Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5701-5720 of 6266 results.
State Vs. Abdul Barek and Others, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
....alled and cancelled. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 28; 7 MLR (AD) 17. ...... respective bail bond and the warrant of arrest issued against respondent Nos. 4 and 5 are recalled and cancelled. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 28; 7 MLR (AD) 17. ...... respective bail bond and the warrant of arrest issued against respondent Nos. 4 and 5 are recalled and cancelled. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 28; 7 MLR (AD) 17. ...... State..........................Appellant Vs. Abdul Barek and Others…..…….Respondents Judgment December 12, 2001. Result: The appeal is all..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Ishaque (Md) Vs. Ekramul Huque Chowdhury and others, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
....issed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:54 DLR (AD) (2002) 26. ......rfeiture. In view of the discussion as above the appeal fails. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:54 DLR (AD) (2002) 26. ...... Lawyers Involved: Khandaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Mustafa Niaz Mahmud, Advocate with him) instructed by Shar Uddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate instructed by Md Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent No. 2. ...... (Civil) Present: Mahmudul Amin Choudhury CJ Md. Golam Rabbani J Md. Fazlul Karim J Ishaque (Md) ……………………………..apeallant Vs. Ekramul Huque Chowdhury and others…………Respondent Judgment December 1, 2001. The Evidence Act, 1872 (I..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 70
S. M. Iqbal Hossain Vs. Managing Director, I F I C Bank Ltd., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....that the High Court Division took a correct view in the matter and as such the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......that the High Court Division took a correct view in the matter and as such the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ...... may, from the replies of the show cause as well as pleadings of the parties it appears that the plaintiff-petitioner does not deny the issuance of the Pay Order, signed by him along with one Nurul Islam who also has been removed. They issued pay order for Tk.1,00.000/-against deposit of Tk.100/......ent: M. M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J S. M. Iqbal Hossain................. Petitioner Vs. Managing Director, International Finance Investment and Commerce (IFIC) Bank Ltd. Head Office, Bangladesh Shilpa Bank Bhaban, 17-18 Floors, 8, RAJUK Av..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Md. Marfat Ali Miah Vs. Sree Jagadish Chandra Sheel and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ispose of the suit expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ....... The Other Class Suit No. 82 of 1991 is restored to its file and number. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Marfat Ali Miah being dead his legal heir: Firoj Ahammad Bhulu.....Appellant Vs. Sree Jagadish Chandra Sheel and others....................................... Respondents Judgment ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Md. Yousuf Ali Vs. Kazi Syed Shamsul Hoque and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Ed. ......n cannot be sustained and so the appeal should be allowed. 22. The appeal is, therefore, allowed. In the facts and circumstances we direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. ......7 PC 46 atp.47. Kishore Chandra Vs. Ganesh Prasad, Am 1954 SC 316 at p 320; Jagir Kumar vs. Jaswant Singh, AIR 1963 SC 1521. Moulvi Md. Khurshid Alam vs. Bangladesh 50 DLR (AD) 82. Kazi Md. Amirul Islam vs. Bangladesh 16 BLD (AD) 110;Kazi Imamuddin Bhuiya Vs. Bangladesh 10 BLC (AD) 2005 ......r Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Yousuf Ali ..........................................Appellant. Vs. Kazi Syed Shamsul Hoque and others...........Respondents. Judgment 30 January 2006. Cases Referred To..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 178
Abdul Majid Molla Vs. Biswajit Chandra (minor) & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....judgment of the High Court Division. 9. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed ......he learned Advocate for the petitioner could not point out any legal infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division. 9. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed ......he learned Advocate for the petitioner could not point out any legal infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division. 9. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed ......Division (Civil) Present : Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Abdul Majid Molla.......................................Petitioner Vs. Biswajit Chandra (minor) & others……….........Respondents. Judgment 11 F..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Abdur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....reinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost to be paid by the appellant No. 1. Ed.......itration Appellate Tribunal. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost to be paid by the appellant No. 1. Ed.......y the appeal is dismissed with cost to be paid by the appellant No. 1. Ed.......sion (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and other.................................Appellants. Vs. Abdur Rahman and others.............Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....bsp; Government of Bangladesh, 4 BLC (AD) 213. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney General, (Faisal H. Khan, Assistant Attorney General with him), instructed by Md. Ahsanullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants T.H.......stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ...... ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Md. Anarul Islam and others Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... ......he company may proceed against the accused-appellants for the allegations in the petition of complaint in the appropriate forum and in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......e Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Anarul Islam and others................. Appellant Vs. The State and another…………………â€......t Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Anarul Islam and others................. Appellant Vs. The State and another…………………….......Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited Vs. Janata Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....l for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......t the High Court Division correctly decided the matter and as such it does not call for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......d. Ed. ......mmad Fazlul Karim J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited….......Petitioner Vs. Janata Bank and others........ Respondents Judgment 5 January, 2006 Case Referred To- ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 121
....le order in our view, the High Court Division rightly refused to issue the Rule.
6. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
......ayment of VAT which the petitioner avoided to pay is an appealable order in our view, the High Court Division rightly refused to issue the Rule.
6. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
......y refused to issue the Rule.
6. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
......n of Tikapara Ghoramara Rajshahi...................Petitioner
Vs.
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Finance Internal Resources Division and others................Respondents
Judgment
January 23, 2006.
Result:
The petition ..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Md. Ashaduzzaman Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ismissed. Ed. ......pal amount he borrowed from the Bank. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......gladesh, Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others………......Respondents. Judgment March 23, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate (Moksudul Islam, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. ......uhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Ashaduzzaman................ Petitioner. Vs. Bangladesh, representedby the Secretary, Ministry of local Government, Engineering and Rural Development Bangladesh, Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others……….......Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Md. Habibur Rahman Vs. M/S. Uttara Bank Ltd., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ......our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ...... order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ......nt: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Habibur Rahman.........................Appellant. Vs. M/S. Uttara Bank Ltd., represented by its Managing Director and others….…… Respondents Judgment July 31, 2005. Result: The appeal is dismiss..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Md. Shafique Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Ed. ......-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others………...............Respondents Judgment 5 May 2002. Cases Referred To- Kazi Md. Aminul Islam vs. Secretary, Ministry of Law 16 BLD (AD) 110; Moulvi Md. Khurshid Alam vs. Bangladesh 50 D......usain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Md. Shafique Ahmed........................................ Petitioner Vs Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others………...............Respondents Judgme..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Al-haj Mohammad Seraj-ud-Dowla and others Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of works, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... been made out, we find no merit in the petition for leave to appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......ommitted any error or illegality and no case for interference by this Division has been made out, we find no merit in the petition for leave to appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... has purchased Residential Plot No.257, Road No. 21, Dhanmondi Residential Area, Dhaka vide Regd. Deed No. 1236 dated 7-4-1985 for a consideration of Tk. 10,00,000/- (Tk. ten lacs) only from Kamrul Islam Dewan and others; that Syed Altaf Hossain has also purchased .10 decimals of land of Plot No....... ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Messres MS Jafar Vs. Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca & others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....point of view we do not find any substance in this point. This appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......point of view we do not find any substance in this point. This appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ecial leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ............................................... Appellant Vs. Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca & others ……………..Respondents Judgment July 28, 1980. Result: The appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senio..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Com. of In. Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca Vs. M/S. Badridas Full-chand, Saidpur, Rangpur, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Md Asghar Muhammad Yunus & Co. (1968) 18 Taxation, 89; Commissioner of Income tax vs. D.A. Chetti and Co., 1948 I.T.R., 404; Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Md. Asgar Mohammad Yunus & Co. P.L.D, 1968 Karachi 805; Mohabir Glass Manufacturing Co. vs. C.I......eal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is hereby set aside and the answer of the question under section 66 (1) must be in the negative. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......wer of the question under section 66 (1) must be in the negative. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Shahabuddin Ahmed J Commissioner of Income Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca ……………………..Appellant. Vs. M/S. Badridas Full-chand, Saidpur, Rangpur... ………………………&he..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Udaypur Halima Darul Ulum Madrasha and others Vs. Bangladesh, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....lip;………Respondents Judgment July 29.1980. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (N. H. Khondaker, Advocate with him), instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellant. Md. Moksudur Rahman, Deputy A......ust succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court Division is set aside. Let the Government proceed in accordance with law. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......t proceed in accordance with law. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ...... ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
....ates to the income for the period 1365 B.S. suffers from want of jurisdiction. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the question is answered in the negative. We make no order as to costs.
Ed.
......ates to the income for the period 1365 B.S. suffers from want of jurisdiction. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the question is answered in the negative. We make no order as to costs.
Ed.
...... result, the appeal is allowed and the question is answered in the negative. We make no order as to costs.
Ed.
......Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant.
Hubibul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate, instructed by Sajjadul Haq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 120 of 1978
(From the judgment and order dated April 3, 1975 passed by the High Court Division in Income-tax Reference Case No. 2 o..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 78
People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Sri Sri Madan Gopal Jew Bigraha and ors., 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....es Referred to- Jalil Ahmed vs. The Province of East Pakistan (1967) 19 DLR 106; Tanvir Ahmed Siddiky Vs. The Province of East Pakistan (1968)20 DLR (SC) 144. Lawyers Involve: Md. Moksudur Rahman, Dy. Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on- Record —Fo...... of the first appellate Court is empowered to question validity of Hate Court and restore that of the trial Court recording abatement of the suit, There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ding abatement of the suit, There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J People's Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet and others ..........Appellants. &n..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
13261325131413131307130613041299129712961295129412921290128912881287128412831279