1.92 is vacated. No observation in the interlocutory proceedings binds the trial Court on the merit of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... Deputy Attorney‑ General with him) instructed by Sharifuddin Chakladar, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑For the Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 8 of 1992. (From the Judgment and Order dated 21.1.1992 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Criminal Revision No. 120 of 1..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 88
SA Sultan Vs. The State and another, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....case has been made out and we do not think it fit and proper to quash the proceeding at this stage. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) (1992) 139. ......case has been made out and we do not think it fit and proper to quash the proceeding at this stage. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) (1992) 139. ......case has been made out and we do not think it fit and proper to quash the proceeding at this stage. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) (1992) 139. ......t Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J SA Sultan ............................Accused‑Appellant Vs. The State and another................Respondents Judgment November 20, 1991. Result: The appeal is..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Afsaruddin Ahmed Vs. Banque Indosuez, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....of the Code of Civil Procedure and thereby correctly held that this rule is directory and not mandatory. In the result, this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......of the Code of Civil Procedure and thereby correctly held that this rule is directory and not mandatory. In the result, this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......of the Code of Civil Procedure and thereby correctly held that this rule is directory and not mandatory. In the result, this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ff‑Respondent Judgment March 8th, 1992 Case Referred to- Lahore Improvement Trust Vs. Khuda Bakksh Meraj Din PLD 1956 Lah. 252. Lawyers Involved: Khandakar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate‑on..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 150
Mujibur Rahman (Md) Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
.... the Supreme Court which exercises the judicial power of the State. I concur again with the decision of my learned brother, MH Rahman J. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 111. ......d‑For the Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 35 of 1987). Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney-ÂGeneral (Sharifuddin Chaklader, Assistant Attorney‑General, with him), instructed by Md. Nawab Ali Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 35 of 1987). TH Khan, Seni...... the Supreme Court which exercises the judicial power of the State. I concur again with the decision of my learned brother, MH Rahman J. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 111. ...... Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Mujibur Rahman (Md)……………………………………. Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others……….. Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 35 of 1987) Nazmul Hasan and others .......Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 203
Dr. Ahmed Hussain Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... shall prevent the State, which expression includes Parliament, from making special provision in favour of women. We find no merit in this petition and, accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......bsp; Vs. Bangladesh and others…...........Respondents Judgment March 2, 1992 Lawyers Involved: Dr. Ahmed Hussain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑For the Petitioner. AW Bhuiyan, Additional Attor...... shall prevent the State, which expression includes Parliament, from making special provision in favour of women. We find no merit in this petition and, accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... Dr. Ahmed Hussain ..................Petitioner. Vs. Bangladesh and others…...........Respondents Judgment March 2, 1992 Lawyers Invol..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 191